There exist many usages of `fuzzed_data_provider` where it is evaluated directly in the function call.
Unfortunately, the order of evaluation of function arguments is unspecified. This means it can differ
between compilers/version/optimization levels etc. But when the evaluation order changes, the same
fuzzing input will produce different output, which is bad for coverage/reproducibility.
This PR fixes all these cases where by moving multiple calls to `fuzzed_data_provider` out of the
function arguments.
`send(2)` can be interrupted or for another reason it may not fully
complete sending all the bytes. We should be ready to retry the send
with the remaining bytes. This is what `Sock::SendComplete()` does,
thus use it in `Socks5()`.
Since `Sock::SendComplete()` takes a `CThreadInterrupt` argument,
change also the recv part of `Socks5()` to use `CThreadInterrupt`
instead of a boolean.
Easier reviewed with `git show -b` (ignore white-space changes).
marcofleon
Martin Leitner-Ankerl
Vasil Dimov
MarcoFalke
Hennadii Stepanov
MarcoFalke
Jon Atack
practicalswift