Files
compound-engineering-plugin…/tests/fixtures/ce-doc-review/seeded-auth-plan.expectations.md

3.9 KiB

Expectations — seeded-auth-plan.md

Answer key for this fixture. Never referenced from the fixture body; the fixture must read as an ordinary plan to any reviewer.

This fixture carries two distinct premise roots. ROOT A is "is migration to managed auth justified?"; ROOT B is "is the custom policy-enforcement layer warranted?". Neither subsumes the other. Synthesis should elevate BOTH roots and attach each dependent to the root whose fix moots it; three further manual findings are independent of both roots and must not be chained.

# Section Planted issue Expected class
1 Requirements Trace Header says "7 requirements planned" but only R1-R6 are listed safe_auto
2 Key Technical Decisions Cross-reference points at "Unit 9" but the plan only defines Units 1-6 safe_auto
3 Key Technical Decisions / Units 4-6 "API key", "token", "credential", and "secret" are used interchangeably for one concept safe_auto
4 Unit 4: CSRF protection CSRF check is hand-rolled although the gateway framework ships CSRF middleware with rotation, HMAC signing, and an Origin check the hand-rolled version omits gated_auto
5 Unit 5: Token-refresh middleware Refresh loop is hand-rolled although the auth-service client library ships refresh middleware with backoff, duplicate-refresh guards, and fail-closed semantics gated_auto
6 Unit 6: Coordinate cutover No deployment-ordering guarantee between the gateway's secrets migration and downstream services' config reload gated_auto
7 Risks ROOT A — large migration of a working system with no user-reported failure and only a speculative consolidation benefit manual
8 Risks ROOT B — custom policy DSL is built although the managed service ships a policy language covering 80% of current rules manual
9 Unit 1: Service-mesh adapter Dependent of ROOT A — the adapter and its legacy-JWT fallback exist only because the migration is happening manual
10 Miscellaneous Notes Dependent of ROOT A — the managed secrets store adds a net-new rotation workflow, runbooks, and break-glass surface manual
11 Unit 2: Policy DSL parser Dependent of ROOT B — the recursive-descent parser exists solely to support the custom policy layer manual
12 Unit 3: Per-route policy cache Dependent of ROOT B — the LRU cache design only matters if the custom policy layer is built manual
13 Risks Independent of both roots — refresh loop has no concurrency guard, so burst traffic can stampede the refresh endpoint manual
14 Miscellaneous Notes Independent of both roots — no expected error-rate impact, rollback criteria, or SLO-burn accounting against the 0.1% error budget manual
15 PII Handling Independent of both roots — migration touches user-identifier fields with no stated PII handling for the migration window manual
16 Miscellaneous Notes New code names the struct AuthContext while existing code calls the same concept SessionContext FYI
17 Miscellaneous Notes Config schema is nested 4 levels deep for a handful of flags FYI
18 Miscellaneous Notes Speculative reuse of the adapter pattern for a mobile SDK that is not on the roadmap FYI
19 Known Drift Hand-rolled JWT module retained one release post-cutover with no concrete removal plan FYI
20 Known Drift Units grouped by component rather than by endpoint class — a stated preference either way FYI
21 Miscellaneous Notes Multi-region cache invalidation concern for a single-region deployment not on the roadmap drop
22 Minor Observations "Could be slow under load" with no baseline or benchmark drop
23 Minor Observations Nitpick about commit-message subject length in the rollout plan drop
24 Minor Observations "A few days" migration window described as could-be-tighter, with no consequence drop