mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2025-12-12 20:36:24 +01:00
pack-revindex.c: avoid direct revindex access in 'offset_to_pack_pos()'
To prepare for on-disk reverse indexes, remove a spot in 'offset_to_pack_pos()' that looks at the 'revindex' array in 'struct packed_git'. Even though this use of the revindex pointer is within pack-revindex.c, this clean up is still worth doing. Since the 'revindex' pointer will be NULL when reading from an on-disk reverse index (instead the 'revindex_data' pointer will be mmaped to the 'pack-*.rev' file), this call-site would have to include a conditional to lookup the offset for position 'mi' each iteration through the search. So instead of open-coding 'pack_pos_to_offset()', call it directly from within 'offset_to_pack_pos()'. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Junio C Hamano
parent
d5bc7c60c7
commit
e5dcd78418
@@ -177,21 +177,21 @@ int load_pack_revindex(struct packed_git *p)
|
|||||||
int offset_to_pack_pos(struct packed_git *p, off_t ofs, uint32_t *pos)
|
int offset_to_pack_pos(struct packed_git *p, off_t ofs, uint32_t *pos)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
unsigned lo, hi;
|
unsigned lo, hi;
|
||||||
const struct revindex_entry *revindex;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (load_pack_revindex(p) < 0)
|
if (load_pack_revindex(p) < 0)
|
||||||
return -1;
|
return -1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
lo = 0;
|
lo = 0;
|
||||||
hi = p->num_objects + 1;
|
hi = p->num_objects + 1;
|
||||||
revindex = p->revindex;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
do {
|
do {
|
||||||
const unsigned mi = lo + (hi - lo) / 2;
|
const unsigned mi = lo + (hi - lo) / 2;
|
||||||
if (revindex[mi].offset == ofs) {
|
off_t got = pack_pos_to_offset(p, mi);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (got == ofs) {
|
||||||
*pos = mi;
|
*pos = mi;
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
} else if (ofs < revindex[mi].offset)
|
} else if (ofs < got)
|
||||||
hi = mi;
|
hi = mi;
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
lo = mi + 1;
|
lo = mi + 1;
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user