Code clean-up.
* en/xdiff-cleanup-2:
xdiff: rename rindex -> reference_index
xdiff: change rindex from long to size_t in xdfile_t
xdiff: make xdfile_t.nreff a size_t instead of long
xdiff: make xdfile_t.nrec a size_t instead of long
xdiff: split xrecord_t.ha into line_hash and minimal_perfect_hash
xdiff: use unambiguous types in xdl_hash_record()
xdiff: use size_t for xrecord_t.size
xdiff: make xrecord_t.ptr a uint8_t instead of char
xdiff: use ptrdiff_t for dstart/dend
doc: define unambiguous type mappings across C and Rust
Document other nuances when crossing the FFI boundary. Other language
mappings may be added in the future.
Signed-off-by: Ezekiel Newren <ezekielnewren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git very often uses the terms "object", "reference", or "index" in its
documentation.
However, it's hard to find a clear explanation of these terms and how
they relate to each other in the documentation. The closest candidates
currently are:
1. `gitglossary`. This makes a good effort, but it's an alphabetically
ordered dictionary and a dictionary is not a good way to learn
concepts. You have to jump around too much and it's not possible to
present the concepts in the order that they should be explained.
2. `gitcore-tutorial`. This explains how to use the "core" Git commands.
This is a nice document to have, but it's not necessary to learn how
`update-index` works to understand Git's data model, and we should
not be requiring users to learn how to use the "plumbing" commands
if they want to learn what the term "index" or "object" means.
3. `gitrepository-layout`. This is a great resource, but it includes a
lot of information about configuration and internal implementation
details which are not related to the data model. It also does
not explain how commits work.
The result of this is that Git users (even users who have been using
Git for 15+ years) struggle to read the documentation because they don't
know what the core terms mean, and it's not possible to add links
to help them learn more.
Add an explanation of Git's data model. Some choices I've made in
deciding what "core data model" means:
1. Omit pseudorefs like `FETCH_HEAD`, because it's not clear to me
if those are intended to be user facing or if they're more like
internal implementation details.
2. Don't talk about submodules other than by mentioning how they
relate to trees. This is because Git has a lot of special features,
and explaining how they all work exhaustively could quickly go
down a rabbit hole which would make this document less useful for
understanding Git's core behaviour.
3. Don't discuss the structure of a commit message
(first line, trailers etc).
4. Don't mention configuration.
5. Don't mention the `.git` directory, to avoid getting too much into
implementation details
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The beginning of SHA1-SHA256 interoperability work.
* bc/sha1-256-interop-01:
t1010: use BROKEN_OBJECTS prerequisite
t: allow specifying compatibility hash
fsck: consider gpgsig headers expected in tags
rev-parse: allow printing compatibility hash
docs: add documentation for loose objects
docs: improve ambiguous areas of pack format documentation
docs: reflect actual double signature for tags
docs: update offset order for pack index v3
docs: update pack index v3 format
Commit 5040f9f164 ("doc: add technical design doc for large object
promisors", 2025-02-18) added the large object promisors document
as a technical document (with a '.txt' extension). The merge commit
2c6fd30198 ("Merge branch 'cc/lop-remote'", 2025-03-05) seems to
have renamed the file with an '.adoc' extension.
Despite the '.adoc' extension, this document was not being formatted
by asciidoc(tor) as part of the docs build. In order to do so, add
the document to the make and meson build files.
Having added the document to the build, asciidoc and asciidoctor find
(slightly different) problems with the syntax of the input document.
The first set of warnings (only issued by asciidoc) relate to some
'section title out of sequence: expected level 3, got level 4'. This
document uses 'setext' style of section headers, using a series of
underline characters, where the character used denotes the level of
the title. From document title to level 5 (see [1]), these characters
are =, -, ~, ^, +. This does not seem to fit the error message, which
implies that those characters denote levels 0 -> 4. Replacing the headings
underlined with '+' by the '^' character eliminates these warnings.
The second set of warnings (only issued by asciidoctor) relate to some
headings which seem to use both arabic and roman numerals as part of
a single 'list' sequence. This elicited either 'unterminated listing
block' or (for example) 'list item index: expected I, got II' warnings.
In order not to mix arabic and roman numerals, remove the numeral from
the '0) Non goals' heading. Similarly, the remaining roman numeral
entries had the ')' removed and turned into regular headings with I, II,
III ... at the beginning.
[1] https://asciidoctor.org/docs/asciidoc-recommended-practices/
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We currently have no documentation for how loose objects are stored.
Let's add some here so it's easy for people to understand how they
work.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit bcf7edee09 ("meson: generate articles", 2024-12-27) added the
generation of the 'howto' and 'technical' documents to the meson build.
At this time those documents had a '*.txt' file extension, but they were
renamed with an '*.adoc' extension by commit 1f010d6bdf ("doc: use .adoc
extension for AsciiDoc files", 2025-01-20), for the most part. For the
meson build, commit 87eccc3a81 ("meson: fix building technical and howto
docs", 2025-03-02) fixed the meson.build files, which had not been
updated when the files were renamed.
However, the 'Documentation/Makefile' has not been updated to include
all of the recently added technical documents. In particular, the
following are built by meson, but not by the Makefile:
commit-graph.adoc
directory-rename-detection.adoc
packfile-uri.adoc
remembering-renames.adoc
repository-version.adoc
rerere.adoc
sparse-checkout.adoc
sparse-index.adoc
In order to ensure that both build systems format the same technical
documents, add the above documents to the TECH_DOCS variable in the
Documentation/Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For simplifying automated translation of the documentation, it is better to
only present one term in each entry of a description list of options. This
is because most of these terms can automatically be marked as
notranslatable.
Also, due to portability issues, the script generate-configlist.sh can no
longer insert newlines in the output. However, the result is that it no
longer correctly handles multiple terms in a single entry of definition
lists.
As a result, we now check that these entries do not exist in the
documentation.
Reviewed-by: Collin Funk <collin.funk1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Having an empty line before each delimited sections is not required by
asciidoc, but it is a safety measure that prevents generating malformed
asciidoc when generating translated documentation.
When a delimited section appears just after a paragraph, the asciidoc
processor checks that the length of the delimited section header is
different from the length of the paragraph. If it is not, the asciidoc
processor will generate a title. In the original English documentation, this
is not a problem because the authors always check the output of the asciidoc
processor and fix the length of the delimited section header if it turns out
to be the same as the paragraph length. However, this is not the case for
translations, where the authors have no way to check the length of the
delimited section header or the output of the asciidoc processor. This can
lead to a section title that is not intended.
Indeed, this test also checks that titles are correctly formed, that is,
the length of the underline is equal to the length of the title (otherwise
it would not be a title but a section header).
Finally, this test checks that the delimited section are terminated within
the same file.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git whatchanged" that is longer to type than "git log --raw"
which is its modern rough equivalent has outlived its usefulness
more than 10 years ago. Plan to deprecate and remove it.
* jc/you-still-use-whatchanged:
whatschanged: list it in BreakingChanges document
whatchanged: remove when built with WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES
whatchanged: require --i-still-use-this
tests: prepare for a world without whatchanged
doc: prepare for a world without whatchanged
you-still-use-that??: help deprecating commands for removal
The "cmd-list.perl" script is used to extract the list of commands part
of a specific category and extracts the description of each command from
its respective manpage. The generated output is then included in git(1)
to list all Git commands.
The script is written in Perl. Refactor it to use shell scripting
exclusively so that we can get rid of the mandatory dependency on Perl
to build our documentation.
The converted script is slower compared to its Perl implementation. But
by being careful and not spawning external commands in `format_one ()`
we can mitigate the performance hit to a reasonable level:
Benchmark 1: Perl
Time (mean ± σ): 10.3 ms ± 0.2 ms [User: 7.0 ms, System: 3.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 10.0 ms … 11.1 ms 200 runs
Benchmark 2: Shell
Time (mean ± σ): 74.4 ms ± 0.4 ms [User: 48.6 ms, System: 24.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 73.1 ms … 75.5 ms 200 runs
Summary
Perl ran
7.23 ± 0.13 times faster than Shell
While a sevenfold slowdown is significant, the benefit of not requiring
Perl for a fully-functioning Git installation outweighs waiting a couple
of milliseconds longer during the build process.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "fix-texi.perl" script is used to fix up the output of
`docbook2x-texi`:
- It changes the filename to be "git.info".
- It changes the directory category and entry.
The script is written in Perl, but it can be rather trivially converted
to a shell script. Do so to remove the dependency on Perl for building
the user manual.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A documentation page was left out from formatting and installation,
which has been corrected.
* pw/build-breaking-changes-doc:
docs: add BreakingChanges to TECH_DOCS target
When BreakingChanges.txt was added in 57ec9254eb (docs: introduce
document to announce breaking changes, 2024-06-14) there was no
corresponding change to the Makefile to build it. Fix that by adding it
to the TECH_DOCS target.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When breaking changes are enabled we continue to install documentation
of the git-pack-redundant(1) command even though it is completely
disabled and thus inaccessible. Improve this by only installing the
documentation in case breaking changes aren't enabled.
Based-on-patch-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since commit 8ccc75c245 (remote: announce removal of "branches/" and
"remotes/", 2025-01-22) enabling WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES when building git
removes support for reading branches from ".git/branches" and remotes
from ".git/remotes". However those locations are still documented in
gitrepository-layout.adoc even though the build does not support them.
Rectify this by adding a new document attribute "with-breaking-changes"
and use it to make the inclusion of those sections of the documentation
conditional. Note that the name of the attribute does not match the test
prerequisite WITHOUT_BREAKING_CHANGES added in c5bc9a7f94 (Makefile:
wire up build option for deprecated features, 2025-01-22). This is to
avoid the awkward double negative ifndef::without_breaking_changes for
documentation that should be included when WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES is
enabled. The test prerequisite will be renamed to match the
documentation attribute in a future patch series.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Correct the default target in Documentation/Makefile, and
future-proof all Makefiles from similar breakages by declaring the
default target (which happens to be "all") upfront.
* ad/set-default-target-in-makefiles:
Makefile: set default goals in makefiles
Explicitly set the default goal at the very top of various makefiles.
This is already present in some makefiles, but not all of them.
In particular, this corrects a regression introduced in a38edab7c8
(Makefile: generate doc versions via GIT-VERSION-GEN, 2024-12-06). That
commit added some config files as build targets for the Documentation
directory, and put the target configuration in a sensible place.
Unfortunately, that sensible place was above any other build target
definitions, meaning the default goal changed to being those
configuration files only, rather than the HTML and man page
documentation.
Signed-off-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We presently use the ".txt" extension for our AsciiDoc files. While not
wrong, most editors do not associate this extension with AsciiDoc,
meaning that contributors don't get automatic editor functionality that
could be useful, such as syntax highlighting and prose linting.
It is much more common to use the ".adoc" extension for AsciiDoc files,
since this helps editors automatically detect files and also allows
various forges to provide rich (HTML-like) rendering. Let's do that
here, renaming all of the files and updating the includes where
relevant. Adjust the various build scripts and makefiles to use the new
extension as well.
Note that this should not result in any user-visible changes to the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Wire up sanity checks for Meson to verify that no man pages are missing.
This check is similar to the same check we already have for our tests.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "howto-index.sh" is used to generate an index of our how-to docs. It
receives as input the paths to these documents, which would typically be
relative to the "Documentation/" directory in Makefile-based builds. In
an out-of-tree build though it will get relative that may be rooted
somewhere else entirely.
The file paths do end up in the generated index, and the expectation is
that they should always start with "howto/". But for out-of-tree builds
we would populate it with the paths relative to the build directory,
which is wrong.
Fix the issue by using `$(basename "$file")` to generate the path. While
at it, move the script into "howto/" to align it with the location of
the comparable "api-index.sh" script.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "api-index.sh" script generates an index of API-related
documentation. The script does not handle out-of-tree builds and thus
cannot be used easily by Meson.
Refactor it to be independent of locations by both accepting a source
directory where the API docs live as well as a path to an output file.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When generating our user manual we set up a bit of extra configuration
compared to our normal configuration. This is done by having an extra
"user-manual.conf" file that Asciidoc seems to pull in automatically due
to matching filenames with "user-manual.txt". This dependency is quite
hidden though and thus easy to miss. Furthermore, it seems that Asciidoc
does not know to pull it in for out-of-tree builds where we use relative
paths.
The setup in AsciiDoctor is somewhat different: instead of having two
sets of configuration, we condition the use of manual-specific configs
based on whether the document type is "book". And as we only build our
user manual with that type this is sufficient.
Use the same trick for our user manual by inlining the configuration
into "asciidoc.conf.in" and making it conditional on whether or not
"doctype-book" is defined.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GIT-VERSION-GEN tries to derive the version that Git is being built from
via multiple different sources in the following order:
1. A file called "version" in the source tree's root directory, if it
exists.
2. The current commit in case Git is built from a Git repository.
3. Otherwise, we use a fallback version stored in a variable which is
bumped whenever a new Git version is getting tagged.
It used to be possible to override the version by overriding the
`GIT_VERSION` Makefile variable (e.g. `make GIT_VERSION=foo`). This
worked somewhat by chance, only: `GIT-VERSION-GEN` would write the
actual Git version into `GIT-VERSION-FILE`, not the overridden value,
but when including the file into our Makefile we would not override the
`GIT_VERSION` variable because it has already been set by the user. And
because our Makefile used the variable to propagate the version to our
build tools instead of using `GIT-VERSION-FILE` the resulting build
artifacts used the overridden version.
But that subtle mechanism broke with 4838deab65 (Makefile: refactor
GIT-VERSION-GEN to be reusable, 2024-12-06) and subsequent commits
because the version information is not propagated via the Makefile
variable anymore, but instead via the files that `GIT-VERSION-GEN`
started to write. And as the script never knew about the `GIT_VERSION`
environment variable in the first place it uses one of the values listed
above instead of the overridden value.
Fix this issue by making `GIT-VERSION-GEN` handle the case where
`GIT_VERSION` has been set via the environment.
Note that this requires us to introduce a new GIT_VERSION_OVERRIDE
variable that stores a potential user-provided value, either via the
environment or via "config.mak". Ideally we wouldn't need it and could
just continue to use GIT_VERSION for this. But unfortunately, Makefiles
will first include all sub-Makefiles before figuring out whether it
needs to re-make any of them [1]. Consequently, if there already is a
GIT-VERSION-FILE, we would have slurped in its value of GIT_VERSION
before we call GIT-VERSION-GEN, and because GIT-VERSION-GEN now uses
that value as an override it would mean that the first generated value
for GIT_VERSION will remain unchanged.
Furthermore we have to move the include for "GIT-VERSION-FILE" after the
includes for "config.mak" and related so that GIT_VERSION_OVERRIDE can
be set to the value provided by "config.mak".
[1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Remaking-Makefiles.html
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a new template to call GIT-VERSION-GEN. This will allow us to
iterate on how exactly the script is called in subsequent commits
without having to adapt all call sites every time.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some of the callsites of GIT-VERSION-GEN generate the target file with a
"+" suffix first and then move the file into place when the new contents
are different compared to the old contents. This allows us to avoid a
needless rebuild by not updating timestamps of the target file when its
contents will remain unchanged anyway.
In fact though, this exact logic is already handled in GIT-VERSION-GEN,
so doing this manually is pointless. This is a leftover from an earlier
version of 4838deab65 (Makefile: refactor GIT-VERSION-GEN to be
reusable, 2024-12-06), where the script didn't handle that logic for us.
Drop the needless indirection.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We include "GIT-VERSION-FILE" in our docs Makefile, but don't actually
use the "GIT_VERSION" variable that it provides. This is a leftover from
the conversion to make "GIT-VERSION-GEN" generate version information
in-place by substituting placeholders in 4838deab65 (Makefile: refactor
GIT-VERSION-GEN to be reusable, 2024-12-06) and subsequent commits,
where all usages of the variable were removed.
Stop including the file.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We're contemplating whether to eventually replace our build systems with
a build system that is easier to use. Add a comparison of build systems
to our technical documentation as a baseline for discussion.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We include the list of available mergetools into our manpages. Extract
the script that performs this logic such that we can reuse it in other
build systems.
While at it, refactor the Makefile targets such that we don't create
"mergetools-list.made" anymore. It shouldn't be necessary, as we can
instead have other targets depend on "mergetools-{diff,merge}.txt"
directly.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "cmd-list.perl" script generates a list of commands that can be
included into our manpages. The script doesn't know about out-of-tree
builds and instead writes resulting files into the source directory.
Adapt it such that we can read data from the source directory and write
data into the build directory.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our documentation uses "include::" directives to include parts that are
either reused across multiple documents or parts that we generate at
build time. Unfortunately, top-level includes are only ever resolved
relative to the base directory, which is typically the directory of the
including document. Most importantly, it is not possible to have either
asciidoc or asciidoctor search multiple directories.
It follows that both kinds of includes must live in the same directory.
This is of course a bummer for out-of-tree builds, because here the
dynamically-built includes live in the build directory whereas the
static includes live in the source directory.
Introduce a `build_dir` attribute and prepend it to all of our includes
for dynamically-built files. This attribute gets set to the build
directory and thus converts the include path to an absolute path, which
asciidoc and asciidoctor know how to resolve.
Note that this change also requires us to update "build-docdep.perl",
which tries to figure out included files such our Makefile can set up
proper build-time dependencies. This script simply scans through the
source files for any lines that match "^include::" and treats the
remainder of the line as included file path. But given that those may
now contain the "{build_dir}" variable we have to teach the script to
replace that attribute with the actual build directory.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation we generate embeds information for the exact Git
version used as well as the date of the commit. This information is
injected by injecting attributes into the build process via command line
argument.
Refactor the logic so that we write the information into "asciidoc.conf"
and "asciidoctor-extensions.rb" via `GIT-VERSION-GEN` for AsciiDoc and
AsciiDoctor, respectively.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A policy document that describes platform support levels and
expectation on platform stakeholders has been introduced.
* es/doc-platform-support-policy:
Documentation: add platform support policy
Supporting many platforms is only possible when we have the right tools to
ensure that support.
Teach platform maintainers how they can help us to help them, by
explaining what kind of tooling support we would like to have, and what
level of support becomes available as a result. Provide examples so that
platform maintainers can see what we're asking for in practice.
With this policy in place, we can make changes with stronger assurance
that we are not breaking anybody we promised not to. Instead, we can
feel confident that our existing testing and integration practices
protect those who care from breakage.
Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Work around asciidoctor's css that renders `monospace` material
in the SYNOPSIS section of manual pages as block elements.
* js/doc-markup-updates-fix:
Doc: fix Asciidoctor css workaround
asciidoctor: fix `synopsis` rendering
The previous step introduced docinfo.html to be used to tweak the
CSS used by the asciidoctor, that by default renders <code> inside
<pre> as a block element, breaking the SYNOPSIS section of a few
pages that adopted a new convention we use since Git 2.45.
But in this project, HTML files are all generated. We do not force
any human to write HTML by hand, which is an unusual and cruel
punishment. "*.html" is in the .gitignore file, and "make clean"
removes them. Having a tracked .html file makes "make clean" make
the tree dirty by removing the tracked docinfo.html file.
Let's do an obvious, minimum and stupid workaround to generate that
file at runtime instead. The mark-up is being rethought in a major
way for the next development cycle, and the CSS workaround we added
in the previous step may have to adjusted, possibly in a large way,
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 76880f0510 (doc: git-clone: apply new documentation formatting
guidelines, 2024-03-29), the synopsis of `git clone`'s manual page is
rendered differently than before; Its parent commit did the same for
`git init`.
The result looks quite nice. When rendered with AsciiDoc, that is. When
rendered using AsciiDoctor and displayed in a graphical web browser such
as Firefox, Chrome, Edge, etc, the result is quite unpleasant to my eye,
reading something like this:
SYNOPSIS
git clone
[
--template=
<template-directory>]
[
-l
] [
-s
] [
--no-hardlinks
] [
-q
] [
[... continuing like this ...]
The reason is that AsciiDoctor's default style sheet contains this (see
https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/blob/854923b15533/src/stylesheets/asciidoctor.css#L519-L521
for context):
pre > code {
display: block;
}
It is this `display: block` that forces the parts that are enclosed in
`<code>` tags (such as the `git clone` or the `--template=` part) to be
rendered on their own line.
Side note: This seems not to affect console web browsers like `lynx` or
`w3m`, most likely because most style sheet directions cannot be
respected in text terminals and therefore they seem to punt on style
sheets altogether.
To fix this, let's apply the method recommended by AsciiDoctor in
https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoctor/latest/html-backend/default-stylesheet/#customize-docinfo
to partially override AsciiDoctor's default style sheet so that the
`<code>` sections of the synopsis are no longer each rendered on their
own, individual lines.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/5063.
Even on the Git home page, where AsciiDoctor's default stylesheet is
_not_ used, this change resulted in some unpleasant rendering where not
only the font is changed for the `<code>` sections of the synopsis, but
padding and a different background color make the visual impression
quite uneven. This has been addressed in the meantime, via
https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/commit/a492d0565512.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The pseudo-merge reachability bitmap to help more efficient storage
of the reachability bitmap in a repository with too many refs has
been added.
* tb/pseudo-merge-reachability-bitmap: (26 commits)
pack-bitmap.c: ensure pseudo-merge offset reads are bounded
Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt: add missing position table
t/perf: implement performance tests for pseudo-merge bitmaps
pseudo-merge: implement support for finding existing merges
ewah: `bitmap_equals_ewah()`
pack-bitmap: extra trace2 information
pack-bitmap.c: use pseudo-merges during traversal
t/test-lib-functions.sh: support `--notick` in `test_commit_bulk()`
pack-bitmap: implement test helpers for pseudo-merge
ewah: implement `ewah_bitmap_popcount()`
pseudo-merge: implement support for reading pseudo-merge commits
pack-bitmap.c: read pseudo-merge extension
pseudo-merge: scaffolding for reads
pack-bitmap: extract `read_bitmap()` function
pack-bitmap-write.c: write pseudo-merge table
pseudo-merge: implement support for selecting pseudo-merge commits
config: introduce `git_config_double()`
pack-bitmap: make `bitmap_writer_push_bitmapped_commit()` public
pack-bitmap: implement `bitmap_writer_has_bitmapped_object_id()`
pack-bitmap-write: support storing pseudo-merge commits
...
The "check-docs" target of our top-level Makefile fulfills two different
roles. For one it runs the "lint-docs" target of the "Documentation/"
Makefile. And second it performs some checks of whether there are any
manpages that are missing or extraneous via some inline scripts.
The second set of checks feels quite misplaced in the top-level Makefile
as it would fit in much better with our "lint-docs" target. Back when
the checks were introduced in 8c989ec528 (Makefile: $(MAKE) check-docs,
2006-04-13), that target did not yet exist though.
Furthermore, the script makes use of several Makefile variables which
are defined in the top-level Makefile, which makes it hard to access
their contents from elsewhere. There is a trick though that we already
use in "check-builtins.sh" to gain access: we can create an ad-hoc
Makefile that has an extra target to print those variables.
Pull out the script into a separate "lint-manpages.sh" script by using
that trick. Wire up that script via the "lint-docs" target. For one,
normal shell scripts are way easier to reason about than those which are
embedded in a Makefile. Second, it allows one to easily execute the
script standalone without any of the other checks.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a new manual page, gitpacking(7) to collect useful information
about advanced packing concepts in Git.
In future commits in this series, this manual page will expand to
describe the new pseudo-merge bitmaps feature, as well as include
examples, relevant configuration bits, use-cases, and so on.
Outside of this series, this manual page may absorb similar pieces from
other parts of Git's documentation about packing.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The Git project currently operates according to an informal
consensus-building process, which is currently described in the
SubmittingPatches document. However, that focuses on small/medium-scale
patch series. For larger-scale decisions, the process is not as well
described. Document what to expect so that we have something concrete to
help inform newcomers to the project.
This document explicitly does not aim to impose a formal process to
decision-making, nor to change pre-existing norms. Its only aim is to
describe how the project currently operates today.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In our current testing environment, we spend a significant amount of
effort crafting end-to-end tests for error conditions that could easily
be captured by unit tests (or we simply forgo some hard-to-setup and
rare error conditions). Describe what we hope to accomplish by
implementing unit tests, and explain some open questions and milestones.
Discuss desired features for test frameworks/harnesses, and provide a
comparison of several different frameworks. Finally, document our
rationale for implementing a custom framework.
Co-authored-by: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
manpages expect the date of the last revision, if that is not found
DocBook Stylesheets go through a series of hacks to generate one with
the format `%d/%d/%Y` which is not ideal.
In addition to this format not being standard, different tools generate
dates with different formats.
There's no need for any confusion if we specify the revision date, so
let's do so.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The hacks to add version information to the man pages comes from 2007
7ef195ba3e (Documentation: Add version information to man pages,
2007-03-25). In that code we passed three fields to DocBook Stylesheets:
`source`, `version`, and `manual`, however, all the stylesheets do is
join the strings `source` and `version` [1].
Their own documentation explains that in pracice the source is just a
combination of two fields [2]:
In practice, there are many pages that simply have a version number in
the "source" field.
Splitting that information might have seemed more proper in 2007, but it
not achieve anything in practice.
Asciidoctor had support for this information in their manpage backend
since day 1: v1.5.3 (2015), but it didn't include the version. In the
docbook5 backend they did in v1.5.7 (2018), but again: no version.
There is no need for us to demand that that they add support for the
version field when in reality all that is going to happen is that both
fields are going to be joined.
Let's do that ourselves so we can forget about all our hacks for this
and so it works for both asciidoc.py, and docbook5 and manpage backends
of asciidoctor.
[1] https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/blob/master/xsl/common/refentry.xsl#L545
[2] https://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/common/template.get.refentry.source.html
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 50d9bbba92 (Documentation: Avoid use of xmlto --stringparam,
2009-12-04) introduced manpage-base-url.xsl because ancient versions of
xmlto did not have --stringparam.
However, that was more than ten years ago, no need for that complexity
anymore, we can just use --stringparam.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 2007 the docbook project made the mistake of converting ' to \' for
man pages [1]. It's a problem because groff interprets \' as acute
accent which is rendered as ' in ASCII, but as ´ in utf-8.
This started a cascade of bug reports in git [2], debian [3], Arch Linux
[4], docbook itself [5], and probably many others.
A solution was to use the correct groff character: \(aq, which is always
rendered as ', but the problem is that such character doesn't work in
other troff programs.
A portable solution required the use of a conditional character that is
\(aq in groff, but ' in all others:
.ie \n(.g .ds Aq \(aq
.el .ds Aq '
The proper solution took time to be implemented in docbook, but in 2010
they did it [6]. So the docbook man page stylesheets were broken from
1.73 to 1.76.
Unfortunately by that point many workarounds already existed. In the
case of git, GNU_ROFF was introduced, and in the case of Arch Linux
a mapping from \' to ' was added to groff's man.local. Other
distributions might have done the same, or similar workarounds.
Since 2010 there is no need for this workaround, which is fixed
elsewhere, not just in docbook, but other layers as well.
Let's remove it.
[1] ea2a0bac56
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20091012102926.GA3937@debian.b2j/
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507673#65
[4] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9643
[5] https://sourceforge.net/p/docbook/bugs/1022/
[6] fb55343426
Inspired-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
