[ Upstream commit c4a413e56d ]
Smatch reports:
drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:166 stm32_pwr_regulator_probe() warn:
'base' from of_iomap() not released on lines: 151,166.
In stm32_pwr_regulator_probe(), base is not released
when devm_kzalloc() fails to allocate memory or
devm_regulator_register() fails to register a new regulator device,
which may cause a leak.
To fix this issue, replace of_iomap() with
devm_platform_ioremap_resource(). devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
is a specialized function for platform devices.
It allows 'base' to be automatically released whether the probe
function succeeds or fails.
Besides, use IS_ERR(base) instead of !base
as the return value of devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
can either be a pointer to the remapped memory or
an ERR_PTR() encoded error code if the operation fails.
Fixes: dc62f951a6 ("regulator: stm32-pwr: Fix return value check in stm32_pwr_regulator_probe()")
Signed-off-by: YAN SHI <m202071378@hust.edu.cn>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304111750.o2643eJN-lkp@intel.com/
Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230412033529.18890-1-m202071378@hust.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit cba6cfdc7c ]
An automated bot told me that there was a potential lockdep problem
with regulators. This was on the chromeos-5.15 kernel, but I see
nothing that would be different downstream compared to upstream. The
bot said:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.15.104-lockdep-17461-gc1e499ed6604 #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/u16:4/115 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffff8083110170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: create_regulator+0x398/0x7ec
but task is already holding lock:
ffffff808378e170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ww_mutex_trylock+0x3c/0x7b8
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/115:
#0: ffffff808006a948 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x520/0x1348
#1: ffffffc00e0a7cc0 ((work_completion)(&entry->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x55c/0x1348
#2: ffffff80828a2260 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach_async_helper+0xd0/0x2a4
#3: ffffff808378e170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ww_mutex_trylock+0x3c/0x7b8
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 115 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.15.104-lockdep-17461-gc1e499ed6604 #1 9292e52fa83c0e23762b2b3aa1bacf5787a4d5da
Hardware name: Google Quackingstick (rev0+) (DT)
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x4ec
show_stack+0x34/0x50
dump_stack_lvl+0xdc/0x11c
dump_stack+0x1c/0x48
__lock_acquire+0x16d4/0x6c74
lock_acquire+0x208/0x750
__mutex_lock_common+0x11c/0x11f8
ww_mutex_lock+0xc0/0x440
create_regulator+0x398/0x7ec
regulator_resolve_supply+0x654/0x7c4
regulator_register_resolve_supply+0x30/0x120
class_for_each_device+0x1b8/0x230
regulator_register+0x17a4/0x1f40
devm_regulator_register+0x60/0xd0
reg_fixed_voltage_probe+0x728/0xaec
platform_probe+0x150/0x1c8
really_probe+0x274/0xa20
__driver_probe_device+0x1dc/0x3f4
driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1c0
__device_attach_driver+0x1ac/0x2c8
bus_for_each_drv+0x11c/0x190
__device_attach_async_helper+0x1e4/0x2a4
async_run_entry_fn+0xa0/0x3ac
process_one_work+0x638/0x1348
worker_thread+0x4a8/0x9c4
kthread+0x2e4/0x3a0
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
The problem was first reported soon after we made many of the
regulators probe asynchronously, though nothing I've seen implies that
the problems couldn't have also happened even without that.
I haven't personally been able to reproduce the lockdep issue, but the
issue does look somewhat legitimate. Specifically, it looks like in
regulator_resolve_supply() we are holding a "rdev" lock while calling
set_supply() -> create_regulator() which grabs the lock of a
_different_ "rdev" (the one for our supply). This is not necessarily
safe from a lockdep perspective since there is no documented ordering
between these two locks.
In reality, we should always be locking a regulator before the
supplying regulator, so I don't expect there to be any real deadlocks
in practice. However, the regulator framework in general doesn't
express this to lockdep.
Let's fix the issue by simply grabbing the two locks involved in the
same way we grab multiple locks elsewhere in the regulator framework:
using the "wound/wait" mechanisms.
Fixes: eaa7995c52 ("regulator: core: avoid regulator_resolve_supply() race condition")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329143317.RFC.v2.2.I30d8e1ca10cfbe5403884cdd192253a2e063eb9e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b83a1772be ]
When a codepath locks a rdev using ww_mutex_lock_slow() directly then
that codepath is responsible for incrementing the "ref_cnt" and also
setting the "mutex_owner" to "current".
The regulator core consistently got that right for "ref_cnt" but
didn't always get it right for "mutex_owner". Let's fix this.
It's unlikely that this truly matters because the "mutex_owner" is
only needed if we're going to do subsequent locking of the same
rdev. However, even though it's not truly needed it seems less
surprising if we consistently set "mutex_owner" properly.
Fixes: f8702f9e4a ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329143317.RFC.v2.1.I4e9d433ea26360c06dd1381d091c82bb1a4ce843@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 691c1fcda5 ]
This is very close to a straight revert of commit 218320fec2
("regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on
regulators"). We've identified that patch as causing a boot speed
regression on sc7180-trogdor boards. While boot speed certainly isn't
more important than making sure that power sequencing is correct,
looking closely at the original change it doesn't seem to have been
fully justified. It mentions "cycling issues" without describing
exactly what the issues were. That means it's possible that the
cycling issues were really a problem that should be fixed in a
different way.
Let's take a careful look at how we should handle regulators that have
an off-on-delay and that are boot-on or always-on. Linux currently
doesn't have any way to identify whether a GPIO regulator was already
on when the kernel booted. That means that when the kernel boots we
probe a regulator, see that it wants boot-on / always-on we, and then
turn the regulator on. We could be in one of two cases when we do
this:
a) The regulator might have been left on by the bootloader and we're
ensuring that it stays on.
b) The regulator might have been left off by the bootloader and we're
just now turning it on.
For case a) we definitely don't need any sort of delay. For case b) we
_might_ need some delay in case the bootloader turned the regulator
off _right_ before booting the kernel. To get the proper delay for
case b) then we can just assume a `last_off` of 0, which is what it
gets initialized to by default.
As per above, we can't tell whether we're in case a) or case b) so
we'll assume the longer delay (case b). This basically puts the code
to how it was before commit 218320fec2 ("regulator: core: Fix
off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators"). However, we add
one important change: we make sure that the delay is actually honored
if `last_off` is 0. Though the original "cycling issues" cited were
vague, I'm hopeful that this important extra change will be enough to
fix the issues that the initial commit mentioned.
With this fix, I've confined that on a sc7180-trogdor board the delay
at boot goes down from 500 ms to ~250 ms. That's not as good as the 0
ms that we had prior to commit 218320fec2 ("regulator: core: Fix
off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators"), but it's probably
safer because we don't know if the bootloader turned the regulator off
right before booting.
One note is that it's possible that we could be in a state that's not
a) or b) if there are other issues in the kernel. The only one I can
think of is related to pinctrl. If the pinctrl driver being used on a
board isn't careful about avoiding glitches when setting up a pin then
it's possible that setting up a pin could cause the regulator to "turn
off" briefly immediately before the regulator probes. If this is
indeed causing problems then the pinctrl driver should be fixed,
perhaps in a similar way to what was done in commit d21f4b7ffc
("pinctrl: qcom: Avoid glitching lines when we first mux to output")
Fixes: 218320fec2 ("regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators")
Cc: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230313111806.1.I2eaad872be0932a805c239a7c7a102233fb0b03b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 80d2c29e09 upstream.
For regulators with 'off-on-delay-us' the regulator framework currently
uses ktime_get() to determine how long the regulator has been off
before re-enabling it (after a delay if needed). A problem with using
ktime_get() is that it doesn't account for the time the system is
suspended. As a result a regulator with a longer 'off-on-delay' (e.g.
500ms) that was switched off during suspend might still incurr in a
delay on resume before it is re-enabled, even though the regulator
might have been off for hours. ktime_get_boottime() accounts for
suspend time, use it instead of ktime_get().
Fixes: a8ce7bd896 ("regulator: core: Fix off_on_delay handling")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13+
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230223003301.v2.1.I9719661b8eb0a73b8c416f9c26cf5bd8c0563f99@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 4fd8bcec5f ]
Explicitly bounds-check the id before accessing the opmode array. Seen
with GCC 13:
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c: In function 'max77802_enable':
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:217:29: warning: array subscript [0, 41] is outside array bounds of 'unsigned int[42]' [-Warray-bounds=]
217 | if (max77802->opmode[id] == MAX77802_OFF_PWRREQ)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:62:22: note: while referencing 'opmode'
62 | unsigned int opmode[MAX77802_REG_MAX];
| ^~~~~~
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127225203.never.864-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 02228f6aa6 ]
If the system does not come from reset (like when it is kexec()), the
regulator might have an IRQ waiting for us.
If we enable the IRQ handler before its structures are ready, we crash.
This patch fixes:
[ 1.141839] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 0000000000000078
[ 1.316096] Call trace:
[ 1.316101] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0xa8
[ 1.322757] cpu cpu0: dummy supplies not allowed for exclusive requests
[ 1.327823] regulator_notifier_call_chain+0x1c/0x2c
[ 1.327825] da9211_irq_handler+0x68/0xf8
[ 1.327829] irq_thread+0x11c/0x234
[ 1.327833] kthread+0x13c/0x154
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@dm.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221124-da9211-v2-0-1779e3c5d491@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit cb3543cff9 upstream.
When updating the operating mode as part of regulator enable, the caller
has already locked the regulator tree and drms_uA_update() must not try
to do the same in order not to trigger a deadlock.
The lock inversion is reported by lockdep as:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-next-20221215 #142 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
udevd/154 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffc11f123d7e50 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x280
but task is already holding lock:
ffff80000e4c36e8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: regulator_enable+0x34/0x80
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
lock(regulator_list_mutex);
lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
lock(regulator_list_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
just before probe of a Qualcomm UFS controller (occasionally) deadlocks
when enabling one of its regulators.
Fixes: 9243a195be ("regulator: core: Change voltage setting path")
Fixes: f8702f9e4a ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221215104646.19818-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 8f3cbcd6b4 ]
Following by the below discussion, there's the potential UAF issue
between regulator and mfd.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221128143601.1698148-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com/
From the analysis of Yingliang
CPU A |CPU B
mt6370_probe() |
devm_mfd_add_devices() |
|mt6370_regulator_probe()
| regulator_register()
| //allocate init_data and add it to devres
| regulator_of_get_init_data()
i2c_unregister_device() |
device_del() |
devres_release_all() |
// init_data is freed |
release_nodes() |
| // using init_data causes UAF
| regulator_register()
It's common to use mfd core to create child device for the regulator.
In order to do the DT lookup for init data, the child that registered
the regulator would pass its parent as the parameter. And this causes
init data resource allocated to its parent, not itself. The issue happen
when parent device is going to release and regulator core is still doing
some operation of init data constraint for the regulator of child device.
To fix it, this patch expand 'regulator_register' API to use the
different devices for init data allocation and DT lookup.
Reported-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1670311341-32664-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0591b14ce0 ]
I found a use_count leakage towards supply regulator of rdev with
boot-on option.
┌───────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────┐
│ regulator_dev A │ │ regulator_dev B │
│ (boot-on) │ │ (boot-on) │
│ use_count=0 │◀──supply──│ use_count=1 │
│ │ │ │
└───────────────────┘ └───────────────────┘
In case of rdev(A) configured with `regulator-boot-on', the use_count
of supplying regulator(B) will increment inside
regulator_enable(rdev->supply).
Thus, B will acts like always-on, and further balanced
regulator_enable/disable cannot actually disable it anymore.
However, B was also configured with `regulator-boot-on', we wish it
could be disabled afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <zr.zhang@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201033806.2567812-1-zr.zhang@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f2b41b748c ]
I got the the following report:
OF: ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2,
of_node_get()/of_node_put() unbalanced - destroy cset entry:
attach overlay node /i2c/pmic@62/regulators/exten
In of_get_regulator(), the node is returned from of_parse_phandle()
with refcount incremented, after using it, of_node_put() need be called.
Fixes: 69511a452e ("regulator: map consumer regulator based on device tree")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115091508.900752-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Pull regulator fixes from Mark Brown:
"This is more changes than I'd like this late although the diffstat is
still fairly small, I kept on holding off as new fixes came in to give
things time to soak in -next but should probably have tagged and sent
an additional pull request earlier.
There's some relatively large fixes to the twl6030 driver to fix
issues with the TWL6032 variant which resulted from some work on the
core TWL6030 driver, a couple of fixes for error handling paths
(mostly in the core), and a nice stability fix for the sgl51000 driver
that's been pulled out of a BSP"
* tag 'regulator-fix-v6.1-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator:
regulator: twl6030: fix get status of twl6032 regulators
regulator: twl6030: re-add TWL6032_SUBCLASS
regulator: slg51000: Wait after asserting CS pin
regulator: core: fix UAF in destroy_regulator()
regulator: rt5759: fix OOB in validate_desc()
regulator: core: fix kobject release warning and memory leak in regulator_register()
In former times, info->feature was populated via the parent driver
by pdata/regulator_init_data->driver_data for all regulators when
USB_PRODUCT_ID_LSB indicates a TWL6032.
Today, the information is not set, so re-add it at the regulator
definitions.
Fixes: 25d8233770 ("regulator: twl: make driver DT only")
Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120221208.3093727-2-andreas@kemnade.info
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
I got a UAF report as following:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x935/0x2060
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810e838220 by task python3/268
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x67/0x83
print_report+0x178/0x4b0
kasan_report+0x90/0x190
__lock_acquire+0x935/0x2060
lock_acquire+0x156/0x400
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
lockref_get+0x11/0x30
simple_recursive_removal+0x41/0x440
debugfs_remove.part.12+0x32/0x50
debugfs_remove+0x29/0x30
_regulator_put.cold.54+0x3e/0x27f
regulator_put+0x1f/0x30
release_nodes+0x6a/0xa0
devres_release_all+0xf8/0x150
Allocated by task 37:
kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
__kasan_slab_alloc+0x5d/0x70
slab_post_alloc_hook+0x62/0x510
kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x222/0x5a0
__d_alloc+0x31/0x440
d_alloc+0x30/0xf0
d_alloc_parallel+0xc4/0xd20
__lookup_slow+0x15e/0x2f0
lookup_one_len+0x13a/0x150
start_creating+0xea/0x190
debugfs_create_dir+0x1e/0x210
create_regulator+0x254/0x4e0
_regulator_get+0x2a1/0x467
_devm_regulator_get+0x5a/0xb0
regulator_virtual_probe+0xb9/0x1a0
Freed by task 30:
kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50
__kasan_slab_free+0x102/0x190
kmem_cache_free+0xf6/0x600
rcu_core+0x54c/0x12b0
__do_softirq+0xf2/0x5e3
Last potentially related work creation:
kasan_save_stack+0x1c/0x40
__kasan_record_aux_stack+0x98/0xb0
call_rcu+0x42/0x700
dentry_free+0x6c/0xd0
__dentry_kill+0x23b/0x2d0
dput.part.31+0x431/0x780
simple_recursive_removal+0xa9/0x440
debugfs_remove.part.12+0x32/0x50
debugfs_remove+0x29/0x30
regulator_unregister+0xe3/0x230
release_nodes+0x6a/0xa0
==================================================================
Here is how happened:
processor A processor B
regulator_register()
rdev_init_debugfs()
rdev->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir()
devm_regulator_get()
rdev = regulator_dev_lookup()
create_regulator(rdev)
// using rdev->debugfs as parent
debugfs_create_dir(rdev->debugfs)
mfd_remove_devices_fn()
release_nodes()
regulator_unregister()
// free rdev->debugfs
debugfs_remove_recursive(rdev->debugfs)
release_nodes()
destroy_regulator()
debugfs_remove_recursive() <- causes UAF
In devm_regulator_get(), after getting rdev, the refcount
is get, so fix this by moving debugfs_remove_recursive()
to regulator_dev_release(), then it can be proctected by
the refcount, the 'rdev->debugfs' can not be freed until
the refcount is 0.
Fixes: 5de705194e ("regulator: Add basic per consumer debugfs")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116033706.3595812-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
I got the following OOB report:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in validate_desc+0xba/0x109
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888107db8ff0 by task python3/253
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x67/0x83
print_report+0x178/0x4b0
kasan_report+0x90/0x190
validate_desc+0xba/0x109
gpiod_set_value_cansleep+0x40/0x5a
regulator_ena_gpio_ctrl+0x93/0xfc
_regulator_do_enable.cold.61+0x89/0x163
set_machine_constraints+0x140a/0x159c
regulator_register.cold.73+0x762/0x10cd
devm_regulator_register+0x57/0xb0
rt5759_probe+0x3a0/0x4ac [rt5759_regulator]
The desc used in validate_desc() is passed from 'reg_cfg.ena_gpiod',
which is not initialized. Fix this by initializing 'reg_cfg' to 0.
Fixes: 7b36ddb208 ("regulator: rt5759: Add support for Richtek RT5759 DCDC converter")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116092943.1668326-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Here is a warning report about lack of registered release()
from kobject lib:
Device '(null)' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 48430 at drivers/base/core.c:2332 device_release+0x104/0x120
Call Trace:
kobject_put+0xdc/0x180
put_device+0x1b/0x30
regulator_register+0x651/0x1170
devm_regulator_register+0x4f/0xb0
When regulator_register() returns fail and directly goto `clean` symbol,
rdev->dev has not registered release() function yet (which is registered
by regulator_class in the following), so rdev needs to be freed manually.
If rdev->dev.of_node is not NULL, which means the of_node has gotten by
regulator_of_get_init_data(), it needs to call of_node_put() to avoid
refcount leak.
Otherwise, only calling put_device() would lead memory leak of rdev
in further:
unreferenced object 0xffff88810d0b1000 (size 2048):
comm "107-i2c-rtq6752", pid 48430, jiffies 4342258431 (age 1341.780s)
backtrace:
kmalloc_trace+0x22/0x110
regulator_register+0x184/0x1170
devm_regulator_register+0x4f/0xb0
When regulator_register() returns fail and goto `wash` symbol,
rdev->dev has registered release() function, so directly call
put_device() to cleanup everything.
Fixes: d3c731564e ("regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path")
Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116074339.1024240-1-zengheng4@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Pull regulator updates from Mark Brown:
"The core work this time around has mostly been around the code to
manage regulator modes, simplifying the interface for configuring
modes to not take account of the voltage and as a side effect
resolving a bootstrapping issue on systems where we can't read the
voltage from the regulator.
Otherwise it's been quite a quiet release with some new drivers and a
devm helper:
- Make the load handling in the Qualcomm RPMH regulators much more
idiomatic and general cleanups to the handling of load
configuration
- devm helper for a combined get and enable operation
- Support for MediaTek MT6331, Qualcomm PM660, 660L and PM6125, Texas
Instruments TPS65219"
* tag 'regulator-v6.1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator: (45 commits)
dt-bindings: gpio-regulator: add vin-supply property support
regulator: gpio: Add input_supply support in gpio_regulator_config
regulator: tps65219: Fix is_enabled checking in tps65219_set_bypass
regulator: qcom,rpmh: add pm660 and pm660l pmics
regulator: qcom-rpmh: add pm660 and pm660l pmics
regulator: of: Fix kernel-doc
regulator: of: Fix kernel-doc
regulator: Add driver for MT6332 PMIC regulators
regulator: Add bindings for MT6332 regulator
regulator: Add driver for MT6331 PMIC regulators
regulator: Add bindings for MT6331 regulator
regulator: tps65219: Fix .bypass_val_on setting
regulator: qcom_rpm: Fix circular deferral regression
regulator: core: Prevent integer underflow
regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: Indicate regulator-allow-set-load dependencies
regulator: bd9576: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
regulator: bd71815: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
regulator: core: Fix regulator supply registration with sysfs
regulator: tps65219: change tps65219_regulator_irq_types to static
regulator: core: Don't err if allow-set-load but no allowed-modes
...
Pull i2c updates from Wolfram Sang:
- 'remove' callback converted to return void. Big change with trivial
fixes all over the tree. Other subsystems depending on this change
have been asked to pull an immutable topic branch for this.
- new driver for Microchip PCI1xxxx switch
- heavy refactoring of the Mellanox BlueField driver
- we prefer async probe in the i801 driver now
- the rest is usual driver updates (support for more SoCs, some
refactoring, some feature additions)
* tag 'i2c-for-6.1-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux: (37 commits)
i2c: pci1xxxx: prevent signed integer overflow
i2c: acpi: Replace zero-length array with DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper
i2c: i801: Prefer async probe
i2c: designware-pci: Use standard pattern for memory allocation
i2c: designware-pci: Group AMD NAVI quirk parts together
i2c: microchip: pci1xxxx: Add driver for I2C host controller in multifunction endpoint of pci1xxxx switch
docs: i2c: slave-interface: return errno when handle I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED
i2c: mlxbf: remove device tree support
i2c: mlxbf: support BlueField-3 SoC
i2c: cadence: Add standard bus recovery support
i2c: mlxbf: add multi slave functionality
i2c: mlxbf: support lock mechanism
macintosh/ams: Adapt declaration of ams_i2c_remove() to earlier change
i2c: riic: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
i2c: mlxbf: remove IRQF_ONESHOT
dt-bindings: i2c: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3128-i2c
dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,rcar-i2c: Add r8a779g0 support
i2c: tegra: Add GPCDMA support
i2c: scmi: Convert to be a platform driver
i2c: rk3x: Add rv1126 support
...
Pull thermal control updates from Rafael Wysocki:
"The most significant part of this update is the thermal control DT
initialization rework from Daniel Lezcano and the following conversion
of drivers to use the new API introduced by it
Apart from that, the maximum number of trip points in a thermal zone
is increased and there are some fixes and code cleanups
Specifics:
- Rework the device tree initialization, convert the drivers to the
new API and remove the old OF code (Daniel Lezcano)
- Fix return value to -ENODEV when searching for a specific thermal
zone which does not exist (Daniel Lezcano)
- Fix the return value inspection in of_thermal_zone_find() (Dan
Carpenter)
- Fix kernel panic when KASAN is enabled as it detects use after free
when unregistering a thermal zone (Daniel Lezcano)
- Move the set_trip ops inside the therma sysfs code (Daniel Lezcano)
- Remove unnecessary error message as it is already shown in the
underlying function (Jiapeng Chong)
- Rework the monitoring path and move the locks upper in the call
stack to fix some potentials race windows (Daniel Lezcano)
- Fix lockdep_assert() warning introduced by the lock rework (Daniel
Lezcano)
- Do not lock thermal zone mutex in the user space governor (Rafael
Wysocki)
- Revert the Mellanox 'hotter thermal zone' feature because it is
already handled in the thermal framework core code (Daniel Lezcano)
- Increase maximum number of trip points in the thermal core (Sumeet
Pawnikar)
- Replace strlcpy() with unused retval with strscpy() in the core
thermal control code (Wolfram Sang)
- Use module_pci_driver() macro in the int340x processor_thermal
driver (Shang XiaoJing)
- Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() in the intel_powerclamp
thermal driver to prevent it from crashing and remove unused
accounting for IRQ wakes from it (Srinivas Pandruvada)
- Consolidate priv->data_vault checks in int340x_thermal (Rafael
Wysocki)
- Check the policy first in cpufreq_cooling_register() (Xuewen Yan)
- Drop redundant error message from da9062-thermal (zhaoxiao)
- Drop of_match_ptr() from thermal_mmio (Jean Delvare)"
* tag 'thermal-6.1-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (55 commits)
thermal: core: Increase maximum number of trip points
thermal: int340x: processor_thermal: Use module_pci_driver() macro
thermal: intel_powerclamp: Remove accounting for IRQ wakes
thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash
thermal: int340x_thermal: Consolidate priv->data_vault checks
thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Check the policy first in cpufreq_cooling_register()
thermal: Drop duplicate words from comments
thermal: move from strlcpy() with unused retval to strscpy()
thermal: da9062-thermal: Drop redundant error message
thermal/drivers/thermal_mmio: Drop of_match_ptr()
thermal: gov_user_space: Do not lock thermal zone mutex
Revert "mlxsw: core: Add the hottest thermal zone detection"
thermal/core: Fix lockdep_assert() warning
thermal/core: Move the mutex inside the thermal_zone_device_update() function
thermal/core: Move the thermal zone lock out of the governors
thermal/governors: Group the thermal zone lock inside the throttle function
thermal/core: Rework the monitoring a bit
thermal/core: Rearm the monitoring only one time
thermal/drivers/qcom/spmi-adc-tm5: Remove unnecessary print function dev_err()
thermal/of: Remove old OF code
...
This is simillar as fixed-regulator.
Used to extract regulator parent from the device tree.
Without that property used, the parent regulator can be shut down (if not an always on).
Thus leading to inappropriate behavior:
On am62-SP-SK this fix is required to avoid tps65219 ldo1 (SDMMC rail) to be shut down after boot completion.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Neanne <jneanne@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220929132526.29427-2-jneanne@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Merge series from AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>:
In an effort to give some love to the apparently forgotten MT6795 SoC,
I am upstreaming more components that are necessary to support platforms
powered by this one apart from a simple boot to serial console.
This series adds support for the regulators found in MT6331 and MT6332
main/companion PMICs.
Adding support to each driver in each subsystem is done in different
patch series as to avoid spamming uninteresting patches to maintainers.
Tested on a MT6795 Sony Xperia M5 (codename "Holly") smartphone.
The .bypass_val_on setting does not match the .bypass_mask setting, so the
.bypass_mask bit will never get set. Fix it by removing .bypass_val_on
setting, the regulator_set_bypass_regmap and regulator_get_bypass_regmap
helpers will use rdev->desc->bypass_mask as val_on if the val_on is 0.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220828120153.1512508-1-axel.lin@ingics.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
On recent kernels, the PM8058 L16 (or any other PM8058 LDO-regulator)
does not come up if they are supplied by an SMPS-regulator. This
is not very strange since the regulators are registered in a long
array and the L-regulators are registered before the S-regulators,
and if an L-regulator defers, it will never get around to registering
the S-regulator that it needs.
See arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8060-dragonboard.dts:
pm8058-regulators {
(...)
vdd_l13_l16-supply = <&pm8058_s4>;
(...)
Ooops.
Fix this by moving the PM8058 S-regulators first in the array.
Do the same for the PM8901 S-regulators (though this is currently
not causing any problems with out device trees) so that the pattern
of registration order is the same on all PMnnnn chips.
Fixes: 087a1b5cdd ("regulator: qcom: Rework to single platform device")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220909112529.239143-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
By using a ratio of delay to poll_enabled_time that is not integer
time_remaining underflows and does not exit the loop as expected.
As delay could be derived from DT and poll_enabled_time is defined
in the driver this can easily happen.
Use a signed iterator to make sure that the loop exits once
the remaining time is negative.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220909125954.577669-1-patrick.rudolph@9elements.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Pull regulator fixes from Mark Brown:
"One core fix here improving the error handling on enable failure, plus
smaller fixes for the pfuze100 drive and the SPMI DT bindings"
* tag 'regulator-fix-v6.0-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator:
regulator: Fix qcom,spmi-regulator schema
regulator: pfuze100: Fix the global-out-of-bounds access in pfuze100_regulator_probe()
regulator: core: Clean up on enable failure
