[ Upstream commit c11bd04648 ]
The recursion check in __bpf_prog_enter* and __bpf_prog_exit*
leave preempt_count_{sub,add} unprotected. When attaching trampoline to
them we get panic as follows,
[ 867.843050] BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at 0000000009d325cf (stack is 0000000046a46a15..00000000537e7b28)
[ 867.843064] stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[ 867.843067] CPU: 8 PID: 11009 Comm: trace Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.2.0+ #4
[ 867.843100] Call Trace:
[ 867.843101] <TASK>
[ 867.843104] asm_exc_int3+0x3a/0x40
[ 867.843108] RIP: 0010:preempt_count_sub+0x1/0xa0
[ 867.843135] __bpf_prog_enter_recur+0x17/0x90
[ 867.843148] bpf_trampoline_6442468108_0+0x2e/0x1000
[ 867.843154] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1/0xa0
[ 867.843157] preempt_count_sub+0x5/0xa0
[ 867.843159] ? migrate_enable+0xac/0xf0
[ 867.843164] __bpf_prog_exit_recur+0x2d/0x40
[ 867.843168] bpf_trampoline_6442468108_0+0x55/0x1000
...
[ 867.843788] preempt_count_sub+0x5/0xa0
[ 867.843793] ? migrate_enable+0xac/0xf0
[ 867.843829] __bpf_prog_exit_recur+0x2d/0x40
[ 867.843837] BUG: IRQ stack guard page was hit at 0000000099bd8228 (stack is 00000000b23e2bc4..000000006d95af35)
[ 867.843841] BUG: IRQ stack guard page was hit at 000000005ae07924 (stack is 00000000ffd69623..0000000014eb594c)
[ 867.843843] BUG: IRQ stack guard page was hit at 00000000028320f0 (stack is 00000000034b6438..0000000078d1bcec)
[ 867.843842] bpf_trampoline_6442468108_0+0x55/0x1000
...
That is because in __bpf_prog_exit_recur, the preempt_count_{sub,add} are
called after prog->active is decreased.
Fixing this by adding these two functions into btf ids deny list.
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Yafang <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230413025248.79764-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7be14c1c90 ]
Xu reports that after commit 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32
bounds tracking"), the following BPF program is rejected by the verifier:
0: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) ; R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=0,imm=0)
1: (61) r3 = *(u32 *)(r1 +4) ; R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0)
2: (bf) r1 = r2
3: (07) r1 += 1
4: (2d) if r1 > r3 goto pc+8
5: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 +0) ; R1_w=scalar(umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
6: (18) r0 = 0x7fffffffffffff10
8: (0f) r1 += r0 ; R1_w=scalar(umin=0x7fffffffffffff10,umax=0x800000000000000f)
9: (18) r0 = 0x8000000000000000
11: (07) r0 += 1
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2
13: (b7) r0 = 0
14: (95) exit
And the verifier log says:
func#0 @0
0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) ; R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=0,imm=0)
1: (61) r3 = *(u32 *)(r1 +4) ; R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0)
2: (bf) r1 = r2 ; R1_w=pkt(off=0,r=0,imm=0) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=0,imm=0)
3: (07) r1 += 1 ; R1_w=pkt(off=1,r=0,imm=0)
4: (2d) if r1 > r3 goto pc+8 ; R1_w=pkt(off=1,r=1,imm=0) R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0)
5: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 +0) ; R1_w=scalar(umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0)
6: (18) r0 = 0x7fffffffffffff10 ; R0_w=9223372036854775568
8: (0f) r1 += r0 ; R0_w=9223372036854775568 R1_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854775568,umax=9223372036854775823,s32_min=-240,s32_max=15)
9: (18) r0 = 0x8000000000000000 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775808
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775807
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775807 R1_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854775568,umax=9223372036854775809)
13: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
14: (95) exit
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775807 R1_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854775810,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775806
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775806 R1_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854775810,umax=9223372036854775810,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xffffffff))
13: safe
[...]
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775795 R1=scalar(umin=9223372036854775822,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xffffffff)) R2=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775794
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775794 R1=scalar(umin=9223372036854775822,umax=9223372036854775822,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xffffffff))
13: safe
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775794 R1=scalar(umin=9223372036854775823,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xffffffff)) R2=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775793
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775793 R1=scalar(umin=9223372036854775823,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xffffffff))
13: safe
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775793 R1=scalar(umin=9223372036854775824,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xffffffff)) R2=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775792
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775792 R1=scalar(umin=9223372036854775824,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xffffffff))
13: safe
[...]
The 64bit umin=9223372036854775810 bound continuously bumps by +1 while
umax=9223372036854775823 stays as-is until the verifier complexity limit
is reached and the program gets finally rejected. During this simulation,
the umin also eventually surpasses umax. Looking at the first 'from 12
to 11' output line from the loop, R1 has the following state:
R1_w=scalar(umin=0x8000000000000002 (9223372036854775810),
umax=0x800000000000000f (9223372036854775823),
var_off=(0x8000000000000000;
0xffffffff))
The var_off has technically not an inconsistent state but it's very
imprecise and far off surpassing 64bit umax bounds whereas the expected
output with refined known bits in var_off should have been like:
R1_w=scalar(umin=0x8000000000000002 (9223372036854775810),
umax=0x800000000000000f (9223372036854775823),
var_off=(0x8000000000000000;
0xf))
In the above log, var_off stays as var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xffffffff)
and does not converge into a narrower mask where more bits become known,
eventually transforming R1 into a constant upon umin=9223372036854775823,
umax=9223372036854775823 case where the verifier would have terminated and
let the program pass.
The __reg_combine_64_into_32() marks the subregister unknown and propagates
64bit {s,u}min/{s,u}max bounds to their 32bit equivalents iff they are within
the 32bit universe. The question came up whether __reg_combine_64_into_32()
should special case the situation that when 64bit {s,u}min bounds have
the same value as 64bit {s,u}max bounds to then assign the latter as
well to the 32bit reg->{s,u}32_{min,max}_value. As can be seen from the
above example however, that is just /one/ special case and not a /generic/
solution given above example would still not be addressed this way and
remain at an imprecise var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xffffffff).
The improvement is needed in __reg_bound_offset() to refine var32_off with
the updated var64_off instead of the prior reg->var_off. The reg_bounds_sync()
code first refines information about the register's min/max bounds via
__update_reg_bounds() from the current var_off, then in __reg_deduce_bounds()
from sign bit and with the potentially learned bits from bounds it'll
update the var_off tnum in __reg_bound_offset(). For example, intersecting
with the old var_off might have improved bounds slightly, e.g. if umax
was 0x7f...f and var_off was (0; 0xf...fc), then new var_off will then
result in (0; 0x7f...fc). The intersected var64_off holds then the
universe which is a superset of var32_off. The point for the latter is
not to broaden, but to further refine known bits based on the intersection
of var_off with 32 bit bounds, so that we later construct the final var_off
from upper and lower 32 bits. The final __update_reg_bounds() can then
potentially still slightly refine bounds if more bits became known from the
new var_off.
After the improvement, we can see R1 converging successively:
func#0 @0
0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) ; R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=0,imm=0)
1: (61) r3 = *(u32 *)(r1 +4) ; R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0)
2: (bf) r1 = r2 ; R1_w=pkt(off=0,r=0,imm=0) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=0,imm=0)
3: (07) r1 += 1 ; R1_w=pkt(off=1,r=0,imm=0)
4: (2d) if r1 > r3 goto pc+8 ; R1_w=pkt(off=1,r=1,imm=0) R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0)
5: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 +0) ; R1_w=scalar(umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0)
6: (18) r0 = 0x7fffffffffffff10 ; R0_w=9223372036854775568
8: (0f) r1 += r0 ; R0_w=9223372036854775568 R1_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854775568,umax=9223372036854775823,s32_min=-240,s32_max=15)
9: (18) r0 = 0x8000000000000000 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775808
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775807
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775807 R1_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854775568,umax=9223372036854775809)
13: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
14: (95) exit
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775807 R1_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854775810,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xf),s32_min=0,s32_max=15,u32_max=15) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775806
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775806 R1_w=-9223372036854775806
13: safe
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775806 R1_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854775811,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xf),s32_min=0,s32_max=15,u32_max=15) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775805
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775805 R1_w=-9223372036854775805
13: safe
[...]
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775798 R1=scalar(umin=9223372036854775819,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000008; 0x7),s32_min=8,s32_max=15,u32_min=8,u32_max=15) R2=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775797
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775797 R1=-9223372036854775797
13: safe
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775797 R1=scalar(umin=9223372036854775820,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x800000000000000c; 0x3),s32_min=12,s32_max=15,u32_min=12,u32_max=15) R2=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775796
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775796 R1=-9223372036854775796
13: safe
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775796 R1=scalar(umin=9223372036854775821,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x800000000000000c; 0x3),s32_min=12,s32_max=15,u32_min=12,u32_max=15) R2=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775795
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775795 R1=-9223372036854775795
13: safe
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775795 R1=scalar(umin=9223372036854775822,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x800000000000000e; 0x1),s32_min=14,s32_max=15,u32_min=14,u32_max=15) R2=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775794
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775794 R1=-9223372036854775794
13: safe
from 12 to 11: R0_w=-9223372036854775794 R1=-9223372036854775793 R2=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
11: (07) r0 += 1 ; R0_w=-9223372036854775793
12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2
last_idx 12 first_idx 12
parent didn't have regs=1 stack=0 marks: R0_rw=P-9223372036854775801 R1_r=scalar(umin=9223372036854775815,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xf),s32_min=0,s32_max=15,u32_max=15) R2=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
last_idx 11 first_idx 11
regs=1 stack=0 before 11: (07) r0 += 1
parent didn't have regs=1 stack=0 marks: R0_rw=P-9223372036854775805 R1_rw=scalar(umin=9223372036854775812,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xf),s32_min=0,s32_max=15,u32_max=15) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
last_idx 12 first_idx 0
regs=1 stack=0 before 12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2
regs=1 stack=0 before 11: (07) r0 += 1
regs=1 stack=0 before 12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2
regs=1 stack=0 before 11: (07) r0 += 1
regs=1 stack=0 before 12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2
regs=1 stack=0 before 11: (07) r0 += 1
regs=1 stack=0 before 9: (18) r0 = 0x8000000000000000
last_idx 12 first_idx 12
parent didn't have regs=2 stack=0 marks: R0_rw=P-9223372036854775801 R1_r=Pscalar(umin=9223372036854775815,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xf),s32_min=0,s32_max=15,u32_max=15) R2=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
last_idx 11 first_idx 11
regs=2 stack=0 before 11: (07) r0 += 1
parent didn't have regs=2 stack=0 marks: R0_rw=P-9223372036854775805 R1_rw=Pscalar(umin=9223372036854775812,umax=9223372036854775823,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0xf),s32_min=0,s32_max=15,u32_max=15) R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=1,imm=0) R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
last_idx 12 first_idx 0
regs=2 stack=0 before 12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2
regs=2 stack=0 before 11: (07) r0 += 1
regs=2 stack=0 before 12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2
regs=2 stack=0 before 11: (07) r0 += 1
regs=2 stack=0 before 12: (ad) if r0 < r1 goto pc-2
regs=2 stack=0 before 11: (07) r0 += 1
regs=2 stack=0 before 9: (18) r0 = 0x8000000000000000
regs=2 stack=0 before 8: (0f) r1 += r0
regs=3 stack=0 before 6: (18) r0 = 0x7fffffffffffff10
regs=2 stack=0 before 5: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 +0)
13: safe
from 4 to 13: safe
verification time 322 usec
stack depth 0
processed 56 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 1 total_states 3 peak_states 3 mark_read 1
This also fixes up a test case along with this improvement where we match
on the verifier log. The updated log now has a refined var_off, too.
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230314203424.4015351-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230322213056.2470-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 082cdc69a4 ]
For every BPF_ADD/SUB involving a pointer, adjust_ptr_min_max_vals()
ensures that the resulting pointer has a constant offset if
bypass_spec_v1 is false. This is ensured by calling sanitize_check_bounds()
which in turn calls check_stack_access_for_ptr_arithmetic(). There,
-EACCESS is returned if the register's offset is not constant, thereby
rejecting the program.
In summary, an unprivileged user must never be able to create stack
pointers with a variable offset. That is also the case, because a
respective check in check_stack_write() is missing. If they were able
to create a variable-offset pointer, users could still use it in a
stack-write operation to trigger unsafe speculative behavior [1].
Because unprivileged users must already be prevented from creating
variable-offset stack pointers, viable options are to either remove
this check (replacing it with a clarifying comment), or to turn it
into a "verifier BUG"-message, also adding a similar check in
check_stack_write() (for consistency, as a second-level defense).
This patch implements the first option to reduce verifier bloat.
This check was introduced by commit 01f810ace9 ("bpf: Allow
variable-offset stack access") which correctly notes that
"variable-offset reads and writes are disallowed (they were already
disallowed for the indirect access case) because the speculative
execution checking code doesn't support them". However, it does not
further discuss why the check in check_stack_read() is necessary.
The code which made this check obsolete was also introduced in this
commit.
I have compiled ~650 programs from the Linux selftests, Linux samples,
Cilium, and libbpf/examples projects and confirmed that none of these
trigger the check in check_stack_read() [2]. Instead, all of these
programs are, as expected, already rejected when constructing the
variable-offset pointers. Note that the check in
check_stack_access_for_ptr_arithmetic() also prints "off=%d" while the
code removed by this patch does not (the error removed does not appear
in the "verification_error" values). For reproducibility, the
repository linked includes the raw data and scripts used to create
the plot.
[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.03757.pdf
[2] https://gitlab.cs.fau.de/un65esoq/bpf-spectre/-/raw/53dc19fcf459c186613b1156a81504b39c8d49db/data/plots/23-02-26_23-56_bpftool/bpftool/0004-errors.pdf?inline=false
Fixes: 01f810ace9 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <gerhorst@cs.fau.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230315165358.23701-1-gerhorst@cs.fau.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 52c2b005a3 ]
When doing state comparison, if old state has register that is not
marked as REG_LIVE_READ, then we just skip comparison, regardless what's
the state of corresponing register in current state. This is because not
REG_LIVE_READ register is irrelevant for further program execution and
correctness. All good here.
But when we get to precision propagation, after two states were declared
equivalent, we don't take into account old register's liveness, and thus
attempt to propagate precision for register in current state even if
that register in old state was not REG_LIVE_READ anymore. This is bad,
because register in current state could be anything at all and this
could cause -EFAULT due to internal logic bugs.
Fix by taking into account REG_LIVE_READ liveness mark to keep the logic
in state comparison in sync with precision propagation.
Fixes: a3ce685dd0 ("bpf: fix precision tracking")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309224131.57449-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 71b547f561 ]
Juan Jose et al reported an issue found via fuzzing where the verifier's
pruning logic prematurely marks a program path as safe.
Consider the following program:
0: (b7) r6 = 1024
1: (b7) r7 = 0
2: (b7) r8 = 0
3: (b7) r9 = -2147483648
4: (97) r6 %= 1025
5: (05) goto pc+0
6: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+2
7: (97) r6 %= 1
8: (b7) r9 = 0
9: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+1
10: (b7) r6 = 0
11: (b7) r0 = 0
12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
13: (18) r4 = 0xffff888103693400 // map_ptr(ks=4,vs=48)
15: (bf) r1 = r4
16: (bf) r2 = r10
17: (07) r2 += -4
18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
19: (55) if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+1
20: (95) exit
21: (77) r6 >>= 10
22: (27) r6 *= 8192
23: (bf) r1 = r0
24: (0f) r0 += r6
25: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0)
26: (7b) *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = r3
27: (95) exit
The verifier treats this as safe, leading to oob read/write access due
to an incorrect verifier conclusion:
func#0 @0
0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (b7) r6 = 1024 ; R6_w=1024
1: (b7) r7 = 0 ; R7_w=0
2: (b7) r8 = 0 ; R8_w=0
3: (b7) r9 = -2147483648 ; R9_w=-2147483648
4: (97) r6 %= 1025 ; R6_w=scalar()
5: (05) goto pc+0
6: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+2 ; R6_w=scalar(umin=18446744071562067969,var_off=(0xffffffff00000000; 0xffffffff)) R9_w=-2147483648
7: (97) r6 %= 1 ; R6_w=scalar()
8: (b7) r9 = 0 ; R9=0
9: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+1 ; R6=scalar(umin=1) R9=0
10: (b7) r6 = 0 ; R6_w=0
11: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
last_idx 12 first_idx 9
regs=1 stack=0 before 11: (b7) r0 = 0
13: R0_w=0 R10=fp0 fp-8=0000????
13: (18) r4 = 0xffff8ad3886c2a00 ; R4_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
15: (bf) r1 = r4 ; R1_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R4_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
16: (bf) r2 = r10 ; R2_w=fp0 R10=fp0
17: (07) r2 += -4 ; R2_w=fp-4
18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 ; R0=map_value_or_null(id=1,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
19: (55) if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+1 ; R0=0
20: (95) exit
from 19 to 21: R0=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R6=0 R7=0 R8=0 R9=0 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmm????
21: (77) r6 >>= 10 ; R6_w=0
22: (27) r6 *= 8192 ; R6_w=0
23: (bf) r1 = r0 ; R0=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R1_w=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
24: (0f) r0 += r6
last_idx 24 first_idx 19
regs=40 stack=0 before 23: (bf) r1 = r0
regs=40 stack=0 before 22: (27) r6 *= 8192
regs=40 stack=0 before 21: (77) r6 >>= 10
regs=40 stack=0 before 19: (55) if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+1
parent didn't have regs=40 stack=0 marks: R0_rw=map_value_or_null(id=1,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R6_rw=P0 R7=0 R8=0 R9=0 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmm????
last_idx 18 first_idx 9
regs=40 stack=0 before 18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
regs=40 stack=0 before 17: (07) r2 += -4
regs=40 stack=0 before 16: (bf) r2 = r10
regs=40 stack=0 before 15: (bf) r1 = r4
regs=40 stack=0 before 13: (18) r4 = 0xffff8ad3886c2a00
regs=40 stack=0 before 12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
regs=40 stack=0 before 11: (b7) r0 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 10: (b7) r6 = 0
25: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) ; R0_w=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R3_w=scalar()
26: (7b) *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = r3 ; R1_w=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R3_w=scalar()
27: (95) exit
from 9 to 11: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R6=0 R7=0 R8=0 R9=0 R10=fp0
11: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
last_idx 12 first_idx 11
regs=1 stack=0 before 11: (b7) r0 = 0
13: R0_w=0 R10=fp0 fp-8=0000????
13: (18) r4 = 0xffff8ad3886c2a00 ; R4_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
15: (bf) r1 = r4 ; R1_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R4_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
16: (bf) r2 = r10 ; R2_w=fp0 R10=fp0
17: (07) r2 += -4 ; R2_w=fp-4
18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
frame 0: propagating r6
last_idx 19 first_idx 11
regs=40 stack=0 before 18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
regs=40 stack=0 before 17: (07) r2 += -4
regs=40 stack=0 before 16: (bf) r2 = r10
regs=40 stack=0 before 15: (bf) r1 = r4
regs=40 stack=0 before 13: (18) r4 = 0xffff8ad3886c2a00
regs=40 stack=0 before 12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
regs=40 stack=0 before 11: (b7) r0 = 0
parent didn't have regs=40 stack=0 marks: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R6_r=P0 R7=0 R8=0 R9=0 R10=fp0
last_idx 9 first_idx 9
regs=40 stack=0 before 9: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+1
parent didn't have regs=40 stack=0 marks: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R6_rw=Pscalar() R7_w=0 R8_w=0 R9_rw=0 R10=fp0
last_idx 8 first_idx 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 8: (b7) r9 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 7: (97) r6 %= 1
regs=40 stack=0 before 6: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+2
regs=40 stack=0 before 5: (05) goto pc+0
regs=40 stack=0 before 4: (97) r6 %= 1025
regs=40 stack=0 before 3: (b7) r9 = -2147483648
regs=40 stack=0 before 2: (b7) r8 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 1: (b7) r7 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 0: (b7) r6 = 1024
19: safe
frame 0: propagating r6
last_idx 9 first_idx 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 6: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+2
regs=40 stack=0 before 5: (05) goto pc+0
regs=40 stack=0 before 4: (97) r6 %= 1025
regs=40 stack=0 before 3: (b7) r9 = -2147483648
regs=40 stack=0 before 2: (b7) r8 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 1: (b7) r7 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 0: (b7) r6 = 1024
from 6 to 9: safe
verification time 110 usec
stack depth 4
processed 36 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 3 peak_states 3 mark_read 2
The verifier considers this program as safe by mistakenly pruning unsafe
code paths. In the above func#0, code lines 0-10 are of interest. In line
0-3 registers r6 to r9 are initialized with known scalar values. In line 4
the register r6 is reset to an unknown scalar given the verifier does not
track modulo operations. Due to this, the verifier can also not determine
precisely which branches in line 6 and 9 are taken, therefore it needs to
explore them both.
As can be seen, the verifier starts with exploring the false/fall-through
paths first. The 'from 19 to 21' path has both r6=0 and r9=0 and the pointer
arithmetic on r0 += r6 is therefore considered safe. Given the arithmetic,
r6 is correctly marked for precision tracking where backtracking kicks in
where it walks back the current path all the way where r6 was set to 0 in
the fall-through branch.
Next, the pruning logics pops the path 'from 9 to 11' from the stack. Also
here, the state of the registers is the same, that is, r6=0 and r9=0, so
that at line 19 the path can be pruned as it is considered safe. It is
interesting to note that the conditional in line 9 turned r6 into a more
precise state, that is, in the fall-through path at the beginning of line
10, it is R6=scalar(umin=1), and in the branch-taken path (which is analyzed
here) at the beginning of line 11, r6 turned into a known const r6=0 as
r9=0 prior to that and therefore (unsigned) r6 <= 0 concludes that r6 must
be 0 (**):
[...] ; R6_w=scalar()
9: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+1 ; R6=scalar(umin=1) R9=0
[...]
from 9 to 11: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R6=0 R7=0 R8=0 R9=0 R10=fp0
[...]
The next path is 'from 6 to 9'. The verifier considers the old and current
state equivalent, and therefore prunes the search incorrectly. Looking into
the two states which are being compared by the pruning logic at line 9, the
old state consists of R6_rwD=Pscalar() R9_rwD=0 R10=fp0 and the new state
consists of R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R6_w=scalar(umax=18446744071562067968)
R7_w=0 R8_w=0 R9_w=-2147483648 R10=fp0. While r6 had the reg->precise flag
correctly set in the old state, r9 did not. Both r6'es are considered as
equivalent given the old one is a superset of the current, more precise one,
however, r9's actual values (0 vs 0x80000000) mismatch. Given the old r9
did not have reg->precise flag set, the verifier does not consider the
register as contributing to the precision state of r6, and therefore it
considered both r9 states as equivalent. However, for this specific pruned
path (which is also the actual path taken at runtime), register r6 will be
0x400 and r9 0x80000000 when reaching line 21, thus oob-accessing the map.
The purpose of precision tracking is to initially mark registers (including
spilled ones) as imprecise to help verifier's pruning logic finding equivalent
states it can then prune if they don't contribute to the program's safety
aspects. For example, if registers are used for pointer arithmetic or to pass
constant length to a helper, then the verifier sets reg->precise flag and
backtracks the BPF program instruction sequence and chain of verifier states
to ensure that the given register or stack slot including their dependencies
are marked as precisely tracked scalar. This also includes any other registers
and slots that contribute to a tracked state of given registers/stack slot.
This backtracking relies on recorded jmp_history and is able to traverse
entire chain of parent states. This process ends only when all the necessary
registers/slots and their transitive dependencies are marked as precise.
The backtrack_insn() is called from the current instruction up to the first
instruction, and its purpose is to compute a bitmask of registers and stack
slots that need precision tracking in the parent's verifier state. For example,
if a current instruction is r6 = r7, then r6 needs precision after this
instruction and r7 needs precision before this instruction, that is, in the
parent state. Hence for the latter r7 is marked and r6 unmarked.
For the class of jmp/jmp32 instructions, backtrack_insn() today only looks
at call and exit instructions and for all other conditionals the masks
remain as-is. However, in the given situation register r6 has a dependency
on r9 (as described above in **), so also that one needs to be marked for
precision tracking. In other words, if an imprecise register influences a
precise one, then the imprecise register should also be marked precise.
Meaning, in the parent state both dest and src register need to be tracked
for precision and therefore the marking must be more conservative by setting
reg->precise flag for both. The precision propagation needs to cover both
for the conditional: if the src reg was marked but not the dst reg and vice
versa.
After the fix the program is correctly rejected:
func#0 @0
0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (b7) r6 = 1024 ; R6_w=1024
1: (b7) r7 = 0 ; R7_w=0
2: (b7) r8 = 0 ; R8_w=0
3: (b7) r9 = -2147483648 ; R9_w=-2147483648
4: (97) r6 %= 1025 ; R6_w=scalar()
5: (05) goto pc+0
6: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+2 ; R6_w=scalar(umin=18446744071562067969,var_off=(0xffffffff80000000; 0x7fffffff),u32_min=-2147483648) R9_w=-2147483648
7: (97) r6 %= 1 ; R6_w=scalar()
8: (b7) r9 = 0 ; R9=0
9: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+1 ; R6=scalar(umin=1) R9=0
10: (b7) r6 = 0 ; R6_w=0
11: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
last_idx 12 first_idx 9
regs=1 stack=0 before 11: (b7) r0 = 0
13: R0_w=0 R10=fp0 fp-8=0000????
13: (18) r4 = 0xffff9290dc5bfe00 ; R4_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
15: (bf) r1 = r4 ; R1_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R4_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
16: (bf) r2 = r10 ; R2_w=fp0 R10=fp0
17: (07) r2 += -4 ; R2_w=fp-4
18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 ; R0=map_value_or_null(id=1,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
19: (55) if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+1 ; R0=0
20: (95) exit
from 19 to 21: R0=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R6=0 R7=0 R8=0 R9=0 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmm????
21: (77) r6 >>= 10 ; R6_w=0
22: (27) r6 *= 8192 ; R6_w=0
23: (bf) r1 = r0 ; R0=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R1_w=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
24: (0f) r0 += r6
last_idx 24 first_idx 19
regs=40 stack=0 before 23: (bf) r1 = r0
regs=40 stack=0 before 22: (27) r6 *= 8192
regs=40 stack=0 before 21: (77) r6 >>= 10
regs=40 stack=0 before 19: (55) if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+1
parent didn't have regs=40 stack=0 marks: R0_rw=map_value_or_null(id=1,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R6_rw=P0 R7=0 R8=0 R9=0 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmm????
last_idx 18 first_idx 9
regs=40 stack=0 before 18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
regs=40 stack=0 before 17: (07) r2 += -4
regs=40 stack=0 before 16: (bf) r2 = r10
regs=40 stack=0 before 15: (bf) r1 = r4
regs=40 stack=0 before 13: (18) r4 = 0xffff9290dc5bfe00
regs=40 stack=0 before 12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
regs=40 stack=0 before 11: (b7) r0 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 10: (b7) r6 = 0
25: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) ; R0_w=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R3_w=scalar()
26: (7b) *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = r3 ; R1_w=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R3_w=scalar()
27: (95) exit
from 9 to 11: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R6=0 R7=0 R8=0 R9=0 R10=fp0
11: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
last_idx 12 first_idx 11
regs=1 stack=0 before 11: (b7) r0 = 0
13: R0_w=0 R10=fp0 fp-8=0000????
13: (18) r4 = 0xffff9290dc5bfe00 ; R4_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
15: (bf) r1 = r4 ; R1_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R4_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
16: (bf) r2 = r10 ; R2_w=fp0 R10=fp0
17: (07) r2 += -4 ; R2_w=fp-4
18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
frame 0: propagating r6
last_idx 19 first_idx 11
regs=40 stack=0 before 18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
regs=40 stack=0 before 17: (07) r2 += -4
regs=40 stack=0 before 16: (bf) r2 = r10
regs=40 stack=0 before 15: (bf) r1 = r4
regs=40 stack=0 before 13: (18) r4 = 0xffff9290dc5bfe00
regs=40 stack=0 before 12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
regs=40 stack=0 before 11: (b7) r0 = 0
parent didn't have regs=40 stack=0 marks: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R6_r=P0 R7=0 R8=0 R9=0 R10=fp0
last_idx 9 first_idx 9
regs=40 stack=0 before 9: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+1
parent didn't have regs=240 stack=0 marks: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R6_rw=Pscalar() R7_w=0 R8_w=0 R9_rw=P0 R10=fp0
last_idx 8 first_idx 0
regs=240 stack=0 before 8: (b7) r9 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 7: (97) r6 %= 1
regs=40 stack=0 before 6: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+2
regs=240 stack=0 before 5: (05) goto pc+0
regs=240 stack=0 before 4: (97) r6 %= 1025
regs=240 stack=0 before 3: (b7) r9 = -2147483648
regs=40 stack=0 before 2: (b7) r8 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 1: (b7) r7 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 0: (b7) r6 = 1024
19: safe
from 6 to 9: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R6_w=scalar(umax=18446744071562067968) R7_w=0 R8_w=0 R9_w=-2147483648 R10=fp0
9: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+1
last_idx 9 first_idx 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 6: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+2
regs=240 stack=0 before 5: (05) goto pc+0
regs=240 stack=0 before 4: (97) r6 %= 1025
regs=240 stack=0 before 3: (b7) r9 = -2147483648
regs=40 stack=0 before 2: (b7) r8 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 1: (b7) r7 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 0: (b7) r6 = 1024
last_idx 9 first_idx 0
regs=200 stack=0 before 6: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+2
regs=240 stack=0 before 5: (05) goto pc+0
regs=240 stack=0 before 4: (97) r6 %= 1025
regs=240 stack=0 before 3: (b7) r9 = -2147483648
regs=40 stack=0 before 2: (b7) r8 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 1: (b7) r7 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 0: (b7) r6 = 1024
11: R6=scalar(umax=18446744071562067968) R9=-2147483648
11: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
last_idx 12 first_idx 11
regs=1 stack=0 before 11: (b7) r0 = 0
13: R0_w=0 R10=fp0 fp-8=0000????
13: (18) r4 = 0xffff9290dc5bfe00 ; R4_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
15: (bf) r1 = r4 ; R1_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R4_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
16: (bf) r2 = r10 ; R2_w=fp0 R10=fp0
17: (07) r2 += -4 ; R2_w=fp-4
18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 ; R0_w=map_value_or_null(id=3,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
19: (55) if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+1 ; R0_w=0
20: (95) exit
from 19 to 21: R0=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R6=scalar(umax=18446744071562067968) R7=0 R8=0 R9=-2147483648 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmm????
21: (77) r6 >>= 10 ; R6_w=scalar(umax=18014398507384832,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fffffffffffff))
22: (27) r6 *= 8192 ; R6_w=scalar(smax=9223372036854767616,umax=18446744073709543424,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffffffffe000),s32_max=2147475456,u32_max=-8192)
23: (bf) r1 = r0 ; R0=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R1_w=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0)
24: (0f) r0 += r6
last_idx 24 first_idx 21
regs=40 stack=0 before 23: (bf) r1 = r0
regs=40 stack=0 before 22: (27) r6 *= 8192
regs=40 stack=0 before 21: (77) r6 >>= 10
parent didn't have regs=40 stack=0 marks: R0_rw=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R6_r=Pscalar(umax=18446744071562067968) R7=0 R8=0 R9=-2147483648 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmm????
last_idx 19 first_idx 11
regs=40 stack=0 before 19: (55) if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+1
regs=40 stack=0 before 18: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
regs=40 stack=0 before 17: (07) r2 += -4
regs=40 stack=0 before 16: (bf) r2 = r10
regs=40 stack=0 before 15: (bf) r1 = r4
regs=40 stack=0 before 13: (18) r4 = 0xffff9290dc5bfe00
regs=40 stack=0 before 12: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r0
regs=40 stack=0 before 11: (b7) r0 = 0
parent didn't have regs=40 stack=0 marks: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R6_rw=Pscalar(umax=18446744071562067968) R7_w=0 R8_w=0 R9_w=-2147483648 R10=fp0
last_idx 9 first_idx 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 9: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+1
regs=240 stack=0 before 6: (bd) if r6 <= r9 goto pc+2
regs=240 stack=0 before 5: (05) goto pc+0
regs=240 stack=0 before 4: (97) r6 %= 1025
regs=240 stack=0 before 3: (b7) r9 = -2147483648
regs=40 stack=0 before 2: (b7) r8 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 1: (b7) r7 = 0
regs=40 stack=0 before 0: (b7) r6 = 1024
math between map_value pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed
verification time 886 usec
stack depth 4
processed 49 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 1 total_states 5 peak_states 5 mark_read 2
Fixes: b5dc0163d8 ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking")
Reported-by: Juan Jose Lopez Jaimez <jjlopezjaimez@google.com>
Reported-by: Meador Inge <meadori@google.com>
Reported-by: Simon Scannell <simonscannell@google.com>
Reported-by: Nenad Stojanovski <thenenadx@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Co-developed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Jose Lopez Jaimez <jjlopezjaimez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Meador Inge <meadori@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Scannell <simonscannell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit d3178e8a43 upstream.
The verifier skips invalid kfunc call in check_kfunc_call(), which
would be captured in fixup_kfunc_call() if such insn is not eliminated
by dead code elimination. However, this can lead to the following
warning in backtrack_insn(), also see [1]:
------------[ cut here ]------------
verifier backtracking bug
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 8646 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756 backtrack_insn
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756
__mark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3065
mark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3165
adjust_reg_min_max_vals kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10715
check_alu_op kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10928
do_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:13821 [inline]
do_check_common kernel/bpf/verifier.c:16289
[...]
So make backtracking conservative with this by returning ENOTSUPP.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsaXNceR8ZjkLG=dT3P=4A8SBsg0Z5h5PWLryF5=ghKq=g@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+4da3ff23081bafe74fc2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230104014709.9375-1-sunhao.th@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 71f656a501 ]
Register range information is copied in several places. The intent is
to transfer range/id information from one register/stack spill to
another. Currently this is done using direct register assignment, e.g.:
static void find_equal_scalars(..., struct bpf_reg_state *known_reg)
{
...
struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
...
*reg = *known_reg;
...
}
However, such assignments also copy the following bpf_reg_state fields:
struct bpf_reg_state {
...
struct bpf_reg_state *parent;
...
enum bpf_reg_liveness live;
...
};
Copying of these fields is accidental and incorrect, as could be
demonstrated by the following example:
0: call ktime_get_ns()
1: r6 = r0
2: call ktime_get_ns()
3: r7 = r0
4: if r0 > r6 goto +1 ; r0 & r6 are unbound thus generated
; branch states are identical
5: *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = 0xdeadbeef ; 64-bit write to fp[-8]
--- checkpoint ---
6: r1 = 42 ; r1 marked as written
7: *(u8 *)(r10 - 8) = r1 ; 8-bit write, fp[-8] parent & live
; overwritten
8: r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8)
9: r0 = 0
10: exit
This example is unsafe because 64-bit write to fp[-8] at (5) is
conditional, thus not all bytes of fp[-8] are guaranteed to be set
when it is read at (8). However, currently the example passes
verification.
First, the execution path 1-10 is examined by verifier.
Suppose that a new checkpoint is created by is_state_visited() at (6).
After checkpoint creation:
- r1.parent points to checkpoint.r1,
- fp[-8].parent points to checkpoint.fp[-8].
At (6) the r1.live is set to REG_LIVE_WRITTEN.
At (7) the fp[-8].parent is set to r1.parent and fp[-8].live is set to
REG_LIVE_WRITTEN, because of the following code called in
check_stack_write_fixed_off():
static void save_register_state(struct bpf_func_state *state,
int spi, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
int size)
{
...
state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = *reg; // <--- parent & live copied
if (size == BPF_REG_SIZE)
state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
...
}
Note the intent to mark stack spill as written only if 8 bytes are
spilled to a slot, however this intent is spoiled by a 'live' field copy.
At (8) the checkpoint.fp[-8] should be marked as REG_LIVE_READ but
this does not happen:
- fp[-8] in a current state is already marked as REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
- fp[-8].parent points to checkpoint.r1, parentage chain is used by
mark_reg_read() to mark checkpoint states.
At (10) the verification is finished for path 1-10 and jump 4-6 is
examined. The checkpoint.fp[-8] never gets REG_LIVE_READ mark and this
spill is pruned from the cached states by clean_live_states(). Hence
verifier state obtained via path 1-4,6 is deemed identical to one
obtained via path 1-6 and program marked as safe.
Note: the example should be executed with BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag
set to force creation of intermediate verifier states.
This commit revisits the locations where bpf_reg_state instances are
copied and replaces the direct copies with a call to a function
copy_register_state(dst, src) that preserves 'parent' and 'live'
fields of the 'dst'.
Fixes: 679c782de1 ("bpf/verifier: per-register parent pointers")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230106142214.1040390-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e4f4db4779 ]
To mitigate Spectre v4, 2039f26f3a ("bpf: Fix leakage due to
insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation") inserts lfence
instructions after 1) initializing a stack slot and 2) spilling a
pointer to the stack.
However, this does not cover cases where a stack slot is first
initialized with a pointer (subject to sanitization) but then
overwritten with a scalar (not subject to sanitization because
the slot was already initialized). In this case, the second write
may be subject to speculative store bypass (SSB) creating a
speculative pointer-as-scalar type confusion. This allows the
program to subsequently leak the numerical pointer value using,
for example, a branch-based cache side channel.
To fix this, also sanitize scalars if they write a stack slot
that previously contained a pointer. Assuming that pointer-spills
are only generated by LLVM on register-pressure, the performance
impact on most real-world BPF programs should be small.
The following unprivileged BPF bytecode drafts a minimal exploit
and the mitigation:
[...]
// r6 = 0 or 1 (skalar, unknown user input)
// r7 = accessible ptr for side channel
// r10 = frame pointer (fp), to be leaked
//
r9 = r10 # fp alias to encourage ssb
*(u64 *)(r9 - 8) = r10 // fp[-8] = ptr, to be leaked
// lfence added here because of pointer spill to stack.
//
// Ommitted: Dummy bpf_ringbuf_output() here to train alias predictor
// for no r9-r10 dependency.
//
*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r6 // fp[-8] = scalar, overwrites ptr
// 2039f26f3a: no lfence added because stack slot was not STACK_INVALID,
// store may be subject to SSB
//
// fix: also add an lfence when the slot contained a ptr
//
r8 = *(u64 *)(r9 - 8)
// r8 = architecturally a scalar, speculatively a ptr
//
// leak ptr using branch-based cache side channel:
r8 &= 1 // choose bit to leak
if r8 == 0 goto SLOW // no mispredict
// architecturally dead code if input r6 is 0,
// only executes speculatively iff ptr bit is 1
r8 = *(u64 *)(r7 + 0) # encode bit in cache (0: slow, 1: fast)
SLOW:
[...]
After running this, the program can time the access to *(r7 + 0) to
determine whether the chosen pointer bit was 0 or 1. Repeat this 64
times to recover the whole address on amd64.
In summary, sanitization can only be skipped if one scalar is
overwritten with another scalar. Scalar-confusion due to speculative
store bypass can not lead to invalid accesses because the pointer
bounds deducted during verification are enforced using branchless
logic. See 979d63d50c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on
pointer arithmetic") for details.
Do not make the mitigation depend on !env->allow_{uninit_stack,ptr_leaks}
because speculative leaks are likely unexpected if these were enabled.
For example, leaking the address to a protected log file may be acceptable
while disabling the mitigation might unintentionally leak the address
into the cached-state of a map that is accessible to unprivileged
processes.
Fixes: 2039f26f3a ("bpf: Fix leakage due to insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <gerhorst@cs.fau.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Henriette Hofmeier <henriette.hofmeier@rub.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/edc95bad-aada-9cfc-ffe2-fa9bb206583c@cs.fau.de
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230109150544.41465-1-gerhorst@cs.fau.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit ceb35b666d ]
Most allocation sites in the kernel want an explicitly sized allocation
(and not "more"), and that dynamic runtime analysis tools (e.g. KASAN,
UBSAN_BOUNDS, FORTIFY_SOURCE, etc) are looking for precise bounds checking
(i.e. not something that is rounded up). A tiny handful of allocations
were doing an implicit alloc/realloc loop that actually depended on
ksize(), and didn't actually always call realloc. This has created a
long series of bugs and problems over many years related to the runtime
bounds checking, so these callers are finally being adjusted to _not_
depend on the ksize() side-effect, by doing one of several things:
- tracking the allocation size precisely and just never calling ksize()
at all [1].
- always calling realloc and not using ksize() at all. (This solution
ends up actually be a subset of the next solution.)
- using kmalloc_size_roundup() to explicitly round up the desired
allocation size immediately [2].
The bpf/verifier case is this another of this latter case, and is the
last outstanding case to be fixed in the kernel.
Because some of the dynamic bounds checking depends on the size being an
_argument_ to an allocator function (i.e. see the __alloc_size attribute),
the ksize() users are rare, and it could waste local variables, it
was been deemed better to explicitly separate the rounding up from the
allocation itself [3].
Round up allocations with kmalloc_size_roundup() so that the verifier's
use of ksize() is always accurate.
[1] e.g.:
https://git.kernel.org/linus/712f210a457dhttps://git.kernel.org/linus/72c08d9f4c72
[2] e.g.:
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/12d6c1d3a2adhttps://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ab3f7828c979https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d6dd508080a3
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0ea1fc165a6c6117f982f4f135093e69cb884930.camel@redhat.com/
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221118183409.give.387-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d35af0a7fe ]
In BPF all global functions, and BPF helpers return a 64-bit
value. For kfunc calls, this is not the case, and they can return
e.g. 32-bit values.
The return register R0 for kfuncs calls can therefore be marked as
subreg_def != DEF_NOT_SUBREG. In general, if a register is marked with
subreg_def != DEF_NOT_SUBREG, some archs (where bpf_jit_needs_zext()
returns true) require the verifier to insert explicit zero-extension
instructions.
For kfuncs calls, however, the caller should do sign/zero extension
for return values. In other words, the compiler is responsible to
insert proper instructions, not the verifier.
An example, provided by Yonghong Song:
$ cat t.c
extern unsigned foo(void);
unsigned bar1(void) {
return foo();
}
unsigned bar2(void) {
if (foo()) return 10; else return 20;
}
$ clang -target bpf -mcpu=v3 -O2 -c t.c && llvm-objdump -d t.o
t.o: file format elf64-bpf
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000000000 <bar1>:
0: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -0x1
1: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
0000000000000010 <bar2>:
2: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -0x1
3: bc 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 w1 = w0
4: b4 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 w0 = 0x14
5: 16 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 if w1 == 0x0 goto +0x1 <LBB1_2>
6: b4 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 w0 = 0xa
0000000000000038 <LBB1_2>:
7: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
If the return value of 'foo()' is used in the BPF program, the proper
zero-extension will be done.
Currently, the verifier correctly marks, say, a 32-bit return value as
subreg_def != DEF_NOT_SUBREG, but will fail performing the actual
zero-extension, due to a verifier bug in
opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(). load_reg is not properly set to R0,
and the following path will be taken:
if (WARN_ON(load_reg == -1)) {
verbose(env, "verifier bug. zext_dst is set, but no reg is defined\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
A longer discussion from v1 can be found in the link below.
Correct the verifier by avoiding doing explicit zero-extension of R0
for kfunc calls. Note that R0 will still be marked as a sub-register
for return values smaller than 64-bit.
Fixes: 83a2881903 ("bpf: Account for BPF_FETCH in insn_has_def32()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221202103620.1915679-1-bjorn@kernel.org/
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207103540.396496-1-bjorn@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 529409ea92 ]
When equivalent completed state is found and it has additional precision
restrictions, BPF verifier propagates precision to
currently-being-verified state chain (i.e., including parent states) so
that if some of the states in the chain are not yet completed, necessary
precision restrictions are enforced.
Unfortunately, right now this happens only for the last frame (deepest
active subprogram's frame), not all the frames. This can lead to
incorrect matching of states due to missing precision marker. Currently
this doesn't seem possible as BPF verifier forces everything to precise
when validated BPF program has any subprograms. But with the next patch
lifting this restriction, this becomes problematic.
In fact, without this fix, we'll start getting failure in one of the
existing test_verifier test cases:
#906/p precise: cross frame pruning FAIL
Unexpected success to load!
verification time 48 usec
stack depth 0+0
processed 26 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 3 total_states 17 peak_states 17 mark_read 8
This patch adds precision propagation across all frames.
Fixes: a3ce685dd0 ("bpf: fix precision tracking")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221104163649.121784-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a3b666bfa9 ]
When processing ALU/ALU64 operations (apart from BPF_MOV, which is
handled correctly already; and BPF_NEG and BPF_END are special and don't
have source register), if destination register is already marked
precise, this causes problem with potentially missing precision tracking
for the source register. E.g., when we have r1 >>= r5 and r1 is marked
precise, but r5 isn't, this will lead to r5 staying as imprecise. This
is due to the precision backtracking logic stopping early when it sees
r1 is already marked precise. If r1 wasn't precise, we'd keep
backtracking and would add r5 to the set of registers that need to be
marked precise. So there is a discrepancy here which can lead to invalid
and incompatible states matched due to lack of precision marking on r5.
If r1 wasn't precise, precision backtracking would correctly mark both
r1 and r5 as precise.
This is simple to fix, though. During the forward instruction simulation
pass, for arithmetic operations of `scalar <op>= scalar` form (where
<op> is ALU or ALU64 operations), if destination register is already
precise, mark source register as precise. This applies only when both
involved registers are SCALARs. `ptr += scalar` and `scalar += ptr`
cases are already handled correctly.
This does have (negative) effect on some selftest programs and few
Cilium programs. ~/baseline-tmp-results.csv are veristat results with
this patch, while ~/baseline-results.csv is without it. See post
scriptum for instructions on how to make Cilium programs testable with
veristat. Correctness has a price.
$ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,insns,states ~/baseline-results.csv ~/baseline-tmp-results.csv | grep -v '+0'
File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF)
----------------------- -------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- -------------------
bpf_cubic.bpf.linked1.o bpf_cubic_cong_avoid 997 1700 +703 (+70.51%) 62 90 +28 (+45.16%)
test_l4lb.bpf.linked1.o balancer_ingress 4559 5469 +910 (+19.96%) 118 126 +8 (+6.78%)
----------------------- -------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- -------------------
$ ./veristat -C -e file,prog,verdict,insns,states ~/baseline-results-cilium.csv ~/baseline-tmp-results-cilium.csv | grep -v '+0'
File Program Total insns (A) Total insns (B) Total insns (DIFF) Total states (A) Total states (B) Total states (DIFF)
------------- ------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- -------------------
bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 4448 5261 +813 (+18.28%) 234 247 +13 (+5.56%)
bpf_host.o tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress 3396 3446 +50 (+1.47%) 201 203 +2 (+1.00%)
bpf_lxc.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 4448 5261 +813 (+18.28%) 234 247 +13 (+5.56%)
bpf_overlay.o tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6 4448 5261 +813 (+18.28%) 234 247 +13 (+5.56%)
bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv4 71736 73442 +1706 (+2.38%) 4295 4370 +75 (+1.75%)
------------- ------------------------------ --------------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------------- -------------------
P.S. To make Cilium ([0]) programs libbpf-compatible and thus
veristat-loadable, apply changes from topmost commit in [1], which does
minimal changes to Cilium source code, mostly around SEC() annotations
and BPF map definitions.
[0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/
[1] https://github.com/anakryiko/cilium/commits/libbpf-friendliness
Fixes: b5dc0163d8 ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221104163649.121784-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f5e477a861 ]
For the case where allow_ptr_leaks is false, code is checking whether
slot type is STACK_INVALID and STACK_SPILL and rejecting other cases.
This is a consequence of incorrectly checking for register type instead
of the slot type (NOT_INIT and SCALAR_VALUE respectively). Fix the
check.
Fixes: 01f810ace9 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191013.1236066-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 261f4664ca ]
When support was added for spilled PTR_TO_BTF_ID to be accessed by
helper memory access, the stack slot was not overwritten to STACK_MISC
(and that too is only safe when env->allow_ptr_leaks is true).
This means that helpers who take ARG_PTR_TO_MEM and write to it may
essentially overwrite the value while the verifier continues to track
the slot for spilled register.
This can cause issues when PTR_TO_BTF_ID is spilled to stack, and then
overwritten by helper write access, which can then be passed to BPF
helpers or kfuncs.
Handle this by falling back to the case introduced in a later commit,
which will also handle PTR_TO_BTF_ID along with other pointer types,
i.e. cd17d38f8b ("bpf: Permits pointers on stack for helper calls").
Finally, include a comment on why REG_LIVE_WRITTEN is not being set when
clobber is set to true. In short, the reason is that while when clobber
is unset, we know that we won't be writing, when it is true, we *may*
write to any of the stack slots in that range. It may be a partial or
complete write, to just one or many stack slots.
We cannot be sure, hence to be conservative, we leave things as is and
never set REG_LIVE_WRITTEN for any stack slot. However, clobber still
needs to reset them to STACK_MISC assuming writes happened. However read
marks still need to be propagated upwards from liveness point of view,
as parent stack slot's contents may still continue to matter to child
states.
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com>
Fixes: 1d68f22b3d ("bpf: Handle spilled PTR_TO_BTF_ID properly when checking stack_boundary")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191013.1236066-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kmemleak reports this issue:
unreferenced object 0xffff88817139d000 (size 2048):
comm "test_progs", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (age 45851.820s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<0000000045f075f0>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0
[<0000000098b7c90a>] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230
[<00000000b4c3c403>] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700
[<00000000aa3875b7>] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0
[<000000001147357b>] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0
[<00000000b5a595b4>] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0
[<0000000011e391b1>] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940
[<0000000007f765c0>] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650
[<00000000839815d6>] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0
[<00000000946ee250>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[<0000000000506b7f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The root case here is: In function prepare_func_exit(), the callee is
not released in the abnormal scenario after "state->curframe--;". To
fix, move "state->curframe--;" to the very bottom of the function,
right when we free callee and reset frame[] pointer to NULL, as Andrii
suggested.
In addition, function __check_func_call() has a similar problem. In
the abnormal scenario before "state->curframe++;", the callee also
should be released by free_func_state().
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Fixes: fd978bf7fd ("bpf: Add reference tracking to verifier")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1667884291-15666-1-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Some helper functions will allocate memory. To avoid memory leaks, the
verifier requires the eBPF program to release these memories by calling
the corresponding helper functions.
When a resource is released, all pointer registers corresponding to the
resource should be invalidated. The verifier use release_references() to
do this job, by apply __mark_reg_unknown() to each relevant register.
It will give these registers the type of SCALAR_VALUE. A register that
will contain a pointer value at runtime, but of type SCALAR_VALUE, which
may allow the unprivileged user to get a kernel pointer by storing this
register into a map.
Using __mark_reg_not_init() while NOT allow_ptr_leaks can mitigate this
problem.
Fixes: fd978bf7fd ("bpf: Add reference tracking to verifier")
Signed-off-by: Youlin Li <liulin063@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221103093440.3161-1-liulin063@gmail.com
If an error (NULL) is returned by krealloc(), callers of realloc_array()
were setting their allocation pointers to NULL, but on error krealloc()
does not touch the original allocation. This would result in a memory
resource leak. Instead, free the old allocation on the error handling
path.
The memory leak information is as follows as also reported by Zhengchao:
unreferenced object 0xffff888019801800 (size 256):
comm "bpf_repo", pid 6490, jiffies 4294959200 (age 17.170s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<00000000b211474b>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x45/0xc0
[<0000000086712a0b>] krealloc+0x83/0xd0
[<00000000139aab02>] realloc_array+0x82/0xe2
[<00000000b1ca41d1>] grow_stack_state+0xfb/0x186
[<00000000cd6f36d2>] check_mem_access.cold+0x141/0x1341
[<0000000081780455>] do_check_common+0x5358/0xb350
[<0000000015f6b091>] bpf_check.cold+0xc3/0x29d
[<000000002973c690>] bpf_prog_load+0x13db/0x2240
[<00000000028d1644>] __sys_bpf+0x1605/0x4ce0
[<00000000053f29bd>] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xb0
[<0000000056fedaf5>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
[<000000002bd58261>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Fixes: c69431aab6 ("bpf: verifier: Improve function state reallocation")
Reported-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <oss@lmb.io>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221029025433.2533810-1-keescook@chromium.org
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf 2022-10-23
We've added 7 non-merge commits during the last 18 day(s) which contain
a total of 8 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Wait for busy refill_work when destroying bpf memory allocator, from Hou.
2) Allow bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() callbacks to return 1, from David.
3) Fix dispatcher patchable function entry to 5 bytes nop, from Jiri.
4) Prevent decl_tag from being referenced in func_proto, from Stanislav.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf:
bpf: Use __llist_del_all() whenever possbile during memory draining
bpf: Wait for busy refill_work when destroying bpf memory allocator
bpf: Fix dispatcher patchable function entry to 5 bytes nop
bpf: prevent decl_tag from being referenced in func_proto
selftests/bpf: Add reproducer for decl_tag in func_proto return type
selftests/bpf: Make bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() selftest callback return 1
bpf: Allow bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() callbacks to return 1
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221023192244.81137-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() helper function allows a BPF program to
specify a callback that is invoked when draining entries from a
BPF_MAP_TYPE_USER_RINGBUF ring buffer map. The API is meant to allow the
callback to return 0 if it wants to continue draining samples, and 1 if
it's done draining. Unfortunately, bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() landed shortly
after commit 1bfe26fb08 ("bpf: Add verifier support for custom
callback return range"), which changed the default behavior of callbacks
to only support returning 0.
This patch corrects that oversight by allowing bpf_user_ringbuf_drain()
callbacks to return 0 or 1. A follow-on patch will update the
user_ringbuf selftests to also return 1 from a bpf_user_ringbuf_drain()
callback to prevent this from regressing in the future.
Fixes: 2057156738 ("bpf: Add bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() helper")
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221012232015.1510043-2-void@manifault.com
The prandom_u32() function has been a deprecated inline wrapper around
get_random_u32() for several releases now, and compiles down to the
exact same code. Replace the deprecated wrapper with a direct call to
the real function. The same also applies to get_random_int(), which is
just a wrapper around get_random_u32(). This was done as a basic find
and replace.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> # for ext4
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> # for sch_cake
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> # for nfsd
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # for thunderbolt
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> # for xfs
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # for parisc
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> # for s390
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Allow dynamic pointers (struct bpf_dynptr_kern *) to be specified as
parameters in kfuncs. Also, ensure that dynamic pointers passed as argument
are valid and initialized, are a pointer to the stack, and of the type
local. More dynamic pointer types can be supported in the future.
To properly detect whether a parameter is of the desired type, introduce
the stringify_struct() macro to compare the returned structure name with
the desired name. In addition, protect against structure renames, by
halting the build with BUILD_BUG_ON(), so that developers have to revisit
the code.
To check if a dynamic pointer passed to the kfunc is valid and initialized,
and if its type is local, export the existing functions
is_dynptr_reg_valid_init() and is_dynptr_type_expected().
Cc: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920075951.929132-5-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Move dynptr type check to is_dynptr_type_expected() from
is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(), so that callers can better determine the cause
of a negative result (dynamic pointer not valid/initialized, dynamic
pointer of the wrong type). It will be useful for example for BTF, to
restrict which dynamic pointer types can be passed to kfuncs, as initially
only the local type will be supported.
Also, splitting makes the code more readable, since checking the dynamic
pointer type is not necessarily related to validity and initialization.
Split the validity/initialization and dynamic pointer type check also in
the verifier, and adjust the expected error message in the test (a test for
an unexpected dynptr type passed to a helper cannot be added due to missing
suitable helpers, but this case has been tested manually).
Cc: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920075951.929132-4-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In a prior change, we added a new BPF_MAP_TYPE_USER_RINGBUF map type which
will allow user-space applications to publish messages to a ring buffer
that is consumed by a BPF program in kernel-space. In order for this
map-type to be useful, it will require a BPF helper function that BPF
programs can invoke to drain samples from the ring buffer, and invoke
callbacks on those samples. This change adds that capability via a new BPF
helper function:
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(struct bpf_map *map, void *callback_fn, void *ctx,
u64 flags)
BPF programs may invoke this function to run callback_fn() on a series of
samples in the ring buffer. callback_fn() has the following signature:
long callback_fn(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context);
Samples are provided to the callback in the form of struct bpf_dynptr *'s,
which the program can read using BPF helper functions for querying
struct bpf_dynptr's.
In order to support bpf_ringbuf_drain(), a new PTR_TO_DYNPTR register
type is added to the verifier to reflect a dynptr that was allocated by
a helper function and passed to a BPF program. Unlike PTR_TO_STACK
dynptrs which are allocated on the stack by a BPF program, PTR_TO_DYNPTR
dynptrs need not use reference tracking, as the BPF helper is trusted to
properly free the dynptr before returning. The verifier currently only
supports PTR_TO_DYNPTR registers that are also DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL.
Note that while the corresponding user-space libbpf logic will be added
in a subsequent patch, this patch does contain an implementation of the
.map_poll() callback for BPF_MAP_TYPE_USER_RINGBUF maps. This
.map_poll() callback guarantees that an epoll-waiting user-space
producer will receive at least one event notification whenever at least
one sample is drained in an invocation of bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(),
provided that the function is not invoked with the BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP
flag. If the BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP flag is provided, a wakeup
notification is sent even if no sample was drained.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220920000100.477320-3-void@manifault.com
We want to support a ringbuf map type where samples are published from
user-space, to be consumed by BPF programs. BPF currently supports a
kernel -> user-space circular ring buffer via the BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF
map type. We'll need to define a new map type for user-space -> kernel,
as none of the helpers exported for BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF will apply
to a user-space producer ring buffer, and we'll want to add one or
more helper functions that would not apply for a kernel-producer
ring buffer.
This patch therefore adds a new BPF_MAP_TYPE_USER_RINGBUF map type
definition. The map type is useless in its current form, as there is no
way to access or use it for anything until we one or more BPF helpers. A
follow-on patch will therefore add a new helper function that allows BPF
programs to run callbacks on samples that are published to the ring
buffer.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220920000100.477320-2-void@manifault.com
BPF_PTR_POISON was added in commit c0a5a21c25 ("bpf: Allow storing
referenced kptr in map") to denote a bpf_func_proto btf_id which the
verifier will replace with a dynamically-determined btf_id at verification
time.
This patch adds verifier 'poison' functionality to BPF_PTR_POISON in
order to prepare for expanded use of the value to poison ret- and
arg-btf_id in ongoing work, namely rbtree and linked list patchsets
[0, 1]. Specifically, when the verifier checks helper calls, it assumes
that BPF_PTR_POISON'ed ret type will be replaced with a valid type before
- or in lieu of - the default ret_btf_id logic. Similarly for arg btf_id.
If poisoned btf_id reaches default handling block for either, consider
this a verifier internal error and fail verification. Otherwise a helper
w/ poisoned btf_id but no verifier logic replacing the type will cause a
crash as the invalid pointer is dereferenced.
Also move BPF_PTR_POISON to existing include/linux/posion.h header and
remove unnecessary shift.
[0]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220830172759.4069786-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
[1]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220904204145.3089-1-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220912154544.1398199-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Verifier logic to confirm that a callback function returns 0 or 1 was
added in commit 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper").
At the time, callback return value was only used to continue or stop
iteration.
In order to support callbacks with a broader return value range, such as
those added in rbtree series[0] and others, add a callback_ret_range to
bpf_func_state. Verifier's helpers which set in_callback_fn will also
set the new field, which the verifier will later use to check return
value bounds.
Default to tnum_range(0, 0) instead of using tnum_unknown as a sentinel
value as the latter would prevent the valid range (0, U64_MAX) being
used. Previous global default tnum_range(0, 1) is explicitly set for
extant callback helpers. The change to global default was made after
discussion around this patch in rbtree series [1], goal here is to make
it more obvious that callback_ret_range should be explicitly set.
[0]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220830172759.4069786-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/
[1]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220830172759.4069786-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com/
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220908230716.2751723-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Since commit 27ae7997a6 ("bpf: Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS")
there has existed bpf_verifier_ops:btf_struct_access. When
btf_struct_access is _unset_ for a prog type, the verifier runs the
default implementation, which is to enforce read only:
if (env->ops->btf_struct_access) {
[...]
} else {
if (atype != BPF_READ) {
verbose(env, "only read is supported\n");
return -EACCES;
}
[...]
}
When btf_struct_access is _set_, the expectation is that
btf_struct_access has full control over accesses, including if writes
are allowed.
Rather than carve out an exception for each prog type that may write to
BTF ptrs, delete the redundant check and give full control to
btf_struct_access.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/962da2bff1238746589e332ff1aecc49403cd7ce.1662568410.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
For a lot of use cases in future patches, we will want to modify the
state of registers part of some same 'group' (e.g. same ref_obj_id). It
won't just be limited to releasing reference state, but setting a type
flag dynamically based on certain actions, etc.
Hence, we need a way to easily pass a callback to the function that
iterates over all registers in current bpf_verifier_state in all frames
upto (and including) the curframe.
While in C++ we would be able to easily use a lambda to pass state and
the callback together, sadly we aren't using C++ in the kernel. The next
best thing to avoid defining a function for each case seems like
statement expressions in GNU C. The kernel already uses them heavily,
hence they can passed to the macro in the style of a lambda. The
statement expression will then be substituted in the for loop bodies.
Variables __state and __reg are set to current bpf_func_state and reg
for each invocation of the expression inside the passed in verifier
state.
Then, convert mark_ptr_or_null_regs, clear_all_pkt_pointers,
release_reference, find_good_pkt_pointers, find_equal_scalars to
use bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220904204145.3089-16-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
For drivers (outside of network), the incoming data is not statically
defined in a struct. Most of the time the data buffer is kzalloc-ed
and thus we can not rely on eBPF and BTF to explore the data.
This commit allows to return an arbitrary memory, previously allocated by
the driver.
An interesting extra point is that the kfunc can mark the exported
memory region as read only or read/write.
So, when a kfunc is not returning a pointer to a struct but to a plain
type, we can consider it is a valid allocated memory assuming that:
- one of the arguments is either called rdonly_buf_size or
rdwr_buf_size
- and this argument is a const from the caller point of view
We can then use this parameter as the size of the allocated memory.
The memory is either read-only or read-write based on the name
of the size parameter.
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220906151303.2780789-7-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When a function was trying to access data from context in a syscall eBPF
program, the verifier was rejecting the call unless it was accessing the
first element.
This is because the syscall context is not known at compile time, and
so we need to check this when actually accessing it.
Check for the valid memory access if there is no convert_ctx callback,
and allow such situation to happen.
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220906151303.2780789-4-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
btf_check_subprog_arg_match() was used twice in verifier.c:
- when checking for the type mismatches between a (sub)prog declaration
and BTF
- when checking the call of a subprog to see if the provided arguments
are correct and valid
This is problematic when we check if the first argument of a program
(pointer to ctx) is correctly accessed:
To be able to ensure we access a valid memory in the ctx, the verifier
assumes the pointer to context is not null.
This has the side effect of marking the program accessing the entire
context, even if the context is never dereferenced.
For example, by checking the context access with the current code, the
following eBPF program would fail with -EINVAL if the ctx is set to null
from the userspace:
```
SEC("syscall")
int prog(struct my_ctx *args) {
return 0;
}
```
In that particular case, we do not want to actually check that the memory
is correct while checking for the BTF validity, but we just want to
ensure that the (sub)prog definition matches the BTF we have.
So split btf_check_subprog_arg_match() in two so we can actually check
for the memory used when in a call, and ignore that part when not.
Note that a further patch is in preparation to disentangled
btf_check_func_arg_match() from these two purposes, and so right now we
just add a new hack around that by adding a boolean to this function.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220906151303.2780789-3-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2022-09-05
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 106 non-merge commits during the last 18 day(s) which contain
a total of 159 files changed, 5225 insertions(+), 1358 deletions(-).
There are two small merge conflicts, resolve them as follows:
1) tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
Commit 27e23836ce ("selftests/bpf: Add lru_bug to s390x deny list") in
bpf tree was needed to get BPF CI green on s390x, but it conflicted with
newly added tests on bpf-next. Resolve by adding both hunks, result:
[...]
lru_bug # prog 'printk': failed to auto-attach: -524
setget_sockopt # attach unexpected error: -524 (trampoline)
cb_refs # expected error message unexpected error: -524 (trampoline)
cgroup_hierarchical_stats # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
htab_update # failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 (trampoline)
[...]
2) net/core/filter.c
Commit 1227c1771d ("net: Fix data-races around sysctl_[rw]mem_(max|default).")
from net tree conflicts with commit 29003875bd ("bpf: Change bpf_setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET)
to reuse sk_setsockopt()") from bpf-next tree. Take the code as it is from
bpf-next tree, result:
[...]
if (getopt) {
if (optname == SO_BINDTODEVICE)
return -EINVAL;
return sk_getsockopt(sk, SOL_SOCKET, optname,
KERNEL_SOCKPTR(optval),
KERNEL_SOCKPTR(optlen));
}
return sk_setsockopt(sk, SOL_SOCKET, optname,
KERNEL_SOCKPTR(optval), *optlen);
[...]
The main changes are:
1) Add any-context BPF specific memory allocator which is useful in particular for BPF
tracing with bonus of performance equal to full prealloc, from Alexei Starovoitov.
2) Big batch to remove duplicated code from bpf_{get,set}sockopt() helpers as an effort
to reuse the existing core socket code as much as possible, from Martin KaFai Lau.
3) Extend BPF flow dissector for BPF programs to just augment the in-kernel dissector
with custom logic. In other words, allow for partial replacement, from Shmulik Ladkani.
4) Add a new cgroup iterator to BPF with different traversal options, from Hao Luo.
5) Support for BPF to collect hierarchical cgroup statistics efficiently through BPF
integration with the rstat framework, from Yosry Ahmed.
6) Support bpf_{g,s}et_retval() under more BPF cgroup hooks, from Stanislav Fomichev.
7) BPF hash table and local storages fixes under fully preemptible kernel, from Hou Tao.
8) Add various improvements to BPF selftests and libbpf for compilation with gcc BPF
backend, from James Hilliard.
9) Fix verifier helper permissions and reference state management for synchronous
callbacks, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.
10) Add support for BPF selftest's xskxceiver to also be used against real devices that
support MAC loopback, from Maciej Fijalkowski.
11) Various fixes to the bpf-helpers(7) man page generation script, from Quentin Monnet.
12) Document BPF verifier's tnum_in(tnum_range(), ...) gotchas, from Shung-Hsi Yu.
13) Various minor misc improvements all over the place.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (106 commits)
bpf: Optimize rcu_barrier usage between hash map and bpf_mem_alloc.
bpf: Remove usage of kmem_cache from bpf_mem_cache.
bpf: Remove prealloc-only restriction for sleepable bpf programs.
bpf: Prepare bpf_mem_alloc to be used by sleepable bpf programs.
bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types
bpf: Convert percpu hash map to per-cpu bpf_mem_alloc.
bpf: Add percpu allocation support to bpf_mem_alloc.
bpf: Batch call_rcu callbacks instead of SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU.
bpf: Adjust low/high watermarks in bpf_mem_cache
bpf: Optimize call_rcu in non-preallocated hash map.
bpf: Optimize element count in non-preallocated hash map.
bpf: Relax the requirement to use preallocated hash maps in tracing progs.
samples/bpf: Reduce syscall overhead in map_perf_test.
selftests/bpf: Improve test coverage of test_maps
bpf: Convert hash map to bpf_mem_alloc.
bpf: Introduce any context BPF specific memory allocator.
selftest/bpf: Add test for bpf_getsockopt()
bpf: Change bpf_getsockopt(SOL_IPV6) to reuse do_ipv6_getsockopt()
bpf: Change bpf_getsockopt(SOL_IP) to reuse do_ip_getsockopt()
bpf: Change bpf_getsockopt(SOL_TCP) to reuse do_tcp_getsockopt()
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905161136.9150-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Since bpf hash map was converted to use bpf_mem_alloc it is safe to use
from tracing programs and in RT kernels.
But per-cpu hash map is still using dynamic allocation for per-cpu map
values, hence keep the warning for this map type.
In the future alloc_percpu_gfp can be front-end-ed with bpf_mem_cache
and this restriction will be completely lifted.
perf_event (NMI) bpf programs have to use preallocated hash maps,
because free_htab_elem() is using call_rcu which might crash if re-entered.
Sleepable bpf programs have to use preallocated hash maps, because
life time of the map elements is not protected by rcu_read_lock/unlock.
This restriction can be lifted in the future as well.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220902211058.60789-6-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Hsin-Wei reported a KASAN splat triggered by their BPF runtime fuzzer which
is based on a customized syzkaller:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004e90b58 by task syz-executor.0/1489
CPU: 1 PID: 1489 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xc9
print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x1f0
? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0
kasan_report.cold+0xeb/0x197
? kvmalloc_node+0x170/0x200
? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0
bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0
? arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher+0xd0/0xd0
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x70
bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x3e8/0x640
? bpf_obj_name_cpy+0x149/0x1b0
bpf_prog_load+0x102f/0x2220
? __bpf_prog_put.constprop.0+0x220/0x220
? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110
? __might_fault+0xd6/0x180
? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0
? lock_is_held_type+0xa6/0x120
? __might_fault+0x147/0x180
__sys_bpf+0x137b/0x6070
? bpf_perf_link_attach+0x530/0x530
? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600
? __fget_files+0x255/0x450
? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0
? fput+0x30/0x1a0
? ksys_write+0x1a8/0x260
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7a/0xc0
? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x21/0x70
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f917c4e2c2d
The problem here is that a range of tnum_range(0, map->max_entries - 1) has
limited ability to represent the concrete tight range with the tnum as the
set of resulting states from value + mask can result in a superset of the
actual intended range, and as such a tnum_in(range, reg->var_off) check may
yield true when it shouldn't, for example tnum_range(0, 2) would result in
00XX -> v = 0000, m = 0011 such that the intended set of {0, 1, 2} is here
represented by a less precise superset of {0, 1, 2, 3}. As the register is
known const scalar, really just use the concrete reg->var_off.value for the
upper index check.
Fixes: d2e4c1e6c2 ("bpf: Constant map key tracking for prog array pokes")
Reported-by: Hsin-Wei Hung <hsinweih@uci.edu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/984b37f9fdf7ac36831d2137415a4a915744c1b6.1661462653.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Precision markers need to be propagated whenever we have an ARG_CONST_*
style argument, as the verifier cannot consider imprecise scalars to be
equivalent for the purposes of states_equal check when such arguments
refine the return value (in this case, set mem_size for PTR_TO_MEM). The
resultant mem_size for the R0 is derived from the constant value, and if
the verifier incorrectly prunes states considering them equivalent where
such arguments exist (by seeing that both registers have reg->precise as
false in regsafe), we can end up with invalid programs passing the
verifier which can do access beyond what should have been the correct
mem_size in that explored state.
To show a concrete example of the problem:
0000000000000000 <prog>:
0: r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 80)
1: r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 76)
2: r3 = r1
3: r3 += 4
4: if r3 > r2 goto +18 <LBB5_5>
5: w2 = 0
6: *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2
7: r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0)
8: r2 = 1
9: if w1 == 0 goto +1 <LBB5_3>
10: r2 = -1
0000000000000058 <LBB5_3>:
11: r1 = 0 ll
13: r3 = 0
14: call bpf_ringbuf_reserve
15: if r0 == 0 goto +7 <LBB5_5>
16: r1 = r0
17: r1 += 16777215
18: w2 = 0
19: *(u8 *)(r1 + 0) = r2
20: r1 = r0
21: r2 = 0
22: call bpf_ringbuf_submit
00000000000000b8 <LBB5_5>:
23: w0 = 0
24: exit
For the first case, the single line execution's exploration will prune
the search at insn 14 for the branch insn 9's second leg as it will be
verified first using r2 = -1 (UINT_MAX), while as w1 at insn 9 will
always be 0 so at runtime we don't get error for being greater than
UINT_MAX/4 from bpf_ringbuf_reserve. The verifier during regsafe just
sees reg->precise as false for both r2 registers in both states, hence
considers them equal for purposes of states_equal.
If we propagated precise markers using the backtracking support, we
would use the precise marking to then ensure that old r2 (UINT_MAX) was
within the new r2 (1) and this would never be true, so the verification
would rightfully fail.
The end result is that the out of bounds access at instruction 19 would
be permitted without this fix.
Note that reg->precise is always set to true when user does not have
CAP_BPF (or when subprog count is greater than 1 (i.e. use of any static
or global functions)), hence this is only a problem when precision marks
need to be explicitly propagated (i.e. privileged users with CAP_BPF).
A simplified test case has been included in the next patch to prevent
future regressions.
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220823185300.406-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently, verifier verifies callback functions (sync and async) as if
they will be executed once, (i.e. it explores execution state as if the
function was being called once). The next insn to explore is set to
start of subprog and the exit from nested frame is handled using
curframe > 0 and prepare_func_exit. In case of async callback it uses a
customized variant of push_stack simulating a kind of branch to set up
custom state and execution context for the async callback.
While this approach is simple and works when callback really will be
executed only once, it is unsafe for all of our current helpers which
are for_each style, i.e. they execute the callback multiple times.
A callback releasing acquired references of the caller may do so
multiple times, but currently verifier sees it as one call inside the
frame, which then returns to caller. Hence, it thinks it released some
reference that the cb e.g. got access through callback_ctx (register
filled inside cb from spilled typed register on stack).
Similarly, it may see that an acquire call is unpaired inside the
callback, so the caller will copy the reference state of callback and
then will have to release the register with new ref_obj_ids. But again,
the callback may execute multiple times, but the verifier will only
account for acquired references for a single symbolic execution of the
callback, which will cause leaks.
Note that for async callback case, things are different. While currently
we have bpf_timer_set_callback which only executes it once, even for
multiple executions it would be safe, as reference state is NULL and
check_reference_leak would force program to release state before
BPF_EXIT. The state is also unaffected by analysis for the caller frame.
Hence async callback is safe.
Since we want the reference state to be accessible, e.g. for pointers
loaded from stack through callback_ctx's PTR_TO_STACK, we still have to
copy caller's reference_state to callback's bpf_func_state, but we
enforce that whatever references it adds to that reference_state has
been released before it hits BPF_EXIT. This requires introducing a new
callback_ref member in the reference state to distinguish between caller
vs callee references. Hence, check_reference_leak now errors out if it
sees we are in callback_fn and we have not released callback_ref refs.
Since there can be multiple nested callbacks, like frame 0 -> cb1 -> cb2
etc. we need to also distinguish between whether this particular ref
belongs to this callback frame or parent, and only error for our own, so
we store state->frameno (which is always non-zero for callbacks).
In short, callbacks can read parent reference_state, but cannot mutate
it, to be able to use pointers acquired by the caller. They must only
undo their changes (by releasing their own acquired_refs before
BPF_EXIT) on top of caller reference_state before returning (at which
point the caller and callback state will match anyway, so no need to
copy it back to caller).
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220823013125.24938-1-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When a data slice is obtained from a dynptr (through the bpf_dynptr_data API),
the ref obj id of the dynptr must be found and then associated with the data
slice.
The ref obj id of the dynptr must be found *before* the caller saved regs are
reset. Without this fix, the ref obj id tracking is not correct for
dynptrs that are at an offset from the frame pointer.
Please also note that the data slice's ref obj id must be assigned after the
ret types are parsed, since RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM-type return regs get
zero-marked.
Fixes: 34d4ef5775 ("bpf: Add dynptr data slices")
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220809214055.4050604-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Discussion around a recently-submitted patch provided historical
context for check_refcount_ok [0]. Specifically, the function and its
helpers - may_be_acquire_function and arg_type_may_be_refcounted -
predate the OBJ_RELEASE type flag and the addition of many more helpers
with acquire/release semantics.
The purpose of check_refcount_ok is to ensure:
1) Helper doesn't have multiple uses of return reg's ref_obj_id
2) Helper with release semantics only has one arg needing to be
released, since that's tracked using meta->ref_obj_id
With current verifier, it's safe to remove check_refcount_ok and its
helpers. Since addition of OBJ_RELEASE type flag, case 2) has been
handled by the arg_type_is_release check in check_func_arg. To ensure
case 1) won't result in verifier silently prioritizing one use of
ref_obj_id, this patch adds a helper_multiple_ref_obj_use check which
fails loudly if a helper passes > 1 test for use of ref_obj_id.
[0]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220713234529.4154673-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220808171559.3251090-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch cleans up a few things in the verifier:
* type_is_pkt_pointer():
Future work (skb + xdp dynptrs [0]) will be using the reg type
PTR_TO_PACKET | PTR_MAYBE_NULL. type_is_pkt_pointer() should return
true for any type whose base type is PTR_TO_PACKET, regardless of
flags attached to it.
* reg_type_may_be_refcounted_or_null():
Get the base type at the start of the function to avoid
having to recompute it / improve readability
* check_func_proto(): remove unnecessary 'meta' arg
* check_helper_call():
Use switch casing on the base type of return value instead of
nested ifs on the full type
There are no functional behavior changes.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220726184706.954822-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220802214638.3643235-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Instead of populating multiple sets to indicate some attribute and then
researching the same BTF ID in them, prepare a single unified BTF set
which indicates whether a kfunc is allowed to be called, and also its
attributes if any at the same time. Now, only one call is needed to
perform the lookup for both kfunc availability and its attributes.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721134245.2450-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Syzkaller found a problem similar to d1a6edecc1 ("bpf: Check
attach_func_proto more carefully in check_return_code") where
attach_func_proto might be NULL:
RIP: 0010:check_helper_call+0x3dcb/0x8d50 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:7330
do_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:12302 [inline]
do_check_common+0x6e1e/0xb980 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:14610
do_check_main kernel/bpf/verifier.c:14673 [inline]
bpf_check+0x661e/0xc520 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:15243
bpf_prog_load+0x11ae/0x1f80 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2620
With the following reproducer:
bpf$BPF_PROG_RAW_TRACEPOINT_LOAD(0x5, &(0x7f0000000780)={0xf, 0x4, &(0x7f0000000040)=@framed={{}, [@call={0x85, 0x0, 0x0, 0xbb}]}, &(0x7f0000000000)='GPL\x00', 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, '\x00', 0x0, 0x2b, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x8, 0x0, 0x0, 0x10, 0x0}, 0x80)
Let's do the same here, only check attach_func_proto for the prog types
where we are certain that attach_func_proto is defined.
Fixes: 69fd337a97 ("bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor")
Reported-by: syzbot+0f8d989b1fba1addc5e0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220720164729.147544-1-sdf@google.com
The commit 7337224fc1 ("bpf: Improve the info.func_info and info.func_info_rec_size behavior")
accidently made bpf_prog_ksym_set_name() conservative for bpf subprograms.
Fixed it so instead of "bpf_prog_tag_F" the stack traces print "bpf_prog_tag_full_subprog_name".
Fixes: 7337224fc1 ("bpf: Improve the info.func_info and info.func_info_rec_size behavior")
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220714211637.17150-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
YafangandGreg Kroah-Hartman
Daniel BorkmannandGreg Kroah-Hartman
Luis GerhorstandGreg Kroah-Hartman
Andrii NakryikoandGreg Kroah-Hartman
Hao SunandGreg Kroah-Hartman
Eduard ZingermanandGreg Kroah-Hartman
Kees CookandGreg Kroah-Hartman
Björn TöpelandGreg Kroah-Hartman
Kumar Kartikeya DwivediandGreg Kroah-Hartman
Wang YufenandMartin KaFai Lau
Youlin LiandDaniel Borkmann
Jakub Kicinski
David VernetandAndrii Nakryiko
Jason A. Donenfeld
Roberto SassuandAlexei Starovoitov
Dave MarchevskyandAlexei Starovoitov
Daniel XuandAlexei Starovoitov
Benjamin TissoiresandAlexei Starovoitov
Paolo Abeni
Artem SavkovandAlexei Starovoitov
Joanne KoongandAlexei Starovoitov
Stanislav FomichevandDaniel Borkmann