[ Upstream commit d1378d1d7e ]
In cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(), policy->rwsem is used. But in
cpufreq_policy_alloc(), if freq_qos_add_notifier() returns an error, error
path via err_kobj_remove or err_min_qos_notifier will be reached and
cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() will be called before policy->rwsem is
initialized. Thus, the calling of init_rwsem() should be moved to where
before these two error paths can be reached.
Fixes: 67d874c3b2 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework")
Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250709104145.2348017-3-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1cefe495ca ]
In the passive mode, intel_cpufreq_update_pstate() sets HWP_MIN_PERF in
accordance with the target frequency to ensure delivering adequate
performance, but it sets HWP_DESIRED_PERF to 0, so the processor has no
indication that the desired performance level is actually equal to the
floor one. This may cause it to choose a performance point way above
the desired level.
Moreover, this is inconsistent with intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf() which
actually sets HWP_DESIRED_PERF in accordance with the target performance
value.
Address this by adjusting intel_cpufreq_update_pstate() to pass
target_pstate as both the minimum and the desired performance levels
to intel_cpufreq_hwp_update().
Fixes: a365ab6b9d ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shashank Balaji <shashank.mahadasyam@sony.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/6173276.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b1b41bc072 ]
An earlier patch marked one of the two CPU masks as 'static' to reduce stack
usage, but if CONFIG_NR_CPUS is large enough, the function still produces
a warning for compile testing:
drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c: In function 'armada_8k_cpufreq_init':
drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:203:1: error: the frame size of 1416 bytes is larger than 1408 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
Normally this should be done using alloc_cpumask_var(), but since the
driver already has a static mask and the probe function is not called
concurrently, use the same trick for both.
Fixes: 1ffec650d0 ("cpufreq: armada-8k: Avoid excessive stack usage")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6c9bb86922 ]
Currently, all SCMI devices with performance domains attempt to register
a cpufreq driver, even if their performance domains aren't used to
control the CPUs. The cpufreq framework only supports registering a
single driver, so only the first device will succeed. And if that device
isn't used for the CPUs, then cpufreq will scale the wrong domains.
To avoid this, return early from scmi_cpufreq_probe() if the probing
SCMI device isn't referenced by the CPU device phandles.
This keeps the existing assumption that all CPUs are controlled by a
single SCMI device.
Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit cb6a85f38f upstream.
commit 0834667545 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computation")
modified get_max_boost_ratio() to return the nominal_freq advertised
in the _CPC object. This was for the purposes of computing the maximum
frequency. The frequencies advertised in _CPC objects are in
MHz. However, cpufreq expects the frequency to be in KHz. Since the
nominal_freq returned by get_max_boost_ratio() was not in KHz but
instead in MHz,the cpuinfo_max_frequency that was computed using this
nominal_freq was incorrect and an invalid value which resulted in
cpufreq reporting the P0 frequency as the cpuinfo_max_freq.
Fix this by converting the nominal_freq to KHz before returning the
same from get_max_boost_ratio().
Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aDaB63tDvbdcV0cg@HQ-GR2X1W2P57/
Fixes: 0834667545 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computation")
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: 6.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.14+
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250529085143.709-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit db1cafc77a ]
set_boost is a per-policy function call, hence a driver wide lock is
unnecessary. Also this mutex_acquire can collide with the mutex_acquire
from the mode-switch path in status_store(), which can lead to a
deadlock. So, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fc5414a477 ]
SM8650 have already been supported by qcom-cpufreq-hw driver, but
never been added to cpufreq-dt-platdev. This makes noise
[ 0.388525] cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: failed register driver: -17
[ 0.388537] cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: probe with driver cpufreq-dt failed with error -17
So adding it to the cpufreq-dt-platdev driver's blocklist to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Pengyu Luo <mitltlatltl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 7491cdf46b upstream.
Since cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() can run in parallel with
cpufreq_set_policy() and there is no synchronization between them,
the former may access policy->min and policy->max while the latter
is updating them and it may see intermediate values of them due
to the way the update is carried out. Also the compiler is free
to apply any optimizations it wants both to the stores in
cpufreq_set_policy() and to the loads in cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq()
which may result in additional inconsistencies.
To address this, use WRITE_ONCE() when updating policy->min and
policy->max in cpufreq_set_policy() and use READ_ONCE() for reading
them in cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(). Moreover, rearrange the update
in cpufreq_set_policy() to avoid storing intermediate values in
policy->min and policy->max with the help of the observation that
their new values are expected to be properly ordered upfront.
Also modify cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() to take the possible reverse
ordering of policy->min and policy->max, which may happen depending on
the ordering of operations when this function and cpufreq_set_policy()
run concurrently, into account by always honoring the max when it
turns out to be less than the min (in case it comes from thermal
throttling or similar).
Fixes: 1517176906 ("cpufreq: Make policy min/max hard requirements")
Cc: 5.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5907080.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit ac4e04d9e3 upstream.
When turbo mode is unavailable on a Skylake-X system, executing the
command:
# echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/no_turbo
results in an unchecked MSR access error:
WRMSR to 0x199 (attempted to write 0x0000000100001300).
This issue was reproduced on an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer)
system and is not a common problem across all Skylake-X systems.
This error occurs because the MSR 0x199 Turbo Engage Bit (bit 32) is set
when turbo mode is disabled. The issue arises when intel_pstate fails to
detect that turbo mode is disabled. Here intel_pstate relies on
MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE bit 38 to determine the status of turbo mode.
However, on this system, bit 38 is not set even when turbo mode is
disabled.
According to the Intel Software Developer's Manual (SDM), the BIOS sets
this bit during platform initialization to enable or disable
opportunistic processor performance operations. Logically, this bit
should be set in such cases. However, the SDM also specifies that "OS
and applications must use CPUID leaf 06H to detect processors with
opportunistic processor performance operations enabled."
Therefore, in addition to checking MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE bit 38, verify
that CPUID.06H:EAX[1] is 0 to accurately determine if turbo mode is
disabled.
Fixes: 4521e1a0ce ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Reflect current no_turbo state correctly")
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit a374f28700 ]
Commit 3f66425a4f ("cpufreq: Enable COMPILE_TEST on Arm drivers")
enabled compile testing of most Arm CPUFreq drivers but left the
existing default values unchanged so that many drivers are enabled by
default whenever COMPILE_TEST is selected.
This specifically results in the S3C64XX CPUFreq driver being enabled
and initialised during boot of non-S3C64XX platforms with the following
error logged:
cpufreq: Unable to obtain ARMCLK: -2
Commit d4f610a9ba ("cpufreq: Do not enable by default during compile
testing") recently fixed most of the default values, but two entries
were missed and two could use a more specific default condition.
Fix the default values for drivers that can be compile tested and that
should be enabled by default when not compile testing.
Fixes: 3f66425a4f ("cpufreq: Enable COMPILE_TEST on Arm drivers")
Cc: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2b8e6b5888 ]
Returning a negative error code in a function with an unsigned
return type is a pretty bad idea. It is probably worse when the
justification for the change is "our static analisys tool found it".
Fixes: cf7de25878 ("cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereference")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 73b24dc731 ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present
in the policy->cpus mask. scpi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for
this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference.
Fixes: 343a8d17fa ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 484d3f15cc ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present
in the policy->cpus mask. scmi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for
this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference.
Add NULL check after cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() to prevent this issue.
Fixes: 99d6bdf338 ("cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9992649f67 ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present
in the policy->cpus mask. apple_soc_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check
for this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference.
Fixes: 6286bbb405 ("cpufreq: apple-soc: Add new driver to control Apple SoC CPU P-states")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 14c8a41815 ]
A KASAN enabled kernel reports an out-of-bounds access when handling the
nvmem cell in the sun50i cpufreq driver:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sun50i_cpufreq_nvmem_probe+0x180/0x3d4
Read of size 4 at addr ffff000006bf31e0 by task kworker/u16:1/38
This is because the DT specifies the nvmem cell as covering only two
bytes, but we use a u32 pointer to read the value. DTs for other SoCs
indeed specify 4 bytes, so we cannot just shorten the variable to a u16.
Fortunately nvmem_cell_read() allows to return the length of the nvmem
cell, in bytes, so we can use that information to only access the valid
portion of the data.
To cover multiple cell sizes, use memcpy() to copy the information into a
zeroed u32 buffer, then also make sure we always read the data in little
endian fashion, as this is how the data is stored in the SID efuses.
Fixes: 6cc4bcceff ("cpufreq: sun50i: Refactor speed bin decoding")
Reported-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4a1e3bf61f ]
Support was added for Tegra234 in the referenced commit, but the Kconfig
was not updated to allow building for the arch.
Fixes: 273bc890a2 ("cpufreq: tegra194: Add support for Tegra234")
Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3698dd6b13 ]
We observed an issue that the CPU frequency can't raise up with a 100% CPU
load when NOHZ is off and the 'conservative' governor is selected.
'idle_time' can be negative if it's obtained from get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy()
when NOHZ is off. This was found and explained in commit 9485e4ca0b
("cpufreq: governor: Fix handling of special cases in dbs_update()").
However, commit 7592019634 ("cpufreq: governors: Fix long idle detection
logic in load calculation") introduced a comparison between 'idle_time' and
'samling_rate' to detect a long idle interval. While 'idle_time' is
converted to int before comparison, it's actually promoted to unsigned
again when compared with an unsigned 'sampling_rate'. Hence, this leads to
wrong idle interval detection when it's in fact 100% busy and sets
policy_dbs->idle_periods to a very large value. 'conservative' adjusts the
frequency to minimum because of the large 'idle_periods', such that the
frequency can't raise up. 'Ondemand' doesn't use policy_dbs->idle_periods
so it fortunately avoids the issue.
Correct negative 'idle_time' to 0 before any use of it in dbs_update().
Fixes: 7592019634 ("cpufreq: governors: Fix long idle detection logic in load calculation")
Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250213035510.2402076-1-zhanjie9@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4742da9774 ]
The CPU rate from clk_get_rate() may not be divisible by 1000
(e.g., 133333333). But the rate calculated from frequency(kHz) is
always divisible by 1000 (e.g., 133333000).
Comparing the rate causes a warning during CPU scaling:
"cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -5".
When we choose to compare kHz here, the issue does not occur.
Fixes: 343a8d17fa ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency")
Signed-off-by: zuoqian <zuoqian113@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit f1f010c9d9 upstream.
This driver can be built as a module since commit 3b062a0869 ("cpufreq:
dt-platdev: Support building as module"), but unfortunately this caused
a regression because the cputfreq-dt-platdev.ko module does not autoload.
Usually, this is solved by just using the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() macro to
export all the device IDs as module aliases. But this driver is special
due how matches with devices and decides what platform supports.
There are two of_device_id lists, an allow list that are for CPU devices
that always match and a deny list that's for devices that must not match.
The driver registers a cpufreq-dt platform device for all the CPU device
nodes that either are in the allow list or contain an operating-points-v2
property and are not in the deny list.
Enforce builtin compile of cpufreq-dt-platdev to make autoload work.
Fixes: 3b062a0869 ("cpufreq: dt-platdev: Support building as module")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241104201424.2a42efdd@akair/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241119111918.1732531-1-javierm@redhat.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Reported-by: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
[ Viresh: Picked commit log from Javier, updated tags ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 0834667545 ]
Commit 3c55e94c0a ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover
boost frequencies") introduced an assumption in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init()
that the first entry in the P-state table was the nominal frequency.
This assumption is incorrect. The frequency corresponding to the P0
P-State need not be the same as the nominal frequency advertised via
CPPC.
Since the driver is using the CPPC.highest_perf and CPPC.nominal_perf
to compute the boost-ratio, it makes sense to use CPPC.nominal_freq to
compute the max-frequency. CPPC.nominal_freq is advertised on
platforms supporting CPPC revisions 3 or higher.
Hence, fallback to using the first entry in the P-State table only on
platforms that do not advertise CPPC.nominal_freq.
Fixes: 3c55e94c0a ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies")
Tested-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250113044107.566-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com
[ rjw: Retain reverse X-mas tree ordering of local variable declarations ]
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a9ba290d0b ]
determine_rate() callback is used by the clk_set_rate() API to get the
closest rate of the target rate supported by the clock. If this callback
is not implemented (nor round_rate() callback), then the API will assume
that the clock cannot set the requested rate. And since there is no parent,
it will return -EINVAL.
This is not an issue right now as clk_set_rate() mistakenly compares the
target rate with cached rate and bails out early. But once that is fixed
to compare the target rate with the actual rate of the clock (returned by
recalc_rate()), then clk_set_rate() for this clock will start to fail as
below:
cpu cpu0: _opp_config_clk_single: failed to set clock rate: -22
So implement the determine_rate() callback that just returns the actual
rate at which the clock is passed to the CPUs in a domain.
Fixes: 4370232c72 ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support")
Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 85d8b11351 ]
Currently, qcom_cpufreq_hw_recalc_rate() returns the LMh throttled
frequency for the domain even if LMh IRQ is not available. But as per
qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(), the driver has to query LUT entries to get the
actual frequency of the domain. So do the same in
qcom_cpufreq_hw_recalc_rate().
While doing so, refactor the existing qcom_cpufreq_hw_get() function so
that qcom_cpufreq_hw_recalc_rate() can make use of the existing code and
avoid code duplication. This also requires setting the
qcom_cpufreq_data::policy even if LMh IRQ is not available.
Fixes: 4370232c72 ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support")
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 172bf5ed04 upstream.
mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power() return 0 if the policy is NULL. Then in
em_create_perf_table(), the later zero check for power is not invalid
as power is uninitialized. As Lukasz suggested, it must return -EINVAL when
the 'policy' is not found. So return -EINVAL to fix it.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 4855e26bcf ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW")
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b51eb0874d ]
cppc_get_cpu_power() return 0 if the policy is NULL. Then in
em_create_perf_table(), the later zero check for power is not valid
as power is uninitialized. As Quentin pointed out, kernel energy model
core check the return value of active_power() first, so if the callback
failed it should tell the core. So return -EINVAL to fix it.
Fixes: a78e720756 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cpufreq_cpu_get_raw()")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit db01e46689 ]
Even if it's not critical, the avoidance of checking the error code
from devm_mutex_init() call today diminishes the point of using devm
variant of it. Tomorrow it may even leak something. Add the missed
check.
Fixes: ccf5145414 ("cpufreq: Add Loongson-3 CPUFreq driver support")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1a1374bb8c ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() may return NULL if the cpu is not in
policy->cpus cpu mask and it will cause null pointer dereference,
so check NULL for cppc_get_cpu_cost().
Fixes: 740fcdc2c2 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a78e720756 ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() may return NULL if the cpu is not in
policy->cpus cpu mask and it will cause null pointer dereference.
Fixes: 740fcdc2c2 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c471956319 ]
The CPPC performance feedback counters could be 0 or unchanged when the
target cpu is in a low-power idle state, e.g. power-gated or clock-gated.
When the counters are 0, cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() returns 0 KHz, which makes
cpufreq_online() get a false error and fail to generate a cpufreq policy.
When the counters are unchanged, the existing cppc_perf_from_fbctrs()
returns a cached desired perf, but some platforms may update the real
frequency back to the desired perf reg.
For the above cases in cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(), get the latest desired perf
from the CPPC reg to reflect the frequency because some platforms may
update the actual frequency back there; if failed, use the cached desired
perf.
Fixes: 6a4fec4f6d ("cpufreq: cppc: cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() returns zero in all error cases.")
Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0c411b39e4 ]
The amd-pstate driver sets CPPC_REQ.min_perf to CPPC_REQ.max_perf when
in active mode with performance governor. Typically CPPC_REQ.max_perf
is set to CPPC.highest_perf. This causes frequency throttling on
power-limited platforms which causes performance regressions on
certain classes of workloads.
Hence, set the CPPC_REQ.min_perf to the CPPC.nominal_perf or
CPPC_REQ.max_perf, whichever is lower of the two.
Fixes: ffa5096a7c ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: implement Pstate EPP support for the AMD processors")
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241021101836.9047-2-gautham.shenoy@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
