[ Upstream commit 0b07572447 ]
Building BPF selftests out of srctree fails with:
make: *** No rule to make target '/linux-build//ima_setup.sh', needed by 'ima_setup.sh'. Stop.
The culprit is the rule that defines convenient shorthands like
"make test_progs", which builds $(OUTPUT)/test_progs. These shorthands
make sense only for binaries that are built though; scripts that live
in the source tree do not end up in $(OUTPUT).
Therefore drop $(TEST_PROGS) and $(TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED) from the rule.
The issue exists for a while, but it became a problem only after commit
d68ae4982c ("selftests/bpf: Install all required files to run selftests"),
which added dependencies on these scripts.
Fixes: 03dcb78460 ("selftests/bpf: Add simple per-test targets to Makefile")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230208231211.283606-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 475244f5e0 ]
Add a test case to ensure that released pointer registers will not be
leaked into the map.
Before fix:
./test_verifier 984
984/u reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg FAIL
Unexpected success to load!
verification time 67 usec
stack depth 4
processed 23 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 2
peak_states 2 mark_read 1
984/p reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg OK
Summary: 1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
After fix:
./test_verifier 984
984/u reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg OK
984/p reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg OK
Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Youlin Li <liulin063@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221103093440.3161-2-liulin063@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 2d2202ba85 upstream.
cgroup_skb/egress programs which sock_fields test installs process packets
flying in both directions, from the client to the server, and in reverse
direction.
Recently added dst_port check relies on the fact that destination
port (remote peer port) of the socket which sends the packet is known ahead
of time. This holds true only for the client socket, which connects to the
known server port.
Filter out any traffic that is not egressing from the client socket in the
BPF program that tests reading the dst_port.
Fixes: 8f50f16ff3 ("selftests/bpf: Extend verifier and bpf_sock tests for dst_port loads")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220317113920.1068535-3-jakub@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 8f50f16ff3 upstream.
Add coverage to the verifier tests and tests for reading bpf_sock fields to
ensure that 32-bit, 16-bit, and 8-bit loads from dst_port field are allowed
only at intended offsets and produce expected values.
While 16-bit and 8-bit access to dst_port field is straight-forward, 32-bit
wide loads need be allowed and produce a zero-padded 16-bit value for
backward compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130115518.213259-3-jakub@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[OP: backport to 5.10: adjusted context in sock_fields.c]
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit b4f894633f upstream.
sk_lookup doesn't allow setting data_in for bpf_prog_run. This doesn't
play well with the verifier tests, since they always set a 64 byte
input buffer. Allow not running verifier tests by setting
bpf_test.runs to a negative value and don't run the ctx access case
for sk_lookup. We have dedicated ctx access tests so skipping here
doesn't reduce coverage.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-6-lmb@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit ec80906b0f ]
When test_lirc_mode2_user exec failed, the test report failed but still
exit with 0. Fix it by exiting with an error code.
Another issue is for the LIRCDEV checking. With bash -n, we need to quote
the variable, or it will always be true. So if test_lirc_mode2_user was
not run, just exit with skip code.
Fixes: 6bdd533cee ("bpf: add selftest for lirc_mode2 type program")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220321024149.157861-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a4c9fe0ed4 ]
The helper macro that records an error in BPF programs that exercise sock
fields access has been inadvertently broken by adaptation work that
happened in commit b18c1f0aa4 ("bpf: selftest: Adapt sock_fields test to
use skel and global variables").
BPF_NOEXIST flag cannot be used to update BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY. The operation
always fails with -EEXIST, which in turn means the error never gets
recorded, and the checks for errors always pass.
Revert the change in update flags.
Fixes: b18c1f0aa4 ("bpf: selftest: Adapt sock_fields test to use skel and global variables")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220317113920.1068535-2-jakub@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d23a872032 ]
In test_lwt_ip_encap, the ingress IPv6 encap test failed from time to
time. The failure occured when an IPv4 ping through the IPv6 GRE
encapsulation did not receive a reply within the timeout. The IPv4 ping
and the IPv6 ping in the test used different timeouts (1 sec for IPv4
and 6 sec for IPv6), probably taking into account that IPv6 might need
longer to successfully complete. However, when IPv4 pings (with the
short timeout) are encapsulated into the IPv6 tunnel, the delays of IPv6
apply.
The actual reason for the long delays with IPv6 was that the IPv6
neighbor discovery sometimes did not complete in time. This was caused
by the outgoing interface only having a tentative link local address,
i.e., not having completed DAD for that lladdr. The ND was successfully
retried after 1 sec but that was too late for the ping timeout.
The IPv6 addresses for the test were already added with nodad. However,
for the lladdrs, DAD was still performed. We now disable DAD in the test
netns completely and just assume that the two lladdrs on each veth pair
do not collide. This removes all the delays for IPv6 traffic in the
test.
Without the delays, we can now also reduce the delay of the IPv6 ping to
1 sec. This makes the whole test complete faster because we don't need
to wait for the excessive timeout for each IPv6 ping that is supposed
to fail.
Fixes: 0fde56e438 ("selftests: bpf: add test_lwt_ip_encap selftest")
Signed-off-by: Felix Maurer <fmaurer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/4987d549d48b4e316cd5b3936de69c8d4bc75a4f.1646305899.git.fmaurer@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c2fcbf81c3 ]
The libbpf CI reported occasional failure in btf_skc_cls_ingress:
test_syncookie:FAIL:Unexpected syncookie states gen_cookie:80326634 recv_cookie:0
bpf prog error at line 97
"error at line 97" means the bpf prog cannot find the listening socket
when the final ack is received. It then skipped processing
the syncookie in the final ack which then led to "recv_cookie:0".
The problem is the userspace program did not do accept() and went
ahead to close(listen_fd) before the kernel (and the bpf prog) had
a chance to process the final ack.
The fix is to add accept() call so that the userspace will wait for
the kernel to finish processing the final ack first before close()-ing
everything.
Fixes: 9a856cae22 ("bpf: selftest: Add test_btf_skc_cls_ingress")
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216191630.466151-1-kafai@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit b560b21f71 upstream.
This commit adds BPF verifier selftests that cover all corner cases by
packet boundary checks. Specifically, 8-byte packet reads are tested at
the beginning of data and at the beginning of data_meta, using all kinds
of boundary checks (all comparison operators: <, >, <=, >=; both
permutations of operands: data + length compared to end, end compared to
data + length). For each case there are three tests:
1. Length is just enough for an 8-byte read. Length is either 7 or 8,
depending on the comparison.
2. Length is increased by 1 - should still pass the verifier. These
cases are useful, because they failed before commit 2fa7d94afc
("bpf: Fix the off-by-two error in range markings").
3. Length is decreased by 1 - should be rejected by the verifier.
Some existing tests are just renamed to avoid duplication.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211207081521.41923-1-maximmi@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2fa7d94afc upstream.
The first commit cited below attempts to fix the off-by-one error that
appeared in some comparisons with an open range. Due to this error,
arithmetically equivalent pieces of code could get different verdicts
from the verifier, for example (pseudocode):
// 1. Passes the verifier:
if (data + 8 > data_end)
return early
read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]
// 2. Rejected by the verifier (should still pass):
if (data + 7 >= data_end)
return early
read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]
The attempted fix, however, shifts the range by one in a wrong
direction, so the bug not only remains, but also such piece of code
starts failing in the verifier:
// 3. Rejected by the verifier, but the check is stricter than in #1.
if (data + 8 >= data_end)
return early
read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]
The change performed by that fix converted an off-by-one bug into
off-by-two. The second commit cited below added the BPF selftests
written to ensure than code chunks like #3 are rejected, however,
they should be accepted.
This commit fixes the off-by-two error by adjusting new_range in the
right direction and fixes the tests by changing the range into the
one that should actually fail.
Fixes: fb2a311a31 ("bpf: fix off by one for range markings with L{T, E} patterns")
Fixes: b37242c773 ("bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all access tests")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130181607.593149-1-maximmi@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit a20eac0af0 upstream.
Previous fix aded bpf_clamp_umax() helper use to re-validate boundaries.
While that works correctly, it introduces more branches, which blows up
past 1 million instructions in no-alu32 variant of strobemeta selftests.
Switching len variable from u32 to u64 also fixes the issue and reduces
the number of validated instructions, so use that instead. Fix this
patch and bpf_clamp_umax() removed, both alu32 and no-alu32 selftests
pass.
Fixes: 0133c20480 ("selftests/bpf: Fix strobemeta selftest regression")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101230118.1273019-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b9979db834 ]
Before this fix:
166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22
from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
After this fix:
166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22
from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1))
While processing BPF_JLE the reg_set_min_max() would set true_reg->umax_value = 1
and call __reg_combine_64_into_32(true_reg).
Without the fix it would not pass the condition:
if (__reg64_bound_u32(reg->umin_value) && __reg64_bound_u32(reg->umax_value))
since umin_value == 0 at this point.
Before commit 10bf4e8316 the umin was incorrectly ingored.
The commit 10bf4e8316 fixed the correctness issue, but pessimized
propagation of 64-bit min max into 32-bit min max and corresponding var_off.
Fixes: 10bf4e8316 ("bpf: Fix propagation of 32 bit unsigned bounds from 64 bit bounds")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c3fc706e94 ]
Similar to the fix in commit:
e31eec77e4 ("bpf: selftests: Fix fd cleanup in get_branch_snapshot")
We use designated initializer to set fds to -1 without breaking on
future changes to MAX_SERVER constant denoting the array size.
The particular close(0) occurs on non-reuseport tests, so it can be seen
with -n 115/{2,3} but not 115/4. This can cause problems with future
tests if they depend on BTF fd never being acquired as fd 0, breaking
internal libbpf assumptions.
Fixes: 0ab5539f85 ("selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Commit 183d9ebd44 ("selftests/bpf: Fix core_reloc test runner") causes
builds of selftests/bpf to fail on 5.10.y since the branch doesn't have the
ASSERT_FALSE macro yet. Replace ASSERT_FALSE with ASSERT_EQ.
Fixes: 183d9ebd44 ("selftests/bpf: Fix core_reloc test runner")
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit d888eaac4f ]
When building bpf selftest with make -j, I'm randomly getting build failures
such as this one:
In file included from progs/bpf_flow.c:19:
[...]/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf_helpers.h:11:10: fatal error: 'bpf_helper_defs.h' file not found
#include "bpf_helper_defs.h"
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The file that fails the build varies between runs but it's always in the
progs/ subdir.
The reason is a missing make dependency on libbpf for the .o files in
progs/. There was a dependency before commit 3ac2e20fba but that commit
removed it to prevent unneeded rebuilds. However, that only works if libbpf
has been built already; the 'wildcard' prerequisite does not trigger when
there's no bpf_helper_defs.h generated yet.
Keep the libbpf as an order-only prerequisite to satisfy both goals. It is
always built before the progs/ objects but it does not trigger unnecessary
rebuilds by itself.
Fixes: 3ac2e20fba ("selftests/bpf: BPF object files should depend only on libbpf headers")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ee84ab66436fba05a197f952af23c98d90eb6243.1632758415.git.jbenc@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2d82d73da3 ]
0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host.
-------------------
# selftests: bpf: test_maps
# Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
# Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
# Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
# Failed sockmap unexpected timeout
not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1
# selftests: bpf: test_lru_map
# nr_cpus:8
-------------------
Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have
only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report.
In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps',
and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820015556.23276-2-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b16ac5bf73 ]
libbpf CI has reported send_signal test is flaky although
I am not able to reproduce it in my local environment.
But I am able to reproduce with on-demand libbpf CI ([1]).
Through code analysis, the following is possible reason.
The failed subtest runs bpf program in softirq environment.
Since bpf_send_signal() only sends to a fork of "test_progs"
process. If the underlying current task is
not "test_progs", bpf_send_signal() will not be triggered
and the subtest will fail.
To reduce the chances where the underlying process is not
the intended one, this patch boosted scheduling priority to
-20 (highest allowed by setpriority() call). And I did
10 runs with on-demand libbpf CI with this patch and I
didn't observe any failures.
[1] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/workflows/ondemand.yml
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210817190923.3186725-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d164dd9a5c ]
The "probed" part of test_core_autosize copies an integer using
bpf_core_read() into an integer of a potentially different size.
On big-endian machines a destination offset is required for this to
produce a sensible result.
Fixes: 888d83b961 ("selftests/bpf: Validate libbpf's auto-sizing of LD/ST/STX instructions")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210812224814.187460-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 973377ffe8 upstream
In almost all cases from test_verifier that have been changed in here, we've
had an unreachable path with a load from a register which has an invalid
address on purpose. This was basically to make sure that we never walk this
path and to have the verifier complain if it would otherwise. Change it to
match on the right error for unprivileged given we now test these paths
under speculative execution.
There's one case where we match on exact # of insns_processed. Due to the
extra path, this will of course mismatch on unprivileged. Thus, restrict the
test->insn_processed check to privileged-only.
In one other case, we result in a 'pointer comparison prohibited' error. This
is similarly due to verifying an 'invalid' branch where we end up with a value
pointer on one side of the comparison.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit d7a5091351 upstream
Update various selftest error messages:
* The 'Rx tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types'
is reworked into more specific/differentiated error messages for better
guidance.
* The change into 'value -4294967168 makes map_value pointer be out of
bounds' is due to moving the mixed bounds check into the speculation
handling and thus occuring slightly later than above mentioned sanity
check.
* The change into 'math between map_value pointer and register with
unbounded min value' is similarly due to register sanity check coming
before the mixed bounds check.
* The case of 'map access: known scalar += value_ptr from different maps'
now loads fine given masks are the same from the different paths (despite
max map value size being different).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 1bad6fd52b upstream
Given we don't need to simulate the speculative domain for registers with
immediates anymore since the verifier uses direct imm-based rewrites instead
of having to mask, we can also lift a few cases that were previously rejected.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit c25ce589dc upstream.
Change every shebang which does not need an argument to use /usr/bin/env.
This is needed as not every distro has everything under /usr/bin,
sometimes not even bash.
Signed-off-by: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.de>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 10bf4e8316 ]
Similarly as b02709587e ("bpf: Fix propagation of 32-bit signed bounds
from 64-bit bounds."), we also need to fix the propagation of 32 bit
unsigned bounds from 64 bit counterparts. That is, really only set the
u32_{min,max}_value when /both/ {umin,umax}_value safely fit in 32 bit
space. For example, the register with a umin_value == 1 does /not/ imply
that u32_min_value is also equal to 1, since umax_value could be much
larger than 32 bit subregister can hold, and thus u32_min_value is in
the interval [0,1] instead.
Before fix, invalid tracking result of R2_w=inv1:
[...]
5: R0_w=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0
5: (35) if r2 >= 0x1 goto pc+1
[...] // goto path
7: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,umin_value=1) R10=fp0
7: (b6) if w2 <= 0x1 goto pc+1
[...] // goto path
9: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,smin_value=-9223372036854775807,smax_value=9223372032559808513,umin_value=1,umax_value=18446744069414584321,var_off=(0x1; 0xffffffff00000000),s32_min_value=1,s32_max_value=1,u32_max_value=1) R10=fp0
9: (bc) w2 = w2
10: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv1 R10=fp0
[...]
After fix, correct tracking result of R2_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)):
[...]
5: R0_w=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0
5: (35) if r2 >= 0x1 goto pc+1
[...] // goto path
7: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,umin_value=1) R10=fp0
7: (b6) if w2 <= 0x1 goto pc+1
[...] // goto path
9: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372032559808513,umax_value=18446744069414584321,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000001),s32_min_value=0,s32_max_value=1,u32_max_value=1) R10=fp0
9: (bc) w2 = w2
10: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)) R10=fp0
[...]
Thus, same issue as in b02709587e holds for unsigned subregister tracking.
Also, align __reg64_bound_u32() similarly to __reg64_bound_s32() as done in
b02709587e to make them uniform again.
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: Manfred Paul (@_manfp)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit bede0ebf0b ]
Fix failed tests checks in core_reloc test runner, which allowed failing tests
to pass quietly. Also add extra check to make sure that expected to fail test cases with
invalid names are caught as test failure anyway, as this is not an expected
failure mode. Also fix mislabeled probed vs direct bitfield test cases.
Fixes: 124a892d1c ("selftests/bpf: Test TYPE_EXISTS and TYPE_SIZE CO-RE relocations")
Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5a30eb2392 ]
Negative field existence cases for have a broken assumption that FIELD_EXISTS
CO-RE relo will fail for fields that match the name but have incompatible type
signature. That's not how CO-RE relocations generally behave. Types and fields
that match by name but not by expected type are treated as non-matching
candidates and are skipped. Error later is reported if no matching candidate
was found. That's what happens for most relocations, but existence relocations
(FIELD_EXISTS and TYPE_EXISTS) are more permissive and they are designed to
return 0 or 1, depending if a match is found. This allows to handle
name-conflicting but incompatible types in BPF code easily. Combined with
___flavor suffixes, it's possible to handle pretty much any structural type
changes in kernel within the compiled once BPF source code.
So, long story short, negative field existence test cases are invalid in their
assumptions, so this patch reworks them into a single consolidated positive
case that doesn't match any of the fields.
Fixes: c7566a6969 ("selftests/bpf: Add field existence CO-RE relocs tests")
Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 31254dc956 ]
When fixing the bpf test_tunnel.sh geneve failure. I only fixed the IPv4
part but forgot the IPv6 issue. Similar with the IPv4 fixes 557c223b64
("selftests/bpf: No need to drop the packet when there is no geneve opt"),
when there is no tunnel option and bpf_skb_get_tunnel_opt() returns error,
there is no need to drop the packets and break all geneve rx traffic.
Just set opt_class to 0 and keep returning TC_ACT_OK at the end.
Fixes: 557c223b64 ("selftests/bpf: No need to drop the packet when there is no geneve opt")
Fixes: 933a741e3b ("selftests/bpf: bpf tunnel test.")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210309032214.2112438-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
