[ Upstream commit d1378d1d7e ]
In cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(), policy->rwsem is used. But in
cpufreq_policy_alloc(), if freq_qos_add_notifier() returns an error, error
path via err_kobj_remove or err_min_qos_notifier will be reached and
cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() will be called before policy->rwsem is
initialized. Thus, the calling of init_rwsem() should be moved to where
before these two error paths can be reached.
Fixes: 67d874c3b2 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework")
Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250709104145.2348017-3-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1cefe495ca ]
In the passive mode, intel_cpufreq_update_pstate() sets HWP_MIN_PERF in
accordance with the target frequency to ensure delivering adequate
performance, but it sets HWP_DESIRED_PERF to 0, so the processor has no
indication that the desired performance level is actually equal to the
floor one. This may cause it to choose a performance point way above
the desired level.
Moreover, this is inconsistent with intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf() which
actually sets HWP_DESIRED_PERF in accordance with the target performance
value.
Address this by adjusting intel_cpufreq_update_pstate() to pass
target_pstate as both the minimum and the desired performance levels
to intel_cpufreq_hwp_update().
Fixes: a365ab6b9d ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shashank Balaji <shashank.mahadasyam@sony.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/6173276.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6c9bb86922 ]
Currently, all SCMI devices with performance domains attempt to register
a cpufreq driver, even if their performance domains aren't used to
control the CPUs. The cpufreq framework only supports registering a
single driver, so only the first device will succeed. And if that device
isn't used for the CPUs, then cpufreq will scale the wrong domains.
To avoid this, return early from scmi_cpufreq_probe() if the probing
SCMI device isn't referenced by the CPU device phandles.
This keeps the existing assumption that all CPUs are controlled by a
single SCMI device.
Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit cb6a85f38f upstream.
commit 0834667545 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computation")
modified get_max_boost_ratio() to return the nominal_freq advertised
in the _CPC object. This was for the purposes of computing the maximum
frequency. The frequencies advertised in _CPC objects are in
MHz. However, cpufreq expects the frequency to be in KHz. Since the
nominal_freq returned by get_max_boost_ratio() was not in KHz but
instead in MHz,the cpuinfo_max_frequency that was computed using this
nominal_freq was incorrect and an invalid value which resulted in
cpufreq reporting the P0 frequency as the cpuinfo_max_freq.
Fix this by converting the nominal_freq to KHz before returning the
same from get_max_boost_ratio().
Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aDaB63tDvbdcV0cg@HQ-GR2X1W2P57/
Fixes: 0834667545 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computation")
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: 6.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.14+
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250529085143.709-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 7491cdf46b upstream.
Since cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() can run in parallel with
cpufreq_set_policy() and there is no synchronization between them,
the former may access policy->min and policy->max while the latter
is updating them and it may see intermediate values of them due
to the way the update is carried out. Also the compiler is free
to apply any optimizations it wants both to the stores in
cpufreq_set_policy() and to the loads in cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq()
which may result in additional inconsistencies.
To address this, use WRITE_ONCE() when updating policy->min and
policy->max in cpufreq_set_policy() and use READ_ONCE() for reading
them in cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(). Moreover, rearrange the update
in cpufreq_set_policy() to avoid storing intermediate values in
policy->min and policy->max with the help of the observation that
their new values are expected to be properly ordered upfront.
Also modify cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() to take the possible reverse
ordering of policy->min and policy->max, which may happen depending on
the ordering of operations when this function and cpufreq_set_policy()
run concurrently, into account by always honoring the max when it
turns out to be less than the min (in case it comes from thermal
throttling or similar).
Fixes: 1517176906 ("cpufreq: Make policy min/max hard requirements")
Cc: 5.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5907080.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 2b8e6b5888 ]
Returning a negative error code in a function with an unsigned
return type is a pretty bad idea. It is probably worse when the
justification for the change is "our static analisys tool found it".
Fixes: cf7de25878 ("cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereference")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 73b24dc731 ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present
in the policy->cpus mask. scpi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for
this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference.
Fixes: 343a8d17fa ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 484d3f15cc ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present
in the policy->cpus mask. scmi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for
this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference.
Add NULL check after cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() to prevent this issue.
Fixes: 99d6bdf338 ("cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3698dd6b13 ]
We observed an issue that the CPU frequency can't raise up with a 100% CPU
load when NOHZ is off and the 'conservative' governor is selected.
'idle_time' can be negative if it's obtained from get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy()
when NOHZ is off. This was found and explained in commit 9485e4ca0b
("cpufreq: governor: Fix handling of special cases in dbs_update()").
However, commit 7592019634 ("cpufreq: governors: Fix long idle detection
logic in load calculation") introduced a comparison between 'idle_time' and
'samling_rate' to detect a long idle interval. While 'idle_time' is
converted to int before comparison, it's actually promoted to unsigned
again when compared with an unsigned 'sampling_rate'. Hence, this leads to
wrong idle interval detection when it's in fact 100% busy and sets
policy_dbs->idle_periods to a very large value. 'conservative' adjusts the
frequency to minimum because of the large 'idle_periods', such that the
frequency can't raise up. 'Ondemand' doesn't use policy_dbs->idle_periods
so it fortunately avoids the issue.
Correct negative 'idle_time' to 0 before any use of it in dbs_update().
Fixes: 7592019634 ("cpufreq: governors: Fix long idle detection logic in load calculation")
Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250213035510.2402076-1-zhanjie9@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4742da9774 ]
The CPU rate from clk_get_rate() may not be divisible by 1000
(e.g., 133333333). But the rate calculated from frequency(kHz) is
always divisible by 1000 (e.g., 133333000).
Comparing the rate causes a warning during CPU scaling:
"cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -5".
When we choose to compare kHz here, the issue does not occur.
Fixes: 343a8d17fa ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency")
Signed-off-by: zuoqian <zuoqian113@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0834667545 ]
Commit 3c55e94c0a ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover
boost frequencies") introduced an assumption in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init()
that the first entry in the P-state table was the nominal frequency.
This assumption is incorrect. The frequency corresponding to the P0
P-State need not be the same as the nominal frequency advertised via
CPPC.
Since the driver is using the CPPC.highest_perf and CPPC.nominal_perf
to compute the boost-ratio, it makes sense to use CPPC.nominal_freq to
compute the max-frequency. CPPC.nominal_freq is advertised on
platforms supporting CPPC revisions 3 or higher.
Hence, fallback to using the first entry in the P-State table only on
platforms that do not advertise CPPC.nominal_freq.
Fixes: 3c55e94c0a ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies")
Tested-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250113044107.566-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com
[ rjw: Retain reverse X-mas tree ordering of local variable declarations ]
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 172bf5ed04 upstream.
mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power() return 0 if the policy is NULL. Then in
em_create_perf_table(), the later zero check for power is not invalid
as power is uninitialized. As Lukasz suggested, it must return -EINVAL when
the 'policy' is not found. So return -EINVAL to fix it.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 4855e26bcf ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW")
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b51eb0874d ]
cppc_get_cpu_power() return 0 if the policy is NULL. Then in
em_create_perf_table(), the later zero check for power is not valid
as power is uninitialized. As Quentin pointed out, kernel energy model
core check the return value of active_power() first, so if the callback
failed it should tell the core. So return -EINVAL to fix it.
Fixes: a78e720756 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cpufreq_cpu_get_raw()")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1a1374bb8c ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() may return NULL if the cpu is not in
policy->cpus cpu mask and it will cause null pointer dereference,
so check NULL for cppc_get_cpu_cost().
Fixes: 740fcdc2c2 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a78e720756 ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() may return NULL if the cpu is not in
policy->cpus cpu mask and it will cause null pointer dereference.
Fixes: 740fcdc2c2 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d182dc6de9 ]
of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask currently assumes a 1-argument
phandle format, and directly returns the argument. Generalize this to
return the full of_phandle_args, so it can be used by drivers which use
other phandle styles (e.g. separate nodes). This also requires changing
the CPU sharing match to compare the full args structure.
Also, make sure to of_node_put(args.np) (the original code was leaking a
reference).
Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Stable-dep-of: c0f02536ff ("cpufreq: Avoid a bad reference count on CPU node")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 50b813b147 ]
Move and rename cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz() and cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf() to
use them outside cppc_cpufreq in topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc().
Modify the interface to use struct cppc_perf_caps *caps instead of
struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data as we only use the fields of cppc_perf_caps.
cppc_cpufreq was converting the lowest and nominal freq from MHz to kHz
before using them. We move this conversion inside cppc_perf_to_khz and
cppc_khz_to_perf to make them generic and usable outside cppc_cpufreq.
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211104855.558096-6-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Stable-dep-of: d93df29bda ("cpufreq: CPPC: fix perf_to_khz/khz_to_perf conversion exception")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit abc00ffda4 ]
Commit b4bc9f9e27 ("cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: add support for omap34xx
and omap36xx") introduced special handling for OMAP3 class devices
where syscon node may not be present. However, this also creates a bug
where the syscon node is present, however the offset used to read
is beyond the syscon defined range.
Fix this by providing a quirk option that is populated when such
special handling is required. This allows proper failure for all other
platforms when the syscon node and efuse offsets are mismatched.
Fixes: b4bc9f9e27 ("cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: add support for omap34xx and omap36xx")
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Tested-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 074cffb502 ]
Conversion of target_freq to HZ in scmi_cpufreq_fast_switch()
can lead to overflow if the multiplied result is greater than
UINT_MAX, since type of target_freq is unsigned int. Avoid this
overflow by assigning target_freq to unsigned long variable for
converting it to HZ.
Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d01c84b97f ]
The code refactoring added new error paths between the np device node
allocation and the call to of_node_put(), which leads to memory leaks if
any of those errors occur.
Add the missing of_node_put() in the error paths that require it.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 57f2f8b4aa ("cpufreq: qcom: Refactor the driver to make it easier to extend")
Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2a5d46c3ad ]
Simplify the allocation and cleanup of driver data by using devm
together with a flexible array. Prepare for adding additional per-CPU
data by defining a struct qcom_cpufreq_drv_cpu instead of storing the
opp_tokens directly.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@kernkonzept.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Stable-dep-of: d01c84b97f ("cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: fix memory leaks in probe error paths")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 402732324b ]
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Stable-dep-of: d01c84b97f ("cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: fix memory leaks in probe error paths")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit a1ff59784b upstream.
It is reported that single-thread performance on some hybrid systems
dropped significantly after commit 7feec7430e ("ACPI: CPPC: Only probe
for _CPC if CPPC v2 is acked") which prevented _CPC from being used if
the support for it had not been confirmed by the platform firmware.
The problem is that if the platform firmware does not confirm CPPC v2
support, cppc_get_perf_caps() returns an error which prevents the
intel_pstate driver from enabling ITMT. Consequently, the scheduler
does not get any hints on CPU performance differences, so in a hybrid
system some tasks may run on CPUs with lower capacity even though they
should be running on high-capacity CPUs.
To address this, modify intel_pstate to use the information from
MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES to enable ITMT if CPPC is not available (which is
done already if the highest performance number coming from CPPC is not
realistic).
Fixes: 7feec7430e ("ACPI: CPPC: Only probe for _CPC if CPPC v2 is acked")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/d01b0a1f-bd33-47fe-ab41-43843d8a374f@kfocus.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/ZnD22b3Br1ng7alf@kf-XE
Reported-by: Aaron Rainbolt <arainbolt@kfocus.org>
Tested-by: Aaron Rainbolt <arainbolt@kfocus.org>
Cc: 5.19+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.19+
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/12460110.O9o76ZdvQC@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e4731baaf2 upstream.
The nominal frequency in cpudata is maintained in MHz whereas all other
frequencies are in KHz. This means we have to convert nominal frequency
value to KHz before we do any interaction with other frequency values.
In amd_pstate_set_boost(), this conversion from MHz to KHz is missed,
fix that.
Tested on a AMD Zen4 EPYC server
Before:
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy*/scaling_max_freq | uniq
2151
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy*/cpuinfo_min_freq | uniq
400000
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy*/scaling_cur_freq | uniq
2151
409422
After:
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy*/scaling_max_freq | uniq
2151000
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy*/cpuinfo_min_freq | uniq
400000
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy*/scaling_cur_freq | uniq
2151000
1799527
Fixes: ec437d71db ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Introduce a new AMD P-State driver to support future processors")
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Acked-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Tested-by: Peter Jung <ptr1337@cachyos.org>
Cc: 5.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.17+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit cf7de25878 ]
cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() and hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() can be called from
different places with various parameters. So cpufreq_cpu_get() can return
null as 'policy' in some circumstances.
Fix this bug by adding null return check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: a28b2bfc09 ("cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list")
Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@t-argos.ru>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b8f85833c0 ]
The exit() callback is optional and shouldn't be called without checking
a valid pointer first.
Also, we must clear freq_table pointer even if the exit() callback isn't
present.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Fixes: 91a12e91dc ("cpufreq: Allow light-weight tear down and bring up of CPUs")
Fixes: f339f35417 ("cpufreq: Rearrange locking in cpufreq_remove_dev()")
Reported-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c4d61a529d ]
Offlining a CPU and bringing it back online is a common operation and it
happens frequently during system suspend/resume, where the non-boot CPUs
are hotplugged out during suspend and brought back at resume.
The cpufreq core already tries to make this path as fast as possible as
the changes are only temporary in nature and full cleanup of resources
isn't required in this case. For example the drivers can implement
online()/offline() callbacks to avoid a lot of tear down of resources.
On similar lines, there is no need to unregister the cpufreq cooling
device during suspend / resume, but only while the policy is getting
removed.
Moreover, unregistering the cpufreq cooling device is resulting in an
unwanted outcome, where the system suspend is eventually aborted in the
process. Currently, during system suspend the cpufreq core unregisters
the cooling device, which in turn removes a kobject using device_del()
and that generates a notification to the userspace via uevent broadcast.
This causes system suspend to abort in some setups.
This was also earlier reported (indirectly) by Roman [1]. Maybe there is
another way around to fixing that problem properly, but this change
makes sense anyways.
Move the registering and unregistering of the cooling device to policy
creation and removal times onlyy.
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218521
Reported-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <quic_manafm@quicinc.com>
Reported-by: Roman Stratiienko <r.stratiienko@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20220710164026.541466-1-r.stratiienko@gmail.com/ [1]
Tested-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <quic_manafm@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d2399501c2 ]
Commit 0499a78369 ("ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase
supported CPUs to 512") changed the handling of cpumasks on ARM 64bit,
what resulted in the strange issues and warnings during cpufreq-dt
initialization on some big.LITTLE platforms.
This was caused by mixing OPPs between big and LITTLE cores, because
OPP-sharing information between big and LITTLE cores is computed on
cpumask, which in turn was not zeroed on allocation. Fix this by
switching to zalloc_cpumask_var() call.
Fixes: dc279ac6e5 ("cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter (Ampere) <cl@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit eaffb10b51 ]
devm_regulator_get_optional() returns -ENODEV if no supply can be found.
By introducing its usage, commit 788715b5f2 ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw:
Wait for CPU supplies before probing") caused the driver to fail probe
if no supply was present in any of the CPU DT nodes.
Use devm_regulator_get() instead since the CPUs do require supplies
even if not described in the DT. It will gracefully return a dummy
regulator if none is found in the DT node, allowing probe to succeed.
Fixes: 788715b5f2 ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Wait for CPU supplies before probing")
Reported-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Closes: https://linux.kernelci.org/test/case/id/65b0b169710edea22852a3fa/
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 788715b5f2 ]
Before proceeding with the probe and enabling frequency scaling for the
CPUs, make sure that all supplies feeding the CPUs have probed.
This fixes an issue observed on MT8195-Tomato where if the
mediatek-cpufreq-hw driver enabled the hardware (by writing to
REG_FREQ_ENABLE) before the SPMI controller driver (spmi-mtk-pmif),
behind which lies the big CPU supply, probed the platform would hang
shortly after with "rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on
CPUs/tasks" being printed in the log.
Fixes: 4855e26bcf ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW")
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a70eb93a24 ]
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Stable-dep-of: 788715b5f2 ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Wait for CPU supplies before probing")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f661017e6d ]
cpufreq_cpu_get may return NULL. To avoid NULL-dereference check it
and return 0 in case of error.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: de322e0859 ("cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: AVS CPUfreq driver for Broadcom STB SoCs")
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova@astralinux.ru>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f0a0fc10ab ]
There is a loophole in pstate limit clamping for the intel_cpufreq CPU
frequency scaling driver (intel_pstate in passive mode), schedutil CPU
frequency scaling governor, HWP (HardWare Pstate) control enabled, when
the adjust_perf call back path is used.
Fix it.
Fixes: a365ab6b9d cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback
Signed-off-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 192cdb1c90 upstream.
On systems using HWP, if a given frequency is equal to the maximum turbo
frequency or the maximum non-turbo frequency, the HWP performance level
corresponding to it is already known and can be used directly without
any computation.
Accordingly, adjust the code to use the known HWP performance levels in
the cases mentioned above.
This also helps to avoid limiting CPU capacity artificially in some
cases when the BIOS produces the HWP_CAP numbers using a different
E-core-to-P-core performance scaling factor than expected by the kernel.
Fixes: f5c8cf2a49 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: hybrid: Use known scaling factor for P-cores")
Cc: 6.1+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.1+
Tested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit c4a5118a3a ]
devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider() may return an errno, so
add a return value check
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 8410e7f3b3 ("cpufreq: scmi: Fix OPP addition failure with a dummy clock provider")
Signed-off-by: Alexandra Diupina <adiupina@astralinux.ru>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b8f3a396a7 ]
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Stable-dep-of: c4a5118a3a ("cpufreq: scmi: process the result of devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2e4e0984c7 ]
For a 900MHz i.MX6ULL CPU the 792MHz OPP is disabled. There is no
convincing reason to disable this OPP. If a CPU can run at 900MHz,
it should also be able to cope with 792MHz. Looking at the voltage
level of 792MHz in [1] (page 24, table 10. "Operating Ranges") the
current defined OPP is above the minimum. So the voltage level
shouldn't be a problem. However in [2] (page 24, table 10.
"Operating Ranges"), it is not mentioned that 792MHz OPP isn't
allowed. Change it to only disable 792MHz OPP for i.MX6ULL types
below 792 MHz.
[1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/IMX6ULLIEC.pdf
[2] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/IMX6ULLCEC.pdf
Fixes: 0aa9abd4c2 ("cpufreq: imx6q: check speed grades for i.MX6ULL")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
[ Viresh: Edited subject ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
