[ Upstream commit 157501b046 ]
We are setting the parent directory's last_unlink_trans directly which
may result in a concurrent task starting to log the directory not see the
update and therefore can log the directory after we removed a child
directory which had a snapshot within instead of falling back to a
transaction commit. Replaying such a log tree would result in a mount
failure since we can't currently delete snapshots (and subvolumes) during
log replay. This is the type of failure described in commit 1ec9a1ae1e
("Btrfs: fix unreplayable log after snapshot delete + parent dir fsync").
Fix this by using btrfs_record_snapshot_destroy() which updates the
last_unlink_trans field while holding the inode's log_mutex lock.
Fixes: 44f714dae5 ("Btrfs: improve performance on fsync against new inode after rename/unlink")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c466e33e72 ]
In case the removed directory had a snapshot that was deleted, we are
propagating its inode's last_unlink_trans to the parent directory after
we removed the entry from the parent directory. This leaves a small race
window where someone can log the parent directory after we removed the
entry and before we updated last_unlink_trans, and as a result if we ever
try to replay such a log tree, we will fail since we will attempt to
remove a snapshot during log replay, which is currently not possible and
results in the log replay (and mount) to fail. This is the type of failure
described in commit 1ec9a1ae1e ("Btrfs: fix unreplayable log after
snapshot delete + parent dir fsync").
So fix this by propagating the last_unlink_trans to the parent directory
before we remove the entry from it.
Fixes: 44f714dae5 ("Btrfs: improve performance on fsync against new inode after rename/unlink")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5a4041f2c4 ]
Running generic/751 on the for-next branch often results in a hang like
below. They are both stack by locking an extent. This suggests someone
forget to unlock an extent.
INFO: task kworker/u128:1:12 blocked for more than 323 seconds.
Not tainted 6.13.0-BTRFS-ZNS+ #503
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u128:1 state:D stack:0 pid:12 tgid:12 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: btrfs-fixup btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__schedule+0x534/0xdd0
schedule+0x39/0x140
__lock_extent+0x31b/0x380 [btrfs]
? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
btrfs_writepage_fixup_worker+0xf1/0x3a0 [btrfs]
btrfs_work_helper+0xff/0x480 [btrfs]
? lock_release+0x178/0x2c0
process_one_work+0x1ee/0x570
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x10b/0x230
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
INFO: task kworker/u134:0:184 blocked for more than 323 seconds.
Not tainted 6.13.0-BTRFS-ZNS+ #503
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u134:0 state:D stack:0 pid:184 tgid:184 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-4)
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__schedule+0x534/0xdd0
schedule+0x39/0x140
__lock_extent+0x31b/0x380 [btrfs]
? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
find_lock_delalloc_range+0xdb/0x260 [btrfs]
writepage_delalloc+0x12f/0x500 [btrfs]
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
extent_write_cache_pages+0x232/0x840 [btrfs]
btrfs_writepages+0x72/0x130 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0xe7/0x260
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? lock_acquire+0xd2/0x300
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
? wbc_attach_and_unlock_inode.part.0+0x102/0x250
? wbc_attach_and_unlock_inode.part.0+0x102/0x250
__writeback_single_inode+0x5c/0x4b0
writeback_sb_inodes+0x22d/0x550
__writeback_inodes_wb+0x4c/0xe0
wb_writeback+0x2f6/0x3f0
wb_workfn+0x32a/0x510
process_one_work+0x1ee/0x570
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x10b/0x230
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
This happens because we have another success path for the zoned mode. When
there is no active zone available, btrfs_reserve_extent() returns
-EAGAIN. In this case, we have two reactions.
(1) If the given range is never allocated, we can only wait for someone
to finish a zone, so wait on BTRFS_FS_NEED_ZONE_FINISH bit and retry
afterward.
(2) Or, if some allocations are already done, we must bail out and let
the caller to send IOs for the allocation. This is because these IOs
may be necessary to finish a zone.
The commit 06f3642847 ("btrfs: do proper folio cleanup when
cow_file_range() failed") moved the unlock code from the inside of the
loop to the outside. So, previously, the allocated extents are unlocked
just after the allocation and so before returning from the function.
However, they are no longer unlocked on the case (2) above. That caused
the hang issue.
Fix the issue by modifying the 'end' to the end of the allocated
range. Then, we can exit the loop and the same unlock code can properly
handle the case.
Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Fixes: 06f3642847 ("btrfs: do proper folio cleanup when cow_file_range() failed")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 06f3642847 ]
[BUG]
When testing with COW fixup marked as BUG_ON() (this is involved with the
new pin_user_pages*() change, which should not result new out-of-band
dirty pages), I hit a crash triggered by the BUG_ON() from hitting COW
fixup path.
This BUG_ON() happens just after a failed btrfs_run_delalloc_range():
BTRFS error (device dm-2): failed to run delalloc range, root 348 ino 405 folio 65536 submit_bitmap 6-15 start 90112 len 106496: -28
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1444!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 434621 Comm: kworker/u24:8 Tainted: G OE 6.12.0-rc7-custom+ #86
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
pc : extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs]
lr : extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs]
Call trace:
extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs]
extent_writepage+0x218/0x330 [btrfs]
extent_write_cache_pages+0x1d4/0x4b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x150 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0x74/0x190
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x88/0xc8
start_delalloc_inodes+0x180/0x3b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x174/0x280 [btrfs]
shrink_delalloc+0x114/0x280 [btrfs]
flush_space+0x250/0x2f8 [btrfs]
btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x164/0x408
worker_thread+0x25c/0x388
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: aa1403e1 9402f3ef aa1403e0 9402f36f (d4210000)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[CAUSE]
That failure is mostly from cow_file_range(), where we can hit -ENOSPC.
Although the -ENOSPC is already a bug related to our space reservation
code, let's just focus on the error handling.
For example, we have the following dirty range [0, 64K) of an inode,
with 4K sector size and 4K page size:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|///////////////////////////////////////|
|#######################################|
Where |///| means page are still dirty, and |###| means the extent io
tree has EXTENT_DELALLOC flag.
- Enter extent_writepage() for page 0
- Enter btrfs_run_delalloc_range() for range [0, 64K)
- Enter cow_file_range() for range [0, 64K)
- Function btrfs_reserve_extent() only reserved one 16K extent
So we created extent map and ordered extent for range [0, 16K)
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|////////|//////////////////////////////|
|<- OE ->|##############################|
And range [0, 16K) has its delalloc flag cleared.
But since we haven't yet submit any bio, involved 4 pages are still
dirty.
- Function btrfs_reserve_extent() returns with -ENOSPC
Now we have to run error cleanup, which will clear all
EXTENT_DELALLOC* flags and clear the dirty flags for the remaining
ranges:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|////////| |
| | |
Note that range [0, 16K) still has its pages dirty.
- Some time later, writeback is triggered again for the range [0, 16K)
since the page range still has dirty flags.
- btrfs_run_delalloc_range() will do nothing because there is no
EXTENT_DELALLOC flag.
- extent_writepage_io() finds page 0 has no ordered flag
Which falls into the COW fixup path, triggering the BUG_ON().
Unfortunately this error handling bug dates back to the introduction of
btrfs. Thankfully with the abuse of COW fixup, at least it won't crash
the kernel.
[FIX]
Instead of immediately unlocking the extent and folios, we keep the extent
and folios locked until either erroring out or the whole delalloc range
finished.
When the whole delalloc range finished without error, we just unlock the
whole range with PAGE_SET_ORDERED (and PAGE_UNLOCK for !keep_locked
cases), with EXTENT_DELALLOC and EXTENT_LOCKED cleared.
And the involved folios will be properly submitted, with their dirty
flags cleared during submission.
For the error path, it will be a little more complex:
- The range with ordered extent allocated (range (1))
We only clear the EXTENT_DELALLOC and EXTENT_LOCKED, as the remaining
flags are cleaned up by
btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished()->btrfs_finish_one_ordered().
For folios we finish the IO (clear dirty, start writeback and
immediately finish the writeback) and unlock the folios.
- The range with reserved extent but no ordered extent (range(2))
- The range we never touched (range(3))
For both range (2) and range(3) the behavior is not changed.
Now even if cow_file_range() failed halfway with some successfully
reserved extents/ordered extents, we will keep all folios clean, so
there will be no future writeback triggered on them.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 3ca864de85 upstream.
We have a race between a rename and directory inode logging that if it
happens and we crash/power fail before the rename completes, the next time
the filesystem is mounted, the log replay code will end up deleting the
file that was being renamed.
This is best explained following a step by step analysis of an interleaving
of steps that lead into this situation.
Consider the initial conditions:
1) We are at transaction N;
2) We have directories A and B created in a past transaction (< N);
3) We have inode X corresponding to a file that has 2 hardlinks, one in
directory A and the other in directory B, so we'll name them as
"A/foo_link1" and "B/foo_link2". Both hard links were persisted in a
past transaction (< N);
4) We have inode Y corresponding to a file that as a single hard link and
is located in directory A, we'll name it as "A/bar". This file was also
persisted in a past transaction (< N).
The steps leading to a file loss are the following and for all of them we
are under transaction N:
1) Link "A/foo_link1" is removed, so inode's X last_unlink_trans field
is updated to N, through btrfs_unlink() -> btrfs_record_unlink_dir();
2) Task A starts a rename for inode Y, with the goal of renaming from
"A/bar" to "A/baz", so we enter btrfs_rename();
3) Task A inserts the new BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY for inode Y by calling
btrfs_insert_inode_ref();
4) Because the rename happens in the same directory, we don't set the
last_unlink_trans field of directoty A's inode to the current
transaction id, that is, we don't cal btrfs_record_unlink_dir();
5) Task A then removes the entries from directory A (BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY
and BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY items) when calling __btrfs_unlink_inode()
(actually the dir index item is added as a delayed item, but the
effect is the same);
6) Now before task A adds the new entry "A/baz" to directory A by
calling btrfs_add_link(), another task, task B is logging inode X;
7) Task B starts a fsync of inode X and after logging inode X, at
btrfs_log_inode_parent() it calls btrfs_log_all_parents(), since
inode X has a last_unlink_trans value of N, set at in step 1;
8) At btrfs_log_all_parents() we search for all parent directories of
inode X using the commit root, so we find directories A and B and log
them. Bu when logging direct A, we don't have a dir index item for
inode Y anymore, neither the old name "A/bar" nor for the new name
"A/baz" since the rename has deleted the old name but has not yet
inserted the new name - task A hasn't called yet btrfs_add_link() to
do that.
Note that logging directory A doesn't fallback to a transaction
commit because its last_unlink_trans has a lower value than the
current transaction's id (see step 4);
9) Task B finishes logging directories A and B and gets back to
btrfs_sync_file() where it calls btrfs_sync_log() to persist the log
tree;
10) Task B successfully persisted the log tree, btrfs_sync_log() completed
with success, and a power failure happened.
We have a log tree without any directory entry for inode Y, so the
log replay code deletes the entry for inode Y, name "A/bar", from the
subvolume tree since it doesn't exist in the log tree and the log
tree is authorative for its index (we logged a BTRFS_DIR_LOG_INDEX_KEY
item that covers the index range for the dentry that corresponds to
"A/bar").
Since there's no other hard link for inode Y and the log replay code
deletes the name "A/bar", the file is lost.
The issue wouldn't happen if task B synced the log only after task A
called btrfs_log_new_name(), which would update the log with the new name
for inode Y ("A/bar").
Fix this by pinning the log root during renames before removing the old
directory entry, and unpinning after btrfs_log_new_name() is called.
Fixes: 259c4b96d7 ("btrfs: stop doing unnecessary log updates during a rename")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.18+
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 05a6ec865d ]
The unsigned type is a recommended practice (CWE-190, CWE-194) for bit
shifts to avoid problems with potential unwanted sign extensions.
Although there are no such cases in btrfs codebase, follow the
recommendation.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 1f2889f559 ("btrfs: fix qgroup reservation leak on failure to allocate ordered extent")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 10326fdcb3 ]
Currently we're doing all the ordered extent and extent map generation
inside a while() loop of run_delalloc_nocow(). This makes it pretty
hard to read, nor doing proper error handling.
So move that part of code into a helper, nocow_one_range().
This should not change anything, but there is a tiny timing change where
btrfs_dec_nocow_writers() is only called after nocow_one_range() helper
exits.
This timing change is small, and makes error handling easier, thus
should be fine.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 1f2889f559 ("btrfs: fix qgroup reservation leak on failure to allocate ordered extent")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d3914d6030 ]
If when truncating a block we fail to reserve data space and then we
proceed anyway because we can do a NOCOW write, if we later get an error
when trying to get the folio from the inode's mapping, we end up releasing
data space that we haven't reserved, screwing up the bytes_may_use counter
from the data space_info, eventually resulting in an underflow when all
other reservations done by other tasks are released, if any, or right away
if there are no other reservations at the moment.
This is because when we get an error when trying to grab the block's folio
we call btrfs_delalloc_release_space(), which releases metadata (which we
have reserved) and data (which we haven't reserved).
Fix this by calling btrfs_delalloc_release_space() only if we did reserve
data space, that is, if we aren't falling back to NOCOW, meaning the local
variable @only_release_metadata has a false value, otherwise release only
metadata by calling btrfs_delalloc_release_metadata().
Fixes: 6d4572a9d7 ("btrfs: allow btrfs_truncate_block() to fallback to nocow for data space reservation")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit a0fd1c6098 upstream.
If btrfs_reserve_extent() fails while submitting an async_extent for a
compressed write, then we fail to call free_async_extent_pages() on the
async_extent and leak its folios. A likely cause for such a failure
would be btrfs_reserve_extent() failing to find a large enough
contiguous free extent for the compressed extent.
I was able to reproduce this by:
1. mount with compress-force=zstd:3
2. fallocating most of a filesystem to a big file
3. fragmenting the remaining free space
4. trying to copy in a file which zstd would generate large compressed
extents for (vmlinux worked well for this)
Step 4. hits the memory leak and can be repeated ad nauseam to
eventually exhaust the system memory.
Fix this by detecting the case where we fallback to uncompressed
submission for a compressed async_extent and ensuring that we call
free_async_extent_pages().
Fixes: 131a821a24 ("btrfs: fallback if compressed IO fails for ENOSPC")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Co-developed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit be3f1938d3 upstream.
In run_delalloc_nocow(), when the found btrfs_key's offset > cur_offset,
it indicates a gap between the current processing region and
the next file extent. The original code would directly jump to
the "must_cow" label, which increments the slot and forces a fallback
to COW. This behavior might skip an extent item and result in an
overestimated COW fallback range.
This patch modifies the logic so that when a gap is detected:
- If no COW range is already being recorded (cow_start is unset),
cow_start is set to cur_offset.
- cur_offset is then advanced to the beginning of the next extent.
- Instead of jumping to "must_cow", control flows directly to
"next_slot" so that the same extent item can be reexamined properly.
The change ensures that we accurately account for the extent gap and
avoid accidentally extending the range that needs to fallback to COW.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chen <davechen@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 72dad8e377 ]
[BUG]
When running btrfs with block size (4K) smaller than page size (64K,
aarch64), there is a very high chance to crash the kernel at
generic/750, with the following messages:
(before the call traces, there are 3 extra debug messages added)
BTRFS warning (device dm-3): read-write for sector size 4096 with page size 65536 is experimental
BTRFS info (device dm-3): checking UUID tree
hrtimer: interrupt took 5451385 ns
BTRFS error (device dm-3): cow_file_range failed, root=4957 inode=257 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): run_delalloc_nocow failed, root=4957 inode=257 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): failed to run delalloc range, root=4957 ino=257 folio=1572864 submit_bitmap=8-15 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3020984 at ordered-data.c:360 can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs]
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 3020984 Comm: kworker/u24:1 Tainted: G OE 6.13.0-rc1-custom+ #89
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
pc : can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs]
lr : can_finish_ordered_extent+0x1ec/0x3b8 [btrfs]
Call trace:
can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs] (P)
can_finish_ordered_extent+0x1ec/0x3b8 [btrfs] (L)
btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished+0x130/0x2b8 [btrfs]
extent_writepage+0x10c/0x3b8 [btrfs]
extent_write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x4e8 [btrfs]
btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x160 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0x74/0x190
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x74/0xa0
start_delalloc_inodes+0x17c/0x3b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x17c/0x288 [btrfs]
shrink_delalloc+0x11c/0x280 [btrfs]
flush_space+0x288/0x328 [btrfs]
btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x228/0x680
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1605632 OE len=16384 to_dec=16384 left=0
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1622016 OE len=12288 to_dec=12288 left=0
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1634304 OE len=8192 to_dec=4096 left=0
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 3286940 Comm: kworker/u24:3 Tainted: G W OE 6.13.0-rc1-custom+ #89
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] (btrfs-endio-write)
pstate: 404000c5 (nZcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : process_one_work+0x110/0x680
lr : worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
Call trace:
process_one_work+0x110/0x680 (P)
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360 (L)
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: f84086a1 f9000fe1 53041c21 b9003361 (f9400661)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
SMP: failed to stop secondary CPUs 2-3
Dumping ftrace buffer:
(ftrace buffer empty)
Kernel Offset: 0x275bb9540000 from 0xffff800080000000
PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffff8fbba0000000
CPU features: 0x100,00000070,00801250,8201720b
[CAUSE]
The above warning is triggered immediately after the delalloc range
failure, this happens in the following sequence:
- Range [1568K, 1636K) is dirty
1536K 1568K 1600K 1636K 1664K
| |/////////|////////| |
Where 1536K, 1600K and 1664K are page boundaries (64K page size)
- Enter extent_writepage() for page 1536K
- Enter run_delalloc_nocow() with locked page 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
This is due to the inode having preallocated extents.
- Enter cow_file_range() with locked page 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
- btrfs_reserve_extent() only reserved two extents
The main loop of cow_file_range() only reserved two data extents,
Now we have:
1536K 1568K 1600K 1636K 1664K
| |<-->|<--->|/|///////| |
1584K 1596K
Range [1568K, 1596K) has an ordered extent reserved.
- btrfs_reserve_extent() failed inside cow_file_range() for file offset
1596K
This is already a bug in our space reservation code, but for now let's
focus on the error handling path.
Now cow_file_range() returned -ENOSPC.
- btrfs_run_delalloc_range() do error cleanup <<< ROOT CAUSE
Call btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() with locked folio 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
Function btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() normally needs to skip the
ranges inside the folio, as it will normally be cleaned up by
extent_writepage().
Such split error handling is already problematic in the first place.
What's worse is the folio range skipping itself, which is not taking
subpage cases into consideration at all, it will only skip the range
if the page start >= the range start.
In our case, the page start < the range start, since for subpage cases
we can have delalloc ranges inside the folio but not covering the
folio.
So it doesn't skip the page range at all.
This means all the ordered extents, both [1568K, 1584K) and
[1584K, 1596K) will be marked as IOERR.
And these two ordered extents have no more pending ios, they are marked
finished, and *QUEUED* to be deleted from the io tree.
- extent_writepage() do error cleanup
Call btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() for the range [1536K, 1600K).
Although ranges [1568K, 1584K) and [1584K, 1596K) are finished, the
deletion from io tree is async, it may or may not happen at this
time.
If the ranges have not yet been removed, we will do double cleaning on
those ranges, triggering the above ordered extent warnings.
In theory there are other bugs, like the cleanup in extent_writepage()
can cause double accounting on ranges that are submitted asynchronously
(compression for example).
But that's much harder to trigger because normally we do not mix regular
and compression delalloc ranges.
[FIX]
The folio range split is already buggy and not subpage compatible, it
was introduced a long time ago where subpage support was not even considered.
So instead of splitting the ordered extents cleanup into the folio range
and out of folio range, do all the cleanup inside writepage_delalloc().
- Pass @NULL as locked_folio for btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() in
btrfs_run_delalloc_range()
- Skip the btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() if writepage_delalloc()
failed
So all ordered extents are only cleaned up by
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
- Handle the ranges that already have ordered extents allocated
If part of the folio already has ordered extent allocated, and
btrfs_run_delalloc_range() failed, we also need to cleanup that range.
Now we have a concentrated error handling for ordered extents during
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
Fixes: d1051d6ebf ("btrfs: Fix error handling in btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 8bf334beb3 ("btrfs: fix double accounting race when extent_writepage_io() failed")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 2c8507c63f upstream.
This commit re-attempts the backport of the change to the linux-6.12.y
branch. Commit 9f372e86b9 ("btrfs: avoid monopolizing a core when
activating a swap file") on this branch was reverted.
During swap activation we iterate over the extents of a file and we can
have many thousands of them, so we can end up in a busy loop monopolizing
a core. Avoid this by doing a voluntary reschedule after processing each
extent.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit 9f372e86b9.
The backport for linux-6.12.y, commit 9f372e86b9 ("btrfs: avoid
monopolizing a core when activating a swap file"), inserted
cond_resched() in the wrong location.
Revert it now; a subsequent commit will re-backport the original patch.
Fixes: 9f372e86b9 ("btrfs: avoid monopolizing a core when activating a swap file") # linux-6.12.y
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit c2b47df81c upstream.
[BUG]
With CONFIG_DEBUG_VM set, test case generic/476 has some chance to crash
with the following VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO():
BTRFS error (device dm-3): cow_file_range failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): run_delalloc_nocow failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28
page: refcount:4 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000592787cc index:0x12 pfn:0x10664
aops:btrfs_aops [btrfs] ino:101 dentry name(?):"f1774"
flags: 0x2fffff80004028(uptodate|lru|private|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xfffff)
page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio))
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2992!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 3943513 Comm: kworker/u24:15 Tainted: G OE 6.12.0-rc7-custom+ #87
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
pc : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258
lr : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258
Call trace:
folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258
btrfs_folio_clamp_clear_dirty+0x80/0xd0 [btrfs]
__process_folios_contig+0x154/0x268 [btrfs]
extent_clear_unlock_delalloc+0x5c/0x80 [btrfs]
run_delalloc_nocow+0x5f8/0x760 [btrfs]
btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0xa8/0x220 [btrfs]
writepage_delalloc+0x230/0x4c8 [btrfs]
extent_writepage+0xb8/0x358 [btrfs]
extent_write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x4e8 [btrfs]
btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x150 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0x74/0x190
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x88/0xc8
start_delalloc_inodes+0x178/0x3a8 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x174/0x280 [btrfs]
shrink_delalloc+0x114/0x280 [btrfs]
flush_space+0x250/0x2f8 [btrfs]
btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x164/0x408
worker_thread+0x25c/0x388
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: 910a8021 a90363f7 a9046bf9 94012379 (d4210000)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[CAUSE]
The first two lines of extra debug messages show the problem is caused
by the error handling of run_delalloc_nocow().
E.g. we have the following dirtied range (4K blocksize 4K page size):
0 16K 32K
|//////////////////////////////////////|
| Pre-allocated |
And the range [0, 16K) has a preallocated extent.
- Enter run_delalloc_nocow() for range [0, 16K)
Which found range [0, 16K) is preallocated, can do the proper NOCOW
write.
- Enter fallback_to_fow() for range [16K, 32K)
Since the range [16K, 32K) is not backed by preallocated extent, we
have to go COW.
- cow_file_range() failed for range [16K, 32K)
So cow_file_range() will do the clean up by clearing folio dirty,
unlock the folios.
Now the folios in range [16K, 32K) is unlocked.
- Enter extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() from run_delalloc_nocow()
Which is called with PAGE_START_WRITEBACK to start page writeback.
But folios can only be marked writeback when it's properly locked,
thus this triggered the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO().
Furthermore there is another hidden but common bug that
run_delalloc_nocow() is not clearing the folio dirty flags in its error
handling path.
This is the common bug shared between run_delalloc_nocow() and
cow_file_range().
[FIX]
- Clear folio dirty for range [@start, @cur_offset)
Introduce a helper, cleanup_dirty_folios(), which
will find and lock the folio in the range, clear the dirty flag and
start/end the writeback, with the extra handling for the
@locked_folio.
- Introduce a helper to clear folio dirty, start and end writeback
- Introduce a helper to record the last failed COW range end
This is to trace which range we should skip, to avoid double
unlocking.
- Skip the failed COW range for the error handling
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 30dac24e14 ]
Most of the callers of wbc_account_cgroup_owner() are converting a folio
to page before calling the function. wbc_account_cgroup_owner() is
converting the page back to a folio to call mem_cgroup_css_from_folio().
Convert wbc_account_cgroup_owner() to take a folio instead of a page,
and convert all callers to pass a folio directly except f2fs.
Convert the page to folio for all the callers from f2fs as they were the
only callers calling wbc_account_cgroup_owner() with a page. As f2fs is
already in the process of converting to folios, these call sites might
also soon be calling wbc_account_cgroup_owner() with a folio directly in
the future.
No functional changes. Only compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240926140121.203821-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 51d20d1dac ("iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9a45022a0e ]
During swap activation we iterate over the extents of a file, then do
several checks for each extent, some of which may take some significant
time such as checking if an extent is shared. Since a file can have
many thousands of extents, this can be a very slow operation and it's
currently not interruptible. I had a bug during development of a previous
patch that resulted in an infinite loop when iterating the extents, so
a core was busy looping and I couldn't cancel the operation, which is very
annoying and requires a reboot. So make the loop interruptible by checking
for fatal signals at the end of each iteration and stopping immediately if
there is one.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 03018e5d85 upstream.
When activating a swap file, to determine if an extent is shared we use
can_nocow_extent(), which ends up at btrfs_cross_ref_exist(). That helper
is meant to be quick because it's used in the NOCOW write path, when
flushing delalloc and when doing a direct IO write, however it does return
some false positives, meaning it may indicate that an extent is shared
even if it's no longer the case. For the write path this is fine, we just
do a unnecessary COW operation instead of doing a more rigorous check
which would be too heavy (calling btrfs_is_data_extent_shared()).
However when activating a swap file, the false positives simply result
in a failure, which is confusing for users/applications. One particular
case where this happens is when a data extent only has 1 reference but
that reference is not inlined in the extent item located in the extent
tree - this happens when we create more than 33 references for an extent
and then delete those 33 references plus every other non-inline reference
except one. The function check_committed_ref() assumes that if the size
of an extent item doesn't match the size of struct btrfs_extent_item
plus the size of an inline reference (plus an owner reference in case
simple quotas are enabled), then the extent is shared - that is not the
case however, we can have a single reference but it's not inlined - the
reason we do this is to be fast and avoid inspecting non-inline references
which may be located in another leaf of the extent tree, slowing down
write paths.
The following test script reproduces the bug:
$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdi
MNT=/mnt/sdi
NUM_CLONES=50
umount $DEV &> /dev/null
run_test()
{
local sync_after_add_reflinks=$1
local sync_after_remove_reflinks=$2
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV > /dev/null
#mkfs.xfs -f $DEV > /dev/null
mount $DEV $MNT
touch $MNT/foo
chmod 0600 $MNT/foo
# On btrfs the file must be NOCOW.
chattr +C $MNT/foo &> /dev/null
xfs_io -s -c "pwrite -b 1M 0 1M" $MNT/foo
mkswap $MNT/foo
for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_CLONES; i++)); do
touch $MNT/foo_clone_$i
chmod 0600 $MNT/foo_clone_$i
# On btrfs the file must be NOCOW.
chattr +C $MNT/foo_clone_$i &> /dev/null
cp --reflink=always $MNT/foo $MNT/foo_clone_$i
done
if [ $sync_after_add_reflinks -ne 0 ]; then
# Flush delayed refs and commit current transaction.
sync -f $MNT
fi
# Remove the original file and all clones except the last.
rm -f $MNT/foo
for ((i = 1; i < $NUM_CLONES; i++)); do
rm -f $MNT/foo_clone_$i
done
if [ $sync_after_remove_reflinks -ne 0 ]; then
# Flush delayed refs and commit current transaction.
sync -f $MNT
fi
# Now use the last clone as a swap file. It should work since
# its extent are not shared anymore.
swapon $MNT/foo_clone_${NUM_CLONES}
swapoff $MNT/foo_clone_${NUM_CLONES}
umount $MNT
}
echo -e "\nTest without sync after creating and removing clones"
run_test 0 0
echo -e "\nTest with sync after creating clones"
run_test 1 0
echo -e "\nTest with sync after removing clones"
run_test 0 1
echo -e "\nTest with sync after creating and removing clones"
run_test 1 1
Running the test:
$ ./test.sh
Test without sync after creating and removing clones
wrote 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0
1 MiB, 1 ops; 0.0017 sec (556.793 MiB/sec and 556.7929 ops/sec)
Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 1020 KiB (1044480 bytes)
no label, UUID=a6b9c29e-5ef4-4689-a8ac-bc199c750f02
swapon: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapon failed: Invalid argument
swapoff: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapoff failed: Invalid argument
Test with sync after creating clones
wrote 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0
1 MiB, 1 ops; 0.0036 sec (271.739 MiB/sec and 271.7391 ops/sec)
Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 1020 KiB (1044480 bytes)
no label, UUID=5e9008d6-1f7a-4948-a1b4-3f30aba20a33
swapon: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapon failed: Invalid argument
swapoff: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapoff failed: Invalid argument
Test with sync after removing clones
wrote 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0
1 MiB, 1 ops; 0.0103 sec (96.665 MiB/sec and 96.6651 ops/sec)
Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 1020 KiB (1044480 bytes)
no label, UUID=916c2740-fa9f-4385-9f06-29c3f89e4764
Test with sync after creating and removing clones
wrote 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0
1 MiB, 1 ops; 0.0031 sec (314.268 MiB/sec and 314.2678 ops/sec)
Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 1020 KiB (1044480 bytes)
no label, UUID=06aab1dd-4d90-49c0-bd9f-3a8db4e2f912
swapon: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapon failed: Invalid argument
swapoff: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapoff failed: Invalid argument
Fix this by reworking btrfs_swap_activate() to instead of using extent
maps and checking for shared extents with can_nocow_extent(), iterate
over the inode's file extent items and use the accurate
btrfs_is_data_extent_shared().
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2c8507c63f upstream.
During swap activation we iterate over the extents of a file and we can
have many thousands of them, so we can end up in a busy loop monopolizing
a core. Avoid this by doing a voluntary reschedule after processing each
extent.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 0525064bb8 upstream.
When activating the swap file we flush all delalloc and wait for ordered
extent completion, so that we don't miss any delalloc and extents before
we check that the file's extent layout is usable for a swap file and
activate the swap file. We are called with the inode's VFS lock acquired,
so we won't race with buffered and direct IO writes, however we can still
race with memory mapped writes since they don't acquire the inode's VFS
lock. The race window is between flushing all delalloc and locking the
whole file's extent range, since memory mapped writes lock an extent range
with the length of a page.
Fix this by acquiring the inode's mmap lock before we flush delalloc.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 9c803c474c ]
When activating a swap file we acquire the root's snapshot drew lock and
then check if the root is dead, failing and returning with -EPERM if it's
dead but without unlocking the root's snapshot lock. Fix this by adding
the missing unlock.
Fixes: 60021bd754 ("btrfs: prevent subvol with swapfile from being deleted")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 05b36b04d7 ]
Shinichiro reported the following use-after free that sometimes is
happening in our CI system when running fstests' btrfs/284 on a TCMU
runner device:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in lock_release+0x708/0x780
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888106a83f18 by task kworker/u80:6/219
CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 219 Comm: kworker/u80:6 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6-kts+ #15
Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPi-TF, BIOS 3.3 02/21/2020
Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_end_bio_work [btrfs]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0
? lock_release+0x708/0x780
print_report+0x174/0x505
? lock_release+0x708/0x780
? __virt_addr_valid+0x224/0x410
? lock_release+0x708/0x780
kasan_report+0xda/0x1b0
? lock_release+0x708/0x780
? __wake_up+0x44/0x60
lock_release+0x708/0x780
? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
? lock_is_held_type+0x9a/0x110
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x60
__wake_up+0x44/0x60
btrfs_encoded_read_endio+0x14b/0x190 [btrfs]
btrfs_check_read_bio+0x8d9/0x1360 [btrfs]
? lock_release+0x1b0/0x780
? trace_lock_acquire+0x12f/0x1a0
? __pfx_btrfs_check_read_bio+0x10/0x10 [btrfs]
? process_one_work+0x7e3/0x1460
? lock_acquire+0x31/0xc0
? process_one_work+0x7e3/0x1460
process_one_work+0x85c/0x1460
? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10
? assign_work+0x16c/0x240
worker_thread+0x5e6/0xfc0
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x2c3/0x3a0
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x31/0x70
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
Allocated by task 3661:
kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50
kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
__kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0
btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages+0x16c/0x6d0 [btrfs]
send_extent_data+0xf0f/0x24a0 [btrfs]
process_extent+0x48a/0x1830 [btrfs]
changed_cb+0x178b/0x2ea0 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_send+0x3bf9/0x5c20 [btrfs]
_btrfs_ioctl_send+0x117/0x330 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x184a/0x60a0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x12e/0x1a0
do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Freed by task 3661:
kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50
kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x70
__kasan_slab_free+0x4f/0x70
kfree+0x143/0x490
btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages+0x531/0x6d0 [btrfs]
send_extent_data+0xf0f/0x24a0 [btrfs]
process_extent+0x48a/0x1830 [btrfs]
changed_cb+0x178b/0x2ea0 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_send+0x3bf9/0x5c20 [btrfs]
_btrfs_ioctl_send+0x117/0x330 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x184a/0x60a0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x12e/0x1a0
do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888106a83f00
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-07-96 of size 96
The buggy address is located 24 bytes inside of
freed 96-byte region [ffff888106a83f00, ffff888106a83f60)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff888106a83800 pfn:0x106a83
flags: 0x17ffffc0000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
page_type: f5(slab)
raw: 0017ffffc0000000 ffff888100053680 ffffea0004917200 0000000000000004
raw: ffff888106a83800 0000000080200019 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff888106a83e00: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
ffff888106a83e80: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
>ffff888106a83f00: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
^
ffff888106a83f80: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
ffff888106a84000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
==================================================================
Further analyzing the trace and the crash dump's vmcore file shows that
the wake_up() call in btrfs_encoded_read_endio() is calling wake_up() on
the wait_queue that is in the private data passed to the end_io handler.
Commit 4ff47df40447 ("btrfs: move priv off stack in
btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages()") moved 'struct
btrfs_encoded_read_private' off the stack.
Before that commit one can see a corruption of the private data when
analyzing the vmcore after a crash:
*(struct btrfs_encoded_read_private *)0xffff88815626eec8 = {
.wait = (wait_queue_head_t){
.lock = (spinlock_t){
.rlock = (struct raw_spinlock){
.raw_lock = (arch_spinlock_t){
.val = (atomic_t){
.counter = (int)-2005885696,
},
.locked = (u8)0,
.pending = (u8)157,
.locked_pending = (u16)40192,
.tail = (u16)34928,
},
.magic = (unsigned int)536325682,
.owner_cpu = (unsigned int)29,
.owner = (void *)__SCT__tp_func_btrfs_transaction_commit+0x0 = 0x0,
.dep_map = (struct lockdep_map){
.key = (struct lock_class_key *)0xffff8881575a3b6c,
.class_cache = (struct lock_class *[2]){ 0xffff8882a71985c0, 0xffffea00066f5d40 },
.name = (const char *)0xffff88815626f100 = "",
.wait_type_outer = (u8)37,
.wait_type_inner = (u8)178,
.lock_type = (u8)154,
},
},
.__padding = (u8 [24]){ 0, 157, 112, 136, 50, 174, 247, 31, 29 },
.dep_map = (struct lockdep_map){
.key = (struct lock_class_key *)0xffff8881575a3b6c,
.class_cache = (struct lock_class *[2]){ 0xffff8882a71985c0, 0xffffea00066f5d40 },
.name = (const char *)0xffff88815626f100 = "",
.wait_type_outer = (u8)37,
.wait_type_inner = (u8)178,
.lock_type = (u8)154,
},
},
.head = (struct list_head){
.next = (struct list_head *)0x112cca,
.prev = (struct list_head *)0x47,
},
},
.pending = (atomic_t){
.counter = (int)-1491499288,
},
.status = (blk_status_t)130,
}
Here we can see several indicators of in-memory data corruption, e.g. the
large negative atomic values of ->pending or
->wait->lock->rlock->raw_lock->val, as well as the bogus spinlock magic
0x1ff7ae32 (decimal 536325682 above) instead of 0xdead4ead or the bogus
pointer values for ->wait->head.
To fix this, change atomic_dec_return() to atomic_dec_and_test() to fix the
corruption, as atomic_dec_return() is defined as two instructions on
x86_64, whereas atomic_dec_and_test() is defined as a single atomic
operation. This can lead to a situation where counter value is already
decremented but the if statement in btrfs_encoded_read_endio() is not
completely processed, i.e. the 0 test has not completed. If another thread
continues executing btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages() the
atomic_dec_return() there can see an already updated ->pending counter and
continues by freeing the private data. Continuing in the endio handler the
test for 0 succeeds and the wait_queue is woken up, resulting in a
use-after-free.
Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
Fixes: 1881fba89b ("btrfs: add BTRFS_IOC_ENCODED_READ ioctl")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 68d3b27e05 ]
Change btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages() so that the priv struct
is allocated rather than stored on the stack, in preparation for adding
an asynchronous mode to the function.
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 05b36b04d7 ("btrfs: fix use-after-free in btrfs_encoded_read_endio()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 26efd44796 ]
Change the behaviour of btrfs_encoded_read() so that if it needs to read
an extent from disk, it leaves the extent and inode locked and returns
-EIOCBQUEUED. The caller is then responsible for doing the I/O via
btrfs_encoded_read_regular() and unlocking the extent and inode.
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 05b36b04d7 ("btrfs: fix use-after-free in btrfs_encoded_read_endio()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 590168edbe ]
The file_offset parameter used to be passed to encoded read struct but
was removed in commit b665affe93 ("btrfs: remove unused members from
struct btrfs_encoded_read_private").
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 05b36b04d7 ("btrfs: fix use-after-free in btrfs_encoded_read_endio()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"A few more one-liners that fix some user visible problems:
- use correct range when clearing qgroup reservations after COW
- properly reset freed delayed ref list head
- fix ro/rw subvolume mounts to be backward compatible with old and
new mount API"
* tag 'for-6.12-rc6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: fix the length of reserved qgroup to free
btrfs: reinitialize delayed ref list after deleting it from the list
btrfs: fix per-subvolume RO/RW flags with new mount API
The dealloc flag may be cleared and the extent won't reach the disk in
cow_file_range when errors path. The reserved qgroup space is freed in
commit 30479f31d4 ("btrfs: fix qgroup reserve leaks in
cow_file_range"). However, the length of untouched region to free needs
to be adjusted with the correct remaining region size.
Fixes: 30479f31d4 ("btrfs: fix qgroup reserve leaks in cow_file_range")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.11+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Haisu Wang <haisuwang@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
- mount option fixes:
- fix handling of compression mount options on remount
- reject rw remount in case there are options that don't work
in read-write mode (like rescue options)
- fix zone accounting of unusable space
- fix in-memory corruption when merging extent maps
- fix delalloc range locking for sector < page
- use more convenient default value of drop subtree threshold, clean
more subvolumes without the fallback to marking quotas inconsistent
- fix smatch warning about incorrect value passed to ERR_PTR
* tag 'for-6.12-rc4-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in btrfs_search_dir_index_item()
btrfs: reject ro->rw reconfiguration if there are hard ro requirements
btrfs: fix read corruption due to race with extent map merging
btrfs: fix the delalloc range locking if sector size < page size
btrfs: qgroup: set a more sane default value for subtree drop threshold
btrfs: clear force-compress on remount when compress mount option is given
btrfs: zoned: fix zone unusable accounting for freed reserved extent
The ret may be zero in btrfs_search_dir_index_item() and should not
passed to ERR_PTR(). Now btrfs_unlink_subvol() is the only caller to
this, reconstructed it to check ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) while ret >= 0.
This fixes smatch warnings:
fs/btrfs/dir-item.c:353
btrfs_search_dir_index_item() warn: passing zero to 'ERR_PTR'
Fixes: 9dcbe16fcc ("btrfs: use btrfs_for_each_slot in btrfs_search_dir_index_item")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
- in incremental send, fix invalid clone operation for file that got
its size decreased
- fix __counted_by() annotation of send path cache entries, we do not
store the terminating NUL
- fix a longstanding bug in relocation (and quite hard to hit by
chance), drop back reference cache that can get out of sync after
transaction commit
- wait for fixup worker kthread before finishing umount
- add missing raid-stripe-tree extent for NOCOW files, zoned mode
cannot have NOCOW files but RST is meant to be a standalone feature
- handle transaction start error during relocation, avoid potential
NULL pointer dereference of relocation control structure (reported by
syzbot)
- disable module-wide rate limiting of debug level messages
- minor fix to tracepoint definition (reported by checkpatch.pl)
* tag 'for-6.12-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: disable rate limiting when debug enabled
btrfs: wait for fixup workers before stopping cleaner kthread during umount
btrfs: fix a NULL pointer dereference when failed to start a new trasacntion
btrfs: send: fix invalid clone operation for file that got its size decreased
btrfs: tracepoints: end assignment with semicolon at btrfs_qgroup_extent event class
btrfs: drop the backref cache during relocation if we commit
btrfs: also add stripe entries for NOCOW writes
btrfs: send: fix buffer overflow detection when copying path to cache entry
asm/unaligned.h is always an include of asm-generic/unaligned.h;
might as well move that thing to linux/unaligned.h and include
that - there's nothing arch-specific in that header.
auto-generated by the following:
for i in `git grep -l -w asm/unaligned.h`; do
sed -i -e "s/asm\/unaligned.h/linux\/unaligned.h/" $i
done
for i in `git grep -l -w asm-generic/unaligned.h`; do
sed -i -e "s/asm-generic\/unaligned.h/linux\/unaligned.h/" $i
done
git mv include/asm-generic/unaligned.h include/linux/unaligned.h
git mv tools/include/asm-generic/unaligned.h tools/include/linux/unaligned.h
sed -i -e "/unaligned.h/d" include/asm-generic/Kbuild
sed -i -e "s/__ASM_GENERIC/__LINUX/" include/linux/unaligned.h tools/include/linux/unaligned.h
NOCOW writes do not generate stripe_extent entries in the RAID stripe
tree, as the RAID stripe-tree feature initially was designed with a
zoned filesystem in mind and on a zoned filesystem, we do not allow NOCOW
writes. But the RAID stripe-tree feature is independent from the zoned
feature, so we must also do NOCOW writes for RAID stripe-tree filesystems.
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Based on the previous patch, the compression path can be
directly used in folio without converting to page.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. And page_to_inode() can be replaced with folio_to_inode() now.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Now clear_page_extent_mapped() can deal with a folio
directly, so change its name to clear_folio_extent_mapped().
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's only one caller inode_should_defrag() that passes NULL to
btrfs_add_inode_defrag() so we can drop it an simplify the code.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function does not follow the pattern where the underscores would be
justified, so rename it.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function name is a bit misleading as it submits the btrfs_bio
(bbio), rename it so we can use btrfs_submit_bio() when an actual bio is
submitted.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a comment to document the complicated locked_page unlock logic in
cow_file_range_inline. The specifically tricky part is that a caller
just up the stack converts ret == 0 to ret == 1 and then another
caller far up the callstack handles ret == 1 as a success, AND returns
without cleanup in that case, both of which "feel" unnatural and led to
the original bug.
Try to document that somewhat specific callstack logic here to explain
the weird un-setting of locked_folio on success.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of getting a page and using that to clear dirty for io, use the
folio helper and use the appropriate folio functions.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We only use a page to copy in the data for the inline extent. Use a
folio for this instead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already use a lot of functions here that use folios, update the
function to use __filemap_get_folio instead of find_get_page and then
use the folio directly.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently this already uses a folio for most things, update it to take a
folio and update all the page usage with the corresponding folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We only pass this into read_inline_extent, change it to take a folio and
update the callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of using a page, use a folio instead, take a folio as an
argument, and update the callers appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Update uncompress_inline to take a folio and update it's usage
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now the fixup creator and consumer use folios, change this to use a
folio as well.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of a page, use a folio for btrfs_writepage_cow_fixup. We
already have a folio at the only caller, and the fixup worker uses
folios.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function heavily messes with pages, instead update it to use a
folio.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This mostly uses folios already, update it to take a folio and update
the rest of the function to use the folio instead of the page.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of passing in the page for ->locked_page, make it hold a
locked_folio and then update the users of async_chunk to act
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Filipe Manana
Naohiro Aota
Qu Wenruo
David Sterba
Boris Burkov
Dave Chen
Koichiro Den
Pankaj Raghav
Johannes Thumshirn
Mark Harmstone
Linus Torvalds
Haisu Wang
Yue Haibing
Al Viro
Li Zetao
Josef Bacik