mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2026-08-09 06:14:34 +02:00
Mykyta YatsenkoandAlexei Starovoitov
84f7a49e76
Support resizable hashmap in BPF map benchmarks.
1. LOOKUP (single producer, M events/sec)
key | max | nr | htab | rhtab | ratio | delta
----+-----+-------+---------+---------+-------+-------
8 | 1K | 750 | 99.85 | 81.92 | 0.82x | -18 %
8 | 1K | 1K | 100.71 | 80.19 | 0.80x | -20 %
8 | 1M | 750K | 23.37 | 72.09 | 3.08x | +208 %
8 | 1M | 1M | 13.39 | 53.72 | 4.01x | +301 %
32 | 1K | 750 | 51.57 | 42.78 | 0.83x | -17 %
32 | 1K | 1K | 50.81 | 45.83 | 0.90x | -10 %
32 | 1M | 750K | 11.27 | 15.29 | 1.36x | +36 %
32 | 1M | 1M | 7.32 | 8.75 | 1.19x | +19 %
256 | 1K | 750 | 7.58 | 7.88 | 1.04x | +4 %
256 | 1K | 1K | 7.43 | 7.81 | 1.05x | +5 %
256 | 1M | 750K | 3.69 | 4.27 | 1.16x | +16 %
256 | 1M | 1M | 2.60 | 3.12 | 1.20x | +20 %
Pattern:
* Small map (1K): htab wins for 8 / 32 byte keys by 10-20%
* Large map (1M): rhtab wins everywhere, up to 4x at high load
factor with 8 byte keys.
* Higher load factor amplifies rhtab's lead: rhtab grows the
bucket array; htab stays at user-declared max.
2. FULL UPDATE (M events/sec per producer)
htab per-producer:
20.33 22.02 19.27 23.61 24.18 23.17 21.07
mean 21.94 range 19.27 - 24.18
rhtab per-producer:
133.51 129.47 74.52 129.29 102.26 129.98 107.64
mean 115.24 range 74.52 - 133.51
speedup (mean): 5.25x (+425 %)
In-place memcpy avoids the per-update alloc + RCU pointer swap
that htab pays.
3. MEMORY
value_size | htab ops/s | rhtab ops/s | htab mem | rhtab mem
-----------+-------------+-------------+----------+----------
32 B | 122.87 k/s | 133.04 k/s | 2.47 MiB | 2.49 MiB
4096 B | 64.43 k/s | 65.38 k/s | 6.74 MiB | 6.44 MiB
rhtab/htab : +8 % ops, +0.8 % mem (32 B)
+1 % ops, -4 % mem (4096 B)
Throughput effectively tied
SUMMARY
* Small / well-fitting map: htab is faster (cache-friendly
fixed bucket array), but only by ~10-20 %.
* Large / high-load-factor map: rhtab is dramatically faster
(1.2x to 4x) because rhashtable resizes to keep the load
factor sane while htab stays stuck at user-declared max.
* Update-heavy workloads: rhtab is ~5x faster per producer
via in-place memcpy.
* Memory benchmark: effectively on par.
Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260605-rhash-v7-12-5b8e05f8630d@meta.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>