Files
linux-stable-mirror/fs
Qu WenruoandGreg Kroah-Hartman ca91db4f89 btrfs: scrub: always update btrfs_scrub_progress::last_physical
[ Upstream commit 54df8b80cc ]

[BUG]
When a scrub failed immediately without any byte scrubbed, the returned
btrfs_scrub_progress::last_physical will always be 0, even if there is a
non-zero @start passed into btrfs_scrub_dev() for resume cases.

This will reset the progress and make later scrub resume start from the
beginning.

[CAUSE]
The function btrfs_scrub_dev() accepts a @progress parameter to copy its
updated progress to the caller, there are cases where we either don't
touch progress::last_physical at all or copy 0 into last_physical:

- last_physical not updated at all
  If some error happened before scrubbing any super block or chunk, we
  will not copy the progress, leaving the @last_physical untouched.

  E.g. failed to allocate @sctx, scrubbing a missing device or even
  there is already a running scrub and so on.

  All those cases won't touch @progress at all, resulting the
  last_physical untouched and will be left as 0 for most cases.

- Error out before scrubbing any bytes
  In those case we allocated @sctx, and sctx->stat.last_physical is all
  zero (initialized by kvzalloc()).
  Unfortunately some critical errors happened during
  scrub_enumerate_chunks() or scrub_supers() before any stripe is really
  scrubbed.

  In that case although we will copy sctx->stat back to @progress, since
  no byte is really scrubbed, last_physical will be overwritten to 0.

[FIX]
Make sure the parameter @progress always has its @last_physical member
updated to @start parameter inside btrfs_scrub_dev().

At the very beginning of the function, set @progress->last_physical to
@start, so that even if we error out without doing progress copying,
last_physical is still at @start.

Then after we got @sctx allocated, set sctx->stat.last_physical to
@start, this will make sure even if we didn't get any byte scrubbed, at
the progress copying stage the @last_physical is not left as zero.

This should resolve the resume progress reset problem.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2026-01-19 13:09:42 +01:00
..
2025-10-19 16:21:28 +02:00
2024-10-22 15:40:40 +02:00
2024-02-23 08:54:51 +01:00
2025-03-13 12:49:51 +01:00
2025-10-19 16:21:28 +02:00
2025-04-10 14:31:50 +02:00
2024-03-01 13:21:43 +01:00
2023-09-23 11:10:01 +02:00
2025-10-29 14:03:09 +01:00
2025-03-13 12:49:50 +01:00
2023-08-30 16:18:19 +02:00