[ Upstream commit ec00ed472b ]
While testing TCP performance with latest trees,
I saw suspect SOCKET_BACKLOG drops.
tcp_add_backlog() computes its limit with :
limit = (u32)READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) +
(u32)(READ_ONCE(sk->sk_sndbuf) >> 1);
limit += 64 * 1024;
This does not take into account that sk->sk_backlog.len
is reset only at the very end of __release_sock().
Both sk->sk_backlog.len and sk->sk_rmem_alloc could reach
sk_rcvbuf in normal conditions.
We should double sk->sk_rcvbuf contribution in the formula
to absorb bubbles in the backlog, which happen more often
for very fast flows.
This change maintains decent protection against abuses.
Fixes: c377411f24 ("net: sk_add_backlog() take rmem_alloc into account")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240423125620.3309458-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Eric Dumazet
05c6b74734