Patch series "x86: enable EXECMEM_ROX_CACHE for ftrace and kprobes", v3.
These patches enable use of EXECMEM_ROX_CACHE for ftrace and kprobes
allocations on x86.
They also include some ground work in execmem.
Since the execmem model for caching large ROX pages changed from the
initial assumption that the memory that is allocated from ROX cache is
always ROX to the current state where memory can be temporarily made RW
and then restored to ROX, we can stop using text poking to update it.
This also saves the hassle of trying lock text_mutex in
execmem_cache_free() when kprobes already hold that mutex.
This patch (of 8):
The execmem_update_copy() that used text poking was required when memory
allocated from ROX cache was always read-only. Since now its permissions
can be switched to read-write there is no need in a function that updates
memory with text poking.
Remove it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250713071730.4117334-1-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250713071730.4117334-2-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The commit d6d1e3e658 ("mm/execmem: Unify early execmem_cache
behaviour") changed early behaviour of execemem ROX cache to allow its
usage in early x86 code that allocates text pages when
CONFIG_MITGATION_ITS is enabled.
The permission management of the pages allocated from execmem for ITS
mitigation is now completely contained in arch/x86/kernel/alternatives.c
and therefore there is no need to special case early allocations in
execmem.
This reverts commit d6d1e3e658.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250603111446.2609381-6-rppt@kernel.org
ITS mitigation moves the unsafe indirect branches to a safe thunk. This
could degrade the prediction accuracy as the source address of indirect
branches becomes same for different execution paths.
To improve the predictions, and hence the performance, assign a separate
thunk for each indirect callsite. This is also a defense-in-depth measure
to avoid indirect branches aliasing with each other.
As an example, 5000 dynamic thunks would utilize around 16 bits of the
address space, thereby gaining entropy. For a BTB that uses
32 bits for indexing, dynamic thunks could provide better prediction
accuracy over fixed thunks.
Have ITS thunks be variable sized and use EXECMEM_MODULE_TEXT such that
they are both more flexible (got to extend them later) and live in 2M TLBs,
just like kernel code, avoiding undue TLB pressure.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Early kernel memory is RWX, only at the end of early boot (before SMP)
do we mark things ROX. Have execmem_cache mirror this behaviour for
early users.
This avoids having to remember what code is execmem and what is not --
we can poke everything with impunity ;-) Also performance for not
having to do endless text_poke_mm switches.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Using a writable copy for ROX memory is cumbersome and error prone.
Add API that allow temporarily remapping of ranges in the ROX cache as
writable and then restoring their read-only-execute permissions.
This API will be later used in modules code and will allow removing nasty
games with writable copy in alternatives patching on x86.
The restoring of the ROX permissions relies on the ability of architecture
to reconstruct large pages in its set_memory_rox() method.
Signed-off-by: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250126074733.1384926-6-rppt@kernel.org
Extend execmem parameters to accommodate more complex overrides of
module_alloc() by architectures.
This includes specification of a fallback range required by arm, arm64
and powerpc, EXECMEM_MODULE_DATA type required by powerpc, support for
allocation of KASAN shadow required by s390 and x86 and support for
late initialization of execmem required by arm64.
The core implementation of execmem_alloc() takes care of suppressing
warnings when the initial allocation fails but there is a fallback range
defined.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu@dudau.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Several architectures override module_alloc() only to define address
range for code allocations different than VMALLOC address space.
Provide a generic implementation in execmem that uses the parameters for
address space ranges, required alignment and page protections provided
by architectures.
The architectures must fill execmem_info structure and implement
execmem_arch_setup() that returns a pointer to that structure. This way the
execmem initialization won't be called from every architecture, but rather
from a central place, namely a core_initcall() in execmem.
The execmem provides execmem_alloc() API that wraps __vmalloc_node_range()
with the parameters defined by the architectures. If an architecture does
not implement execmem_arch_setup(), execmem_alloc() will fall back to
module_alloc().
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code.
Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems
that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and
puts the burden of code allocation to the modules code.
Several architectures override module_alloc() because of various
constraints where the executable memory can be located and this causes
additional obstacles for improvements of code allocation.
Start splitting code allocation from modules by introducing execmem_alloc()
and execmem_free() APIs.
Initially, execmem_alloc() is a wrapper for module_alloc() and
execmem_free() is a replacement of module_memfree() to allow updating all
call sites to use the new APIs.
Since architectures define different restrictions on placement,
permissions, alignment and other parameters for memory that can be used by
different subsystems that allocate executable memory, execmem_alloc() takes
a type argument, that will be used to identify the calling subsystem and to
allow architectures define parameters for ranges suitable for that
subsystem.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
