18 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Hoppen
4029dd5449 Use for loops to accumulate SourceItem elements in SwiftPMBuildServer
This seems cleaner than having multiple map calls that then get concatenated.
2026-01-03 19:59:53 +01:00
Ben Barham
9c145fd9a2 Merge pull request #2375 from bnbarham/pass-toolset-through
Pass toolsets through to preparation for the SwiftPM build server
2025-12-04 07:46:36 +10:00
Ben Barham
9952a11f4b Pass toolsets through to preparation for the SwiftPM build server
Also adds some logging to the synchronize request so that it's obvious
when background indexing is being skipped.

Fixes #2373
Resolves rdar://165519940
2025-12-03 10:19:49 +10:00
Anthony Latsis
d1b9c27b95 Merge pull request #2366 from AnthonyLatsis/jepa
Enable some Swift 7 mode features
2025-12-02 17:37:01 +00:00
Anthony Latsis
6b19657739 Enable ExistentialAny 2025-12-02 12:27:27 +00:00
Alex Hoppen
99f2bb3915 Merge pull request #2364 from ahoppen/no-optional-map
Don’t use `Optional.map` or `Optional.flatMap`
2025-12-02 00:01:23 +01:00
Alex Hoppen
f9f13a4105 Don’t use Optional.map or Optional.flatMap
Replace usages of `Optional.map` and `Optional.flatMap` by if expressions or other expressions.

I personally find `Optional.map` to be hard to read because `map` implies mapping a collection to me. Usually the alternative constructs seem clearer to me.
2025-11-20 09:47:21 +01:00
Alex Hoppen
05b290ea9d Fix issue that caused the target preparation status to not be cleared when workspace root did not have trailing slash
If a workspace was opened as `/path/to/workspace` instead of `/path/to/workspace/` (notice the trailing slash), the check for `url.deletingLastPathComponent() == self.projectRoot` failed because deleting the last path component always produces a URL with a trailing slash and URL considers two path different if they mismatch in their trailing slash usage.

Use `DocumentURI` for equality checking, which is a little more lenient with declaring equality, including with regard to trailing slashes, and whose equality definition aligns better with what we want in SourceKit-LSP.

I searched for other usages of `==` between URLs and there doesn’t seem to be any similar issues.
2025-11-20 09:21:47 +01:00
Owen Voorhees
f04b971726 Adopt swift-tools-protocols 2025-10-31 14:11:11 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
95538e7de9 Migrate appendingPathComponent to appending(component:)
`appending(component:)` is the more modern API and can take multiple path components at the same time.
2025-09-23 16:57:56 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
a005021666 Support indexing of mulitple Swift files within the same compiler invocation
Fixes #1268
2025-09-20 16:26:26 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
d73433128d Make the build/logMessage conform to the BSP spec
When I added the log structure to `build/logMessage` in #2022 I must have assumed that the entire BSP notifciation was an extension defined by SourceKit-LSP and didn’t realized that this was actually a change that made the notification non-compliant with BSP. Change it up a little bit to make it compliant again.
2025-09-02 20:41:40 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
c31b62eeda Merge pull request #2259 from ahoppen/only-reload-current-package
Improve package reloading logic when manifest is changed
2025-08-25 23:26:25 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
ac0eb22226 Improve package reloading logic when manifest is changed
Two improvements to the logic that determines if we need to reload the package on a file change:
1. Only reload a package if the modified package manifest or Package.resolved is in the root of the package folder. This is relevant if we have a multi-root workspace, in which currently a single change to a package manifest or Package.resolved causes all packages to get reloaded.
2. While I was at it, I noticed that we didn’t properly handle version-specific package manifests. Also trigger a package reload if a version-specific package manifest is modified, created or deleted.
2025-08-25 09:23:08 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
13007e7493 Catch output-file-map.json write error thrown from TSC
We already had logic to retry loading a package manifest if writing the output-file-map failed. This only covered errors thrown from Foundation but I was seeing similar errors from TSC. Cover those as well.
2025-08-25 07:48:46 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
d811fcf855 Ensure that we end the Reloading package interval if a call in reloadPackageAssumingOnPackageLoadingQueue throws
If a call in `reloadPackageAssumingOnPackageLoadingQueue` throws, we weren’t getting to the end of it and would thus never end the signpost started within. Move the `endInterval` call up ensure it is always ended.

Found this while investigating https://ci-external.swift.org/job/swift-PR-windows/44247/console, which failed SourceKit-LSP testing because PackageA could not be loaded due to

```
Initial package loading: invalid access to C:\Users\swift-ci\jenkins\workspace\swift-PR-windows\build\tmp\lsp-test\924F7085\PackageA\.build\index-build\x86_64-unknown-windows-msvc\debug\MyLibrary.build\output-file-map.json
```
2025-08-13 13:37:37 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
98cd30bb1c Apply exhaustive swift-format configuration from swift-syntax
Apply the exhaustive swift-format configuration from https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-syntax/pull/3117 to sourcekit-lsp. Also apply all automatic formattings.
2025-08-11 09:23:39 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
7f4f92e5bd Rename build system to build server in most cases
The term *build system* predated our wide-spread adoption of BSP for communicating between SourceKit-LSP to the build system and was never really the correct term anyway – ie. a `JSONCompilationDatabaseBuildSystem` never really sounded right. We now have a correct term for the communication layer between SourceKit-LSP: A build server. Rename most occurrences of *build system* to *build server* to reflect this. There are unfortunately a couple lingering instances of *build system* that we can’t change, most notably: `fallbackBuildSystem` in the config file, the `workspace/waitForBuildSystemUpdates` BSP extension request and the `synchronize-for-build-system-updates` experimental feature.
2025-08-02 08:45:01 +02:00