This can be useful to IDEs that want to perform some additional semantic processing of source files, which requires knowledge of a file’s build settings.
This request allows IDEs to disable SourceKit-LSP’s background indexing functionality when it requires all compute resources for other, more interactive, tasks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This implements an LSP Extension `PeekDocumentsRequest` to let `ExpandMacroCommand` to open the macro expansions in a "peeked" editor window.
For this to work, the client has to pass "workspace/peekDocuments" enabled to `ClientCapabilities.experimental` and the client should handle the `PeekDocumentsRequest` and show the expansions in a "peeked" editor window.
PR to support the above capability in the "Swift for VS Code" Extension: https://github.com/swiftlang/vscode-swift/pull/945
The "Swift for VS Code" extension cannot send the client capability, so it instead passes the same through `initializationOptions` in the `InitializeRequest`.
For editors which doesn't support this capability, `sourcekit-lsp` sends a `ShowDocumentRequest`.
The `ShowDocumentRequest` is updated to show all the macro expansions in a single generated file. Moreover, its folder structure is updated to use hex string of MD5 hash of concatenation of buffer names of expansions.
Fixes https://github.com/swiftlang/vscode-swift/issues/564
Fixes https://github.com/swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp/issues/1498 ( rdar://130207754 )
deleted OpenInterfaceRequest.swift and moved GeneratedInterfaceDetails to LanguageService.swift
replaced usages by passing its members as parameters directly, refactored usage of TextDocumentIdentifier to DocumentURI
removed from Messages.builtinRequests
removed from SwiftInterfaceTests
removed from Documentation/`LSP Extensions.md`
removed from Sources/LanguageServerProtocol/CMakeLists.txt
The idea here is to unify the different ways in which we can currently set options on SourceKit-LSP in a scalable way: Environment variables, command line arguments to `sourcekit-lsp` and initialization options.
The idea is that a user can define a `~/.sourcekit-lsp/.sourcekit-lsp` file (we store logs in `~/.sourcekit-lsp/logs` on non-Darwin platforms), which will be used as the default configuration for all SourceKit-LSP instances. They can also place a `.sourcekit-lsp` file in the root of a workspace to configure SourceKit-LSP for that project specifically, eg. setting arguments that need to be passed to `swift build` for that project and which thus also need to be set on SourceKit-LSP.
For compatibility reasons, I’m mapping the existing command line options into the new options structure for now. I hope to delete the command line arguments in the future and solely rely on `.sourcekit-lsp` configuration files.
Environment variable will be migrated to `.sourcekit-lsp` in a follow-up commit.
Users should not need to rely on this request. The index should always be updated automatically in the background. Having to invoke this request manes there is a bug in SourceKit-LSP's automatic re-indexing. It does, however, offer a workaround to re-index files when such a bug occurs where otherwise there would be no workaround.
rdar://127476221
Resolves#1263
------
Simplify `SemanticRefactoring` with new `Refactoring` protocol to handle sourcekitd requests
Create and implement `ExpandMacroCommand` while temporarily storing generated expansions.
Create test case `testFreestandingMacroExpansion`
Manually inject `ExpandMacroCommand` into `retrieveRefactorCodeActions` upon an "Inline Macro" from sourcekitd
Address Review Comments
Mark `@_spi(Testing) public` for `MacroExpansionEdit`
Address Review Comments
Create separate directory for each buffer with its name, containing a generated file named as the source file along with position range
Fixed generated macro expansion file extension not recognised, by switching to file names which don't contain fragments
Address Review Comments
Wrap the entire feature under `ExperimentalFeatures`
Address Review Comments
Make Swift Lint Pass
Fix Windows Build not passing
- Rename methods to highlight that we’re talking about generated interfaces here, not `.swiftinterface` files
- Don’t open the generated interface in `documentManager`. Opening documents in `documentManager` should only be done by the `textDocument/didOpen` notification from the LSP client. Otherwise we might indefinitely keep the document in the document manager
- After getting the generated interface from sourcekitd, close the document in sourcekitd again. We don’t provide semantic functionality in the generated interface yet, so we can’t interact with the generated interface path. Before, we left it open in sourcekitd indefinitely.
- A couple of code simplifications.
Fixes#878
rdar://116705653
For example when trying to go-to-definition to `filter` on `Array`, we get a USR `s:s14_ArrayProtocolPsE6filterySay7ElementQzGSbAEKXEKF::SYNTHESIZED::s:Sa`. We were trying to look it up in the index, which failed because synthesized extension methods are not indexed.
Instead, consult the `module` and `groupName` that `sourcekitd` returns in the cursor info request to decide which module to jump to.
rdar://126240558
This ways the client doesn’t need to create a hierarchical structure using the container names. It is also more flexible and allows nesting of test suites + the addition of labels and tags for swift-testing.
The data structure for `TestItem` has been heavily inspired by VS Code’s `TestItem` for the test explorer, which should make it fairly straightforward to integrate these results into the VS Code test explorer.
This uses the indexed rename request I added to clangd to perform global rename in clang’s language using SourceKit-LSP’s index: SourceKit-LSP’s index is used to find the locations to rename and the indexed rename request to clangd is used to translate the rename locations to edits.
rdar://118996369
Previously, we would sometimes log errors for example for the `setTrace` notification sent by VS Code. To avoid those logs, add cases for all known requests and notifications to the `TaskMetadata` initializers.
We could get into a race condition in `testAddFile` where the `DidChangeWatchedFilesNotification` would get handled after we try getting completion results that rely on it.
In a real-world use case, this is OK. Completion might still be incorrect until `DidChangeWatchedFilesNotification` gets handled but it will catch up eventually - usually earlier than later because in real-world scenarios the `DidChangeWatchedFilesNotification` and completion request are more than a few milliseconds apart.
In test, however, we need to guarantee deterministic ordering. Introduce a `BarrierRequest` that has `TaskMetadata.globalConfigurationChange` and thus ensures that all notifications and requests before it have finished before returning. We can run this fake request after sending the `DidChangeWatchedFilesNotification` to make sure that it is handled.
An alternative would be to mark `DidChangeWatchedFilesNotification` as `TaskMetadata.globalConfigurationChange`. But I would really like to avoid introducing a global ordering barrier between requests for a notification that is, for example, sent whenever a `.swift` file in the `.build` directory changes (e.g. on every package update).
The new approach has a few advantages over the olde TIBS-based approach:
1. The source file being tested is defined within the test case itself and not in a separate file, which makes it easier to understand the test case since the auxiliaury file doesn’t need to be opened. Finding it inside `Sources/SKTestSupport/INPUTS` is already hard for people that are not familiar with the codebase.
2. The build setup is significantly simpler since it doesn’t rely on `ninja`. It is thus easier to understand what is run during the test.
3. We can use the emoji location markers to refer to test locations, like we do for files that are opened using `TestSourceKitLSPClient.openDocument`.
This commit only migrates call hierarchy testing to the new design. If we like it, I’ll migrate the other test workspaces as well.
Add `.swift-format` to the repo and format the repo with `swift-format`.
This commit does not add any automation to enforce formatting of sourcekit-lsp in CI. The goal of this commit is to get the majority of source changes out of the way so that the diff of actually enforcing formatting will have fewer changes or conflicts.
Instead of storing build settings inside the language servers based on update notifications from the build system, always call into the `BuildSystemManager` to get the build settings.
Overall, I think this is a much clearer separation of concerns and will allow us to remove `SourceKitServer.documentToPendingQueue` in a follow-up commit as `SwiftLanguageServer` can always directly call into `BuildSystemManager` to get build settings and we don’t need to wait for the initial notification to receive the first build settings.
This requies `BuildServerBuildSystem` to keep track of the build settings it has received from the BSP server.
`ClangLanguageServer` still caches build settings locally. `ClangLanguageServer` will change to the same pull-based model in a follow-up commit.
The asyncification changes caused some non-deterministic test failures. I believe that some of these are due to race conditions that are the result of the partial transition to actors.
Instead of merging the asyncification piece by piece, I will collect the changes asyncification changes in a branch and then qualify that branch througougly (running CI multiple times) before merging it into `main`.
Instead of storing build settings inside the language servers based on update notifications from the build system, always call into the `BuildSystemManager` to get the build settings.
Overall, I think this is a much clearer separation of concerns and will allow us to remove `SourceKitServer.documentToPendingQueue` in a follow-up commit as `SwiftLanguageServer` can always directly call into `BuildSystemManager` to get build settings and we don’t need to wait for the initial notification to receive the first build settings.
This requies `BuildServerBuildSystem` to keep track of the build settings it has received from the BSP server.
`ClangLanguageServer` still caches build settings locally. `ClangLanguageServer` will change to the same pull-based model in a follow-up commit.
Instead of storing build settings inside the language servers based on update notifications from the build system, always call into the `BuildSystemManager` to get the build settings.
Overall, I think this is a much clearer separation of concerns and will allow us to remove `SourceKitServer.documentToPendingQueue` in a follow-up commit as `SwiftLanguageServer` can always directly call into `BuildSystemManager` to get build settings and we don’t need to wait for the initial notification to receive the first build settings.
This requies `BuildServerBuildSystem` to keep track of the build settings it has received from the BSP server.
`ClangLanguageServer` still caches build settings locally. `ClangLanguageServer` will change to the same pull-based model in a follow-up commit.
