Change a l public declarations to the `package` access level, accept for:
- The `LanguageServerProtocol` module
- The `BuildServerProtocol` module
- `InProcessClient.InProcessSourceKitLSPClient`
- `LanguageServerProtocolJSONRPC` (I would like to create a more ergonomic API for this like `InProcessSourceKitLSPClient` in the future, but for now, we’ll leave it public)
Unfortunately, our pattern of marking functions as `@_spi(Testing) public` no longer works with the `package` access level because declarations at the `package` access level cannot be marked as SPI. I have decided to just mark these functions as `package`. Alternatives would be:
- Add an underscore to these functions, like we did for functions exposed for testing before the introduction of `SPI`
- Use `@testable` import in the test targets and mark the methods as `internal`
Resolves#1315
rdar://128295618
The idea here is to unify the different ways in which we can currently set options on SourceKit-LSP in a scalable way: Environment variables, command line arguments to `sourcekit-lsp` and initialization options.
The idea is that a user can define a `~/.sourcekit-lsp/.sourcekit-lsp` file (we store logs in `~/.sourcekit-lsp/logs` on non-Darwin platforms), which will be used as the default configuration for all SourceKit-LSP instances. They can also place a `.sourcekit-lsp` file in the root of a workspace to configure SourceKit-LSP for that project specifically, eg. setting arguments that need to be passed to `swift build` for that project and which thus also need to be set on SourceKit-LSP.
For compatibility reasons, I’m mapping the existing command line options into the new options structure for now. I hope to delete the command line arguments in the future and solely rely on `.sourcekit-lsp` configuration files.
Environment variable will be migrated to `.sourcekit-lsp` in a follow-up commit.
Diagnostics are usually not helpful if the file’s target hasn’t been prepared yet. We should await the target’s preparation before returning diagnostics.
rdar://128645617
`SwiftPMBuildSystem.testFiles()` returned all source files in the package, including files of package dependencies. This caused us to index those files for tests in the syntactic test index, which we should not.
Make `SwiftPMBuildSystem.testFiles` only return files from the root package.
Also add test infrastructure to be able to test cross-package functionality.
rdar://126965614
When the client sends us `workspace/didChangeWatchedFiles` notification of an updated `.swift` file, we should refresh the other open files in that module since they might be referencing functions from that updated file.
If a `.swiftmodule` file has been updated, we refresh all the files within the package since they might import that module. Technically, we would only need to refresh files that are in module that are downstream of the updated module but we don’t currently have that information easily available from SwiftPM. Also, usually, if the client has a file from a low-level module open, he’ll be working on that module which means that such an optimization won’t help. The real solution here is to wait for us to finish preparation (which we would exactly know when it finishes since sourcekit-lsp would schedule it) but for that we need to implement background preparation.
Fixes#620Fixes#1116
rdar://99329579
rdar://123971779
Rename all the classes that write files to disk to create a test project that we can open in sourcekit-lsp to end with `TestProject`. This is better than the old `Workspace` suffix because it avoids ambiguities with the `Workspace` type inside sourcekit-lsp.
- IndexedSingleSwiftFileWorkspace -> IndexedSingleSwiftFileTestProject
- MultiFileTestWorkspace -> MultiFileTestProject
- SwiftPMTestWorkspace -> SwiftPMTestProject
