The SwiftPM build system integration was the only one in its own modules. Merge it into the `BuildSystemIntegration` modules next to eg. the compilation database build system.
As part of its initialization options the client can pass a
textDocument/codeLens object that lists the supported commands the
client can handle.
It is in the form of a dictionary where the key is the lens name
recognized by SourceKit-LSP and the value is the command as recognized
by the client.
```
initializationOptions: {
"textDocument/codeLens": {
supportedCommands: {
"swift.run": "clientCommandName_Run",
"swift.debug": "clientCommandName_Debug",
}
}
}
```
Adds a response to the textDocument/codeLens request that returns two
code lenses on the `@main` attribute of an application.
The LSP documentation breaks out the code lens requests into a
[`Code Lens Request`](https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#textDocument_codeLens)
and a
[`Code Lens Resolve Request`](https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#codeLens_resolve),
stating this is for performance reasons. However, there is no intensive
work we need to do in order to resolve the commands for a CodeLens;
we know them based on context at the time of discovery. For this reason
we return resolved lenses with Commands for code lens requests.
A missing piece is only returning code lenses if the file resides in an
executable product. To my knoledge Libraries and Plugins can't have an
`@main` entrypoint and so it doesn't make sense to provide these code
lenses in those contexts.
Some guidance is required on how to best determine if the textDocument
in the request is within an executable product.
`testCodeLensRequestWithInvalidProduct` asserts that no lenses are
returned with the `@main` attribute is on a file in a `.executable`, and
is currently failing until this is addressed.
Change a l public declarations to the `package` access level, accept for:
- The `LanguageServerProtocol` module
- The `BuildServerProtocol` module
- `InProcessClient.InProcessSourceKitLSPClient`
- `LanguageServerProtocolJSONRPC` (I would like to create a more ergonomic API for this like `InProcessSourceKitLSPClient` in the future, but for now, we’ll leave it public)
Unfortunately, our pattern of marking functions as `@_spi(Testing) public` no longer works with the `package` access level because declarations at the `package` access level cannot be marked as SPI. I have decided to just mark these functions as `package`. Alternatives would be:
- Add an underscore to these functions, like we did for functions exposed for testing before the introduction of `SPI`
- Use `@testable` import in the test targets and mark the methods as `internal`
Resolves#1315
rdar://128295618
Report to clients that the server supports the
`workspace/triggerReindex` request. This lets clients expose this
functionality only if SourceKit-LSP is configured to support it.
fix!: remove `documentManager` property
fix!: remove `documentManager` in constructor
fix: added documentManager as a computed Property
fix: remove old documentmanager resetting step
fix!: get throws instead of crashing server
fix: throw ResponseError instead of NSError
fix: adding try & orLog where necesary
fix: refined orLog usage
style: ran swift-format
fix: document being opened twice
fix(DocumentManager): remove unwanted comments
lint: ran swift format
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This implements an LSP Extension `PeekDocumentsRequest` to let `ExpandMacroCommand` to open the macro expansions in a "peeked" editor window.
For this to work, the client has to pass "workspace/peekDocuments" enabled to `ClientCapabilities.experimental` and the client should handle the `PeekDocumentsRequest` and show the expansions in a "peeked" editor window.
PR to support the above capability in the "Swift for VS Code" Extension: https://github.com/swiftlang/vscode-swift/pull/945
The "Swift for VS Code" extension cannot send the client capability, so it instead passes the same through `initializationOptions` in the `InitializeRequest`.
For editors which doesn't support this capability, `sourcekit-lsp` sends a `ShowDocumentRequest`.
The `ShowDocumentRequest` is updated to show all the macro expansions in a single generated file. Moreover, its folder structure is updated to use hex string of MD5 hash of concatenation of buffer names of expansions.
Fixes https://github.com/swiftlang/vscode-swift/issues/564
Fixes https://github.com/swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp/issues/1498 ( rdar://130207754 )
deleted OpenInterfaceRequest.swift and moved GeneratedInterfaceDetails to LanguageService.swift
replaced usages by passing its members as parameters directly, refactored usage of TextDocumentIdentifier to DocumentURI
removed from Messages.builtinRequests
removed from SwiftInterfaceTests
removed from Documentation/`LSP Extensions.md`
removed from Sources/LanguageServerProtocol/CMakeLists.txt
This allows us to flip the default in the future more easily. It also allows users to disable background indexing when it’s enabled by default.
rdar://130280855
The idea here is to unify the different ways in which we can currently set options on SourceKit-LSP in a scalable way: Environment variables, command line arguments to `sourcekit-lsp` and initialization options.
The idea is that a user can define a `~/.sourcekit-lsp/.sourcekit-lsp` file (we store logs in `~/.sourcekit-lsp/logs` on non-Darwin platforms), which will be used as the default configuration for all SourceKit-LSP instances. They can also place a `.sourcekit-lsp` file in the root of a workspace to configure SourceKit-LSP for that project specifically, eg. setting arguments that need to be passed to `swift build` for that project and which thus also need to be set on SourceKit-LSP.
For compatibility reasons, I’m mapping the existing command line options into the new options structure for now. I hope to delete the command line arguments in the future and solely rely on `.sourcekit-lsp` configuration files.
Environment variable will be migrated to `.sourcekit-lsp` in a follow-up commit.
clangd uses a completely different semantic token legend than SourceKit-LSP (it doesn’t even adhere to the ordering of the pre-defined token types) but we were passing index offsets from clangd through assuming that clangd uses the same legend, which was incorrect.
When retrieving semantic tokens from clangd, translate the semantic tokens from clangd’s legend to SourceKit-LSP’s legend.
rdar://129895062
Users should not need to rely on this request. The index should always be updated automatically in the background. Having to invoke this request manes there is a bug in SourceKit-LSP's automatic re-indexing. It does, however, offer a workaround to re-index files when such a bug occurs where otherwise there would be no workaround.
rdar://127476221
Resolves#1263
The purpose of the different modules wasn’t clearly defined, which lead to inconsistent responsibilities between the different modules. Define each module’s purpose and move a few files between modules to satisfy these definitions.
There are a few more larger changes that will need to be made for a fully consistent module structure. These are FIXMEs in the new Modules.md document and I’ll address them in follow-up PRs.
We need to watch for changes to `Package.resolved` so that we can update the dependency checkouts in `.index-build` when the user runs `swift package update`.
This allows VS Code to detect when sourcekitd has crashed and prompt the user to gather a diagnostic report + file an issue about the crash.
rdar://129678779
Fixes#1476
The key issue here was that we were looking at the symbol occurrence that had the `overrideOf` role and were using this symbol occurrence to also check that it’s a child of one of the receiver types. But if the protocol requirement is satisfied in an extension, we have an implicit symbol occurrence at the location where the protocol requirement is stated but the real declaration’s occurrence is inside the extension. The fix here is to just extract the USR from the `overrideOf` relation and then do another index lookup to find the symbol’s definition.
rdar://129412428
- Rename methods to highlight that we’re talking about generated interfaces here, not `.swiftinterface` files
- Don’t open the generated interface in `documentManager`. Opening documents in `documentManager` should only be done by the `textDocument/didOpen` notification from the LSP client. Otherwise we might indefinitely keep the document in the document manager
- After getting the generated interface from sourcekitd, close the document in sourcekitd again. We don’t provide semantic functionality in the generated interface yet, so we can’t interact with the generated interface path. Before, we left it open in sourcekitd indefinitely.
- A couple of code simplifications.
Fixes#878
rdar://116705653
Since the `Atomic*` types can not be marked as `Sendable` (because they aren’t C structs), we can change the variables to constants and can remove `nonisolated(unsafe)`.
This allows us to fix a toolchain when using a `SwiftPMBuildSystem`, which is critical to ensure that a target gets prepared using the same toolchain that is used to index it and that is used for sourcekitd.
We used C atomics but these were allocated as Swift variables. Even thought they were atomic, concurrent accesses to them could violate Swift’s exclusivity laws, raising thread sanitizer errors.
Allocate the C atomics using malloc to fix this problem.
rdar://129170128
