Files
swift-composable-architectu…/Tests/ComposableArchitectureTests/ScopeTests.swift
Mason Kim 71f8291ee7 Replace deprecated viewStore with store (#3341)
* [FIX] Replace deprecated viewStore with store

* [FIX] Replace deprecated viewStore with store in Article

* [TEST] Match the changed view store message with the test message

* [TEST] Match the changed view store message with the test message
2024-09-05 14:41:59 -07:00

153 lines
4.1 KiB
Swift

import ComposableArchitecture
import XCTest
@available(*, deprecated, message: "TODO: Update to use case pathable syntax with Swift 5.9")
final class ScopeTests: BaseTCATestCase {
func testStructChild() async {
let store = await TestStore(initialState: Feature.State()) {
Feature()
}
await store.send(.child1(.incrementButtonTapped)) {
$0.child1.count = 1
}
await store.send(.child1(.decrementButtonTapped)) {
$0.child1.count = 0
}
await store.send(.child1(.decrementButtonTapped)) {
$0.child1.count = -1
}
await store.receive(.child1(.incrementButtonTapped)) {
$0.child1.count = 0
}
}
func testEnumChild() async {
let store = await TestStore(initialState: Feature.State()) {
Feature()
}
await store.send(.child2(.count(1))) {
$0.child2 = .count(1)
}
await store.send(.child2(.count(-1))) {
$0.child2 = .count(-1)
}
await store.receive(.child2(.count(0))) {
$0.child2 = .count(0)
}
}
@MainActor
func testNilChild() async {
let store = TestStoreOf<Child2>(initialState: Child2.State.count(0)) {
Scope(state: \.name, action: \.name) {}
}
XCTExpectFailure {
$0.compactDescription == """
failed - A "Scope" at "\(#fileID):\(#line - 5)" received a child action when child state \
was set to a different case. …
Action:
Child2.Action.name
State:
Child2.State.count
This is generally considered an application logic error, and can happen for a few reasons:
• A parent reducer set "Child2.State" to a different case before the scoped reducer ran. \
Child reducers must run before any parent reducer sets child state to a different case. \
This ensures that child reducers can handle their actions while their state is still \
available. Consider using "Reducer.ifCaseLet" to embed this child reducer in the \
parent reducer that change its state to ensure the child reducer runs first.
• An in-flight effect emitted this action when child state was unavailable. While it may \
be perfectly reasonable to ignore this action, consider canceling the associated effect \
before child state changes to another case, especially if it is a long-living effect.
• This action was sent to the store while state was another case. Make sure that actions \
for this reducer can only be sent from a store when state is set to the appropriate \
case. In SwiftUI applications, use "SwitchStore".
"""
}
await store.send(.name("Blob"))
}
}
@Reducer
private struct Feature {
struct State: Equatable {
var child1 = Child1.State()
var child2 = Child2.State.count(0)
}
enum Action: Equatable {
case child1(Child1.Action)
case child2(Child2.Action)
}
var body: some ReducerOf<Self> {
Scope(state: \.child1, action: \.child1) {
Child1()
}
Scope(state: \.child2, action: \.child2) {
Child2()
}
}
}
@Reducer
private struct Child1 {
struct State: Equatable {
var count = 0
}
enum Action: Equatable {
case decrementButtonTapped
case incrementButtonTapped
}
var body: some Reducer<State, Action> {
Reduce { state, action in
switch action {
case .decrementButtonTapped:
state.count -= 1
return state.count < 0
? .run { await $0(.incrementButtonTapped) }
: .none
case .incrementButtonTapped:
state.count += 1
return .none
}
}
}
}
@Reducer
private struct Child2 {
enum State: Equatable {
case count(Int)
case name(String)
}
enum Action: Equatable {
case count(Int)
case name(String)
}
var body: some ReducerOf<Self> {
Scope(state: \.count, action: \.count) {
Reduce { state, action in
state = action
return state < 0
? .run { await $0(0) }
: .none
}
}
Scope(state: \.name, action: \.name) {
Reduce { state, action in
state = action
return state.isEmpty
? .run { await $0("Empty") }
: .none
}
}
}
}