mirror of
https://github.com/apple/swift.git
synced 2025-12-14 20:36:38 +01:00
Distinguish conformance and superclass generic requirements.
As part of this, use a different enum for parsed generic requirements. NFC except that I noticed that ASTWalker wasn't visiting the second type in a conformance constraint; fixing this seems to have no effect beyond producing better IDE annotations.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -754,6 +754,7 @@ public:
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (auto &Req : GS->getRequirements()) {
|
||||
switch (Req.getKind()) {
|
||||
case RequirementKind::Superclass:
|
||||
case RequirementKind::Conformance:
|
||||
ResultGS.ConformanceRequirements.emplace_back(
|
||||
sma::ConformanceRequirement{
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user