[libSyntax] Remove the C++ SyntaxClassifier

The recommended way forward is to use the SyntaxClassifier on the Swift
side.

By removing the C++ SyntaxClassifier, we can also eliminate the
-force-libsyntax-based-processing option that was used to bootstrap
incremental parsing and would generate the syntax map from a syntax
tree.
This commit is contained in:
Alex Hoppen
2018-07-27 14:14:25 -07:00
parent bae048123d
commit 749a13a6fe
38 changed files with 200 additions and 1644 deletions

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
// RUN: %sourcekitd-test -req=open -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift == -req=edit -print-raw-response -pos=6:13 -length=1 -replace=" " %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift == -req="edit" -pos=14:1 -length=0 -replace="let y = 2" -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift == -req="edit" -pos=8:10 -length=7 -replace='Int64 = 3; let z = 2' -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift == -req="edit" -pos=4:9 -length=2 -replace='50 * 95 - 100' -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift == -req="edit" -pos=1:1 -length=0 -replace='func firstFunc(x: Int) {}' -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift | %sed_clean > %t.response
// RUN: %FileCheck -input-file=%t.response %s --check-prefixes CHECK,CHECK-OLD
// RUN: %sourcekitd-test -req=open -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift -force-libsyntax-based-processing == -req=edit -print-raw-response -pos=6:13 -length=1 -replace=" " %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift -force-libsyntax-based-processing == -req="edit" -pos=14:1 -length=0 -replace="let y = 2" -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift -force-libsyntax-based-processing == -req="edit" -pos=8:10 -length=7 -replace='Int64 = 3; let z = 2' -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift -force-libsyntax-based-processing == -req="edit" -pos=4:9 -length=2 -replace='50 * 95 - 100' -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift -force-libsyntax-based-processing == -req="edit" -pos=1:1 -length=0 -replace='func firstFunc(x: Int) {}' -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-multiple-edits.swift -force-libsyntax-based-processing | %sed_clean > %t.libsyntax.response
// RUN: %FileCheck -input-file=%t.libsyntax.response %s --check-prefixes CHECK,CHECK-NEW
// RUN: %FileCheck -input-file=%t.response %s
// Initial syntax map
@@ -13,29 +11,23 @@
// CHECK-NEXT: {
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.doccomment,
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 2,
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: key.length: 14
// CHECK-NEW-NEXT: key.length: 13
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 14
// CHECK-NEXT: },
// CHECK-NEXT: {
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.doccomment,
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 16,
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 6
// CHECK-NEXT: },
// CHECK-NEXT: {
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.doccomment.field,
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 22,
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 4
// CHECK-NEXT: },
// CHECK-NEXT: {
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.doccomment,
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 26,
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 19
// CHECK-NEXT: },
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: {
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.doccomment,
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: key.offset: 16,
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: key.length: 6
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: },
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: {
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.doccomment.field,
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: key.offset: 22,
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: key.length: 4
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: },
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: {
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.doccomment,
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: key.offset: 26,
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: key.length: 19
// CHECK-OLD-NEXT: },
// CHECK-NEW-NEXT: {
// CHECK-NEW-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.doccomment,
// CHECK-NEW-NEXT: key.offset: 16,
// CHECK-NEW-NEXT: key.length: 28
// CHECK-NEW-NEXT: },
// CHECK-NEXT: {
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.keyword,
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 45,