averello/swift-mirror
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/apple/swift.git synced 2025-12-21 12:14:44 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

NFC: Fix indentation around the newly renamed LLVM_DEBUG macro.

Browse Source 
Jordan used a sed command to rename DEBUG to LLVM_DEBUG. That caused some
lines to wrap and messed up indentiation for multi-line arguments.
This commit is contained in:
Bob Wilson
2018-07-21 00:56:18 -07:00
parent 3257145cf1
commit 8e330ee344
89 changed files with 980 additions and 857 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
lib/SILOptimizer/LoopTransforms/ArrayBoundsCheckOpts.cpp
View File

@@ -311,8 +311,8 @@ private:
// that we don't understand.
if (Array && !isIdentifiedUnderlyingArrayObject(Array)) {
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
<< " not safe because of not identified underlying object "
<< *Array << " in " << *Inst);
<< " not safe because of not identified underlying object "
<< *Array << " in " << *Inst);
allArraysInMemoryAreUnsafe = true;
// No need to store specific arrays in this case.
UnsafeArrays.clear();
@@ -393,12 +393,12 @@ static bool removeRedundantChecksInBlock(SILBasicBlock &BB, ArraySet &Arrays,
auto IndexedArray =
getArrayIndexPair(Array, ArrayIndex, Kind);
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " IndexedArray: " << *Array << " and "
<< *ArrayIndex);
<< *ArrayIndex);
// Saw a check for the first time.
if (!RedundantChecks.count(IndexedArray)) {
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " first time: " << *Inst
<< " with array argument: " << *Array);
<< " with array argument: " << *Array);
RedundantChecks.insert(IndexedArray);
continue;
}
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static bool removeRedundantChecks(DominanceInfoNode *CurBB,
// Saw a check for the first time.
if (!DominatingSafeChecks.count(IndexedArray)) {
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " first time: " << *Inst
<< " with array arg: " << *Array);
<< " with array arg: " << *Array);
DominatingSafeChecks.insert(IndexedArray);
SafeChecksToPop.push_back(IndexedArray);
continue;
@@ -798,7 +798,8 @@ public:
InductionInfo *Info;
if (!(Info = analyzeIndVar(Arg, IV.Inc, IV.IncVal))) {
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " could not analyze the induction on: " << *Arg);
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " could not analyze the induction on: "
<< *Arg);
continue;
}
@@ -860,8 +861,8 @@ private:
return nullptr;
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " found an induction variable (ICMP_EQ): "
<< *HeaderVal << " start: " << *Start
<< " end: " << *End);
<< *HeaderVal << " start: " << *Start
<< " end: " << *End);
// Check whether the addition is overflow checked by a cond_fail or whether
// code in the preheader's predecessor ensures that we won't overflow.
@@ -1018,7 +1019,8 @@ static bool hoistChecksInLoop(DominanceInfo *DT, DominanceInfoNode *DTNode,
"Must be able to hoist the instruction.");
Changed = true;
ArrayCall.hoist(Preheader->getTerminator(), DT);
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " could hoist invariant bounds check: " << *Inst);
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << " could hoist invariant bounds check: "
<< *Inst);
continue;
}
@@ -1145,7 +1147,8 @@ static bool hoistBoundsChecks(SILLoop *Loop, DominanceInfo *DT, SILLoopInfo *LI,
if (!Loop->getSubLoops().empty())
return false;
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "Attempting to remove redundant checks in " << *Loop);
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "Attempting to remove redundant checks in "
<< *Loop);
LLVM_DEBUG(Header->getParent()->dump());
// Collect safe arrays. Arrays are safe if there is no function call that
@@ -1174,8 +1177,7 @@ static bool hoistBoundsChecks(SILLoop *Loop, DominanceInfo *DT, SILLoopInfo *LI,
SILBasicBlock *ExitBlk = Loop->getExitBlock();
SILBasicBlock *Latch = Loop->getLoopLatch();
if (!ExitingBlk || !Latch || !ExitBlk) {
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs()
<< "No single exiting block or latch found\n");
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "No single exiting block or latch found\n");
if (!Latch)
return Changed;