Make SILInstruction no longer a subclass of ValueBase and

introduce a common superclass, SILNode.

This is in preparation for allowing instructions to have multiple
results.  It is also a somewhat more elegant representation for
instructions that have zero results.  Instructions that are known
to have exactly one result inherit from a class, SingleValueInstruction,
that subclasses both ValueBase and SILInstruction.  Some care must be
taken when working with SILNode pointers and testing for equality;
please see the comment on SILNode for more information.

A number of SIL passes needed to be updated in order to handle this
new distinction between SIL values and SIL instructions.

Note that the SIL parser is now stricter about not trying to assign
a result value from an instruction (like 'return' or 'strong_retain')
that does not produce any.
This commit is contained in:
John McCall
2017-09-21 00:17:10 -07:00
parent 6d9294f565
commit ab3f77baf2
195 changed files with 6114 additions and 4985 deletions

View File

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ const uint16_t VERSION_MAJOR = 0;
/// in source control, you should also update the comment to briefly
/// describe what change you made. The content of this comment isn't important;
/// it just ensures a conflict if two people change the module format.
const uint16_t VERSION_MINOR = 366; // Last change: default argument resilience expansion
const uint16_t VERSION_MINOR = 367; // Last change: SIL values vs. instructions
using DeclID = PointerEmbeddedInt<unsigned, 31>;
using DeclIDField = BCFixed<31>;