// For some reason, we are suggesting the "last" property instead of the subscript. (But only in this test, not locally.) // XFAIL: * // RUN: rm -rf %t // RUN: split-file %s %t // RUN: not %target-swift-frontend -typecheck -I %t/Inputs %t/test.swift -enable-experimental-cxx-interop 2>&1 | %FileCheck %s //--- Inputs/module.modulemap module Test { header "test.h" requires cplusplus } //--- Inputs/test.h #include using V = std::vector; //--- test.swift import Test import CxxStdlib.vector public func test(v: V) { // CHECK: note: C++ method 'at' that returns a reference of type 'UnsafePointer' is unavailable. // CHECK: note: C++ method 'at' may return an interior pointer. // CHECK: note: Do you want to replace it with a call to the subscript operator? // CHECK: ~^~~ ~ // CHECK: [ ] v.at(1) // CHECK: note: C++ method 'at' that returns a reference of type 'UnsafePointer' is unavailable. // CHECK: note: C++ method 'at' may return an interior pointer. // CHECK: note: Do you want to replace it with a call to the subscript operator? // CHECK: ~~^~~ ~ // CHECK: [ ] v . at(42 ) }