Files
swift-mirror/test/decl/ext/extension-generic-objc.swift
Slava Pestov 8ecb83e29a Sema: Diagnose unsupported '@objc' on classes and members of extensions of classes with resilient ancestry
Unless -enable-resilient-objc-class-stubs is passed in, these cases
are not supported, so now we diagnose them instead of asserting or
failing to link.

Note the behavior change here; classes with resilient ancestry were
previously isObjC(). However this is wrong since isObjC() means
"statically visible to Objective-C via the generated header".

After this patch, isObjC() only returns true for a class with resilient
ancestry if -enable-resilient-objc-class-stubs is passed in.
2019-03-26 18:58:12 -04:00

57 lines
1.1 KiB
Swift

// RUN: %target-typecheck-verify-swift
// REQUIRES: objc_interop
import Foundation
// Tests for correct detection of the "objc_in_generic_extension" error,
// declared in {Swift Source}/include/swift/AST/DiagnosticsSema.def
// Test "0 levels" deep
class A<T> : NSObject {
init(a: ()) {
super.init()
}
}
extension A {
// This should throw an error
@objc func a1() {} // expected-error{{extensions of generic classes cannot contain '@objc' members}}
// This should *not* throw an error
func a2() {}
}
// Test "1 level" deep
class B : A<Int> {
init(b: ()) {
super.init(a: ())
}
}
extension B {
// This is supported now
@objc func b1() {}
func b2() {}
}
// Test "many levels" deep
class C : B {}
class D : C {
init(d: ()) {
super.init(b: ())
}
}
extension D {
// This is supported now
@objc func d1() {}
func d2() {}
}
class Outer<T> {
class Inner {}
}
extension Outer.Inner {
@objc func outerInner1() {}
// expected-error@-1{{extensions of classes from generic context cannot contain '@objc' members}}
func outerInner2() {}
}