Files
swift-mirror/lib/SILGen/Condition.cpp
John McCall e249fd680e Destructure result types in SIL function types.
Similarly to how we've always handled parameter types, we
now recursively expand tuples in result types and separately
determine a result convention for each result.

The most important code-generation change here is that
indirect results are now returned separately from each
other and from any direct results.  It is generally far
better, when receiving an indirect result, to receive it
as an independent result; the caller is much more likely
to be able to directly receive the result in the address
they want to initialize, rather than having to receive it
in temporary memory and then copy parts of it into the
target.

The most important conceptual change here that clients and
producers of SIL must be aware of is the new distinction
between a SILFunctionType's *parameters* and its *argument
list*.  The former is just the formal parameters, derived
purely from the parameter types of the original function;
indirect results are no longer in this list.  The latter
includes the indirect result arguments; as always, all
the indirect results strictly precede the parameters.
Apply instructions and entry block arguments follow the
argument list, not the parameter list.

A relatively minor change is that there can now be multiple
direct results, each with its own result convention.
This is a minor change because I've chosen to leave
return instructions as taking a single operand and
apply instructions as producing a single result; when
the type describes multiple results, they are implicitly
bound up in a tuple.  It might make sense to split these
up and allow e.g. return instructions to take a list
of operands; however, it's not clear what to do on the
caller side, and this would be a major change that can
be separated out from this already over-large patch.

Unsurprisingly, the most invasive changes here are in
SILGen; this requires substantial reworking of both call
emission and reabstraction.  It also proved important
to switch several SILGen operations over to work with
RValue instead of ManagedValue, since otherwise they
would be forced to spuriously "implode" buffers.
2016-02-18 01:26:28 -08:00

210 lines
7.8 KiB
C++

//===--- Condition.cpp - Implements the SILGen Condition class ------------===//
//
// This source file is part of the Swift.org open source project
//
// Copyright (c) 2014 - 2016 Apple Inc. and the Swift project authors
// Licensed under Apache License v2.0 with Runtime Library Exception
//
// See http://swift.org/LICENSE.txt for license information
// See http://swift.org/CONTRIBUTORS.txt for the list of Swift project authors
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "Condition.h"
#include "Initialization.h"
#include "ManagedValue.h"
#include "RValue.h"
#include "swift/SIL/SILArgument.h"
#include "swift/SIL/SILFunction.h"
using namespace swift;
using namespace Lowering;
void Condition::enterTrue(SILGenFunction &SGF) {
assert(TrueBB && "Cannot call enterTrue without a True block!");
// TrueBB has already been inserted somewhere unless there's a
// continuation block.
if (!ContBB) return;
SGF.B.emitBlock(TrueBB);
}
/// Extract the last SILLocation used in BB.
static SILLocation getContinuationLoc(SILBasicBlock &BB, SILLocation Fallback) {
for (auto I = BB.rbegin(); I != BB.rend(); ++I)
if (auto L = I->getLoc())
return L;
return Fallback;
}
void Condition::exitTrue(SILGenFunction &SGF, ArrayRef<SILValue> Args) {
// If there's no continuation block, it's because the condition was
// folded to true. In that case, we just continue emitting code as
// if we were still in the true case, and we're unreachable iff the
// end of the true case is unreachable. In other words, there's
// nothing to do.
if (!ContBB) {
assert(!FalseBB && "no continuation");
return;
}
// If there is a continuation block, we should branch to it if the
// current point is reachable.
if (!SGF.B.hasValidInsertionPoint()) {
// If there is no false code, the continuation block has a use
// because the main condition jumps directly to it.
assert(ContBB->pred_empty() || !FalseBB);
return;
}
// Otherwise, resume into the continuation block. This branch might
// be folded by exitFalse if it turns out that that point is
// unreachable.
SGF.B.createBranch(getContinuationLoc(*SGF.B.getInsertionBB(), Loc),
ContBB, Args);
// Coming out of exitTrue, we can be in one of three states:
// - a valid non-terminal IP, but only if there is no continuation
// block, which is only possible if there is no false block;
// - a valid terminal IP, if the end of the true block was reachable; or
// - a cleared IP, if the end of the true block was not reachable.
}
void Condition::enterFalse(SILGenFunction &SGF) {
assert(FalseBB && "entering the false branch when it was not valid");
// FalseBB has already been inserted somewhere unless there's a
// continuation block.
if (!ContBB) return;
// It's possible to have no insertion point here if the end of the
// true case was unreachable.
SGF.B.emitBlock(FalseBB);
}
void Condition::exitFalse(SILGenFunction &SGF, ArrayRef<SILValue> Args) {
// If there's no continuation block, it's because the condition was
// folded to false. In that case, we just continue emitting code as
// if we were still in the false case, and we're unreachable iff the
// end of the false case is unreachable. In other words, there's
// nothing to do.
if (!ContBB) return;
if (ContBB->pred_empty()) {
// If the true case didn't need the continuation block, then
// we don't either, regardless of whether the current location
// is reachable. Just keep inserting / being unreachable
// right where we are.
} else if (!SGF.B.hasValidInsertionPoint()) {
// If the true case did need the continuation block, but the false
// case doesn't, just merge the continuation block back into its
// single predecessor and move the IP there.
//
// Note that doing this tends to strand the false code after
// everything else in the function, so maybe it's not a great idea.
auto PI = ContBB->pred_begin();
SILBasicBlock *ContPred = *PI;
// Verify there was only a single predecessor to ContBB.
++PI;
assert(PI == ContBB->pred_end() && "Only expect one branch to the ContBB");
// Insert before the uncond branch and zap it.
auto *Br = cast<BranchInst>(ContPred->getTerminator());
SGF.B.setInsertionPoint(Br->getParent());
Br->eraseFromParent();
assert(ContBB->pred_empty() &&
"Zapping the branch should make ContBB dead");
} else {
// Otherwise, branch to the continuation block and start inserting there.
SGF.B.createBranch(getContinuationLoc(*SGF.B.getInsertionBB(), Loc),
ContBB, Args);
}
}
SILBasicBlock *Condition::complete(SILGenFunction &SGF) {
// If there is no continuation block, it's because we
// constant-folded the branch. The case-exit will have left us in a
// normal insertion state (i.e. not a post-terminator IP) with
// nothing to clean up after.
if (!ContBB) {
return SGF.B.getInsertionBB();
}
// Kill the continuation block if it's not being used. Case-exits
// only leave themselves post-terminator if they use the
// continuation block, so we're in an acceptable insertion state.
if (ContBB->pred_empty() && ContBB->bbarg_empty()) {
SGF.eraseBasicBlock(ContBB);
return SGF.B.hasValidInsertionPoint() ? SGF.B.getInsertionBB() : nullptr;
}
// Okay, we need to insert the continuation block.
SGF.B.emitBlock(ContBB);
return ContBB;
}
ConditionalValue::ConditionalValue(SILGenFunction &gen, SGFContext C,
SILLocation loc,
const TypeLowering &valueTL)
: gen(gen), tl(valueTL), contBB(gen.createBasicBlock()), loc(loc)
{
if (tl.isAddressOnly()) {
// If the result type is address-only, get a result buffer for it.
result = gen.getBufferForExprResult(loc, tl.getLoweredType(), C);
} else {
// Otherwise, add a BB arg to the continuation block to receive loadable
// result.
result = new (gen.F.getModule()) SILArgument(contBB, tl.getLoweredType());
}
}
SGFContext ConditionalValue::enterBranch(SILBasicBlock *bb) {
if (bb) {
assert(!gen.B.hasValidInsertionPoint() && "already in a branch");
gen.B.emitBlock(bb);
}
assert(!scope.hasValue() && "already have a scope");
// Start a scope for the current branch.
scope.emplace(gen.Cleanups, CleanupLocation::get(loc));
// Code emitted in the branch can emit into our buffer for address-only
// conditionals.
if (tl.isAddressOnly()) {
assert(!currentInitialization && "already have an initialization?!");
currentInitialization = gen.useBufferAsTemporary(result, tl);
return SGFContext(currentInitialization.get());
}
/// TODO: We might be able to coordinate AllowPlusZero across conditionals
/// if all branches of the conditional can actually produce a +0 result.
return SGFContext();
}
void ConditionalValue::exitBranch(RValue &&condResult) {
assert(scope.hasValue() && "no current scope?!");
if (tl.isAddressOnly()) {
// Transfer the result into our buffer if it wasn't emitted in-place
// already.
assert(currentInitialization && "no current initialization?!");
std::move(condResult).forwardInto(gen, loc,
currentInitialization.release());
scope.reset();
gen.B.createBranch(loc, contBB);
} else {
SILValue resultVal = std::move(condResult).forwardAsSingleValue(gen, loc);
// Branch with the result as a BB argument.
scope.reset();
gen.B.createBranch(loc, contBB, resultVal);
}
}
ManagedValue ConditionalValue::complete() {
assert(!gen.B.hasValidInsertionPoint() && "still in a branch");
assert(!scope && "still in a branch scope");
assert(!currentInitialization && "still in a branch initialization");
gen.B.emitBlock(contBB);
return gen.emitManagedRValueWithCleanup(result);
}