Files
swift-mirror/test/SourceKit/Misc/resource-dir-handling.swift
Jordan Rose 43feb9cbe1 On Apple platforms, use swiftmodule directories for the stdlib (#21797)
This changes the Swift resource directory from looking like

    lib/
      swift/
        macosx/
          libswiftCore.dylib
          libswiftDarwin.dylib
          x86_64/
            Swift.swiftmodule
            Swift.swiftdoc
            Darwin.swiftmodule
            Darwin.swiftdoc

to

    lib/
      swift/
        macosx/
          libswiftCore.dylib
          libswiftDarwin.dylib
          Swift.swiftmodule/
            x86_64.swiftmodule
            x86_64.swiftdoc
          Darwin.swiftmodule/
            x86_64.swiftmodule
            x86_64.swiftdoc

matching the layout we use for multi-architecture swiftmodules
everywhere else (particularly frameworks).

There's no change in this commit to how Linux swiftmodules are
packaged. There's been past interest in going the /opposite/ direction
for Linux, since there's not standard support for fat
(multi-architecture) .so libraries. Moving the .so search path /down/
to an architecture-specific directory on Linux would allow the same
resource directory to be used for both host-compiling and
cross-compiling.

rdar://problem/43545560
2019-02-19 14:47:21 -08:00

13 lines
573 B
Swift

// REQUIRES: OS=macosx
var p: CoolInt
// RUN: %empty-directory(%t)
// RUN: %empty-directory(%t/custom-resource-dir/macosx/Swift.swiftmodule)
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -emit-module -module-name Swift -parse-stdlib -target x86_64-apple-macosx10.12 %S/Inputs/custom-resource-stdlib.swift -o %t/custom-resource-dir/macosx/Swift.swiftmodule/%target-swiftmodule-name
// RUN: %sourcekitd-test -req=cursor -pos=3:8 %s -- -resource-dir %t/custom-resource-dir -target x86_64-apple-macosx10.12 %s | %FileCheck %s
// CHECK: source.lang.swift.ref.struct
// CHECK-NEXT: CoolInt