mirror of
https://github.com/apple/swift.git
synced 2025-12-14 20:36:38 +01:00
749a13a6fe
The recommended way forward is to use the SyntaxClassifier on the Swift side. By removing the C++ SyntaxClassifier, we can also eliminate the -force-libsyntax-based-processing option that was used to bootstrap incremental parsing and would generate the syntax map from a syntax tree.
71 lines
2.5 KiB
Swift
71 lines
2.5 KiB
Swift
// RUN: %sourcekitd-test -req=open -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-edit-chained-comment.swift == -req=edit -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-edit-chained-comment.swift -pos=1:9 -replace=" " -length=1 == -req=edit -print-raw-response %S/Inputs/syntaxmap-edit-chained-comment.swift -pos=1:9 -replace="/" -length=1 | %sed_clean > %t.response
|
|
// RUN: %FileCheck -input-file=%t.response %s
|
|
|
|
// Initial state
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: {{^}}{
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 0,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 25,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.diagnostic_stage: source.diagnostic.stage.swift.parse,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.syntaxmap: [
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.keyword,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 0,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 3
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: },
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.identifier,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 4,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 1
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: },
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.comment,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 8,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 6
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: },
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.comment,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 16,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 6
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: },
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.number,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 23,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 1
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: }
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ],
|
|
|
|
|
|
// After replacing the '/' from the comment open with ' '
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: {{^}}{
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 8,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 14,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.diagnostic_stage: source.diagnostic.stage.swift.parse,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.syntaxmap: [
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.comment,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 13,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 6
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: }
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ],
|
|
|
|
// After adding the '/' back to the comment open
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: {{^}}{
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 8,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 14,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.diagnostic_stage: source.diagnostic.stage.swift.parse,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.syntaxmap: [
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.comment,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 8,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 6
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: },
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.kind: source.lang.swift.syntaxtype.comment,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.offset: 16,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: key.length: 6
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: }
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ],
|