mirror of
https://github.com/apple/swift.git
synced 2025-12-21 12:14:44 +01:00
5e75b1ad3b
These are all tests that would otherwise fail if the expression type checker support for Swift 3 is removed. I've moved some of the code from deleted Migrator tests into new Constraints tests that verify that we do not support the constructs.
26 lines
1.3 KiB
Swift
26 lines
1.3 KiB
Swift
// RUN: %target-typecheck-verify-swift
|
|
|
|
func test1(_: ()) {} // expected-note {{'test1' declared here}}
|
|
test1() // expected-error {{missing argument for parameter #1 in call}}
|
|
|
|
enum Result<T> {
|
|
case success(T) // expected-note {{'success' declared here}}
|
|
}
|
|
func test3(_: Result<()>) {}
|
|
test3(.success()) // expected-error {{missing argument for parameter #1 in call}}
|
|
|
|
func toString(indexes: Int?...) -> String {
|
|
let _ = indexes.reduce(0) { print($0); return $0.0 + ($0.1 ?? 0)}
|
|
// expected-error@-1 {{contextual closure type '(_, Int?) throws -> _' expects 2 arguments, but 1 was used in closure body}}
|
|
let _ = indexes.reduce(0) { (true ? $0 : (1, 2)).0 + ($0.1 ?? 0) }
|
|
// expected-error@-1 {{contextual closure type '(_, Int?) throws -> _' expects 2 arguments, but 1 was used in closure body}}
|
|
_ = ["Hello", "Foo"].sorted { print($0); return $0.0.count > ($0).1.count }
|
|
// expected-error@-1 {{argument passed to call that takes no arguments}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func doit(_ x: Int) -> Bool { return x > 0 }
|
|
let _: ((String, Int)) -> [String:Bool] = { [$0: doit($1)] }
|
|
// expected-error@-1 {{closure tuple parameter '(String, Int)' does not support destructuring with implicit parameters}}
|
|
func returnClosure() -> ((Int, Int)) -> Bool { return {$1 > $0} }
|
|
// expected-error@-1 {{closure tuple parameter '(Int, Int)' does not support destructuring with implicit parameters}}
|