I think from SIL's perspective, it should only worry about whether the
type is move-only. That includes MoveOnlyWrapped SILTypes and regular
types that cannot be copied.
Most of the code querying `SILType::isPureMoveOnly` is in SILGen, where
it's very likely that the original AST type is sitting around already.
In such cases, I think it's fine to ask the AST type if it is
noncopyable. The clarity of only asking the ASTType if it's noncopyable
is beneficial, I think.
f1142d5da4