Patrick Steinhardt 9e35f29eb1 upload-pack: reduce lock contention when writing packfile data
In our production systems we have recently observed write contention in
git-upload-pack(1). The system in question was consistently streaming
packfiles at a rate of dozens of gigabits per second, but curiously the
system was neither bottlenecked on CPU, memory or IOPS.

We eventually discovered that Git was spending 80% of its time in
`pipe_write()`, out of which almost all of the time was spent in the
`ep_poll_callback` function in the kernel. Quoting the reporter:

  This infrastructure is part of an event notification queue designed to
  allow for multiple producers to emit events, but that concurrency
  safety is guarded by 3 layers of locking. The layer we're hitting
  contention in uses a simple reader/writer lock mode (a.k.a. shared
  versus exclusive mode), where producers need shared-mode (read mode),
  and various other actions use exclusive (write) mode.

The system in question generates workloads where we have hundreds of
git-upload-pack(1) processes active at the same point in time. These
processes end up contending around those locks, and the consequence is
that the Git processes stall.

Now git-upload-pack(1) already has the infrastructure in place to buffer
some of the data it reads from git-pack-objects(1) before actually
sending it out. We only use this infrastructure in very limited ways
though, so we generally end up matching one read(3p) call with one
write(3p) call. Even worse, when the sideband is enabled we end up
matching one read with _two_ writes: one for the pkt-line length, and
one for the packfile data.

Extend our use of the buffering infrastructure so that we soak up bytes
until the buffer is filled up at least 2/3rds of its capacity. The
change is relatively simple to implement as we already know to flush the
buffer in `create_pack_file()` after git-pack-objects(1) has finished.

This significantly reduces the number of write(3p) syscalls we need to
do. Before this change, cloning the Linux repository resulted in around
400,000 write(3p) syscalls. With the buffering in place we only do
around 130,000 syscalls.

Now we could of course go even further and make sure that we always fill
up the whole buffer. But this might cause an increase in read(3p)
syscalls, and some tests show that this only reduces the number of
write(3p) syscalls from 130,000 to 100,000. So overall this doesn't seem
worth it.

Helped-by: Matt Smiley <msmiley@gitlab.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-02-27 09:22:28 -08:00
2026-01-23 13:34:36 -08:00
2026-01-23 13:34:37 -08:00
2025-12-19 17:57:26 +09:00
2026-01-23 13:34:36 -08:00
2025-10-08 12:17:55 -07:00
2026-01-23 13:34:36 -08:00
2025-10-26 16:34:39 -07:00
2025-12-30 12:58:19 +09:00
2025-12-07 07:28:13 +09:00
2026-01-09 18:36:16 -08:00
2026-01-09 06:37:02 -08:00
2025-09-16 18:00:25 -07:00
2025-09-16 18:00:25 -07:00
2025-12-25 08:29:29 +09:00
2025-12-25 08:29:28 +09:00
2025-12-30 10:53:47 +09:00
2025-11-03 06:49:55 -08:00
2025-09-12 08:59:52 -07:00
2025-12-05 14:49:56 +09:00
2026-02-01 18:15:01 -08:00
2026-01-23 13:34:36 -08:00
2025-12-16 11:08:35 +09:00
2025-11-25 12:15:59 -08:00
2025-11-25 12:15:59 -08:00
2025-11-19 17:41:03 -08:00
2025-11-19 17:41:03 -08:00
2025-08-21 13:46:59 -07:00
2026-01-23 13:34:37 -08:00
2025-11-04 07:48:07 -08:00
2025-08-21 13:46:58 -07:00
2025-11-19 10:55:42 -08:00
2025-12-23 11:33:15 +09:00
2025-12-25 08:29:28 +09:00
2025-12-25 08:29:28 +09:00
2025-12-29 22:02:54 +09:00
2026-01-09 18:36:17 -08:00
2026-01-09 18:36:17 -08:00
2025-12-16 11:08:35 +09:00
2025-12-07 07:28:11 +09:00
2025-11-12 14:04:04 -08:00

Build status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.adoc to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.adoc for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.adoc for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.adoc (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).

Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md (a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).

To subscribe to the list, send an email to git+subscribe@vger.kernel.org (see https://subspace.kernel.org/subscribing.html for details). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, https://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
Git Source Code Mirror - This is a publish-only repository but pull requests can be turned into patches to the mailing list via GitGitGadget (https://gitgitgadget.github.io/). Please follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches procedure for any of your improvements.
Readme 524 MiB
Languages
C 50.5%
Shell 38.8%
Perl 4.4%
Tcl 3.2%
Python 0.8%
Other 2.1%