mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2025-12-12 20:36:24 +01:00
c177d3dc50
In most places that write files to the object database (even packfiles via index-pack or fast-import), we use finalize_object_file(). This prefers link()/unlink() over rename(), because it means we will prefer data that is already in the repository to data that we are newly writing. We should do the same thing in pack-objects. Even though we don't think of it as accepting outside data (and thus not being susceptible to collision attacks), in theory a determined attacker could present just the right set of objects to cause an incremental repack to generate a pack with their desired hash. This has some test and real-world fallout, as seen in the adjustment to t5303 below. That test script assumes that we can "fix" corruption by repacking into a good state, including when the pack generated by that repack operation collides with a (corrupted) pack with the same hash. This violates our assumption from the previous adjustments to finalize_object_file() that if we're moving a new file over an existing one, that since their checksums match, so too must their contents. This makes "fixing" corruption like this a more explicit operation, since the test (and users, who may fix real-life corruption using a similar technique) must first move the broken contents out of the way. Note also that we now call adjust_shared_perm() twice. We already call adjust_shared_perm() in stage_tmp_packfiles(), and now call it again in finalize_object_file(). This is somewhat wasteful, but cleaning up the existing calls to adjust_shared_perm() is tricky (because sometimes we're writing to a tmpfile, and sometimes we're writing directly into the final destination), so let's tolerate some minor waste until we can more carefully clean up the now-redundant calls. Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see
Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and
Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command.
If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be
read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the
documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt
(man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is
installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).
Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message
string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md
(a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).
To subscribe to the list, send an email to git+subscribe@vger.kernel.org (see https://subspace.kernel.org/subscribing.html for details). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, https://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.
The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):
- random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
- stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
- "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
- "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks