mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2026-05-26 11:40:24 +02:00
KVM: arm64: Make MTE_frac masking conditional on MTE capability
If MTE_frac is masked out unconditionally then the guest will always see ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac as 0. However, a value of 0 when ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE is 2 indicates that MTE_ASYNC is supported. Hence, for a host with ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE==2 and ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac==0xf (MTE_ASYNC unsupported) the guest would see MTE_ASYNC advertised as supported whilst the host does not support it. Hence, expose the sanitised value of MTE_frac to the guest and user-space. As MTE_frac was previously hidden, always 0, and KVM must accept values from KVM provided by user-space, when ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.MTE is 2 allow user-space to set ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.MTE_frac to 0. However, ignore it to avoid incorrectly claiming hardware support for MTE_ASYNC in the guest. Note that linux does not check the value of ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac and wrongly assumes that MTE async faults can be generated even on hardware that does nto support them. This issue is not addressed here. Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250512114112.359087-3-ben.horgan@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1600,13 +1600,14 @@ static u64 __kvm_read_sanitised_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
val = sanitise_id_aa64pfr0_el1(vcpu, val);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1:
|
||||
if (!kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm))
|
||||
if (!kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm)) {
|
||||
val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE);
|
||||
val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_SME);
|
||||
val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_RNDR_trap);
|
||||
val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_NMI);
|
||||
val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac);
|
||||
val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_GCS);
|
||||
val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_THE);
|
||||
val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTEX);
|
||||
@@ -1953,11 +1954,34 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
{
|
||||
u64 hw_val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1);
|
||||
u64 mpam_mask = ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MPAM_frac_MASK;
|
||||
u8 mte = SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, MTE, hw_val);
|
||||
u8 user_mte_frac = SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, MTE_frac, user_val);
|
||||
u8 hw_mte_frac = SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, MTE_frac, hw_val);
|
||||
|
||||
/* See set_id_aa64pfr0_el1 for comment about MPAM */
|
||||
if ((hw_val & mpam_mask) == (user_val & mpam_mask))
|
||||
user_val &= ~ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MPAM_frac_MASK;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Previously MTE_frac was hidden from guest. However, if the
|
||||
* hardware supports MTE2 but not MTE_ASYM_FAULT then a value
|
||||
* of 0 for this field indicates that the hardware supports
|
||||
* MTE_ASYNC. Whereas, 0xf indicates MTE_ASYNC is not supported.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* As KVM must accept values from KVM provided by user-space,
|
||||
* when ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.MTE is 2 allow user-space to set
|
||||
* ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.MTE_frac to 0. However, ignore it to avoid
|
||||
* incorrectly claiming hardware support for MTE_ASYNC in the
|
||||
* guest.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (mte == ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_MTE2 &&
|
||||
hw_mte_frac == ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac_NI &&
|
||||
user_mte_frac == ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac_ASYNC) {
|
||||
user_val &= ~ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac_MASK;
|
||||
user_val |= hw_val & ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_frac_MASK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, user_val);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user