Andrii Nakryiko d636c8da2d Merge branch 'libbpf: Support uniform BTF-defined key/value specification across all BPF maps'
Hengqi Chen says:

====================

Currently a bunch of (usually pretty specialized) BPF maps do not support
specifying BTF types for they key and value. For such maps, specifying
their definition like this:

  struct {
      __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY);
      __type(key, int);
      __type(value, int);
  } my_perf_buf SEC(".maps");

Would actually produce warnings about retrying BPF map creation without BTF.
Users are forced to know such nuances and use __uint(key_size, 4) instead.
This is non-uniform, annoying, and inconvenient.

This patch set teaches libbpf to recognize those specialized maps and removes
BTF type IDs when creating BPF map. Also, update existing BPF selftests to
exericse this change.
====================

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2021-10-01 15:31:51 -07:00
2021-09-15 13:56:37 -07:00

Linux kernel
============

There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can
be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read
Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first.

In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or
``make pdfdocs``.  The formatted documentation can also be read online at:

    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/

There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory,
several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation.

Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the
requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about
the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.
S
Description
No description provided
Readme
5.7 GiB
Languages
C 96.9%
Assembly 0.9%
Rust 0.6%
Shell 0.6%
Python 0.5%
Other 0.3%