[Serialization] Only remark if the last digit mismatches in precise tag check

Weaken the precise tag check at loading swiftmodule to accept binary
modules build by a compiler with a tag where only the last digit is
different. We assume that the other digit in the version should ensure
compiler and stdlib compatibility. If the last digit doesn't match,
still raise a remark.

rdar://105158258
This commit is contained in:
Alexis Laferrière
2023-02-13 12:56:07 -08:00
parent e079db233f
commit a5ccbf3264
5 changed files with 44 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@@ -804,9 +804,13 @@ ERROR(serialization_module_too_old,Fatal,
"rebuild %0 and try again: %1",
(Identifier, StringRef))
ERROR(serialization_module_incompatible_revision,Fatal,
"compiled module was created by a different version of the compiler; "
"rebuild %0 and try again: %1",
(Identifier, StringRef))
"compiled module was created by a different version of the compiler '%0'; "
"rebuild %1 and try again: %2",
(StringRef, Identifier, StringRef))
REMARK(serialization_module_problematic_revision, none,
"compiled module was created by a different version of the compiler '%0': "
"%1",
(StringRef, StringRef))
ERROR(serialization_missing_single_dependency,Fatal,
"missing required module '%0'", (StringRef))
ERROR(serialization_missing_dependencies,Fatal,

View File

@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ struct ValidationInfo {
version::Version compatibilityVersion = {};
llvm::VersionTuple userModuleVersion;
StringRef sdkName = {};
StringRef problematicRevision = {};
size_t bytes = 0;
Status status = Status::Malformed;
std::vector<StringRef> allowableClients;

View File

@@ -372,10 +372,18 @@ static ValidationInfo validateControlBlock(
StringRef compilerRevision = forcedDebugRevision ?
forcedDebugRevision : version::getCurrentCompilerSerializationTag();
if (moduleRevision != compilerRevision) {
result.status = Status::RevisionIncompatible;
// The module versions are mismatching, record it and diagnose later.
result.problematicRevision = moduleRevision;
// We can't trust this module format at this point.
return result;
// Reject the module only it still mismatches without the last digit.
StringRef compilerRevisionHead = compilerRevision.rsplit('.').first;
StringRef moduleRevisionHead = moduleRevision.rsplit('.').first;
if (moduleRevisionHead != compilerRevisionHead) {
result.status = Status::RevisionIncompatible;
// We can't trust the module format at this point.
return result;
}
}
}
break;

View File

@@ -836,6 +836,13 @@ LoadedFile *SerializedModuleLoaderBase::loadAST(
if (loadedModuleFile &&
loadedModuleFile->mayHaveDiagnosticsPointingAtBuffer())
OrphanedModuleFiles.push_back(std::move(loadedModuleFile));
} else {
// Report non-fatal compiler tag mismatch.
if (!loadInfo.problematicRevision.empty()) {
Ctx.Diags.diagnose(*diagLoc,
diag::serialization_module_problematic_revision,
loadInfo.problematicRevision, moduleBufferID);
}
}
// The -experimental-hermetic-seal-at-link flag turns on dead-stripping
@@ -896,7 +903,7 @@ void swift::serialization::diagnoseSerializedASTLoadFailure(
break;
case serialization::Status::RevisionIncompatible:
Ctx.Diags.diagnose(diagLoc, diag::serialization_module_incompatible_revision,
ModuleName, moduleBufferID);
loadInfo.problematicRevision, ModuleName, moduleBufferID);
break;
case serialization::Status::Malformed:
Ctx.Diags.diagnose(diagLoc, diag::serialization_malformed_module,

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ public func foo() {}
/// Build Lib as a resilient and non-resilient swiftmodule
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -emit-module %t/Lib.swift -swift-version 5 -o %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache -module-name ResilientLib -enable-library-evolution
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -emit-module %t/Lib.swift -swift-version 5 -o %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache -module-name NonResilientLib
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=my-revision \
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=1.0.0.0.1 \
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -emit-module %t/Lib.swift -swift-version 5 -o %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache -module-name TaggedLib -enable-library-evolution
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@ import NonResilientLib
foo()
/// Building a NonResilientLib client should reject the import for a tagged compiler
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=my-revision \
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=1.0.0.0.1 \
// RUN: not %target-swift-frontend -typecheck %t/NonResilientClient.swift -swift-version 5 -I %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache 2>&1 | %FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-NON-RESILIENT %s
// CHECK-NON-RESILIENT: compiled module was created by a different version of the compiler; rebuild 'NonResilientLib' and try again: {{.*}}NonResilientLib.swiftmodule
// CHECK-NON-RESILIENT: compiled module was created by a different version of the compiler ''; rebuild 'NonResilientLib' and try again: {{.*}}NonResilientLib.swiftmodule
/// 3. Test importing the resilient untagged library
@@ -33,12 +33,12 @@ foo()
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -typecheck %t/ResilientClient.swift -swift-version 5 -I %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache
/// Building a ResilientLib client should reject the import for a tagged compiler
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=not-a-revision \
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=1.0.0.0.1 \
// RUN: not %target-swift-frontend -typecheck %t/ResilientClient.swift -swift-version 5 -I %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache 2>&1 | %FileCheck %s
// CHECK: compiled module was created by a different version of the compiler; rebuild 'ResilientLib' and try again: {{.*}}ResilientLib.swiftmodule
// CHECK: compiled module was created by a different version of the compiler ''; rebuild 'ResilientLib' and try again: {{.*}}ResilientLib.swiftmodule
/// Building a ResilientLib client should succeed for a tagged compiler with SWIFT_IGNORE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=not-a-revision SWIFT_IGNORE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=true \
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=1.0.0.0.1 SWIFT_IGNORE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=true \
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -typecheck %t/ResilientClient.swift -swift-version 5 -I %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache
@@ -47,12 +47,19 @@ foo()
import TaggedLib
foo()
/// Importing TaggedLib should succeed with the same tag or a dev compiler
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=my-revision \
/// Importing TaggedLib should succeed with the same tag.
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=1.0.0.0.1 \
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -typecheck %t/TaggedClient.swift -swift-version 5 -I %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache
/// Importing TaggedLib should succeed with a dev compiler
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -typecheck %t/TaggedClient.swift -swift-version 5 -I %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache
/// Importing TaggedLib should succeed but remark on a last digit difference.
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=1.0.0.0.2 \
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -typecheck %t/TaggedClient.swift -swift-version 5 -I %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache 2>&1 | %FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-LAST-DIGIT
// CHECK-LAST-DIGIT: remark: compiled module was created by a different version of the compiler '1.0.0.0.1': {{.*}}TaggedLib.swiftmodule
/// Building a TaggedLib client should reject the import for a different tagged compiler
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=not-a-revision \
// RUN: env SWIFT_DEBUG_FORCE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION=1.0.0.1.1 \
// RUN: not %target-swift-frontend -typecheck %t/TaggedClient.swift -swift-version 5 -I %t/build -parse-stdlib -module-cache-path %t/cache 2>&1 | %FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-TAGGED
// CHECK-TAGGED: compiled module was created by a different version of the compiler; rebuild 'TaggedLib' and try again: {{.*}}TaggedLib.swiftmodule
// CHECK-TAGGED: error: compiled module was created by a different version of the compiler '1.0.0.0.1'; rebuild 'TaggedLib' and try again: {{.*}}TaggedLib.swiftmodule