[CSOptimizer] Update unary call favoring to include resolved member references

Update special favoring logic for unlabeled unary calls to support
non-overloads member references in argument positions.

The original hack missed a case where a type of a member is known
in advance (i.e. a property without overloads) because there as
another hack (shrink) for that.

This helps in situations like `Double(x)` where `x` is a property
of some type that is referenced using an implicit `self.` injected
by the compiler.

Resolves: rdar://161419917

lib/Sema/CSOptimizer.cpp

@@ -14,10 +14,11 @@
 //
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
-#include "TypeChecker.h"
 #include "OpenedExistentials.h"
+#include "TypeChecker.h"
 #include "swift/AST/ConformanceLookup.h"
 #include "swift/AST/ExistentialLayout.h"
+#include "swift/AST/Expr.h"
 #include "swift/AST/GenericSignature.h"
 #include "swift/Basic/Defer.h"
 #include "swift/Basic/OptionSet.h"
@@ -28,7 +29,6 @@
 #include "llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/TinyPtrVector.h"
-#include "llvm/Support/SaveAndRestore.h"
 #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
 #include <cstddef>
 #include <functional>
@@ -709,15 +709,29 @@ static std::optional<DisjunctionInfo> preserveFavoringOfUnlabeledUnaryArgument(
 
   auto *argument =
       argumentList->getUnlabeledUnaryExpr()->getSemanticsProvidingExpr();
+
+  // If the type associated with a member expression doesn't have any type
+  // variables it means that it was resolved during pre-check to a single
+  // declaration.
+  //
+  // This helps in situations like `Double(x)` where `x` is a property of some
+  // type that is referenced using an implicit `self.` injected by the compiler.
+  auto isResolvedMemberReference = [&cs](Expr *expr) -> bool {
+    auto *UDE = dyn_cast<UnresolvedDotExpr>(expr);
+    return UDE && !cs.getType(UDE)->hasTypeVariable();
+  };
+
   // The hack operated on "favored" types and only declaration references,
   // applications, and (dynamic) subscripts had them if they managed to
   // get an overload choice selected during constraint generation.
-  // It's sometimes possible to infer a type of a literal and an operator
-  // chain, so it should be allowed as well.
+  // 
+  // It's sometimes possible to infer a type of a literal, an operator
+  // chain, and a member, so it should be allowed as well.
   if (!(isExpr<DeclRefExpr>(argument) || isExpr<ApplyExpr>(argument) ||
         isExpr<SubscriptExpr>(argument) ||
         isExpr<DynamicSubscriptExpr>(argument) ||
-        isExpr<LiteralExpr>(argument) || isExpr<BinaryExpr>(argument)))
+        isExpr<LiteralExpr>(argument) || isExpr<BinaryExpr>(argument) ||
+        isResolvedMemberReference(argument)))
     return DisjunctionInfo::none();
 
   auto argumentType = cs.getType(argument)->getRValueType();

test/Constraints/old_hack_related_ambiguities.swift

@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@ do {
     var p: UnsafeMutableRawPointer { get { fatalError() } }
 
     func f(_ p: UnsafeMutableRawPointer) {
-      // The old hack (which is now removed) couldn't handle member references, only direct declaration references.
       guard let x = UnsafeMutablePointer<Double>(OpaquePointer(self.p)) else {
+        // expected-error@-1 {{initializer for conditional binding must have Optional type, not 'UnsafeMutablePointer<Double>'}}
         return
       }
       _ = x

validation-test/Sema/type_checker_perf/fast/property_passed_to_single_arg_init_in_operator_context.swift.gyb

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// RUN: %scale-test --begin 1 --end 16 --step 1 --select NumLeafScopes %s
+// REQUIRES: asserts,no_asan
+
+// There was a performance hack that handled calls with a single unlabeled argument
+// in a very specific way. For source compatibility reasons old behavior has to be
+// preserved in the disjunction optimizer as well, but the old hack missed a case
+// where a type of a member is known in advance (i.e. a property without overloads)
+// because there as another hack (shrink) for that. This test makes sure that
+// performance for such cases won't regress in the future.
+
+struct Test {
+  var v = 0
+
+  func test() {
+    let _ = 1.0 * (
+      1.0 * Double(v) +
+%for i in range(1, N):
+  %if i % 2 == 0:
+      1.0 * Double(v) +
+  %else:
+      1.0 * Double(self.v) +
+  %end
+%end
+      1.0 * Double(v)
+    )
+  }
+}