Merge pull request #26395 from jckarter/opaque-type-class-constraint-substitution

Sema: Fix substitution of opaque types with generic base class constraints.

lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp

@@ -3635,6 +3635,14 @@ OpaqueTypeArchetypeType::get(OpaqueTypeDecl *Decl,
   auto opaqueInterfaceTy = Decl->getUnderlyingInterfaceType();
   auto layout = signature->getLayoutConstraint(opaqueInterfaceTy);
   auto superclass = signature->getSuperclassBound(opaqueInterfaceTy);
+  #if !DO_IT_CORRECTLY
+    // Ad-hoc substitute the generic parameters of the superclass.
+    // If we correctly applied the substitutions to the generic signature
+    // constraints above, this would be unnecessary.
+    if (superclass && superclass->hasTypeParameter()) {
+      superclass = superclass.subst(Substitutions);
+    }
+  #endif
   SmallVector<ProtocolDecl*, 4> protos;
   for (auto proto : signature->getConformsTo(opaqueInterfaceTy)) {
     protos.push_back(proto);

lib/Sema/TypeCheckGeneric.cpp

@@ -222,6 +222,9 @@ Type TypeChecker::getOrCreateOpaqueResultType(TypeResolution resolution,
              diag::opaque_type_invalid_constraint);
     return constraintTypeLoc.getType();
   }
+  
+  if (constraintType->hasArchetype())
+    constraintType = constraintType->mapTypeOutOfContext();
 
   // Create a generic signature for the opaque environment. This is the outer
   // generic signature with an added generic parameter representing the opaque

test/type/opaque_generic_superclass_constraint.swift

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -disable-availability-checking -emit-ir -verify %s
+
+// rdar://problem/53318811
+
+class Foo<T> {
+  var x: T { fatalError() }
+}
+
+func foo<T>(_: T) -> some Foo<T> {
+  let localProp: some Foo<T> = Foo()
+  return localProp
+}
+
+class C<T> {
+  func bar() -> some Foo<T> {
+    return Foo()
+  }
+
+  var prop: some Foo<T> = Foo()
+}
+
+func bar() -> Int {
+  var x = 0
+  x = foo(0).x
+  x = C<Int>().bar().x
+  x = C<Int>().prop.x
+  return x
+}