add `Test`, which is the SIL-equivalent of `FunctionTest`.
It's invocation closure gets a `TestContext` instead of a `FunctionContext`.
^ The commit message #2 will be skipped:
^ - test
* move it from the SIL to the AST module (where it belongs)
* change the signature of `diagnose` from `diagnose(location, .some_error)` to `diagnose(.some_error, at: location)`
* add an overload to allow passing a `SIL.Location` directly to `diagnose`
* add a `Diagnostic : Error` utility struct which allows throwing a `Diagnostic`
MandatoryPerformanceOptimizations already did most of the vtable specialization work.
So it makes sense to remove the VTableSpecializerPass completely and do everything in MandatoryPerformanceOptimizations.
Add a unit test harness to SwiftCompilerSources to match the one in C++ since
both source bases have different implementations of the same utilities, and they
must be consistent for correctness.
Compute, update and handle borrowed-from instruction in various utilities and passes.
Also, used borrowed-from to simplify `gatherBorrowIntroducers` and `gatherEnclosingValues`.
Replace those utilities by `Value.getBorrowIntroducers` and `Value.getEnclosingValues`, which return a lazily computed Sequence of borrowed/enclosing values.
Generic specialization already takes care of removing metatype arguments of generic functions.
But sometimes non-generic functions have metatype arguments which must be removed.
We need handle this case with a function signature optimization.
This enables, for example, to use `OptionSet` in embedded swift.
rdar://121206953
This is what you need to correctly analyze OSSA.
- computeLinearLiveness
- computeInteriorLiveness
- InteriorUseVisitor
- OwnershipUseVisitor
- LivenessBoundary
Along with BorrowUtils.swift, all of our OSSA transformations are
built on top of these fundamentals. With these APIs, we can build
anything OSSA-related in SwiftCompilerSources. These utilities are
immediately needed for borrowed arguments and lifetime dependence. In
the near future, we can also use them to complete OSSA lifetimes and
*correctly* fixup OSSA after transformation without introducing lots
of copies and creating lots of incorrect corner cases.
Key APIs necessary for using OSSA.
- BorrowingInstruction
- BeginBorrowValue
- scopeEndingOperands
- BorrowIntroducers
- EnclosingValues
- innerAdjacentPhis
These need to be complete to be correct.
In regular swift this is a nice optimization. In embedded swift it's a requirement, because the compiler needs to be able to specialize generic deinits of non-copyable types.
The new de-virtualization utilities are called from two places:
* from the new DeinitDevirtualizer pass. It replaces the old MoveOnlyDeinitDevirtualization, which is very basic and does not fulfill the needs for embedded swift.
* from MandatoryPerformanceOptimizations for embedded swift
This could be combined with ValueUseDefWalker if the latter is
refactored to classsify instructions by projections and aggegation
(which always forward) vs. other arbitrary hard-coded instruction
types. It would also need to limit the walk to real operands (which
are always forwarded). Then this walker can call into the default walk
for projections and track the projection path. The current
implementation is however simpler and more efficient.
* add the StaticInitCloner utility
* remove bridging of `copyStaticInitializer` and `createStaticInitializer`
* add `Context.mangleOutlinedVariable` and `Context.createGlobalVariable`
Introduces a set of protocols useful to perform def-use and use-def
traversals to find uses and definitions of values.
This logic was originally baked into `EscapeInfo` directly.
Here we extract it into general utilities, namely:
- `ValueDefUseWalker`: visit uses of a value walking down value-value projections/constructions.
- `AddressDefUseWalker`: visit uses of an address walking down addr-addr projections/constructions.
- `ValueUseDefWalker`: visit definitions of a value walking up value-value projections/constructions.
- `AddressUseDefWalker`: visit definitions of an address walking up addr-addr projections/constructions.
These utilities can then be used in other passes or to create
new utilities by composing them. For example to find a definition
passing through both address projections and value extractions,
it's enough to implement a visitor conforming to both
`AddressUseDefWalker` and `ValueUseDefWalker`.
It’s a replacement for the old `EscapeAnalysis`, implemented in Swift (instead of C++) and with a much simple design and implementation.
While the old EscapeAnalysis builds a connection graph, the new EscapeInfo just performs a simple def-use and use-def walk in the SIL.
The EscapeInfo does not need to analyze the whole function (like the EscapeAnalysis does), but just the relevant value which is inspected. Therefore EscapeInfo is not an `Analysis` which caches its result across optimization passes - it’s not needed.
It’s a replacement for the old `EscapeAnalysis`, implemented in Swift (instead of C++) and with a much simple design and implementation.
While the old EscapeAnalysis builds a connection graph, the new EscapeInfo just performs a simple def-use and use-def walk in the SIL.
The EscapeInfo does not need to analyze the whole function (like the EscapeAnalysis does), but just the relevant value which is inspected. Therefore EscapeInfo is not an `Analysis` which caches its result across optimization passes - it’s not needed.
