Also '#error', '#warning', and '#sourceLocation'.
Other call-like syntax (call expression, macro expansion, and custom
attribtues) requires '(' on the same line as the callee. For consistency,
built-in attributes and built-in directives should also ignore '(' on
next line.
This is a common mistake made more common be suggestions of existing diagnostic
that tell users not to use a 'copy' dependency.
Report a diagnostic error rather than crashing the compiler. Fix the diagnostic
output to make sense relative to the source location.
Fixes rdar://154136015 ([nonescapable] compiler assertion with @_lifetime(x: inout x))
Begin accepting the attribute in the form of `@cdecl(cName)`, using an
identifier instead of a string.
For ease of landing this change we still accept the string form. We
should stop accepting it before making this feature available in
production.
Implements SE-0460 -- the non-underscored version of @specialized.
It allows to specify "internal" (not abi affecting) specializations.
rdar://150033316
SwiftSyntaxParser is already doing this, and we already diagnosed it in Sema anyway, so we’re just moving that diagnostic earlier so the ASTGen testing mode is happy. Also adding compiler tests for it.
Macro-related tests are not included in this commit; they require matching swift-syntax changes which are being negotiated.
* [CS] Decline to handle InlineArray in shrink
Previously we would try the contextual type `(<int>, <element>)`,
which is wrong. Given we want to eliminate shrink, let's just bail.
* [Sema] Sink `ValueMatchVisitor` into `applyUnboundGenericArguments`
Make sure it's called for sugar code paths too. Also let's just always
run it since it should be a pretty cheap check.
* [Sema] Diagnose passing integer to non-integer type parameter
This was previously missed, though would have been diagnosed later
as a requirement failure.
* [Parse] Split up `canParseType`
While here, address the FIXME in `canParseTypeSimpleOrComposition`
and only check to see if we can parse a type-simple, including
`each`, `some`, and `any` for better recovery.
* Introduce type sugar for InlineArray
Parse e.g `[3 x Int]` as type sugar for InlineArray. Gated behind
an experimental feature flag for now.
This will unblock parsing and type-checking availability queries that specify
custom availability domains, e.g.:
```
if #available(CustomDomain) {
// Use declarations protected by @available(CustomDomain)
}
```
In order to unblock resolution of availability domains during type-checking
instead of parsing, diagnostics about missing or superfluous wildcards in
availability specification lists need to move to Sema.
Eventually, querying the `AvailabilityDomain` associated with an
`AvailabilitySpec` will require invoking a request that takes a `DeclContext`.
This means that any diagnostics related to the domain identified by an
`AvailabilitySpec` need to be emitted during type-checking rather than parsing.
This change migrates several `AvailabilitySpec` diagnostics from Parse to Sema
to unblock further work.
Since resolving the domain of an `@available` attribute is done during type
checking now, diagnostics about unexpected versions for a domain need to be
emitted at that point instead of during parsing. It doesn't make sense to
maintain the special version of this diagnostic that is emitted during parsing
for the universal availability domain only.
Since the domain is now resolved by SemanticAvailableAttrRequest, diagnosing
attributes with invalid combinations of fields for a specific domains needs to
be delayed.
Introduce an `unsafe` expression akin to `try` and `await` that notes
that there are unsafe constructs in the expression to the right-hand
side. Extend the effects checker to also check for unsafety along with
throwing and async operations. This will result in diagnostics like
the following:
10 | func sum() -> Int {
11 | withUnsafeBufferPointer { buffer in
12 | let value = buffer[0]
| | `- note: reference to unsafe subscript 'subscript(_:)'
| |- warning: expression uses unsafe constructs but is not marked with 'unsafe'
| `- note: reference to parameter 'buffer' involves unsafe type 'UnsafeBufferPointer<Int>'
13 | tryWithP(X())
14 | return fastAdd(buffer.baseAddress, buffer.count)
These will come with a Fix-It that inserts `unsafe` into the proper
place. There's also a warning that appears when `unsafe` doesn't cover
any unsafe code, making it easier to clean up extraneous `unsafe`.
This approach requires that `@unsafe` be present on any declaration
that involves unsafe constructs within its signature. Outside of the
signature, the `unsafe` expression is used to identify unsafe code.
This attribute will allow you to specify an alternate version of the declaration used for mangling. It will allow minor adjustments to be made to declarations so long as they’re still compatible at the calling convention level, such as refining isolation or sendability, renaming without breaking ABI, etc.
The attribute is behind the experimental feature flag `ABIAttribute`.
Introduce an attribute to allow unsafe code within the annotated
declaration without presenting an unsafe interface to users. This is,
by its nature, and unsafe construct, and is used to document where
unsafe behavior is encapsulated in safe constructs.
There is an optional message that can be used as part of an audit
trail.
Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.
```
%3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```
Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.
But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:
* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located
* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger
The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
This started out as a crash, where an expression macro could not be
defined in terms of one of the builtin macros (e.g., `#line`), because
we were expecting a macro expansion expression but didn't get one.
Easy fix.
However, this uncovered a second bug, which is that we couldn't handle
an expression macro expansino to `#line`. This is because we were
parsing the macro expansion buffer as "top level items", which treats
`#line` at the start of a line as a deprecated alias of
`#sourceLocation`. Switch over to parsing a single expression in these
contexts, and fix up an issue where `#isolation` didn't even have that
expression.
Fixes rdar://139372780.
With the `CoroutineAccessors` feature, `read` is allowed along with
`get` and `set`; alter the diagnostic that's issued when a disallowed
introducer is listed in the requirement list to indicate that `read` is
one of those which are valid, but only when the feature is enabled.
For now this will only be used for HopToMainActorIfNeeded thunks. I am creating
this now since in the past there has only been one option for creating
thunks... to create the thunk in SILGen using SILGenThunk. This code is hard to
test and there is a lot of it. By using an instruction here we get a few benefits:
1. We decouple SILGen from needing to generate new kinds of thunks. This means
that SILGenThunk does not need to expand to handle more thunks.
2. All thunks implemented via ThunkInst will be easy to test in a decoupled way
with SIL tests.
3. Even though this stabilizes the patient, we still have many thunks in SILGen
and various parts of the compiler. Over time, we can swap to this model,
allowing us to hopefully eventually delete SILGenThunk.
Previously, missing return diagnostics for unreachable subscripts
differed from the treatment unreachable functions received, leading to
inconsistent diagnostic behavior. This change removes the responsibility
for handling the relevant diagnostics from the AST code, in favor of the
diagnostics implemented via the SIL optimizer. Additionally, where the
AST-generation code would previously have diagnosed a missing return for
an implicit empty getter, it will now admit as valid, deferring the
missing return diagnostics to the later SIL passes.
Out of an abundance of caution, we:
1. Left in parsing support for transferring but internally made it rely on the
internals of sending.
2. Added a warning to tell people that transferring was going to
be removed very soon.
Now that we have given people some time, remove support for parsing
transferring.
rdar://130253724
Previously we would only diagnose and recover for
invalid tokens following a `#if` body for the decl
and postfix expression case. Sink this logic into
`parseIfConfigRaw`, ensuring that we do this for
all `#if` cases. This requires propagating the
context we're parsing in to customize the
diagnostic.
We are leaving this as an open part of the design space. In the mean time if
people need a +0 parameter, they can use __shared with sending.
rdar://129116182
A few things:
1. Internally except for in the parser and the clang importer, we only represent
'sending'. This means that it will be easy to remove 'transferring' once enough
time has passed.
2. I included a warning that suggested to the user to change 'transferring' ->
'sending'.
3. I duplicated the parsing diagnostics for 'sending' so both will still get
different sets of diagnostics for parsing issues... but anywhere below parsing,
I have just changed 'transferring' to 'sending' since transferring isn't
represented at those lower levels.
4. Since SendingArgsAndResults is always enabled when TransferringArgsAndResults
is enabled (NOTE not vis-a-versa), we know that we can always parse sending. So
we import "transferring" as "sending". This means that even if one marks a
function with "transferring", the compiler will guard it behind a
SendingArgsAndResults -D flag and in the imported header print out sending.
rdar://128216574
