- Respond to Doug's code review feedback
- Stop hacking around with scopes and use "emplace" to work around RAII in the inactive config case
- Limit use of StringRef on the front-end, in favor of std::string
- Use ArrayRef rather than SmallVector within IfConfigDecl
- Reorder new property declarations on BraceStmt to prevent unnecessary alignment issues
- Update ParseBraceItems to better capture top-level declarations, rather than using token lookahead
Swift SVN r14306
These changes add support for build and target configurations in the compiler.
Build and target configurations, combined with the use of #if/#else/#endif allow
for conditional compilation within declaration and statement contexts.
Build configurations can be passed into the compiler via the new '-D' flag, or
set within the LangOptions class. Target configurations are implicit, and
currently only "os" and "arch" are supported.
Swift SVN r14305
The name Stream didn't seem to be working out as intended; we kept
gravitating back to calling it Generator, which is precedented in other
languages. Also, Stream seems to beg for qualification as Input or
Output. I think we'd like to reserve Stream for things that are more
bulk-character-API-ish.
Swift SVN r13893
Allow IfStmts and WhileStmts to have as their condition either an expression, as usual, or a pattern binding introduced by 'var' or 'let', which will conditionally bind to the value inside an optional. Unlike normal pattern bindings, these bindings require an in-line initializer, which will be required to be Optional type. Parse variable bindings in this position, and type-check them by requiring an Optional on the right-hand side and unwrapping it to form the pattern type. Extend SILGen's lowering of if and while statements to handle conditionally binding variables.
Swift SVN r13146
A few places in the core compiler were referring to instances of the
Sequence protocol as "Containers". The "Indexable" protocol will soon
be renamed "Container," so eliminate this potential confusion
Swift SVN r11944
This is step 1 of implementing the new Container/Sequence/Stream
protocols. See test/Prototypes/Container.swift for the complete picture
of where this is headed.
Swift SVN r11924
We still want to allow line wrapping, so only issue the warning when the indentation of the expression and the return keyword is the same.
radar://11945406
Swift SVN r9984
Previously, the Parser and BranchStmt typedef-ed ExprStmtOrDecl as a pointer union. Using typedef made the objects compatible, but did not allow us to extend the type with helper methods, such as getSourceRange(), which is something you can get on all of the AST objects. This patch introduces ASTNode that subclasses from PointerUnion and is used by both parser and BranchStmt.
Swift SVN r9971
Rewrite ForEachStmt SILGen to use the Optional intrinsics with the Generator.next method to iterate through sequences, and kill off the Enumerator path in Sema. Cut over 'EnumeratorType.Element' requirements to instead require 'GeneratorType.Element' in the stdlib.
There are a couple of bugs remaining that need follow-up work. There appears to be a bug in nested enum layout (e.g. T??) that's causing test/Interpreter/enum to break; I'll investigate and fix. There's also a lingering type-checker bug with inferred associated types that causes them to fail requirement checks <rdar://problem/15172101>, which I think Doug needs to look into.
Swift SVN r9017
Set up (currently ignored by SILGen) variable bindings and 'next' method invocations we'll be able to use to cut over to Generator-based iteration.
Swift SVN r9002
Definitions for derived protocol conformances will need to be able to create implicit statements free of the rules formerly hardcoded in Stmt::isImplicit. This also follows Dmitri and Argyrios's "implicit" improvements to the other AST hierarchies.
Swift SVN r8876
ForStmt::Cond is already a NullablePtr<>. This patch changes
ForStmt::Initializer and ForStmt::Increment to be NullablePtr. Otherwise it
looks like Cond can be null, while Initializer and Increment can not.
Swift SVN r7265
Reimplement 'switch' parsing for our new AST representation, where cases contain patterns and 'where' guards, case blocks can have multiple cases, and 'default' is constrained to being the lone label of the last block if present. No type-checking or parsing of actual pattern productions yet.
Swift SVN r5834
A single case block can have one or more 'case ...:' labels. 'case' labels contain patterns instead of exprs. 'default:' is a funny spelling for 'case _:'. Change the CaseStmt representation and rip out all the parsing, type-checking, and SILGen built off the old representation.
Swift SVN r5795
Change AssignStmt into AssignExpr; this will make assignment behave more consistently with assignment-like operators, and is a first step toward integrating '=' parsing with SequenceExpr resolution so that '=' can obey precedence rules. This also nicely simplifies the AST representation of c-style ForStmts; the initializer and increment need only be Expr* instead of awkward Expr*/AssignStmt* unions.
This doesn't actually change any user-visible behavior yet; AssignExpr is still only parsed at statement scope, and typeCheckAssignment is still segregrated from the constraint checker at large. (In particular, a PipeClosureExpr containing a single assign expr in its body still doesn't use the assign expr to resolve its own type.) The parsing issue will be addressed by handling '=' during SequenceExpr resolution. typeCheckAssignment can hopefully be reworked to work within the constraint checker too.
Swift SVN r5500
When the struct definition has no user-defined constructors, and there
is at least one instance variable, add an implicit default
constructor. This default constructor is currently empty; that's to be
fixed next.
Swift SVN r4868
Create a new FallthroughStmt, which transfers control from a 'case' or 'default' block to the next 'case' or 'default' block within a switch. Implement parsing and sema for FallthroughStmt, which syntactically consists of a single 'fallthrough' keyword. Sema verifies that 'fallthrough' actually appears inside a switch statement and that there is a following case or default block to pass control to.
SILGen/IRGen support forthcoming.
Swift SVN r4653
We use three tag bits on Expr*, Stmt*, Decl*, TypeBase* and SILTypeInfo*, and four on DeclContext*, so set the alignment of the pointed-to types formally with alignas(N) instead of relying on operator new passing down the right alignment to the allocator. Get rid of the informal T::Alignment members of these classes and pass alignof(T) to their allocators. Fix the 'operator new' of DeclContext subclasses so that we can actually use the four tag bits PointerLikeTypeTraits<DeclContext*> claims are available.
Swift SVN r4587
Implement switch statements with simple value comparison to get the drudge work of parsing and generating switches in place. Cases are checked using a '=~' operator to compare the subject of the switch to the value in the case. Unlike a C switch, cases each have their own scope and don't fall through. 'break' and 'continue' apply to an outer loop rather to the switch itself. Multiple case values can be specified in a comma-separated list, as in 'case 1, 2, 3, 4:'. Currently no effort is made to check for duplicate cases or to rank cases by match strength; cases are just checked in source order, and the first one wins (aside from 'default', which is branched to if all cases fail).
Swift SVN r4359
We have no intention of ever supporting actual semicolon statements
(separators, statements no), nor do we ever want to because that would
mean the behavior of the program would potentially change if semicolons
were naively removed.
This patch tracks the trailing semicolon now in the decl/expr/stmt,
which will enable someone to write a good "swift indent" tool in the
future.
Swift SVN r3824
implementing rdar://11360347 / 11349750. C-style for loops could be
further enhanced by allowing a comma-separated list of statements in
the increment, but this isn't something I plan to do in the short term.
Swift SVN r1713
