On platforms that are not explicitly mentioned in the #os() guard, this new '*'
availability check generates a version comparison against the minimum deployment target.
This construct, based on feedback from API review, is designed to ease porting
to new platforms. Because new platforms typically branch from
existing platforms, the wildcard allows an API availability check to do the "right"
thing (executing the guarded branch accessing newer APIs) on the new platform without
requiring a modification to every availability guard in the program.
So, if the programmer writes:
if #os(OSX >= 10.10, *) {
. . .
}
and then ports the code to iOS, the body will execute.
We still do compile-time availability checking with '*', so the compiler will
emit errors for references to potentially unavailable symbols in the body when compiled
for iOS.
We require a '*' clause on all #os() guards to force developers to
"future proof" their availability checks against the introduction of new a platform.
Swift SVN r26988
- Enhance PBD with a whereExpr/elseStmt field to hold this.
- Start parsing the pattern of let/var decls as a potentially refutable pattern. It becomes
a semantic error to use a refutable pattern without an 'else' (diagnostics not in place yet).
- Change validatePatternBindingDecl to use 'defer' instead of a goto to ensure cleanups on exit.
- Have it resolve the pattern in a PBD, rewriting it from expressions into pattern nodes when valid.
- Teach resolvePattern to handle TypedPatterns now that they can appear (wrapping) refutable patterns.
- Teach resolvePattern to handle refutable patterns in PBD's without initializers by emitting a diagnostic
instead of by barfing, fixing regressions on validation tests my previous patch caused, and fixing
two existing validation test crashers.
Sema, silgen, and more tests coming later.
Swift SVN r26706
Rename 'assignment' attribute of infix operators to 'mutating'. Add
'has_assignment' attribute, which results in an implicit declaration of
the assignment version of the same operator. Parse "func =foo"
declaration and "foo.=bar" expression. Validate some basic properties of
in-place methods.
Not yet implemented: automatic generation of wrapper for =foo() if foo()
is implemented, or vice versa; likewise for operators.
Swift SVN r26508
This patch also introduces some SILGen infrastructure for
dividing the function into "ordinary" and "postmatter"
sections, with error-handling-like stuff going into the
final section. Currently, this is largely undermined by
SILBuilder, but I'm going to fix that in a follow-up.
Swift SVN r26422
If the placeholder is a typed one, parse its type string into a TypeRepr,
resolve it during typechecking and set it as the type for the associated EditorPlaceholderExpr.
Swift SVN r26215
- Strength reduce isAtStartOfBindingName() to just check for
identifier or _ and inline into its two callers.
- Rename Token::isIdentifierOrNone to isIdentifierOrUnderscore.
- Teach InVarOrLetPattern about matching patterns, so that the
parser knows when it is parsing an expression as a matching
pattern but is not yet inside a let/var pattern.
- Use newfound knowledge of matching patterns to refine handling
of unexpected let/var when parsing an expression, but not in a
pattern context, slightly improving QoI in invalid cases.
Swift SVN r26172
This is still a subject of discussion on swift-dev, but it seems like clearly the right
way to go to me. If it turns out that this isn't a good direction, I'll revert this and
subsequent patches built on top of it.
Swift SVN r26168
This was because the ambiguity between c-style and foreach loops wasn't being
properly handled. Use the canParsePattern() logic to handle this in full
generality.
Since that logic was unused, dust it off and clean it up a bit. Similarly,
remove some old vestigates of default argument parsing in tuples and
old-syntax array handling.
Swift SVN r26164
duplicated by the InVarOrLetPattern state in the Parser object. Beef
InVarOrLetPattern up so that we can remove it.
NFC except that we now reject pointless let patterns in foreach loops,
similar to how we reject var patterns inside of let patterns.
Swift SVN r26163
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.
Where before you might have written:
if let x = foo() {
you now need to write:
if let x? = foo() {
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.
To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?. It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.
For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error. This means that you'll get:
t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
^
?
I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time. I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.
In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).
Swift SVN r26150
conjunction with .fixItInsert(). As such, introduce a helper named
.fixItInsertAfter() that does what we all want. Adopt this in various
places around the compiler. NFC.
Swift SVN r26147
For now, we assume that 'while' after the braces starts
a do/while rather than being an independent statement.
We should disambiguate this, or better, remove do/while.
Tests later.
Swift SVN r26079
We parse 'try' as if it were a unary operator allowed on an
arbitrary element of an expr-sequence, but sequence-folding
constrains it to never appear on the RHS of most operators.
We do allow it on the RHS of an assignment or conditional
operator, but not if there's anything to the right which
was not parsed within the RHS.
We do this for assignments so that
var x = try whatever
and
x = try whatever
both work as you might expect.
We do this for conditionals because it feels natural to
allow 'try' in the center operand, and then disallowing it
in the right operand feels very strange.
In both case, this works largely because these operators are
assumed to be very low-precedence; there are no standard
operators which would parse outside the RHS. But if you
create one and use 'try' before it, we'll diagnose it.
Swift SVN r26052
Make this diagnostic a little nicer in other ways, too:
- Highlight the whole attribute (including the at-sign).
- Don't hardcode the string "objc".
Swift SVN r25999
auto-completing @attributes. By delaying the handling of code completion token after the entire decl being parsed, we know
what are the targets of the attribute to finishe, thus, only suggesting those applicable attributes.
Swift SVN r25938
This introduces a new pattern, spelled "x?" which is sugar for
matching ".Some(x)". It also changes the parser slightly so that
_ (the discard expr) is parsed as a unary expr instead of as an
expr. This allows it to have postfix ? after it, which is important
in pattern contexts to support "case _?:".
Swift SVN r25907
context-sensitive. The first step is to recommend parameter-applicable
attributes only when the code completion token is found inside a
param decl.
Swift SVN r25810
This doesn't allow 'continue' out of an if statement for the same reason we don't
allow it on switch: we'd prefer people to write loops more explicitly.
Swift SVN r25565
Previously, adding observing accessors to a variable caused it to require
an explicit type /and/ an initializer. Now you just need one or the other;
the type of the accessors is drawn from the type of the VarDecl, whether
inferred or explicitly written.
rdar://problem/18148072
Swift SVN r24664
rdar://problem/17198298
- Allow 'static' in protocol property and func requirements, but not 'class'.
- Allow 'static' methods in classes - they are 'class final'.
- Only allow 'class' methods in classes (or extensions of classes)
- Remove now unneeded diagnostics related to finding 'static' in previously banned places.
- Update relevant diagnostics to make the new rules clear.
Swift SVN r24260
SILMetadata is the base class with a single enum member (MDKind).
SILBranchNode is the derived class with additional members:
unsigned NumOperands
an array of uint32_t
A static member function SILBranchNode::get is implemented to get or create
SILBranchNode. All SILMetadata created are uniqued and saved in SILModule's
member variable:
llvm::FoldingSet<SILMetadata> Metadatas
Usage of SILMetadta by SILInstruction is captured in SILModule's member variable:
llvm::DenseMap<const SILInstruction *, SILMetadata *> MetadataStore
This is similar to LLVM's Metadata. Another option is to add a SILMetadata* to
SILInstruction. The disadvantage is the waste of space when we don't have PGO on.
This commit also enables parsing and printing of SILMetadata.
We add keyword sil_metadata to define SILMetadata:
sil_metadata !0 = {"branch_weights", 3, 5}
For parsing, we add a map in SILModule
llvm::DenseMap<unsigned, SILMetadata *> NumberedMetadata
that maps from ID to SILMetadata* to help matching usage of "!id" in SILFunction
with definition of "!id" in sil_metadata section.
For printing, we assign IDs to SILMetadata at SILModule scope, we then pass in
an optional argument of
llvm::DenseMap<const SILMetadata *, unsigned> *MetadataMap
to SILFunction::print in order to get the ID of SILMetadata used in
SILInstruction.
Post-commit review will be appreciated.
rdar://18269754
Swift SVN r23713
Use the same token-splitting technique we use to interpret '>>>' as a series of closing angle brackets to also extract '?' and '!' IUO sigils. Tweak it so that we properly reset the lexer state instead of just peeking the next token, because otherwise, when we chop a token like '>?>>', we'll see only the '?' (because '?' by itself is a question_postfix) and drop the '>>' on the floor. Remove the lexer hacks that pattern-matched specific >?>? sequences.
Swift SVN r22669
llvm::Optional lives in "llvm/ADT/Optional.h". Like Clang, we can get
Optional in the 'swift' namespace by including "swift/Basic/LLVM.h".
We're now fully switched over to llvm::Optional!
Swift SVN r22477
This patch adds a new 'pound_os' token, a new case for it in parseExprPostfix, and parsing of platform version constraints, e.g., OSX >= 10.10.
It also adds enough type checking and SILGen to get the parsing tests to run without triggering "Unimplemented" assertions.
Swift SVN r21865
-Previously the range would include the right brace of the computed variable but not the left one
-Incomplete implicit getter would trigger assertion in the AST verifier.
rdar://18189904
Swift SVN r21659
