Without this when constructing an InstModCallback it is hard to distinguish
which closure is meant for which operation when passed to the constructor of
InstModCallback (if this was in Swift, we could use argument labels, but we do
not have such things in c++).
This new value type sort of formulation makes it unambiguous which callback is
used for what when constructing one of these.
This allows for me to do a couple of things improving quality/correctness/ease of use:
1. I reimplemented InstMod's RAUW and RAUW/erase helpers on top of
setUseValue/deleteInst. Beyond allowing the caller to specify less things, we
gain an orthogonality preventing bugs like overriding erase/RAUW but not
overriding erase or having the erase used in erase/RAUW act differently than
the erase for deleteInst.
2. There were a bunch of places using InstModCallback that also were setting
uses without having the ability for InstModCallbacks perform it (since it
only supported RAUW). This is an anti-pattern and could cause subtle bugs to
be introduced by appropriate state in the caller not being updated.
Specifically before this PR, if a caller did not customize a specific callback
of InstModCallbacks, we would store a static default std::function into
InstModCallbacks. This means that we always would have an indirect jump. That is
unfortunate since this code is often called in loops.
In this PR, I eliminate this problem by:
1. I made all of the actual callback std::function in InstModCallback private
and gave them a "Func" postfix (e.x.: deleteInst -> deleteInstFunc).
2. I created public methods with the old callback names to actually call the
callbacks. This ensured that as long as we are not escaping callbacks from
InstModCallback, this PR would not result in the need for any source changes
since we are changing a call of a std::function field to a call to a method.
3. I changed all of the places that were escaping inst mod's callbacks to take
an InstModCallback. We shouldn't be doing that anyway.
4. I changed the default value of each callback in InstModCallbacks to be a
nullptr and changed the public helper methods to check if a callback is
null. If the callback is not null, it is called, otherwise the getter falls
back to an inline default implementation of the operation.
All together this means that the cost of a plain InstModCallback is reduced and
one pays an indirect function cost price as one customizes it further which is
better scalability.
P.S. as a little extra thing, I added a madeChange field onto the
InstModCallback. Now that we have the helpers calling the callbacks, I can
easily insert instrumentation like this, allowing for users to pass in
InstModCallback and see if anything was RAUWed without needing to specify a
callback.
This is a generic API that when ownership is enabled allows one to replace all
uses of a value with a value with a differing ownership by transforming/lifetime
extending as appropriate.
This API supports all pairings of ownership /except/ replacing a value with
OwnershipKind::None with a value without OwnershipKind::None. This is a more
complex optimization that we do not support today. As a result, we include on
our state struct a helper routine that callers can use to know if the two values
that they want to process can be handled by the algorithm.
My moticiation is to use this to to update InstSimplify and SILCombiner in a
less bug prone way rather than just turn stuff off.
Noting that this transformation inserts ownership instructions, I have made sure
to test this API in two ways:
1. With Mandatory Combiner alone (to make sure it works period).
2. With Mandatory Combiner + Semantic ARC Opts to make sure that we can
eliminate the extra ownership instructions it inserts.
As one can see from the tests, the optimizer today is able to handle all of
these transforms except one conditional case where I need to eliminate a dead
phi arg. I have a separate branch that hits that today but I have exposed unsafe
behavior in ClosureLifetimeFixup that I need to fix first before I can land
that. I don't want that to stop this PR since I think the current low level ARC
optimizer may be able to help me here since this is a simple transform it does
all of the time.
CanonicalizeInstruction will be a superset of
simplifyInstruction (once all the transforms are fixed for ownership
SIL). Additionally, it will also include simple SSA-based
canonicalization that requires new instruction creation. It may not
perform any optimization that interferes with diagnostics or increases
compile time.
Canonicalization replaces simplifyInstruction in SILCombine so we can
easily factor some existing SILCombine transforms into canonicalization.
