We missed to sign the handler. Along the way the signature of it
changed, so adjust for that.
How to get the number:
```
func PROPER(bar: (TaskPriority, TaskPriority) -> Void) {
let p = TaskPriority.default
bar(p, p)
}
```
```
-> % swiftc -target arm64e-apple-macos13 example.swift -S -o - | swift demangle | grep -a3 autda
stur x8, [x29, #-64]
mov x17, x8
movk x17, #11839, lsl #48 <<<<<<<<<
autda x16, x17
ldr x8, [x16, #64]
lsr x8, x8, #0
add x8, x8, #15
```
Resolves rdar://150378890
It is possible for a C++ class template to inherit from a specialization
of itself. Normally, these are imported to Swift as separate (unrelated)
types, but when symbolic import is enabled, unspecialized templates are
imported in place of their specializations, leading to circularly
inheriting classes to seemingly inherit from themselves.
This patch adds a check to guard against the most common case of
circular inheritance, when a class template directly inherits from
itself. This pattern appears in a recent version of libc++,
necessitating this patch. However, the solution here is imperfect as it
does not handle more complex/contrived circular inheritance patterns.
This patch also adds a test case exercising this pattern. The
-index-store-path flag causes swift-frontend to index the C++ module
with symbolic import enabled, without the fix in this patch, that test
triggers an assertion failure due to the circular reference (and can
infinitely recurse in the StorageVisitor when assertions are disabled).
rdar://148026461
This change emits debug info for witness tables passed into generic
functions when a generic type is constrained to a protocol. This
information is required for LLDB's generic expression evaluator
to work in such functions.
rdar://104446865
Instead of passing in the substituted type, we pass in the
InFlightSubstitution. This allows the substituted type to be
recovered if needed, but we can now skip computing it for
the common case of LookUpConformanceInSubstitutionMap.
For the main source module, provide info on which dependencies are directly imported into the user program, explicitly ('import' statement) or implicitly (e.g. stdlib). Thist list does not include Swift overlay dependencies, cross-import dependencies, bridging header dependencies.
Add a note explaining that dependence on closure captures is not
supported. Otherwise, the diagnostics are very confusing:
"it depends on a closure capture; this is not yet supported"
Ensure that we always issue a diagnostic on error, but avoid emitting any notes that don't have source locations.
With implicit accessors and thunks, report the correct line number and indicate which accessor generates the error.
Always check for debug_value users.
Consistently handle access scopes across diagnostic analysis and diagnostic messages.
Suppose protocol P has a primary associated type A, and we have
a `any P<S>` value. We form the generalization signature <T>
with substitution map {T := S}, and the existential signature
<T, Self where T == Self.A>.
Now, if we call a protocol requirement that takes Self.A.A.A,
we see this is fixed concrete type, because the reduced type of
Self.A.A.A is T.A.A in the existential signature.
However, this type parameter is not formed from the
conformance requirements of the generalization signature
(there aren't any), so we cannot directly apply the outer
substitution map.
Instead, change the outer substitution conformance lookup
callback to check if the reduced type parameter is valid
in the generalization signature, and not just rooted in a
generic parameter of the generalization signature.
If it isn't, fall back to global conformance lookup.
A better fix would introduce new requirements into the
generalization signature to handle this, or store them
separately in the generic environment itself. But this is fine
for now.
- Fixes https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/79763.
- Fixes rdar://problem/146111083.
This changes the isIsolatingCurrentContext function to return `Bool?`
and removes all the witness table trickery we did previously to detect
if it was implemented or not. This comes at a cost of trying to invoke
it always, before `checkIsolated`, but it makes for an simpler
implementation and more checkable even by third party Swift code which
may want to ask this question.
Along with the `withSerialExecutor` function, this now enables us to
check the isolation at runtime when we have an `any Actor` e.g. from
`#isolation`.
Updates SE-0471 according to
https://forums.swift.org/t/se-0471-improved-custom-serialexecutor-isolation-checking-for-concurrency-runtime/78834/
review discussions
This replaces the oddly-named mapIntoTypeExpansionContext() method
on SubstitutionMap itself in favor of a global function, just like
the ones that take Type and ProtocolConformanceRef.
These should not be escalated to errors when other strict memory safety
warnings are, because they aren't safety issues. They could go into a
separate group along with the corresponding try and await diagnostics.
Similar to what we do for 'throws' checking, perform argument-specific
checking for unsafe call arguments. This provides more detailed failures:
```
example.swift:18:3: warning: expression uses unsafe constructs but is not
marked with 'unsafe' [#StrictMemorySafety]
16 | x.f(a: 0, b: 17, c: nil)
17 |
18 | x.f(a: 0, b: 17, c: &i)
| | `- note: argument 'c' in call to instance
method 'f' has unsafe type 'UnsafePointer<Int>?'
| `- warning: expression uses unsafe constructs but is not marked
with 'unsafe' [#StrictMemorySafety]
19 | unsafeF()
20 | }
```
It also means that we won't complain for `nil` or `Optional.none`
arguments passed to unsafe types, which eliminates some false
positives, and won't complain about unsafe result types when there is
a call---because we'd still get complaints later about the
actually-unsafe bit, which is using those results.
Fixes rdar://149629670.
`scopeLifetimeParamIndices` sometimes ends up non-null but empty, which causes crashes in module deserialization, blocking cross-module work on nonescapable types.
rdar://147765187
Guard against condfails when older compilers get a swift interface
that uses `@extensible` attribute. The attribute itself doesn't
have any effect in swift interfaces yet since all of the public
enums are already resilient in that mode.
When the RunJob pointer is set to adapters, we try to get the "real" run pointer from the context. However, there are cases where the context can be a dangling pointer, when the task has finished with it but hasn't reset the pointer to anything else. For cases where that can happen, the context is legitimate only when there's a dependency record. Check for a dependency record before trying to read the context in those cases.
In most uses this will fail gracefully or return a garbage run pointer, but swift-reflection-test uses an in-process memory reader which can crash when trying to chase this pointer, resulting in test failures.
rdar://149252404
