Required for UnsafeRawPointer.withMemoryReboud(to:).
%out_token = rebind_memory %0 : $Builtin.RawPointer to %in_token
%0 must be of $Builtin.RawPointer type
%in_token represents a cached set of bound types from a prior memory state.
%out_token is an opaque $Builtin.Word representing the previously bound
types for this memory region.
This instruction's semantics are identical to ``bind_memory``, except
that the types to which memory will be bound, and the extent of the
memory region is unknown at compile time. Instead, the bound-types are
represented by a token that was produced by a prior memory binding
operation. ``%in_token`` must be the result of bind_memory or
Required for UnsafeRawPointer.withMemoryRebound(to:)
%token = bind_memory %0 : $Builtin.RawPointer, %1 : $Builtin.Word to $T
%0 must be of $Builtin.RawPointer type
%1 must be of $Builtin.Word type
%token is an opaque $Builtin.Word representing the previously bound types
for this memory region.
The key thing is that the move checker will not consider the explicit copy value
to be a copy_value that can be rewritten, ensuring that any uses of the result
of the explicit copy_value (consuming or other wise) are not checked.
Similar to the _move operator I recently introduced, this is a transparent
function so we can perform one level of specialization and thus at least be
generic over all concrete types.
This patch introduces a new stdlib function called _move:
```Swift
@_alwaysEmitIntoClient
@_transparent
@_semantics("lifetimemanagement.move")
public func _move<T>(_ value: __owned T) -> T {
#if $ExperimentalMoveOnly
Builtin.move(value)
#else
value
#endif
}
```
It is a first attempt at creating a "move" function for Swift, albeit a skleton
one since we do not yet perform the "no use after move" analysis. But this at
leasts gets the skeleton into place so we can built the analysis on top of it
and churn tree in a manageable way. Thus in its current incarnation, all it does
is take in an __owned +1 parameter and returns it after moving it through
Builtin.move.
Given that we want to use an OSSA based analysis for our "no use after move"
analysis and we do not have opaque values yet, we can not supporting moving
generic values since they are address only. This has stymied us in the past from
creating this function. With the implementation in this PR via a bit of
cleverness, we are now able to support this as a generic function over all
concrete types by being a little clever.
The trick is that when we transparent inline _move (to get the builtin), we
perform one level of specialization causing the inlined Builtin.move to be of a
loadable type. If after transparent inlining, we inline builtin "move" into a
context where it is still address only, we emit a diagnostic telling the user
that they applied move to a generic or existential and that this is not yet
supported.
The reason why we are taking this approach is that we wish to use this to
implement a new (as yet unwritten) diagnostic pass that verifies that _move
(even for non-trivial copyable values) ends the lifetime of the value. This will
ensure that one can write the following code to reliably end the lifetime of a
let binding in Swift:
```Swift
let x = Klass()
let _ = _move(x)
// hypotheticalUse(x)
```
Without the diagnostic pass, if one were to write another hypothetical use of x
after the _move, the compiler would copy x to at least hypotheticalUse(x)
meaning the lifetime of x would not end at the _move, =><=.
So to implement this diagnostic pass, we want to use the OSSA infrastructure and
that only works on objects! So how do we square this circle: by taking advantage
of the mandatory SIL optimzier pipeline! Specifically we take advantage of the
following:
1. Mandatory Inlining and Predictable Dead Allocation Elimination run before any
of the move only diagnostic passes that we run.
2. Mandatory Inlining is able to specialize a callee a single level when it
inlines code. One can take advantage of this to even at -Onone to
monomorphosize code.
and then note that _move is such a simple function that predictable dead
allocation elimination is able to without issue eliminate the extra alloc_stack
that appear in the caller after inlining without issue. So we (as the tests
show) get SIL that for concrete types looks exactly like we just had run a
move_value for that specific type as an object since we promote away the
stores/loads in favor of object operations when we eliminate the allocation.
In order to prevent any issue with this being used in a context where multiple
specializations may occur, I made the inliner emit a diagnostic if it inlines
_move into a function that applies it to an address only value. The diagnostic
is emitted at the source location where the function call occurs so it is easy
to find, e.x.:
```
func addressOnlyMove<T>(t: T) -> T {
_move(t) // expected-error {{move() used on a generic or existential value}}
}
moveonly_builtin_generic_failure.swift:12:5: error: move() used on a generic or existential value
_move(t)
^
```
To eliminate any potential ABI impact, if someone calls _move in a way that
causes it to be used in a context where the transparent inliner will not inline
it, I taught IRGen that Builtin.move is equivalent to a take from src -> dst and
marked _move as always emit into client (AEIC). I also took advantage of the
feature flag I added in the previous commit in order to prevent any cond_fails
from exposing Builtin.move in the stdlib. If one does not pass in the flag
-enable-experimental-move-only then the function just returns the value without
calling Builtin.move, so we are safe.
rdar://83957028
Adds two new IRGen-level builtins (one for allocating, the other for deallocating), a stdlib shim function for enhanced stack-promotion heuristics, and the proposed public stdlib functions.
- 3e1c787b3160bed4146d3b2b5f922aeed3caafd7 `arg_operands` was replaced with `args`.
- 80ea2bb57450a65cc724565ecfc9971ad93a3f15 `get*Attributes` was replaced with `get*Attrs`
Right now this does not actually do anything beyond causing a move_value
instruction to be emitted. With time, I am going to use this to map T ->
@_moveOnly T in the fullness of time... but I am going to stage in that part in
a different commit once I add the MoveOnly type itself. I am trying to split up
that larger commit as much as possible to make it easy to review.
Change the code generation patterns for `async let` bindings to use an ABI based on the following
functions:
- `swift_asyncLet_begin`, which starts an `async let` child task, but which additionally
now associates the `async let` with a caller-owned buffer to receive the result of the task.
This is intended to allow the task to emplace its result in caller-owned memory, allowing the
child task to be deallocated after completion without invalidating the result buffer.
- `swift_asyncLet_get[_throwing]`, which replaces `swift_asyncLet_wait[_throwing]`. Instead of
returning a copy of the value, this entry point concerns itself with populating the local buffer.
If the buffer hasn't been populated, then it awaits completion of the task and emplaces the
result in the buffer; otherwise, it simply returns. The caller can then read the result out of
its owned memory. These entry points are intended to be used before every read from the
`async let` binding, after which point the local buffer is guaranteed to contain an initialized
value.
- `swift_asyncLet_finish`, which replaces `swift_asyncLet_end`. Unlike `_end`, this variant
is async and will suspend the parent task after cancelling the child to ensure it finishes
before cleaning up. The local buffer will also be deinitialized if necessary. This is intended
to be used on exit from an `async let` scope, to handle cleaning up the local buffer if necessary
as well as cancelling, awaiting, and deallocating the child task.
- `swift_asyncLet_consume[_throwing]`, which combines `get` and `finish`. This will await completion
of the task, leaving the result value in the result buffer (or propagating the error, if it
throws), while destroying and deallocating the child task. This is intended as an optimization
for reading `async let` variables that are read exactly once by their parent task.
To avoid an epoch break with existing swiftinterfaces and ABI clients, the old builtins and entry
points are kept intact for now, but SILGen now only generates code using the new interface.
This new interface fixes several issues with the old async let codegen, including use-after-free
crashes if the `async let` was never awaited, and the inability to read from an `async let` variable
more than once.
rdar://77855176
Rather than using group task options constructed from the Swift parts
of the _Concurrency library and passed through `createAsyncTask`'s
options, introduce a separate builtin that always takes a group. Move
the responsibility for creating the options structure into IRGen, so
we don't need to expose the TaskGroupTaskOptionRecord type in Swift.
Introduce a builtin `createAsyncTask` that maps to `swift_task_create`,
and use that for the non-group task creation operations based on the
task-creation flags. `swift_task_create` and the thin function version
`swift_task_create_f` go through the dynamically-replaceable
`swift_task_create_common`, where all of the task creation logic is
present.
While here, move copying of task locals and the initial scheduling of
the task into `swift_task_create_common`, enabling by separate flags.
introduce new options parameter to all task spawning
[Concurrency] ABI for asynclet start to accept options
[Concurrency] fix unittest usages of changed task creation ABI
[Concurrency] introduce constants for parameter indexes in ownership
[Concurrency] fix test/SILOptimizer/closure_lifetime_fixup_concurrency.swift
