The main problem that prevented us from reusing the ASTContext was that we weren’t remapping the `LocToResolve` in the temporary buffer that only contains the re-parsed function back to the original buffer. Thus `NodeFinder` couldn’t find the node that we want to get cursor info for.
Getting AST reuse to work for top-level items is harder because it currently heavily relies on the `HasCodeCompletion` state being set on the parser result. I’ll try that in a follow-up PR.
rdar://103251263
Use the std-equivalent names as the LLVM ones are now deprecated
(eventually `llvm::Optional` will disappear):
- `getValue` -> `value`
- `getValueOr` -> `value_or`
- `hasValue` -> `has_value`
Follow up from ab1b343dad and
7d8bf37e5e with some missing cases.
When emitting a diagnostic that references a declaration that does not
itself have a source location (e.g., because it was synthesized or
deserialized), the diagnostics engine pretty-prints the declaration
into a buffer so it can provide caret diagnostics pointing to that
declaration.
Start marking those buffers as "generated source buffers", so that we
emit their contents into serialized diagnostics files. This will allow
tools that make use of serialized diagnostics to also show caret
information.
When a declaration has a structural opaque return type like:
func foo() -> Bar<some P>
then to mangle that return type `Bar<some P>`, we have to mangle the `some P`
part by referencing its defining declaration `foo()`, which in turn includes
its return type `Bar<some P>` again (this time using a special mangling for
`some P` that prevents infinite recursion). Since we mangle `Bar<some P>`
once as part of mangling the declaration, and we register substitutions for
bound generic types when they're complete, we end up registering the
substitution for `Bar<some P>` twice, once as the return type of the
declaration name, and again as the actual type. This would be fine, except
that the mangler doesn't check for key collisions, and it picks
substitution indexes based on the number of entries in its hash map, so
the duplicated substitution ends up corrupting the substitution sequence,
causing the mangler to produce an invalid mangled name.
Fixing that exposes us to another problem in the remangler: the AST
mangler keys substitutions by type identity, but the remangler
uses the value of the demangled nodes to recognize substitutions.
The mangling for `Bar<current declaration's opaque return type>` can
appear multiple times in a demangled tree, but referring to different
declarations' opaque return types, and the remangler would reconstruct
an incorrect mangled name when this happens. To avoid this, change the
way the demangler represents `OpaqueReturnType` nodes so that they
contain a backreference to the declaration they represent, so that
substitutions involving different declarations' opaque return types
don't get confused.
Establish the relationship for generated sources, whether for macro
expansions or (via a small stretch) replacing function bodies with
other bodies, in the source manager itself. This makes the information
available for diagnostic rendering, and unifies a little bit of the
representation, although it isn't used for much yet.
`getValue` -> `value`
`getValueOr` -> `value_or`
`hasValue` -> `has_value`
`map` -> `transform`
The old API will be deprecated in the rebranch.
To avoid merge conflicts, use the new API already in the main branch.
rdar://102362022
Ensure that any time the existing parser accepts a source file,
the new parser produces a valid parse (no unexpected/missing nodes) for
that same source file.
Basic should not be allowed to link Parse, yet it was doing so
to allow Version to provide a constructor that would conveniently
parse a StringRef. This entrypoint also emitted diagnostics, so it
pulled in libAST.
Sink the version parser entrypoint down into Parse where it belongs
and point all the clients to the right place.
swiftBasic uses `InFlightDiagnostic::flush`, which is defined in
swiftAST. The build graph did not contain that link edge, so it failed
to link on Windows. No idea how it's working on macOS.
Having an out-of-line definition for the LangOptions constructor makes
it easier to enable experimental features one at a time for a build,
without rebuilding everything.
Introduce the `-enable-upcoming-feature X` command-line argument to
allow one to opt into features that will be enabled in an upcoming language
mode. Stage in several features this way (`ConciseMagicFile`,
`ForwardTrailingClosures`, `BareSlashRegexLiterals`).
Use only the SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION macro to check for swiftmodules
being written by the same compiler that reads it. In practice, it's the
macro used for release builds of the compiler.
rdar://96868333
When we encounter an input or output with an unknown extension 'TY_INVALID', still produce valid JSON specifying the type as "unknown" instead of either crashing or producing malformed JSON.
Resolves rdar://94348593
Using the same feature set logic as experimental features, provide
feature names for "future" features, which are changes that will
become available with Swift 6. Use the feature check when determining
whether to implementation the feature instead of a language version
check, and map existing flags for these features (when available) over
to the feature set.
As an internal implementation detail, this makes it easier to reason
about when specific features are enabled (or not). If we decide to go
with piecemeal adoption support for features, it can provide an
alternative path to enabling features that feeds this mechanism.
