Then use that to ban NSError.init(), because it doesn't create a valid
NSError. In the long run Foundation will hopefully add this to their
headers, but they can't yet (rdar://problem/19977891).
rdar://problem/21042412
Swift SVN r28881
For the moment, we do not consider APIs deprecated earlier than watchOS 2.0 as
unavailable. rdar://problem/20948019 track changing this once the ultimate
decision on this policy has been made.
This addresses the compile-time components of rdar://problem/20774229
Swift SVN r28559
We need to ensure they get inlined away if they're referenced from other transparent definitions, as a workaround for SIL deserialization being unable to trigger instantiation of Clang-importer-synthesized modules. Still doesn't solve that problem, but works around it enough for rdar://problem/20902115.
Swift SVN r28526
This came out of today's language review meeting.
The intent is to match #available with the attribute
that describes availability.
This is a divergence from Objective-C.
Swift SVN r28484
Now that we don't have generic parameter lists at arbitrary positions
within the extended type of an extension declaration, simplify the
representation of the extended type down to a TypeLoc along with a
(compiler-synthesized) generic parameter list.
On the parsing side, just parse a type for the extended type, rather
than having a special grammar. We still reject anything that is not a
nominal type (of course), but it's simpler just to call it a type.
As a drive-by, fix the crasher when extending a type with module
qualification, rdar://problem/20900870.
Swift SVN r28469
...so that they can still be used with exhaustive switches.
This is a hack---groveling through the AST to see if it's in the particular
form of an imported enum case alias---but at least it's limited to imported
properties.
More rdar://problem/18662118
Swift SVN r28326
Make unqualified lookup always provide a declaration for the things it
finds, rather than providing either a module or a declaration. Unify
various code paths in our type checker now that module declarations
come in with the other declarations.
Swift SVN r28286
Modules occupy a weird space in the AST now: they can be treated like
types (Swift.Int), which is captured by ModuleType. They can be
treated like values for disambiguation (Swift.print), which is
captured by ModuleExpr. And we jump through hoops in various places to
store "either a module or a decl".
Start cleaning this up by transforming Module into ModuleDecl, a
TypeDecl that's implicitly created to describe a module. Subsequent
changes will start folding away the special cases (ModuleExpr ->
DeclRefExpr, name lookup results stop having a separate Module case,
etc.).
Note that the Module -> ModuleDecl typedef is there to limit the
changes needed. Much of this patch is actually dealing with the fact
that Module used to have Ctx and Name public members that now need to
be accessed via getASTContext() and getName(), respectively.
Swift SVN r28284
This is pretty much a simplification of the existing RawOptionSetType logic; now, instead of generating a bunch of implicit decls, we provide the minimum set of declarations from which the stdlib will be able to generate default implementations of everything else. The new imported declaration looks like this:
struct MyOptions: OptionSetType {
let rawValue: UInt // or whatever raw type
init(rawValue: UInt)
static var A: MyOptions { return MyOptions(rawValue: 1) }
static var B: MyOptions { return MyOptions(rawValue: 2) }
/* etc. */
}
Still hidden behind a staging flag, until the stdlib implementation can land.
Swift SVN r28213
@warn_unused_result can be attached to function declarations to
produce a warning if the function is called but its result is not
used. It has two optional parameters that can be placed in
parentheses:
message="some message": a message to include with the warning.
mutable_variant="somedecl": the name of the mutable variant of the
method that should be suggested when the subject method is called on
a mutable value.
The specific use we're implementing this for now is for the mutating
and in-place operations. For example:
@warn_unused_result(mutable_variant="sortInPlace") func sort() -> [Generator.Element] { ... }
mutating func sortInPlace() { ... }
Translate Clang's __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) into
@warn_unused_result.
Implements rdar://problem/18165189.
Swift SVN r28019
Change the active-platform availability logic to not consider iOS as active on
tvOS. We want all of the messiness of the fact that tvOS was branched
from iOS to be handled in clang, which "transcribes" iOS availability attributes
to their corresponding tvOS counterparts as long as there is not an
existing explicit tvOS availability attribute on the declaration.
This change exposed several places where I needed to add explicit handling of
of tvOS and where we will need to handle watchOS as well.
rdar://problem/20774229 tracks adding logic and tests to handle watchOS in these
places.
It is also unfortunately the case that llvm::triple returns true when isiOS()
is called on tvOS. This means that to test whether an llvm:triple target is
really iOS, we need to check for iOS then check explicitly that it is not
tvOS. We will eventually change llvm's behavior here so that the double
check is not needed.
Swift SVN r28013
This allows SILGen to recognize them as foreign declarations, fixing a bug when classes with subscripts defined in Objective-C were extended to conform to Swift protocols with subscript requirements. rdar://problem/20371661
Swift SVN r27998
The Clang importer was relying on stashing the protocol list within a
nominal type or extension and then retrieving it to fill in all of the
members, which will typically happen before the protocol conformances
can be handled. This prevented the conformance lookup table from being
directly usable for these protocol queries.
In time, the conformance lookup table should have separate callbacks
for "list the protocols to which this conforms" and "provide all of
the conformances", which can make these computations lazier. For now,
use a side table to stash these conformances.
Part of rdar://problem/18448811.
Swift SVN r27980
When deserializing a protocol, the conformance lookup table would not
contain entries for the inherited protocols of that protocol. They
were stashed in the "Protocols" array in TypeDecl (which will
eventually go away), but since there are no conformances for a
protocol, the conformance lookup table never got updated.
Nothing important seems to query this now; that will change soon.
Swift SVN r27967
Previously, we were importing Clang's 'deprecated' attribute in as
@availability(*, unavailable), based on the idea things that were
unconditionally deprecated in Objective-C shouldn't even be accessible
in Swift. (We were motivated by 'tmpnam', among others). However, this
plays havoc with mixed Objective-C/Swift projects, because the
Objective-C 'deprecated' attribute was useless as a mechanism for
making internal changes in the project. We have Clang's
__attribute__((availability(swift, unavailable))) to make an API
unavailable in Swift, so the deprecated -> unavailable mapping here no
longer makes sense.
Fixes rdar://problem/18934173.
Swift SVN r27358
Allow an unversioned 'deprecated' attribute to specify unconditional
deprecation of an API, e.g.,
@availability(*, deprecated, message="sorry")
func foo() { }
Also support platform-specific deprecation, e.g.,
@availability(iOS, deprecated, message="don't use this on iOS")
func bar() { }
Addresses rdar://problem/20562871.
Swift SVN r27355
Allow an unversioned 'deprecated' attribute to specify unconditional
deprecation of an API, e.g.,
@availability(*, deprecated, message="sorry")
func foo() { }
Also support platform-specific deprecation, e.g.,
@availability(iOS, deprecated, message="don't use this on iOS")
func bar() { }
Addresses rdar://problem/20562871.
Swift SVN r27339
This works around a big performance regression in code completion
performance that was introduced with r25741. This hack does not work
completely correctly with multiple file builds, but a) this should be a
minor issue for enum code completions, and b) this simply returns to the
pre-25741 behaviour. This hack should disappear when we fix
rdar://problem/20047340.
For rdar://problem/20445407.
Swift SVN r27320
Introduce basic validation for throwing @objc initializers, e.g., a
failable @objc initializer cannot also be throwing. However,
Objective-C selector computation is broken.
Swift SVN r27292
I don't want to call this complete until
a) we handle using alias names in switch statements (right now they're
straight-up rejected, not just non-complete), and
b) we prefer non-deprecated names over deprecated ones to be the "real"
enum cases.
but this is a good start, and fixes them showing up poorly in the SDK
analyzer.
rdar://problem/18662118
Swift SVN r27130
This is the new and improved version of
__attribute__((annotate("swift1_unavailable"))), with the "improved" being
specifically that the 'availability' attribute supports a message.
This requires a corresponding Clang commit.
Swift side of rdar://problem/18768673.
Swift SVN r27053
...and bump our "Foundation epoch" guard to 3 to match.
Long-term we should switch to an attribute for "yes, this is really a set
of enumerated constants" (and "this is a set of related bitmask options"),
but this unblocks things for now, and doesn't cause any issue if we end
up doing something else.
rdar://problem/20418505
Swift SVN r26944
Previously some parts of the compiler referred to them as "fields",
and most referred to them as "elements". Use the more generic 'elements'
nomenclature because that's what we refer to other things in the compiler
(e.g. the elements of a bracestmt).
At the same time, make the API better by providing "getElement" consistently
and using it, instead of getElements()[i].
NFC.
Swift SVN r26894
Start parsing a "trailing" where clause for extension declarations, which follows the extended type name and (optional) inheritance clause. Such a where clause is only currently permitted for protocol extensions right now.
When used on a protocol extension, it allows one to create a more-constrained protocol extension, e.g.,
extension CollectionType where Self.Generator.Element : Equatable { ... }
which appears to be working, at least in the obvious cases I've tried.
More cleanup, tests, and penance for the previous commit's "--crash" introductions still to come.
Swift SVN r26689
Remove the semantic restrictions that prohibited extensions of
protocol types, and start making some systematic changes so that
protocol extensions start to make sense:
- Replace a lot of occurrences of isa<ProtocolDecl> and
dyn_cast<ProtocolDecl> on DeclContexts to use the new
DeclContext::isProtocolOrProtocolExtensionContext(), where we want
that behavior to apply equally to protocols and protocol extensions.
- Eliminate ProtocolDecl::getSelf() in favor of
DeclContext::getProtocolSelf(), which produces the appropriate
generic type parameter for the 'Self' of a protocol or protocol
extension. Update all of the callers of ProtocolDecl::getSelf()
appropriately.
- Update extension validation to appropriately form generic
parameter lists for protocol extensions.
- Methods in protocol extensions always use the witnesscc calling
convention.
At this point, we can type check and SILGen very basic definitions of
protocol extensions with methods that can call protocol requirements,
generic free functions, and other methods within the same protocol
extension.
Regresses four compiler crashers but improves three compiler
crashers... we'll call that "progress"; the four regressions all hit
the same assertion in the constraint system that will likely be
addressed as protocol extensions starts working.
Swift SVN r26579
I'm not sure this code is even still necessary, but while we're still
using it we can at least not pretend we're still using it for properties.
No functionality change.
Swift SVN r26480
We have an SPI between the Swift compiler and Foundation based on the
SWIFT_SDK_OVERLAY_FOUNDATION_EPOCH preprocessor macro that allows us to
request the new API. rdar://20270080 tracks removing it.
Swift SVN r26475
Currently a no-op, but effective access for entities within the current
module will soon need to take testability into account. This declaration:
internal func foo() {}
has a formal access of 'internal', but an effective access of 'public' if
we're in a testable mode.
Part of rdar://problem/17732115 (testability)
Swift SVN r26472
We now access the conformances of a nominal type through the
conformance lookup table, so there is no reason to continue storing
conformances directly on the nominal type declaration, which was
error-prone regardless. This mirrors the change to ExtensionDecl from
my previous commit.
Swift SVN r26354
Stop storing a conformances array on ExtensionDecls. Instead, always use the conformance lookup table to retrieve conformances (which is lazy and supports multi-file, among other benefits).
As part of this, space-optimize ExtensionDecl's handling of conformance loaders. When one registers a conformance loader, it goes into a DenseMap on ASTContext and gets erased once we've loaded that data, so we get two words worth of space back in each ExtensionDecl.
Swift SVN r26353
This lets us tag imported declarations with arbitrary synthesized
protocols. Use it to handle imported raw option sets as well as the
RawRepresentable conformances of enums that come in as structs.
Swift SVN r26298
This fixes the import of enums like NSCalendarUnit, which changed from
NSXXXCalendarUnit to NSCalendarUnitXXX, as has been the guideline in
recent years. Now even when the old names are present, we can still
prefix-strip based on the new names. If /all/ options are deprecated,
though, we'll prefix-strip as we did before.
Note that we /don't/ check the current deployment target for this,
because we want to use the "nice" names as soon as we have an SDK where
they're available, not when the deployment target matches such an SDK.
rdar://problem/17686122
Swift SVN r26184
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.
Where before you might have written:
if let x = foo() {
you now need to write:
if let x? = foo() {
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.
To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?. It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.
For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error. This means that you'll get:
t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
^
?
I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time. I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.
In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).
Swift SVN r26150
