* libSyntax: Parse member access expression.
This patch uses createNodeInPlace from syntax parsing context API to
merge an expression with its suffix to create recursive nodes such as
member access expression.
Meanwhile, this patch breaks down a signed integer or float literal to a
prefix operator expression. This expression consists of two parts: an
operator and the following expression. This makes literals like "+1" or
"-1" no different from other prefix unary expressions such as "!true".
Tuple expression essentially has the same underlying structure as
function call arguments in libSyntax. However, we separate them as
different libSyntax kinds for better usability.
Different from AST, libSyntax currently allows single-child,
label-free tuple expressions (represented as ParenExpr in AST). This is
subject to change if we need to adopt the same differentiation in
libSyntax in the future.
Along with starting to support ternary expressions, this commit also
slightly changes SyntaxParsingContext APIs as follows:
1. Previously, makeNode() only supports node creation by using the nodes
from the underlying syntax token array; this commit allows it to use the nodes from
the pending syntax list as well.
2. This commit strictly limits that the pending syntax list should never
contain token syntax node.
3. The node kind test shouldn't include unknown kinds. They are noisy.
Avoid heap-allocated memory for syntax parsing context.
Add more assertions to ensure syntax nodes are created only at the top of context stack.
Allow syntax parsing context to delay the specifying of context kind and target syntax kind.
This commit also adds ArrayExpr and DictionaryExpr to the libSyntax nodes
family. Also, it refactors the original parser code for these two
expressions to better fit to the design of SyntaxParsingContext.
This commit has also fixed two crashers.
This commit teaches parser to parse two libSyntax nodes: FunctionCallArgument and
FunctionCallArgumentList. Along with the change, some libSyntax parsing infrastructure changes
as well: (1) parser doesn't directly insert token into the buffer for libSyntax node creation;
instead, when creating a simple libSyntax node like integer literal expression, parser should indicate the location of the last token in the node; (2) implicit libSyntax nodes like empty
statement list must contain a source location indicating where the implicit nodes should appear
(immediately before the token at the given location).
* Re-apply "libSyntax: Ensure round-trip printing when we build syntax tree from parser incrementally. (#12709)"
* Re-apply "libSyntax: Root parsing context should hold a reference to the current token in the parser, NFC."
* Re-apply "libSyntax: avoid copying token text when lexing token syntax nodes, NFC. (#12723)"
* Actually fix the container-overflow issue.
Since all parsing contexts need a reference to the current token of the
parser, we should pass the token reference to the root context. Therefore, the derived
sub-contexts can just copy it while being spawned.
This patch allows Parser to generate a refined token stream to satisfy tooling's need. For syntax coloring, token stream from lexer is insufficient because (1) we have contextual keywords like get and set; (2) we may allow keywords to be used as argument labels and names; and (3) we need to split tokens like "==<". In this patch, these refinements are directly fulfilled through parsing without additional heuristics. The refined token vector is optionally saved in SourceFile instance.
This fixes various issues with getting no code-completion in top-level
code containing array/dictionary sugar, such as:
```
for x in [<HERE>] {}
for x in [1: 2, <HERE>] {}
```
And also removes the index variable from completions inside the sequence
(it was coming through as a local variable with <<error type>>).
rdar://problem/33884082
We parse default argument expressions before building a
FuncDecl, so we might see GenericTypeParamDecls that have
not yet been re-parented to the FuncDecl's context.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-5559>,
<rdar://problem/33539464>.
In anticipation of future attributes, and perhaps the ability to
declare lvalues with specifiers other than 'let' and 'var', expand
the "isLet" bit into a more general "specifier" field.
* Simplify TupleTypeRepr parsing
This patch introduces a TupleTypeReprElement struct that holds the
locations for all relevant bits of tuple elements. It removes the
NameLoc and UnderscoreLoc arrays from TupleTypeReprElement in favor of
holding each of these on TupleTypeReprElement. These extra bits of info
are required for full-fidelity representation in the Syntax library.
* Remove TupleTypeReprBitfields and move EllipsisLoc out of TrailingObjects
* Update users of TupleTypeRepr
* Don't resize the elts if we're going to push_back
* getType -> getElementType
* Move ellipsis back into TrailingObjects.
* Move NumElements into TupleTypeReprBitfields
This changes `getBaseName()` on `DeclName` to return a `DeclBaseName`
instead of an `Identifier`. All places that will continue to be
expecting an `Identifier` are changed to call `getBaseIdentifier` which
will later assert that the `DeclName` is actually backed by an
identifier and not a special name.
For transitional purposes, a conversion operator from `DeclBaseName` to
`Identifier` has been added that will be removed again once migration
to DeclBaseName has been completed in other parts of the compiler.
Unify approach to printing declaration names
Printing a declaration's name using `<<` and `getBaseName()` is be
independent of the return type of `getBaseName()` which will change in
the future from `Identifier` to `DeclBaseName`
Now that preCheckExpression() can handle more cases, we can
eliminate a special case where sometimes we would make
DeclRefExprs instead of TypeExprs for references to generic
types.
This is a bit more robust and user-friendly than hoping more brittle recovery in SILGen or IRGen for unsupported components kicks in. rdar://problem/32200714
Swift 3 supported limited argument destructuring when it comes to
declaring (trailing) closures. Such behavior has been changed by
SE-0110. This patch aims to provide better error message as well
as fix-it (if structure of the expected and actual arguments matches)
to make the migration easier and disambiguate some of the common
mistakes.
Resolves: SR-4738, SR-4745, rdar://problem/31892961.
This introduces a few unfortunate things because the syntax is awkward.
In particular, the period and following token in \.[a], \.? and \.! are
token sequences that don't appear anywhere else in Swift, and so need
special handling. This is somewhat compounded by \foo.bar.baz possibly
being \(foo).bar.baz or \(foo.bar).baz (parens around the type), and,
furthermore, needing to distinguish \Foo?.bar from \Foo.?bar.
rdar://problem/31724243
