As a result, when we're able to devirtualize calls to these functions
we'll also be able to inline all the way down to the user function.
Swift SVN r27136
kind of pattern for let/else. While I haven't done extensive testing, I believe
that let/else is wired up and working now.
Please feel free to kick the tires on let/else and file radars if you run into problems.
The only piece that I know is missing is support for is/as patterns (which will fail on
an llvm_unreachable).
Swift SVN r27135
These aren't really orthogonal concerns--you'll never have a @thick @cc(objc_method), or an @objc_block @cc(witness_method)--and we have gross decision trees all over the codebase that try to hopscotch between the subset of combinations that make sense. Stop the madness by eliminating AbstractCC and folding its states into SILFunctionTypeRepresentation. This cleans up a ton of code across the compiler.
I couldn't quite eliminate AbstractCC's information from AST function types, since SIL type lowering transiently created AnyFunctionTypes with AbstractCCs set, even though these never occur at the source level. To accommodate type lowering, allow AnyFunctionType::ExtInfo to carry a SILFunctionTypeRepresentation, and arrange for the overlapping representations to share raw values.
In order to avoid disturbing test output, AST and SILFunctionTypes are still printed and parsed using the existing @thin/@thick/@objc_block and @cc() attributes, which is kind of gross, but lets me stage in the real source-breaking change separately.
Swift SVN r27095
register a DestroyLocalVariable cleanup: it will be a noop. Getting it out
of the apparently active set of cleanups allows us to avoid emitting empty
blocks in some cases.
Swift SVN r27049
This is necessary for correctly dealing with non-standard
ownership conventions in secondary positions, and it should
also help with non-injective type imports (like BOOL/_Bool).
But right now we aren't doing much with it.
Swift SVN r26954
Previously some parts of the compiler referred to them as "fields",
and most referred to them as "elements". Use the more generic 'elements'
nomenclature because that's what we refer to other things in the compiler
(e.g. the elements of a bracestmt).
At the same time, make the API better by providing "getElement" consistently
and using it, instead of getElements()[i].
NFC.
Swift SVN r26894
We no longer need or use it since we can always refer to the same bit on
the applied function when deciding whether to inline during mandatory
inlining.
Resolves rdar://problem/19478366.
Swift SVN r26534
Getting the protocols of an arbitrary type doesn't make sense, so start phasing this out by introducing specialized entry points that do make sense:
- get the inherited protocols of a ProtocolDecl
- get the conforming protocols for an associated type or generic
type parameter
- (already present) ask for the protocols to which a nominal type conforms
Swift SVN r26411
Replace the loop over all known protocols with a query into the
actual conformance lookup table, which more properly deals with
out-of-order conformance queries, inheritance of protocol
conformances, and conformance queries in multi-file situtations.
The SILGen test change is because we're no longer emitting redundant
conformances, while the slight diagnostic regression in
circular-inheritance cases is because we handle circular inheritance
very poorly throughout the compiler.
While not the end, this is a major step toward finishing
rdar://problem/18448811.
Swift SVN r26299
Previously, a multi-pattern var/let decl like:
var x = 4, y = 17
would produce two pattern binding decls (one for x=4 one for y=17). This is convenient
in some ways, but is bad for source reproducibility from the ASTs (see, e.g. the improvements
in test/IDE/structure.swift and test/decl/inherit/initializer.swift).
The hardest part of this change was to get parseDeclVar to set up the AST in a way
compatible with our existing assumptions. I ended up with an approach that forms PBDs in
more erroneous cases than before. One downside of this is that we now produce a spurious
"type annotation missing in pattern"
diagnostic in some cases. I'll take care of that in a follow-on patch.
Swift SVN r26224
The deallocating parameter convention is a new convention put on a
non-trivial parameter if the caller function guarantees to the callee
that the parameter has the deallocating bit set in its object header.
This means that retains and releases do not need to be emitted on these
parameters even though they are non-trivial. This helps to solve a bug
in +0 self and makes it trivial for the optimizer to perform
optimizations based on this property.
It is not emitted yet by SILGen and will only be put on the self
argument of Deallocator functions.
Swift SVN r26179
- Rename getParentPattern() -> getParentPatternBinding(), since
it returns the pattern binding, not the pattern.
- Introduce new getParentPattern()/getParentInitializer() methods,
covering the most common uses of getParentPatternBinding().
NFC.
Swift SVN r26175
Turns out llvm::DataLayoutPass is used in other places, so the bots are still unhappy.
Re-applying the original change so we can fix the problem holistically.
Swift SVN r25761
This is breaking the testing bot because DataLayoutPass was just removed from LLVM trunk.
Chris is the best one to fix this change, but we need to get the bots green.
Swift SVN r25760
- Have Sema, not SILGen decide if a vardecl can be captured by address
instead of by-box. This is a non-local property that is best computed
during capture set formation. Sema captures this as a bit on the new
CapturedValue entry.
- Rework some diagnostic emission to centralize a class of noescape
diagnostics in capture set calculation. Previously, funcdecl closures
produced their diagnostics there, but ClosureExprs produced them in
MiscDiagnostics (NFC for this part).
This fixes <rdar://problem/19981118> Swift 1.2 beta 2: Closures nested in @noescape closures copy, rather than reference, captured vars.
Swift SVN r25759
when computing the list. This simplifies getLocalCaptures to *just* filter out
global captures, and paves the way for other enhancements. NFC.
Swift SVN r25739
If we have a C function pointer conversion, generate a thunk using the same logic we use for ObjC method thunks, and emit a pointer to that thunk as the C function pointer value. (This works for nongeneric, nonmember functions; generics will additionally need to apply generic parameters within the thunks. Static functions would need to gather the metatype as well.)
Swift SVN r25653
This is also useful in general SIL passes when generating thunks. I am going to
use this in function signature optimization and closure specialization.
Swift SVN r25356
This rearranges code so that the destroy_addr cleanup generated to
deallocate a 'let' stack temporary is generated against the mark_uninitialized
instruction. This allows DI to see it, and nuke it on paths where the let constant
is never assigned.
Swift SVN r25349
rdar://problem/19514920 is caused by a disagreement between IRGen and SILGen about which SILDeclRefs override vtable slots. Factor out the somewhat-hairy code in SILGen to a place IRGen will be able to share it. NFC yet.
Swift SVN r25063
This will have an effect on inlining into thunks.
Currently this flag is set for witness thunks and thunks from function signature optimization.
No change in code generation, yet.
Swift SVN r24998
If a subclass overrides methods with variance in the optionality of non-class-type members, emit a thunk to handle wrapping more optional parameters or results and force-unwrapping any IUO parameters made non-optional in the derived. For this to be useful, we need IRGen to finally pay attention to SILVTables, but this is a step on the way to fixing rdar://problem/19321484.
Swift SVN r24705
Have the ArgumentInitVisitor directly bind argument variables to BB arguments, instead of trying to reuse the InitializationForPattern logic used for general variable bindings. That was a nice idea, but it leads to some ugly edge cases because of the many little ways arguments are different from local variable bindings. By getting rid of the abstraction layers, it's easy for argument binding to bind +0 guaranteed or +1 arguments in place when appropriate, avoiding an r/r pair for "let" bindings. It will also let us eliminate some ugly code from variable binding initialization. Should be NFC aside from some harmless reordering of prolog/epilog variable setup.
Swift SVN r24412
