Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
This PR implements first set of changes required to support autodiff for coroutines. It mostly targeted to `_modify` accessors in standard library (and beyond), but overall implementation is quite generic.
There are some specifics of implementation and known limitations:
- Only `@yield_once` coroutines are naturally supported
- VJP is a coroutine itself: it yields the results *and* returns a pullback closure as a normal return. This allows us to capture values produced in resume part of a coroutine (this is required for defers and other cleanups / commits)
- Pullback is a coroutine, we assume that coroutine cannot abort and therefore we execute the original coroutine in reverse from return via yield and then back to the entry
- It seems there is no semantically sane way to support `_read` coroutines (as we will need to "accept" adjoints via yields), therefore only coroutines with inout yields are supported (`_modify` accessors). Pullbacks of such coroutines take adjoint buffer as input argument, yield this buffer (to accumulate adjoint values in the caller) and finally return the adjoints indirectly.
- Coroutines (as opposed to normal functions) are not first-class values: there is no AST type for them, one cannot e.g. store them into tuples, etc. So, everywhere where AST type is required, we have to hack around.
- As there is no AST type for coroutines, there is no way one could register custom derivative for coroutines. So far only compiler-produced derivatives are supported
- There are lots of common things wrt normal function apply's, but still there are subtle but important differences. I tried to organize the code to enable code reuse, still it was not always possible, so some code duplication could be seen
- The order of how pullback closures are produced in VJP is a bit different: for normal apply's VJP produces both value and pullback closure via a single nested VJP apply. This is not so anymore with coroutine VJP's: yielded values are produced at `begin_apply` site and pullback closure is available only from `end_apply`, so we need to track the order in which pullbacks are produced (and arrange consumption of the values accordingly – effectively delay them)
- On the way some complementary changes were required in e.g. mangler / demangler
This patch covers the generation of derivatives up to SIL level, however, it is not enough as codegen of `partial_apply` of a coroutine is completely broken. The fix for this will be submitted separately as it is not directly autodiff-related.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Savonichev <andrew.savonichev@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Wei <rxwei@apple.com>
Optional's `init_enum_data_addr` and `inject_enum_addr` instructions are generated in presence of non-loadable Optional values. The compiler used to treat these instructions as inactive, and this resulted in silent run-time
issues described in #64223.
The patch marks `init_enum_data_addr` as "active" if its Optional operand is also active, and in PullbackCloner we differentiate through it and the related `inject_enum_addr`.
However, we only determine this relation in simple cases when both instructions are in the same block. There is no def-use relation between them (both take the same Optional operand), so if there is more than one set of instructions
operating on the same Optional, or there is some control flow, we currently bail out.
In PullbackCloner, we walk over instructions in reverse order and start from `inject_enum_addr` and its `Optional<Wrapped>.TangentVector` operand. Assuming that is is already initialized, we emit an `unchecked_take_enum_data_addr` and set it as the adjoint buffer of `init_enum_data_addr`. The Optional value is
invalidated, and we have to destroy the enum data address later when we reach `init_enum_data_addr`.
Introduce the notion of "semantic result parameter". Handle differentiation of inouts via semantic result parameter abstraction. Do not consider non-wrt semantic result parameters as semantic results
Fixes#67174
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
If we know that we have a FunctionRefInst (and not another variant of FunctionRefBaseInst), we know that getting the referenced function will not be null (in contrast to FunctionRefBaseInst::getReferencedFunctionOrNull).
NFC
`DifferentiableFunctionInst` now stores result indices.
`SILAutoDiffIndices` now stores result indices instead of a source index.
`@differentiable` SIL function types may now have multiple differentiability
result indices and `@noDerivative` resutls.
`@differentiable` AST function types do not have `@noDerivative` results (yet),
so this functionality is not exposed to users.
Resolves TF-689 and TF-1256.
Infrastructural support for TF-983: supporting differentiation of `apply`
instructions with multiple active semantic results.
Support differentiation of `is` and `as?` operators.
These operators lower to branching cast SIL instructions, requiring control
flow differentiation support.
Resolves SR-12898.
Move differentiation-related SILOptimizer files to
{include/swift,lib}/SILOptimizer/Differentiation/.
This reduces directory nesting and gathers files together.
Differentiable activity analysis is a dataflow analysis which marks values in
a function as varied, useful, or active (both varied and useful).
Only active values need a derivative.
