Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
Compute, update and handle borrowed-from instruction in various utilities and passes.
Also, used borrowed-from to simplify `gatherBorrowIntroducers` and `gatherEnclosingValues`.
Replace those utilities by `Value.getBorrowIntroducers` and `Value.getEnclosingValues`, which return a lazily computed Sequence of borrowed/enclosing values.
This invalidation kind is used when a compute-effects pass changes function effects.
Also, let optimization passes which don't change effects only invalidate the `FunctionBody` and not `Everything`.
In all of these cases, we already had a SILFunction and were just grabbing its
SILModule instead of passing it in. So this is just an NFC change.
The reason why I am doing this is so that I can force emit opt-remarks on
functions with the semantics attribute "optremark", so I need to be able to
access the SILFunction in the optimization remark infrastructure.
Devirtualizing try_apply modified the CFG, but passes that run
devirtualization were not invalidating any CFG analyses, such as the
domtree.
This could hypothetically have caused miscompilation, but will be
caught by running with -sil-verify-all.
With the advent of dynamic_function_ref the actual callee of such a ref
my vary. Optimizations should not assume to know the content of a
function referenced by dynamic_function_ref. Introduce
getReferencedFunctionOrNull which will return null for such function
refs. And getInitialReferencedFunction to return the referenced
function.
Use as appropriate.
rdar://50959798
In order to make this reasonable, I needed to shift responsibilities
around a little; the devirtualization operation is now responsible for
replacing uses of the original apply. I wanted to remove the
phase-separation completely, but there was optimization-remark code
relying on the old apply site not having been deleted yet.
The begin_apply aspects of this aren't testable independently of
replacing materializeForSet because coroutines are currently never
called indirectly.
To do so this commit does a few different things:
1. I changed SILOptFunctionBuilder to notify the pass manager's logging
functionality when new functions are added to the module and to notify analyses
as well. NOTE: This on purpose does not put the new function on the pass manager
worklist since we do not want to by mistake introduce a large amount of
re-optimizations. Such a thing should be explicit.
2. I eliminated SILModuleTransform::notifyAddFunction. This just performed the
operations from 1. Now that SILOptFunctionBuilder performs this operation for
us, it is not needed.
3. I changed SILFunctionTransform::notifyAddFunction to just add the function to
the passmanager worklist. It does not need to notify the pass manager's logging
or analyses that a new function was added to the module since
SILOptFunctionBuilder now performs that operation. Given its reduced
functionality, I changed the name to addFunctionToPassManagerWorklist(...). The
name is a little long/verbose, but this is a feature since one should think
before getting the pass manager to rerun transforms on a function. Also, giving
it a longer name calls out the operation in the code visually, giving this
operation more prominance when reading code. NOTE: I did the rename using
Xcode's refactoring functionality!
rdar://42301529
introduce a common superclass, SILNode.
This is in preparation for allowing instructions to have multiple
results. It is also a somewhat more elegant representation for
instructions that have zero results. Instructions that are known
to have exactly one result inherit from a class, SingleValueInstruction,
that subclasses both ValueBase and SILInstruction. Some care must be
taken when working with SILNode pointers and testing for equality;
please see the comment on SILNode for more information.
A number of SIL passes needed to be updated in order to handle this
new distinction between SIL values and SIL instructions.
Note that the SIL parser is now stricter about not trying to assign
a result value from an instruction (like 'return' or 'strong_retain')
that does not produce any.
At some point, pass definitions were heavily macro-ized. Pass
descriptive names were added in two places. This is not only redundant
but a source of confusion. You could waste a lot of time grepping for
the wrong string. I removed all the getName() overrides which, at
around 90 passes, was a fairly significant amount of code bloat.
Any pass that we want to be able to invoke by name from a tool
(sil-opt) or pipeline plan *should* have unique type name, enum value,
commend-line string, and name string. I removed a comment about the
various inliner passes that contradicted that.
Side note: We should be consistent with the policy that a pass is
identified by its type. We have a couple passes, LICM and CSE, which
currently violate that convention.
There are now separate functions for function addition and deletion instead of InvalidationKind::Function.
Also, there is a new function for witness/vtable invalidations.
rdar://problem/29311657
It is important to de-serialize the devirtualized function (and its callees), especially because we must make sure that all transparent functions are de-serialized.
SILCombine did not do that. But as we have the same optimization in the Devirtualizer, it's not needed to duplicate the code in SILCombine.
The only reason we had this peephole in SILCombine is that the Devirtualizer pass could not handle partial applies.
So with this change the Devirtualizer can now also handle partial applies.
Fixes rdar://problem/30544344 (again, after my first attempt failed)
Separate collecting the applies and devirtualizing them into two loops.
We run into an issue on a huge test case where we end up devirtualizing a call-site over and over again.
I have not been able to reduce a test case.
rdar://29785529
This re-instates commit de9622654d
The problem of the infinite loop should be fixed by the previous fix in FunctionSignatureOpts.
In addition this new commit implements a safety check to void such cases, even if buggy optimizations try to keep pushing new functions onto the work list.
We were giving special handling to ApplyInst when we were attempting to use
getMemoryBehavior(). This commit changes the special handling to work on all
full apply sites instead of just AI. Additionally, we look through partial
applies and thin to thick functions.
I also added a dumper called BasicInstructionPropertyDumper that just dumps the
results of SILInstruction::get{Memory,Releasing}Behavior() for all instructions
in order to verify this behavior.
Now that we process functions in bottom-up order in the pass manager and
have a mechanism to restart the pass pipeline on the current
function (or on a newly created callee function), we can split these
passes back out from the inliner and end up with the same benefits we
had from initially integrating them. We get the further benefit of fully
optimizing newly created callee functions before continuing with the
function that resulted in the creation of those callee
functions (e.g. as a result of a specialization pass running).
Add back a stand-alone devirtualizer pass, running prior to generic
specialization. As with the stand-alone generic specializer pass, this
may add functions to the pass manager's work list.
This is another step in unbundling these passes from the performance
inliner.
